Bug#702628: RFS: pidgin-audacious/2.0.0-3 [RC, QA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-audacious * Package name: pidgin-audacious Version : 2.0.0-3 Upstream Author : Yoshiki Yazawa y...@honeyplanet.jp * URL : http://www.honeyplanet.jp/download.html * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: pidgin-audacious - pidgin integration with Audacious To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-audacious Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-audacious/pidgin-audacious_2.0.0-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. * Link with -laudclient2 instead of -laudcore -laudgui (Closes: #702609). * Use dh-autoreconf instead of autotools-dev to be able to regenerate configure. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Why is it so hard to get sponsors.....?
On 02/27/2013 06:41 AM, Paul Wise wrote: Bah, I need to read before sending. Very nice response Paul, I think it's worth adding to FAQ: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#Why_is_it_so_hard_to_find_sponsor.3F I've updated What happens if I can't find a sponsor as well. cheers, Tomek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513b3b86.7050...@gmail.com
Bug#702628: RFS: pidgin-audacious/2.0.0-3 [RC, QA]
Uploaded. Thanks for contribution. Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/calf6qjm9rm8nw8jt-wppe6z8sn7eo1-gy6zs76aflrdabcj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian/watch for gitorious
Hello, On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:51:26 +0100 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote: Please do! Having a header in each file makes reviewing license information much, much easier. If there's only a global license file it will often not contain information about files that are released under a different licenses. Or it gets totally unclear what the actual license is if files from project A get copied into project B. By the way. How about upstream shipping a file in debian/copyright format describing all the things about licenses in one place? -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#702628: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-audacious/2.0.0-3 [RC, QA])
Your message dated Sat, 9 Mar 2013 15:39:19 +0100 with message-id calf6qjm9rm8nw8jt-wppe6z8sn7eo1-gy6zs76aflrdabcj...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#702628: RFS: pidgin-audacious/2.0.0-3 [RC, QA] has caused the Debian Bug report #702628, regarding RFS: pidgin-audacious/2.0.0-3 [RC, QA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 702628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702628 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-audacious * Package name: pidgin-audacious Version : 2.0.0-3 Upstream Author : Yoshiki Yazawa y...@honeyplanet.jp * URL : http://www.honeyplanet.jp/download.html * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: pidgin-audacious - pidgin integration with Audacious To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-audacious Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-audacious/pidgin-audacious_2.0.0-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. * Link with -laudclient2 instead of -laudcore -laudgui (Closes: #702609). * Use dh-autoreconf instead of autotools-dev to be able to regenerate configure. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Uploaded. Thanks for contribution. Anton---End Message---
install rule in Makefile
Hi, I am making a package, the original Makefile has not install rule so it install anything then I have to add it. Where must I install this rule? -Patching original Makefile -In debian/rules -In debian/package.install regards, Alfonso -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/capjrgm3amuwojmf7pxmovtao03wygbmuuhewy3_3y1rsvae...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#702490: marked as done (RFS: sfst/1.4.6g-1 [ITA]: Stuttgart finite-state transducer tools)
Your message dated Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:20:30 + with message-id e1uemva-0001u0...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: sfst/1.4.6g-1 [ITA]: Stuttgart finite-state transducer tools has caused the Debian Bug report #702490, regarding RFS: sfst/1.4.6g-1 [ITA]: Stuttgart finite-state transducer tools to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 702490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702490 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-request Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package sfst, which I intend to adopt. * Package name: sfst Version : 1.4.6g-1 Upstream Author : Helmut Schmid (helmut.sch...@ims.uni-stuttgart.de) * URL : http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/projekte/gramotron/SOFTWARE/SFST.html * License : GPL 2 Section : misc It builds those binary packages: libsfst1-1.4 - Shared library for SFST libsfst1-1.4-dev - Development library SFST sfst - Stuttgart finite-state transducer tools To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sfst Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sfst/sfst_1.4.6g-1.dsc More information about SFST can be obtained from http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/projekte/gramotron/SOFTWARE/SFST.html Changes since the last upload: * new maintainer (closes: #702488) * new upstream release * update package style * clean-up separation of upstream/debian files * use autoreconf for building * closes: #701510 * add more headers to dev package (Closes: LP:#583815) * fix some lintian warnings * fix bad whatis entries of man pages * add watch file * bump standards to 2.9.4 Regards, Rico Sennrich ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package sfst version 1.4.6g-1 is in NEW now, and the package at mentors is not newer (2013-03-08) than the package in NEW (2013-03-08), so there is currently no package to sponsor. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/sfst_1.4.6g-1.html http://mentors.debian.net/package/sfst Please remove the package from mentors or mark it needs sponsor = no. If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW, then you can upload an updated package to mentors and feel free to reopen this RFS 702490 or open a new RFS.---End Message---
