Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1
Hi Anton, thanks for the quick reply. You are right: I should have asked the maintainers before. My apologies. I needed the package for myself, and then figured why not learn how to upload? I'm not surprised that the packaging is old. I basically just took the last package und stuffed in the new upstream code. I can try to improve it a little, but let's hear what Steve says first. Thanks, Oliver Am 01.05.2013 17:55, schrieb Anton Gladky: Hi Oliver, thanks for providing the new version of the package! But to do such uploads you should be or (co)maintainer of the package or at least to get a permission from the current maintainer (CC-ing him), as the package has not been orphaned. From the technical point of view the package needs to be fixed before uploading into the archive: see the list of errors/warnings [1]. The last package uploading was 3 years ago and it really requires some work on it. It would be good to know the opinion of the current maintainer, whether he interested to continue it. Thank you, Anton [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/dcraw On 05/01/2013 08:42 AM, Oliver Sander wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dcraw" * Package name: dcraw Version : 9.17-1 Upstream Author : Dave Coffin, dcoffin a cybercom period net * URL : http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/ * License : GPL v2 Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: dcraw - decode raw digital camera images To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dcraw Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dcraw/dcraw_9.17-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release (Closes: #617543) * Build-depend on libjasper-dev Regards, Oliver Sander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5181f7de.6020...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Bug#695674: marked as done (RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE)
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 16:22:33 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE has caused the Debian Bug report #695674, regarding RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 695674: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695674 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "auto-07p" Package name: auto-07p Version : 0.9.1+dfsg-1 Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/ License : BSD Section : math ITP-bug: http://bugs.debian.org/512916 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/auto-07p Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/auto-07p/auto-07p_0.9.1+dfsg-1.dsc N.B.: I'm DM. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package auto-07p has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#687620: marked as done (RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-4 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 16:22:33 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-4 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #687620, regarding RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-4 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 687620: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687620 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Mentors, I'm looking for sponsor for package 'udpxy' -- a UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon. Main purpose of this package - allow use of multicasted stream behind NAT, without configuring igmp forwarding on router. WNPP request are here : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687543 Package uploaded just now : https://mentors.debian.net/package/udpxy Package name: udpxy Version : 1.0.23 URL : http://www.udpxy.com License : GPL-3+ Section : net Upstream author : Pavel V. Cherenkov --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package udpxy has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
RFC: chinese checkers
Hello, I've been packaging and improving the usability of a chinese checkers game, so that other people than the original developers can play it. It's here. http://xdat27.ce.chalmers.se/~salvo/tin171/chinese-checkers_0.2-1.dsc Could someone have a look at it and tell me if something needs to be changed? -- Salvo Tomaselli "Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno." -- Galileo Galilei http://web.student.chalmers.se/~saltom/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1
Hi Oliver, thanks for providing the new version of the package! But to do such uploads you should be or (co)maintainer of the package or at least to get a permission from the current maintainer (CC-ing him), as the package has not been orphaned. From the technical point of view the package needs to be fixed before uploading into the archive: see the list of errors/warnings [1]. The last package uploading was 3 years ago and it really requires some work on it. It would be good to know the opinion of the current maintainer, whether he interested to continue it. Thank you, Anton [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/dcraw On 05/01/2013 08:42 AM, Oliver Sander wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dcraw" > > * Package name: dcraw > Version : 9.17-1 > Upstream Author : Dave Coffin, dcoffin a cybercom period net > * URL : http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/ > * License : GPL v2 > Section : graphics > > It builds those binary packages: > > dcraw - decode raw digital camera images > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/dcraw > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dcraw/dcraw_9.17-1.dsc > > More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. > > Changes since the last upload: > > * New upstream release (Closes: #617543) > * Build-depend on libjasper-dev > > > Regards, >Oliver Sander > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#706510: RFS: xbomb/2.2a-8 [ITA] -- 'minesweeper' game with squares, hexagons or triangles
