Bug#725314: RFS: transcriber/1.5.1.1-8 [RC] -- Transcribe speech data using an integrated editor
Hi Giulio, On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:51AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package transcriber It closes the following two bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725254 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725255 could you drop the version on the tcl-tclex dependency? The dependency on tclex (=1.2a1-3) was the reason transcriber wouldn't be build on the buildds, after the first issue there had been solved. tclex had become a virtual package over the last few weeks, only provided by tcl-tclex, and versioned build-dependencies don't work on virtual packages I was reminded yesterday: as per policy 7.5, If a relationship field has a version number attached, only real packages will be considered to see whether the relationship is satisfied Besides, even oldstable has version 1.2a1-15 of tclex, so the version could have been dropped a while ago (1.2a1-3 seems to have been uploaded in 2001...) Otherwise, did you have a chance to look into the more pedantic lintian warnings? Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131004075824.gs44...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Bug#725314: RFS: transcriber/1.5.1.1-8 [RC] -- Transcribe speech data using an integrated editor
Il 04/10/2013 09:58, Florian Schlichting ha scritto: Hi Giulio, On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:51AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package transcriber It closes the following two bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725254 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725255 could you drop the version on the tcl-tclex dependency? The dependency on tclex (=1.2a1-3) was the reason transcriber wouldn't be build on the buildds, after the first issue there had been solved. tclex had become a virtual package over the last few weeks, only provided by tcl-tclex, and versioned build-dependencies don't work on virtual packages I was reminded yesterday: Dropped. did you have a chance to look into the more pedantic lintian warnings? Unfortunately I had no time to fix the duplicate files issue. There is no distributed upstream changelog, so I just added a lintian-overrides file for it. Bests, Giulio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524e7f8a.6070...@gmail.com
Bug#724791: RFS: gogglesmm/0.12.7-2
Hi,
I have uploaded a corrected version.
Regards,
Hendrik
Am Donnerstag, den 03.10.2013, 17:51 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
Control: owner -1 !
On 2013-09-27 22:10:41, Hendrik Rittich wrote:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gogglesmm/gogglesmm_0.12.7-2.dsc
| diff -Nru gogglesmm-0.12.7/debian/control gogglesmm-0.12.7/debian/control
| --- gogglesmm-0.12.7/debian/control 2013-06-04 23:22:02.0 +0200
| +++ gogglesmm-0.12.7/debian/control 2013-09-27 22:14:22.0 +0200
| @@ -5,13 +5,14 @@
| Homepage: http://code.google.com/p/gogglesmm/
| Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~),
| libdbus-1-dev, libtag1-dev,
| -libfox-1.6-dev, libxrandr-dev, libxine-dev,
| +libfox-1.6-dev, libxrandr-dev, libxine2-dev,
| libsqlite3-dev (= 3.4), libbz2-dev, imagemagick
| Standards-Version: 3.9.4
|
| Package: gogglesmm
| Architecture: any
| Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
| +Recommends: libxine2-plugins
| Description: Goggles Music Manager
| Goggles Music Manager is a music collection manager and player that
| automatically categorizes your music files based on genre, artist,
Please also document the change to Recommends.
| diff -Nru gogglesmm-0.12.7/debian/patches/fox_pkg_config.diff
gogglesmm-0.12.7/debian/patches/fox_pkg_config.diff
| --- gogglesmm-0.12.7/debian/patches/fox_pkg_config.diff 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
| +++ gogglesmm-0.12.7/debian/patches/fox_pkg_config.diff 2013-09-04
22:32:53.0 +0200
| @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
| +Creates the shell script fox-pkg-config.sh. This script generates a
| +pkg-config file for the FOX library.
| +--- /dev/null
| b/fox-pkg-config.sh
| +@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
| ++cat EOF
| ++prefix=$(fox-config --prefix)
| ++exec_prefix=\${prefix}
| ++libdir=\${exec_prefix}/lib
| ++includedir=\${prefix}/include
| ++
| ++Name: FOX
| ++Description: FOX LIB
| ++Version: $(fox-config --version)
| ++Requires:
| ++
| ++Libs: $(fox-config --libs)
| ++Cflags: $(fox-config --cflags)
| ++EOF
I suppose that slipped in. Please remove it.
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380880429.4009.0.camel@home
Install syntax highlight for IDEs
Hi there. I'm continuing packaging gmqcc and now I need to install syntax highlight for many IDE. And I need your advice here. I need just to copy files but... How should I do that? Should I check existence of target dirs (installed IDE)? Can I install those files just via debian/install? Thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#724896: RFS: wiktionarytodict/20130929 [ITP] -- dictionaries for dictd
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Tim Edwards timedwa...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package wiktionarytodict which expands
the number and quality of translation dictionaries available for the dictd
server and compatible client programs.
