Bug#697627: closed by Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org (closing RFS: gogglesmm/0.12.7-1)
Hello, I reuploaded the package to mentors.debian.net and I am still looking for a sponsor. Kind Regards, Hendrik Am Dienstag, den 28.05.2013, 04:27 + schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: #697627: RFS: gogglesmm/0.12.7-1 It has been closed by Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org by replying to this email. E-Mail-Nachricht-Anlage (0.12.7-1) Weitergeleitete Nachricht Von: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org An: 697627-d...@bugs.debian.org Betreff: closing RFS: gogglesmm/0.12.7-1 Datum: Tue, 28 May 2013 04:23:15 + Package gogglesmm has been removed from mentors. E-Mail-Nachricht-Anlage (0.12.7-1) Weitergeleitete Nachricht Von: Hendrik Rittich hendrik.ritt...@gmx.de Reply-to: hendrik.ritt...@gmx.de An: sub...@bugs.debian.org Betreff: RFS: gogglesmm/0.12.7-1 Datum: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:19:36 +0100 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gogglesmm * Package name : gogglesmm Version : 0.12.7-1 Upstream Author : Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gogglesmm/ * License : GPLv3 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: gogglesmm - Goggles Music Manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gogglesmm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gogglesmm/gogglesmm_0.12.7-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release, closes: #697587 * Updated build dependencies * Added the use of buildflags.mk Regards, Hendrik Rittich signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Half of webapp in /usr/ and half in /var
Hello! I'm trying to make deb pkg in accordance with Webapps Policy Manual for one good web application In http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/ manual says I should keep distr in /usr/share/pkg and application-modifiable dirs in /var/lib/pkg. How can I configure apache on this conditions if the webapp is a one file tree? How can I keep half of site in /usr and half in /var ? Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacrea6d5jpn2s5s3g-fdt7jyqzxb9bw5zh2qnxqgds8zfmd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Half of webapp in /usr/ and half in /var
Please include some details about the app. Where does it normally place code? Where does it normally place files modified by the web app? How does it generate an apache config? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6gx1j3wihntwf6fk4car6mxmeq834pttzgqmhwaac9...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#710383: RFS: mpdas/0.3.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mpdas * Package name: mpdas Version : 0.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Henrik Friedrichsen hrk...@gmail.com * URL : http://50hz.ws/mpdas/ * License : BSD-3-clause Section : misc It builds those binary packages: mpdas - Music Player Daemon AudioScrobbler To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mpdas Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpdas/mpdas_0.3.0-1.dsc More information about mpdas can be obtained from http://50hz.ws/mpdas/ Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. (Closes: #513524, #664647) * This is my first Debian package. * Adjusted the Makefile to fix $(DESTDIR) problems. * Fixed header in manual and filename typo. Regards, -- Jordon Smith j...@mockra.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0384d8060edea26aceb5176a24d9c...@mockra.net
Re: Half of webapp in /usr/ and half in /var
Like most of webapps, it expects all its dirs in /var/www :) But I should put some dirs in /usr/share/pkg and some in /var/lib/pkg It doesn't have its apache config. 2013/5/30 Paul Wise p...@debian.org Please include some details about the app. Where does it normally place code? Where does it normally place files modified by the web app? How does it generate an apache config? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6gx1j3wihntwf6fk4car6mxmeq834pttzgqmhwaac9...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#710103: Package renamed and re-uploaded
Hi everyone, Me and upstream made some improvements, as outlined by the review, so I re-uploaded a new version of evdev named now as python-evdev. Thank you! Best regards, -- Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com www.canonical.com www.ubuntu.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a74376.9060...@ubuntu.com
Re: Half of webapp in /usr/ and half in /var
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Anton Balashov wrote: Like most of webapps, it expects all its dirs in /var/www :) But I should put some dirs in /usr/share/pkg and some in /var/lib/pkg It doesn't have its apache config. So you will need to change the webapp to be more flexible about where it looks for code/data. What is the package storing in /var/www other than code? /var/lib/pkg is inappropriate for per-website data that belongs to the website rather than the package. For that the site should have an interactive script to generate the right configuration for apache and for the webapp. The script should prompt for the data location, vhost info and other metadata in order to do that. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6En=nrp04o4rpwnv091fkce6apwbaf5vsssvnnibua...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#710404: RFS: dmaths/3.5.0.9+dfsg1-1 (Package already in Debian)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dmaths * Package name: dmaths Version : 3.5.0.9+dfsg1-1 It builds those binary packages: libreoffice-dmaths - Formula editing plug-in for LibreOffice Writer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dmaths Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.5.0.9+dfsg1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. This package has a growing community of users in Debian [1] Regards, Innocent De Marchi [1] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dmath http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dmaths
Re: How to avoid all arch notice in dpkg-buildpackage.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:17:23AM -0400, linux at iocellnetworks wrote: I am working on the debian package for 7.0 ndas. I would like to have it build without comment, notice or error. I use the instructions here Where? There are some notices left though in the dh_ commands. example: dh_builddeb: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but there are none of that type Can any of y'all point me to the place those are specified so I can have it build those, or bypass? Mostly impossible to tell without seeing your debian/rules. If you are calling programs with -i while not having any arch-indep packages then you should not do that (it's also not a good idea to blindly copy-paste code from some instructions on the web without understanding what does that code do). I made a help ticket about it too. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16818494/what-where-is-all-arch-specified-when-building-a-deb-archive It's not a help ticket and SO is neither a ticket system nor in any way affiliated with Debian. Also, I feel that packaging questions are offtopic there. The best place to ask packaging questions is this list or #debian-mentors on IRC. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: How to avoid all arch notice in dpkg-buildpackage.