Hi Alexandre, thanks for adopting the package. I did not look into the package precisely, sorry, but there are a couple of notes. 1) It seems, you have taken the version 2.1a-7.1 as the base, but in unstable the version 2.2a-1 is available and there are a lot of "packaging" changes there. 2) Do not change the license of debian/* files, because "legally" you need to get a permission from all people, contributed there to do that. 3) Use VCS 4) Try to use autoreconf. Cheers, Anton On 05/01/2013 03:33 AM, Alexandre Dantas wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xbomb" > > * Package name: xbomb >Version : 2.2a-8 >Upstream Author : Andrew M. Bishop > * URL : http://www.gedanken.org.uk/software/xbomb/ > * License : GPL-3.0+ >Section : games > > It builds those binary packages: > > xbomb - 'minesweeper' game with squares, hexagons or triangles > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/xbomb > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xbomb/xbomb_2.2a-8.dsc > > More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. > > Changes since the last upload: > > * New mantainer (Closes: #664100) > * New upstream version. > * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4. > * Bump copyright to 1.0. > * Started using dh. > * Added patch to install executable on /usr/games > * Added patch to store high scores on home directory, instead > of /var/games. > * Removed unnecessary debian/postinst and debian/postrm. > * Refreshed debian/watch. > > Regards, >Alexandre Dantas > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: wheezy/sid > APT prefers precise-updates > APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, > 'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-27-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.iso-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#706556: QA: decibel-audio-player/1.08-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "decibel-audio-player". I upgraded it to the latest upstream release (1.08) and I made it lintian clean. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/decibel-audio-player Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. Regards, Paolo Rotolo - paolorot...@ubuntu.com
Bug#706509: RFS: zatacka/0.1.8-3 [ITA] -- Arcade multiplayer game like nibbles
Hi Alexandre, thanks for adopting the package! It looks fine, but I have 2 minor notes due to the packaging: 1) You are using dh 9, but there are no notice in the changelog. 2) Use VCS for package maintainance. 3) Optionally you can try to use dh-autoreconf ( --with autoreconf), but it is up to you. Also you are targeting the package into unstable, but the Wheezy is not yet released. Let's wait some days till it happens. Cheers, Anton On 05/01/2013 03:28 AM, Alexandre Dantas wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zatacka" > > * Package name: zatacka >Version : 0.1.8-3 >Upstream Author : Mage > * URL : http://zatacka.sourceforge.net/ > * License : GPL-2.0+ >Section : games > > It builds those binary packages: > > zatacka- arcade multiplayer game like nibbles > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/zatacka > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zatacka/zatacka_0.1.8-3.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > * New mantainer (Closes: #694610) > * Bumped to Standards-Version 3.9.4. > * Bumped copyright to the 1.0 version. > * Fixed font installing though patch and link file. > * Replaced dpatch with quilt. > > Regards, >Alexandre Dantas > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: wheezy/sid > APT prefers precise-updates > APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, > 'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-27-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.iso-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#706506: marked as done (RFS: bittwist/2.0-2 -- libpcap based Ethernet packet generator)
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 15:41:47 +0200 with message-id <51811b9b.1050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#706506: RFS: bittwist/2.0-2 -- libpcap based Ethernet packet generator has caused the Debian Bug report #706506, regarding RFS: bittwist/2.0-2 -- libpcap based Ethernet packet generator to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 706506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706506 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bittwist" * Package name: bittwist Version : 2.0-2 Upstream Author : Addy Yeow Chin Heng * URL : http://bittwist.sf.net * License : GPL2 Section : net It builds those binary packages: bittwist - libpcap based Ethernet packet generator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bittwist Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bittwist/bittwist_2.0-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Bump debhelper level to 9. * debian/control: readded VCS fields. * debian/rules: - Added --parallel to DH. - Removed some comments. Regards, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Joao, thanks for taking into account my previous notes. Uploaded! Anton On 05/01/2013 02:45 AM, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bittwist" > > * Package name: bittwist >Version : 2.0-2 >Upstream Author : Addy Yeow Chin Heng > * URL : http://bittwist.sf.net > * License : GPL2 >Section : net > > It builds those binary packages: > > bittwist - libpcap based Ethernet packet generator > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/bittwist > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bittwist/bittwist_2.0-2.