Re: install rule in Makefile
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Alfonso Sabato Siciliano alfi...@gmail.com wrote: I am making a package, the original Makefile has not install rule so it install anything then I have to add it. Where must I install this rule? All 3 options are possible. -Patching original Makefile Choose this solution if you are very close to upstream. In this case they will surely accept your patch, and it will get quickly integrate. This server as temporary solution. -In debian/rules If you need to script or do funky stuff within your d/rules file, then use dh_install -In debian/package.install By far the easiest option. Simply put the name of the file you want to install, and you are done. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CA+7wUswmXEhUoq958ixTBwkx358faSk8OZZ=cV_uK=pxmiz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: install rule in Makefile
Alfonso Sabato Siciliano alfi...@gmail.com writes: I am making a package, the original Makefile has not install rule so it install anything then I have to add it. Where must I install this rule? -Patching original Makefile A good solution if you can send the patch upstream. -In debian/rules Probably best if the above fails. -In debian/package.install This is just for copying files from debian/tmp to debian/package in the case where you have multiple binary packages. It won't be enough since you also need something that installs the files to debian/tmp first. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/847glgbikj@sauna.l.org
Re: install rule in Makefile
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: This is just for copying files from debian/tmp to debian/package in the case where you have multiple binary packages. From debhelper compatibility level 7 on, dh_install will fall back to looking in debian/tmp for files, if it doesn't find them in the current directory This is not the only (or the main) mode of operation. dh_install can be used to copy files from the build dir to the package dir. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: install rule in Makefile
On 2013-03-09 18:15 +0100, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Alfonso Sabato Siciliano alfi...@gmail.com writes: I am making a package, the original Makefile has not install rule so it install anything then I have to add it. Where must I install this rule? -Patching original Makefile A good solution if you can send the patch upstream. -In debian/rules Probably best if the above fails. -In debian/package.install This is just for copying files from debian/tmp to debian/package in the case where you have multiple binary packages. It won't be enough since you also need something that installs the files to debian/tmp first. Huh? Certainly debian/package.install can be used to install files from anywhere in the source tree, not just from debian/tmp. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/876210mqqo@turtle.gmx.de
Re: install rule in Makefile
Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name writes: This is not the only (or the main) mode of operation. dh_install can be used to copy files from the build dir to the package dir. aha, thanks for correcting me. I've always used it with debian/tmp but indeed the man page does talk about copying from source directory too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8438w4bh0w@sauna.l.org
Bug#700296: RFS: libapache2-mod-geoip/1.2.8-1 [ITA] -- GeoIP support for apache2
Hi Prach, as promised here is a review for libapache2-mod-geoip. * Please consider upgrading to new style (dh = 7) rules style. It makes life easier to you and is more forward oriented. That said, your rules file looks ok but you could ease life to all of us, including you. * While you're at it, remove the boilerplate copyright messages in debian/rules. They are not needed. * debian/compat 7 is fine, but not up to date. Please verify if your package works fine with debhelper 9 and if so, raise the compatibility level. Don't forget to push the debhelper dependency because Lintian needlessly may warn you otherwise. * Please consider using the copyright format formerly known as dep5 for debian/copyright: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ * Since you build a single binary package only, there is no need to call the debhelper files libapache2-mod-geoip.apache2.suffix in debian/. You can just omit the package name if you want. This is entirely up to you though. * Your watch file does not work: $ uscan --report-status uscan warning: In debian/watch, no matching hrefs for watch line http://www.maxmind.com/download/geoip/api/mod_geoip2/mod_geoip2_([\d+\.]+|\d+)\.tar\.gz * There is no policy version 3.9.3.4. You either mean 3.9.3 or 3.9.4, with the latter being the most current one. * Please consider using a VCS for your packaging By the way: If you want, we can do another upload to experimental for Apache 2.2 with you as a maintainer set. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: problem install new package
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:49:47AM +0100, Alfonso Sabato Siciliano wrote: Hi Mentors, I have build my first package: $dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc --source-option=--include-binaries and I have my 3 packages: beret_1.2.1-1_amd64.deb, beret-data_1.2.1-1_all.deb and beret-dbg_1.2.1-1_amd64.deb. There aren' t errors or warnings. if I run: #dpkg -i beret-data_1.2.1-1_all.deb all ok! if I run: #dpkg -i beret_1.2.1-1_amd64.deb I have an error: beret depends by libc6-amd64 (= 2.2.5). Please show the Depends: line from debian/control for this package. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: problem install new package
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:49:47AM +0100, Alfonso Sabato Siciliano wrote: I have an error: beret depends by libc6-amd64 (= 2.2.5). This doesn't sound like the correct error text. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: problem install new package