Did you get any sponsor?
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/capdygexhhvupjbvculqauvtay9lbdxb0z7a6v3oqvygqub8...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#724896: RFS: wiktionarytodict/20130929 [ITP] -- dictionaries for dictd
On 04/10/13 13:38, Kartik Mistry wrote: On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Tim Edwards timedwa...@fastmail.com.au wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package wiktionarytodict which expands the number and quality of translation dictionaries available for the dictd server and compatible client programs. Did you get any sponsor? No, not yet. It should be a pretty straightforward set of packages to include as it's really just a packaging of dictionaries generated by my scripts available at https://github.com/tkedwards/wiktionarytodict Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524ec212.40...@fastmail.com.au
Bug#725365: RFS: mercurial-keyring/0.6.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mercurial-keyring * Package name: mercurial-keyring Version : 0.6.1-1 Upstream Author : Marcin Kasperski * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mercurial_keyring * License : BSD-3-clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: mercurial-keyring - Mercurial Keyring Extension To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mercurial-keyring Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mercurial-keyring/mercurial-keyring_0.6.1-1.dsc More information about mercurial-keyring can be obtained from http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mercurial_keyring Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. Regards, Christoph Mathys -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131004165620.19091.43614.reportbug@obsidian
permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
Hi guys, Following the suggestion from Maysima (Linux-fan name?), after reading something about hierarchy, I'm using the following structure: /usr/local/game for the binary /usr/local/share/locale for the language file .mo /usr/local/share/packagename for the data file. What I'm not getting is that I have no write permissions to this directory where the data will be. How can my program fopen(/usr/local/share/pname/pname.dat, w); ? Also, will I hardcode this path? For now I'm just finishing the code, so I can start preparing the packaging. Of course, the packaging may have rules to state where do the .dat file goes, so I'm kind of lost here too. But this is a second stage. For now I just want my program to run in the correct places, write the data in the correct directory. Thanks any light here. Beco. -- Dr Beco A.I. researcher Sometimes the heart sees what is invisible to the eye. (H. Jackson Brown Jr.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALuYw2yGv12Mq9t-pqUqb=w1roms61tduqu_px41mrmqesi...@mail.gmail.com
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 04:58:10PM -0300, Beco wrote: Following the suggestion from Maysima (Linux-fan name?), after reading something about hierarchy, I'm using the following structure: /usr/local/game for the binary /usr/local/share/locale for the language file .mo /usr/local/share/packagename for the data file. You shouldn't put anything in /usr/local. What I'm not getting is that I have no write permissions to this directory where the data will be. Apps that run with user rights usually store their data in that user's home directory. Do you really need to write the data into the global location? What kind of data is it? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#725314: marked as done (RFS: transcriber/1.5.1.1-8 [RC] -- Transcribe speech data using an integrated editor)
Your message dated Fri, 4 Oct 2013 22:07:43 +0200 with message-id 20131004200743.gc44...@zedat.fu-berlin.de and subject line Re: RFS: transcriber/1.5.1.1-8 [RC] -- Transcribe speech data using an integrated editor has caused the Debian Bug report #725314, regarding RFS: transcriber/1.5.1.1-8 [RC] -- Transcribe speech data using an integrated editor to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 725314: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725314 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package transcriber * Package name: transcriber Version : 1.5.1.1-8 Upstream Author : Transcriber Team transcriber-requ...@etca.fr * URL : http://trans.sf.net/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C, Tcl Section : sound It builds those binary packages: transcriber - Transcribe speech data using an integrated editor It closes the following two bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725254 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725255 You can get latest sources from the following git repository: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/transcriber.git More information about transcriber can be obtained from http://trans.sf.net/. Regards, Giulio Paci ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:51AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package transcriber uploaded. Florian---End Message---
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
On 10/05/2013 12:12 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Apps that run with user rights usually store their data in that user's home directory. And /tmp directory for files that are required temporarily. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524f2978.4090...@gmail.com
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