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > * Bump debhelper level to 9. > * debian/control: readded VCS fields. > * debian/rules: > - Added --parallel to DH. > - Removed some comments. > > Regards, >Joao Eriberto Mota Filho > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 7.0 > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (500, 'testing') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#706506: RFS: bittwist/2.0-2 -- libpcap based Ethernet packet generator
Thank you Anton, for your attention and generosity! Kind regards, Eriberto 2013/5/1 Anton Gladky > Hi Joao, > > thanks for taking into account my previous notes. > Uploaded! > > Anton > >
Bug#706506: RFS: bittwist/2.0-2 -- libpcap based Ethernet packet generator
Hi Joao, thanks for taking into account my previous notes. Uploaded! Anton On 05/01/2013 02:45 AM, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bittwist" > > * Package name: bittwist >Version : 2.0-2 >Upstream Author : Addy Yeow Chin Heng > * URL : http://bittwist.sf.net > * License : GPL2 >Section : net > > It builds those binary packages: > > bittwist - libpcap based Ethernet packet generator > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/bittwist > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bittwist/bittwist_2.0-2.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > * Bump debhelper level to 9. > * debian/control: readded VCS fields. > * debian/rules: > - Added --parallel to DH. > - Removed some comments. > > Regards, >Joao Eriberto Mota Filho > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 7.0 > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (500, 'testing') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#696782: marked as done (RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool)
Your message dated Wed, 1 May 2013 13:17:39 +0200 with message-id <2013050739.ga7...@jwilk.net> and subject line Re: Bug#696782: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool has caused the Debian Bug report #696782, regarding RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 696782: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696782 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sequitur-g2p" * Package name: sequitur-g2p Version : 0.0.r1668-1 Upstream Author : Maximilian Bisani * URL : http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/web/Software/g2p.html * License : GPL-2 Section : science It builds those binary packages: sequitur-g2p - Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sequitur-g2p Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sequitur-g2p/sequitur-g2p_0.0.r1668-1.dsc More information about sequitur-g2p can be obtained from http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/web/Software/g2p.html. Regards, Giulio Paci --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Uploaded. -- Jakub Wilk--- End Message ---
Bug#696782: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool
Il 30/04/2013 21:00, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
> * Giulio Paci , 2013-04-30, 03:39:
>>> In mGramCounts.py and LanguageModel.py I see this code:
>>> self.fname = tempfile.mkstemp('counts')[1]
>>> This leaks a filedescriptor... (This doesn't affect Debian AFAICT, so I'm
>>> mentioning it here only if case upstream awakens.)
>> I just fixed, just in case...
>
> Okay, but let's not make the indentation worse that it already was. :)
Updated 1009 patch (it is now using tab+space like in the remaining of the
file).
I have not seen the same issue in other patches.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5180e1a3.6010...@gmail.com
Re: Bug#706361: gti review
On Wed, 1 May 2013 18:42:19 Charles Plessy wrote: > to be comprehensive, there are also the Software Package Data Exchange > project and the Open Source Initiative which both agree on a reference > MIT license: > > http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT > http://spdx.org/licenses/MIT > > So if it matches the above, it may be fair to call it "MIT" if Upstream calls > it "MIT". Interesting, thanks. > In the case of gti, the license does not match the text of the MIT or Expat > license, therefore it is better to use an arbitrary short name. Something > like > "gti", or "MIT-like" (as Upstream calls it), etc. would be enough. The following page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT#Old_Style refers to the text of this license as "MIT Old Style" therefore I suggested to label it as "MIT-old-style" exactly because it's not a new MIT license (AKA Expat). Best wishes, Dmitry Smirnov GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201305011908.26555.only...@member.fsf.org
Bug#706361: gti review