# dpkg -i beret_1.2.1-1_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 419061 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace beret 1.2.1-1 (using beret_1.2.1-1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement beret ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of beret: beret depends on libc6-amd64 (= 2.2.5). dpkg: error processing beret (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Processing triggers for menu ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: beret -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPJrGM0P6cw=w5exzdTE37WNM+wz0f4WWd=+5hyerjiyhvu...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#692263: marked as done (RFS: compton/0.0.1+20121102.git239796ab-1 [ITP] -- Compositor for X11, based on xcompmgr)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:11:02 + with message-id 20130310051102.ga29...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: compton has caused the Debian Bug report #692263, regarding RFS: compton/0.0.1+20121102.git239796ab-1 [ITP] -- Compositor for X11, based on xcompmgr to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 692263: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692263 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package compton Package name: compton Version : 0.0.1+20121102.git239796ab-1 Upstream Author : Christopher Jeffrey chjjeff...@gmail.com URL : https://github.com/chjj/compton License : X/MIT Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: compton- Compositor for X11, based on xcompmgr To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/compton Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/compton/compton_0.0.1+20121102.git239796ab-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: compton (0.0.1+20121102.git239796ab-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #679551) -- Scott Leggett sc...@sl.id.au Sat, 03 Nov 2012 02:20:30 +1100 -- Regards, Scott. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- See bug 701693. At this moment version 0.0.1+20121102.git239796ab-1 is not at mentors while 0.0.1+git-2182505-2013-02-05-1 is. http://mentors.debian.net/package/compton---End Message---
Bug#698752: marked as done (RFS: boinctui/2.2.1-1 (ITP #696702) -- Fullscreen text mode manager for Boinc client)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:16:22 + with message-id 20130310051622.gc29...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: boinctui/2.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #698752, regarding RFS: boinctui/2.2.1-1 (ITP #696702) -- Fullscreen text mode manager for Boinc client to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 698752: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698752 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package boinctui * Package name: boinctui Version : 2.2.0 Upstream Author : Sergey Suslov suleman1...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/boinctui/ * License : GPL-3.0+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: boinctui - Fullscreen text mode manager for Boinc client To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/boinctui Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/boinctui/boinctui_2.2.0.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: -- With best regards, Sergey Suslov. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- The package at mentors has been uploaded and is waiting in the NEW queue now. So at this point there is no package to sponsor. http://mentors.debian.net/package/boinctui http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/boinctui_2.2.1-1.html---End Message---
Bug#701693: RFS: compton/0.0.1+git-2182505-2013-02-05-1 [ITP]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/03/13 22:25, Paul Wise wrote: Sounds like you should work with upstream to merge compton fixes back into xcompmgr, which is already in Debian. Hi Paul, Thanks for the suggestion, but compton provides many added features to xcompmgr as well as bug fixes and IMO has diverged too far from xcompmgr to make merging desirable or practical. For example, compton provides a dbus interface and regex matching of window attributes - features far outside the scope of xcompmgr as a sample compositing manager for X servers. I've uploaded a new package based on the latest upstream snapshot. It can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/package/compton It can also be downloaded using: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/compton/compton_0.0.1+git-b3652f6-2013-03-03-1.dsc Initial release changelog: compton (0.0.1+git-b3652f6-2013-03-03-1) experimental; urgency=low * Imported Upstream version 0.0.1+git-b3652f6-2013-03-03 * Override dh_auto_clean to quiet verbose build warnings. * Initial release (Closes: #679551) -- Scott Leggett sc...@sl.id.au Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:08:58 +1100 - -- Regards, Scott Leggett. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRPBNRAAoJEHlzKPr+55fVRq4P/0Pl17N7e4neHZDVFJlUMu5R arh8eH083FBtChspFLNxte8x+i2mBny3N7x5a2hR+ZhoR7T+jI1LSv+WB47LQXiv XfF5m1J7CUeKHXdz2X6tQU256FQ8cm3yanbIIwcIozQKEX6+ytAnASJ7QS/YPley JgGrKHrLqHTcNa/e/qwNRqJnmJDGvZV1CNpCHSsjMqtA8sCqWK7gFZU/oZOux56N Ric1hAFMZzg5TY55uPWBOXLufq4Db/lF/3HS/vBWNzk6d1I1xzhHZBBboby3xZms DLd+jhM5mce55gsAZ08as3Y4bUs+6DFAVl5VUa0EjTPJiMniUoxGtby2DP0fodUP 6AOEQs21vbEC80+BmaA2Itx+WTXeuxYzNtszR1Cc4PWg7huq5lwS0bdJ5QNOj/V4 blGbc2OMorwBuP+t4Lrk6kxifI2H6KTuNhMGTPkRE3S/FEFVwQIHg+BlmekJmnab LMXqV0ZTv+TWWmNdTkP/P7EcA+6nuZDUoZMS2LNAYNxWGVV6dLK9/ZZDW5r3fMPZ yaXlutZAkxGfoNqBHh2PFawCZpOK9RrfbTfIBTSa/26COSXkzx4RMz8t7+IZKwPz lJgPweYZEJd0nHfHYMkztWJdW/oVi+2PwgYYXIK3UjHXqvlmfUdpzNji2yOlS710 OCCdXbMRcombWlUo6dhX =5IBy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513c1351.3030...@sl.id.au
Bug#701693: RFS: compton/0.0.1+git-2182505-2013-02-05-1 [ITP]
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Scott Leggett sc...@sl.id.au wrote: snip * Override dh_auto_clean to quiet verbose build warnings. You have an empty override target, which is going to cause multiple builds in a row (e.g. debuild debuild) to FTBFS. If these verbose build warnings are causing the clean target to fail, please fix them. Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACZd_tB6PXKGG7dxN0oWUum-q=c8ky26wnqxjzydjq-fzka...@mail.gmail.com