On 4 October 2013 17:12, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote: What I'm not getting is that I have no write permissions to this directory where the data will be. Apps that run with user rights usually store their data in that user's home directory. Do you really need to write the data into the global location? What kind of data is it? -- WBR, wRAR Hi Andrey, Thanks for your attention. It's a game score (top 10 players). I thought saving under $HOME, but then others players would see only their own name. Any suggestion? Hi Hermann, While tmp is a good idea for some other things I have here, in the case of scores it would be better if the file is protected from accidental deletion. Thanks! Cheers, Beco. -- Dr Beco A.I. researcher Sometimes the heart sees what is invisible to the eye. (H. Jackson Brown Jr.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caluyw2z44+9tn6ue4fspyxq6f7v8fpa4kan66r4ocodikd4...@mail.gmail.com
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
❦ 4 octobre 2013 22:56 CEST, Beco r...@beco.cc : What I'm not getting is that I have no write permissions to this directory where the data will be. Apps that run with user rights usually store their data in that user's home directory. Do you really need to write the data into the global location? What kind of data is it? Hi Andrey, Thanks for your attention. It's a game score (top 10 players). I thought saving under $HOME, but then others players would see only their own name. On Debian, those high scores are usually stored in /var/games/X. The file permissions allow a user from the group games to write the file. See for example `monsterz`. -- Make sure your code does nothing gracefully. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
Following the suggestion from Maysima (Linux-fan name?), after reading something about hierarchy, I'm using the following structure: First of all, you've decided to work with Debian. I recommend not to use $(random cookbook/advice), but Debian docs instead, asking here ore filing bugs whenever your question is not/seems not to be answered (yet) in the Debian docs. /usr/local/game for the binary /usr/local/share/locale for the language file .mo /usr/local/share/packagename for the data file. You shouldn't put anything in /usr/local. When I dived into Linux, there was the following workflow: - download the tarball, - extract it (tar xzf), - cd into new directory - ./configure make make install I'm quite shure that configure's default was to choose /usr/local and its subdirectories as default. It was quite instructive as well to see that $PATH did not include /usr/local ;-). Building some .rpm/.deb is different from the workflow described in the last paragraph. Look for files such as READ.ME, INSTALL, … And try ./configure --help. What I'm not getting is that I have no write permissions to this directory where the data will be. There is a difference between building some software and installing it. You need root rights for installations beyond your home directory. Cheers, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524f31c3.5060...@gmx.de
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
On 4 October 2013 18:23, Martin Eberhard Schauer martin.e.scha...@gmx.de wrote: There is a difference between building some software and installing it. You need root rights for installations beyond your home directory. Cheers, Martin Hi Martin, Thanks for the help. Are you saying that my program can't run correctly until I install it? If I make a program (using VI and writing a C code) that tries to save a file gamex.scores under /var/games, then I compile it with a simple gcc command (forget make, and configure for now), the program won't work because of permissions? I tried this simple command under bash: $ touch /var/games/test.txt permission denied! I added myself to group games, but to no avail. What is the miracle? After installing with root permissions, the game won't run with root permission, will it? Please, help clarifying this topic. I'm not getting it. Tx, Beco. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALuYw2zBz72c-pj=BGbPQMOkWyM=mymuovtsue1e7q6ffhs...@mail.gmail.com
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
Hi mentors, I'm putting my thoughts together. I think what I'm trying to ask is how to make it work manually? Suppose I do the following: Step 1: binary gcc myapp.c -o myapp sudo cp myapp /usr/games/ Step 2: prepare translations: mkdir -p /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES xgettext -k_ --flag=_:1:pass-c-format -d myapp -s -o myapp.pot myapp.c msginit -l en_US -o en_US-myapp.po -i myapp.pot msgfmt -c -v -o en_US-myapp.mo en_US-myapp.po sudo cp en_US-myapp.mo /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/myapp.mo Step 3: scores: mkdir -p /var/games/myapp/ cp myapp.scores /var/games/myapp/ Then I probably need to get some permissions right. Here is the problem. I did: For the binary: chown root:games /usr/games/myapp For the score directory and file: chown root:games /var/games/myapp chown root:games /var/games/myapp/myapp chmod g+w /var/games/myapp chmod g+w /var/games/myapp/myapp I suppose that is all I have to do. But myapp still tells me permission denied. Holding my breath! Beco. -- Dr Beco A.I. researcher Sometimes the heart sees what is invisible to the eye. (H. Jackson Brown Jr.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caluyw2wvdh7ospoazxcbw5g-pqqldn2miugbaxbfgu+wqpc...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#723804: Review of phabricator/0.1~git20130909-1