Le Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:37:50PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov a écrit : > > ## debian/copyright > > License name "MIT" is incorrect even though upstream may refer to this > license as such. "MIT" is considered ambiguous by the Free Software > Foundation. copyright-format-1.0 specification recommends to label > newer MIT license as "Expat" however this is an older variant so it > would be better called "MIT-old-style" or similar. See > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License Hi all, to be comprehensive, there are also the Software Package Data Exchange project and the Open Source Initiative which both agree on a reference MIT license: http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT http://spdx.org/licenses/MIT So if it matches the above, it may be fair to call it "MIT" if Upstream calls it "MIT". In the case of gti, the license does not match the text of the MIT or Expat license, therefore it is better to use an arbitrary short name. Something like "gti", or "MIT-like" (as Upstream calls it), etc. would be enough. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130501084219.gc19...@falafel.plessy.net
testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 just testing to make sure the mail goes through now. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlGAzFQACgkQIUUjp07y+ZbAOwCeMD2rcK3s791YoT7TB0dLsryO KDoAnib33PJ7JvAKA0KlJA5yf+t/PfQB =UeVM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/itsig.68336f157a.5180cc54.8040...@itadmins.net
Bug#706361: gti review
Dear Felix, Thanks for packaging this funny software. :) Isn't the animation is a little too fast? I can hardly recognise the animated car and it's certainly moves faster than animated train in `sl`. I had a look at your package and I'd like to share some suggestions with you: There is unnecessary lintian-override for "no-upstream-changelog". Please remove it. It may be a reminder to generate upstream changelog if you're producing orig.tar from checkout. By the way why you didn't forward man page upstream yet? Package version looks a little bit unconventional. Although it's not a problem I would suggest to use just version "1.0.4-1" and backport patches from unreleased upstream commits if necessary. If you don't want to use upstream tarball releases as is then please provide get-orig-source target in debian/rules to generate upstream tarball from checkout. Perhaps the easiest solution would be to use upstream tarball as is. ## debian/watch As it is debian/watch could be fine for package version "1.0.4-1". However it is broken for version "1.0.4+git.20130416.8b0819d-1" which requires "dversionmangle". Otherwise `uscan` can't download orig.tar. ## debian/rules debian/rules contains unnecessary comments (dm-make template remnants?) -- please consider removing 'em. Also you might add override_dh_builddeb: dh_builddeb -- -Zxz To save some space you might want to compress .deb file with xz instead of gz. To use xz compression for Debian source you can also add compression = "xz" to debian/source/options. ## debian/copyright License name "MIT" is incorrect even though upstream may refer to this license as such. "MIT" is considered ambiguous by the Free Software Foundation. copyright-format-1.0 specification recommends to label newer MIT license as "Expat" however this is an older variant so it would be better called "MIT-old-style" or similar. See http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License ## debian/control Priority "extra" is probably better changed to "optional" as per http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Priority IMHO "Suggests: sl" is incorrect because it suggests unrelated package. I would replace it with "Enhances: git". Versioned build-depends on "dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)" is unnecessary and may be completely dropped. ## Patches Please follow Patch Tagging Guidelines: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ Specifically I think it is a good practice to maintain "Forwarded" and "Last-Update" headers. Perhaps it would be Forwarded: non-needed for fix-makefile-do-not-strip-symbols.patch fix-makefile-installation-path.patch "fix-makefile-add-dpkg-buildflags.patch" it is done wrong. I would rename it and modify to respect build flags but without including file provided my dpkg. This way your improvement will be usable for upstream and will have to be forwarded. debhelper 9 in compat 9 mode automatically export build flags which makes unnecessary to include "/usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk" or set "DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS" as we used to do with dh 8 to import hardening flags. Best wishes, Dmitry Smirnov GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B --- Most people work just hard enough not to get fired and get paid just enough money not to quit -- George Carlin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201305011737.50681.only...@member.fsf.org
Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dcraw" * Package name: dcraw Version : 9.17-1 Upstream Author : Dave Coffin, dcoffin a cybercom period net * URL : http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/ * License : GPL v2 Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: dcraw - decode raw digital camera images To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dcraw Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dcraw/dcraw_9.17-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release (Closes: #617543) * Build-depend on libjasper-dev Regards, Oliver Sander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5180b93c.4020...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