On 05/30/2013 12:41 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:17:23AM -0400, linux at iocellnetworks wrote: I am working on the debian package for 7.0 ndas. I would like to have it build without comment, notice or error. I use the instructions here Where? Sorry. These are the build instructions: https://github.com/iocellnetworks/ndas4linux/wiki/How-to-build,-install-and-remove-.deb-ndas-packages There are some notices left though in the dh_ commands. example: dh_builddeb: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but there are none of that type Can any of y'all point me to the place those are specified so I can have it build those, or bypass? Mostly impossible to tell without seeing your debian/rules. Rules on this build are here: https://github.com/iocellnetworks/ndas4linux/blob/master/3.2.0/platform/linux/tarball-tag/debian/rules If you are calling programs with -i while not having any arch-indep packages then you should not do that Maybe this is where to start? The architecture in the control file says all. I changed the one for the modules to amd64, when I am building on the 64Bit version. I got the notice in either case. (it's also not a good idea to blindly copy-paste code from some instructions on the web without understanding what does that code do). I do run the code, almost as it was from the beginning. I did not write it, but I also do not know what it does, since I have not much experience. I do know that, the packages worked on the same kernel version when I made them for a different Debian derived distro in the past. They worked even with the export notices. One thing that I changed on the rules that is still in github, was to add the source folder and provide a deb package version. That took care of another notice about defaulting to 1.0. I made a help ticket about it too. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16818494/what-where-is-all-arch-specified-when-building-a-deb-archive It's not a help ticket and SO is neither a ticket system nor in any way affiliated with Debian. Also, I feel that packaging questions are offtopic there. The best place to ask packaging questions is this list or #debian-mentors on IRC. I see. I was trying to have it build without any hitch, so that I might learn my way around and work toward submitting it. Any help is greatly appreciated in this phase. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a7d4e6.7020...@iocellnetworks.com
Bug#707292: marked as done (RFS: jp2a/1.0.6-4 -- converts jpg images to ascii)
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2013 04:23:23 +
with message-id e1uigs7-0005vh...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: jp2a/1.0.6-4 -- converts jpg images to ascii
has caused the Debian Bug report #707292,
regarding RFS: jp2a/1.0.6-4 -- converts jpg images to ascii
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
707292: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707292
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package jp2a
* Package name: jp2a
Version : 1.0.6-4
Upstream Author : Christian Stigen Larsen c...@sublevel3.org
* URL : http://jp2a.sf.net
* License : gpl2
Section : graphics
It builds those binary packages:
jp2a - converts jpg images to ascii
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jp2a
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jp2a/jp2a_1.0.6-4.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Acknowledge NMU. Thanks to Matthias Klose and Julien Cristau.
(Closes: #618208, #642983)
* Migrations:
- debian format from 1.0 to 3.0. (Closes: #664410)
- debian/copyright to new format (1.0).
- debian/rules: updated to new (reduced) format.
- debhelper version from 7 to 9.
- patch system from dpatch to quilt.
* debian/control:
- Added dpkg-dev in Build-Depends field.
- Added ${misc:Depends} in Depends field.
- Improved long description.
- Removed screenshot reference from long description.
- Updated Standards-Version from 3.8.3 to 3.9.4.
- Updated VCS from svn to git.
* debian/copyright: updated years from Debian packaging.
* debian/README.source: removed because it is useless now.
* debian/rules: added LDFLAGS += -Wl,--as-needed to avoid
messages from dpkg-shlibdeps about ununsed linked libraries.
Regards,
Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package jp2a has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#705237: marked as done (RFS: python-heatclient/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- client library and CLI for OpenStack Heat)
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2013 04:23:23 + with message-id e1uigs7-0005vj...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: python-heatclient/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- client library and CLI for OpenStack Heat has caused the Debian Bug report #705237, regarding RFS: python-heatclient/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- client library and CLI for OpenStack Heat to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 705237: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705237 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-heatclient * Package name: python-heatclient Version : 0.2.2-1 * URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-heatclient * License : Apache-2 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-heatclient - client library and CLI for OpenStack Heat To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-heatclient Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-heatclient/python-heatclient_0.2.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: python-heatclient (0.2.2-1) experimental; urgency=low * Initial release. (Closes: #705231) Regards, Prach Pongpanich ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package python-heatclient version 0.2.2-1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/python-heatclient---End Message---
Bug#706957: marked as done (RFS: tryton-modules-stock-lot/2.8.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2013 04:23:24 + with message-id e1uigs8-0005vn...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-stock-lot/2.8.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #706957, regarding RFS: tryton-modules-stock-lot/2.8.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 706957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tryton-modules-stock-lot * Package name: tryton-modules-stock-lot Version : 2.8.0-1 Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org) * URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/2.8/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : python It builds those binary packages: tryton-modules-stock-lot - Tryton Application Platform (Stock Lot Module) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tryton-modules-stock-lot Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tryton-modules-stock-lot/tryton-modules-stock-lot_2.8.0-1.dsc More information about Tryton can be obtained from http://www.tryton.org Debian packaging for Tryton is hosted at http://debian.tryton.org Regards, Mathias Behrle signature.asc Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package tryton-modules-stock-lot has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