Hello, A new version (0~20131004-1) has been uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/phabricator About the comments: 1 to 6 have been done. a get-orig-source target was implemented. about 7: it doesn't look like libphp-phpmailer will be enough, since phabricator has also a class.phpmailer-lite.php file in there (used by some scripts) that is not present in the libphp-phpmailer debian package... File permissions warning is most probably caused by wrong rights on the git repository and i'm still not sure how to fix that. about 8 and 9: i kept all externals since they look highly integrated in the rest of the code and i'm kind of scared of breaking things by putting them somewhere else on the system. I'll leave it that way since they're really small and i don't really have time to test everything in phabricator to guarantee there will be no impact. Phabricator is a continuous release with a lot of changes from one week to another. I've been following it since february and they're not kidding when they say it's under active development! There is no way to support this like a stable version and backport patches for now. The best that can be done is to upgrade to the latest version (hence a new package version). Fortunately phabricator reacts great to updates. Repackaging doesn't need a lot of time so i can manage to do it. Of course, i'll be able to maintain the package if they release a stable version one day. I hope this is clear, Regards, Le 03/10/2013 22:51, Luke Faraone a écrit : Dear future maintainer, On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:41:32PM +0200, Richard Sellam wrote: * Package name: phabricator Version : 0.1~git20130909-1 As discussed on IRC, you probably want to use 0.0~... or 0~... as the start of the version number. Some other comments: 1. Your description could use some wordsmithing. Specifically, the homepage can be omitted. Explaining that this is a code snapshot may also be beneficial. 2. Please drop the Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser lines or correct them to be the valid links for the VCS repository corresponding to the packaging. 3. As a nit: it would be advisable to license debian/* under the same terms as upstream, even though this is not a strict requirement. 4. Reference the version of the Apache License in common-licenses from debian/copyright rather than including the license in the package. 5. Please remove libphutil/src/parser/xhpast/bin/xhpast.exe from the upstream tarball. 6. Since you're already creating the upstream tarball, please either implement a get-orig-source target in debian/rules, or document how the tarball was constructed in debian/README.source. You may find it helpful to include the git ref used to build the tool in the package version. 7. Please fix all of the lintian errors marked Warning that are listed at https://mentors.debian.net/package/phabricator. The first one (embedded library) could probably be fixed by switching to libphp-phpmailer. 8. Please see whether the things in /usr/share/phabricator/externals can be removed from Phabricator and the appropriate package depended on instead. 9. Please expand debian/copyright to ensure you document the license of all software in the source tarball. If you don't use something in phabricator/externals (because you've done №8), feel free to strip it out of the upstream tarball as long as you document it according to №6. Since Phabricator is a continuous release, are you comfortable backporting security and bug fixes to stable, if the package were accepted? Cheers,
Bug#724896: RFS: wiktionarytodict/20130929 [ITP] -- dictionaries for dictd
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Tim Edwards wrote: No, not yet. It should be a pretty straightforward set of packages to include as it's really just a packaging of dictionaries generated by my scripts available at https://github.com/tkedwards/wiktionarytodict How are the dictionaries modified? What are the dictionaries generated from? Please note (DFSG item 2) that you have to include what they are generated from (the preferred form for modification) in the source package and generate the dictionaries during the package build process. The package you have provided is not doing that right now so it cannot be uploaded to Debian yet. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6GBGZq19i1Qm3M7wunuKtr6k8ndhBGo=8nx3vleh8w...@mail.gmail.com
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
On 4 October 2013 22:56, Beco r...@beco.cc wrote: Hi mentors, [snip] I suppose that is all I have to do. But myapp still tells me permission denied. I got it working using something I was trying to avoid. SGID. chmod g+s mytouch I think its kind of dangerous. But hell, is there any other safe way? Is this the correct way to allow an app to write to some directory outside its HOME? Thanks! Beco -- Dr Beco A.I. researcher Sometimes the heart sees what is invisible to the eye. (H. Jackson Brown Jr.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALuYw2xUgZ2FR1O2KqdPum7rjvqqu_Zbr5=md-ner5fep4g...@mail.gmail.com
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: On Debian, those high scores are usually stored in /var/games/X. The file permissions allow a user from the group games to write the file. See for example `monsterz`. That usually requires the game to be setgid, which isn't worth the trouble. It is better to either only use per-user high-scores or implement a network service to share high scores. However, do not send or download network highscores (or anything else on the network) without permission/instruction from the user. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Games/Upstream/ -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6GiPEFwHhQ_U5zQ06MEjcPN5S1x=-jjaz6tb1zncxk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Paul Wise wrote: per-user high-scores or I forgot to mention that most computers these days (at least in rich countries) are not multi-user so this isn't as big of an issue as it would seem. network service to share high scores You need to ensure that both the server side and the client side are sufficiently secure that this doesn't cause issues. Obviously for FOSS games the code can easily be modified to submit fake scores. One interesting way around that (which I saw used with the puzzle game primrose) is for the game to submit all data needed to create the high score and then the server side can verify that data gives the right high score. This works better for puzzle games with defined rules though. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6hhnabsrwefduyjskmsa6mrh998gycu6xwn9q-sktv...@mail.gmail.com
