Bug#715142: E: ocrodjvu: bad-provided-package-name python:any

[Mathieu Malaterre]

Hi,

  I am trying to sponsor ocrodjvu but if I build it in a recent
sid/chroot here is what I see:

$ lintian -I 
/tmp/d/d/ocrodjvu-0.7.16/../build-area/ocrodjvu_0.7.16-1_amd64.changes
E: ocrodjvu: bad-provided-package-name python:any
I: ocrodjvu: spelling-error-in-manpage
usr/share/man/man1/ocrodjvu.1.gz specifing specifying

  Would it be possible to have this fixed ?

Thanks,


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/ca+7wusyeoprctv3exhxxyjjmz2daw+ameyqz+xmwdssiqgk...@mail.gmail.com

Help with bug #728027

[Jose G. López]

Hi,

I was looking for a solution and I saw that ubuntu uses build1 as version's end 
name [0].
Is this aproach ok in debian?

Reading documentation I don't find a proper versioning scheme that fits this 
problem.
Any help would be appreciated.

Regards

[0] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgringotts


pgpjZ6nEuOvyt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

[Vincent Bernat]

 ❦ 16 novembre 2013 01:27 CET, Eriberto  :

> Thanks a lot for your revision and assistance. I think that was a
> confusion between "n" and "space" keys when reorganizing the Depends
> field. Sorry for that.
>
> I already fixed the problem and I put the new package in Mentors:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/vokoscreen
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vokoscreen/vokoscreen_1.8.1-1.dsc

Uploaded!
-- 
Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
 http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

[Vincent Bernat]

 ❦ 16 novembre 2013 11:50 CET, Vincent Bernat  :

>> Thanks a lot for your revision and assistance. I think that was a
>> confusion between "n" and "space" keys when reorganizing the Depends
>> field. Sorry for that.
>>
>> I already fixed the problem and I put the new package in Mentors:
>>
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/vokoscreen
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vokoscreen/vokoscreen_1.8.1-1.dsc
>
> Uploaded!

Well, no. It doesn't work for me. ffmpeg is called with `-f x11grab` and
this is not supported by ffmpeg as shipped by Debian.
-- 
Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
 http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

[Dominik George]

Hi,

to the maintainer and any sponsor:

** Please do a very, very careful license review! **

We had a very long discussion about this software at debianforum.de
[0][1][2] because the upstream author wanted us to test the software,
but was reluctant to grant us a view at the code all through the thread
until we finally forced them. So any review that was be done is
incomplete, and upstream's attitude justifies a very careful review of
whether the code was now really fully opened or not.

-nik

[0]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=135539
[1]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=136658
[2]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=136755

-- 
 Auf welchem Server liegt das denn jetzt…?
 Wenn es nicht übers Netz kommt bei Hetzner, wenn es nicht
gelesen wird bei STRATO, wenn es klappt bei manitu.

PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17  FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

[Vincent Bernat]

 ❦ 16 novembre 2013 12:14 CET, Dominik George  :

> to the maintainer and any sponsor:
>
> ** Please do a very, very careful license review! **
>
> We had a very long discussion about this software at debianforum.de
> [0][1][2] because the upstream author wanted us to test the software,
> but was reluctant to grant us a view at the code all through the thread
> until we finally forced them. So any review that was be done is
> incomplete, and upstream's attitude justifies a very careful review of
> whether the code was now really fully opened or not.
>
> -nik
>
> [0]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=135539
> [1]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=136658
> [2]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=136755

All the links are in German. It would be convenient to have a
summary. Currently, Vokoscreen is licensed under GPL-2.0. Maybe the
author changed his mind?
-- 
Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
 http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

[Eriberto]

Well, ffmpeg was dropped by Debian and the replace is libav (#729147).
Vokoscreen supports avconv since 18.0 version. Thus, I used
libav-tools (avconv) as install dependency and tested it. Worked fine.
However, we may have a user using ffmpeg in the future and vokoscreen
will prefer it.

There are three solutions:

- Made vokoscreen conflictant with ffmpeg. Unstable haven't ffmpeg and
Debian recommends the libav use. If the user installs ffmpeg by hand
(compiling, not a .deb), it will provides all features and voko will
work fine.

- Write something about libav x ffmpeg in README.Debian.

- Ask to upstream to make vokoscreen choose libav instead ffmpeg if both exist.

What is the better solution in your opinion?

2013/11/16 Vincent Bernat :
>  ❦ 16 novembre 2013 11:50 CET, Vincent Bernat  :
>
> Well, no. It doesn't work for me. ffmpeg is called with `-f x11grab` and
> this is not supported by ffmpeg as shipped by Debian.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJfMGkK�ftGViZJDOSnkCB_=a-GGBqwQyhcVC9i=p...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

[Eriberto]

Well, I checked all files and I wrote a long d/copyright and all
licenses are ok. A summary of the situation:

Files: *
Copyright: 2011-2013 Volker Kohaupt 
License: GPL-2.0


Files: vokoscreen.1
Copyright: 2012 Dominique Lasserre
License: GPL-2.0


Files: libqxt/*
Copyright: 2006-2011, the LibQxt project 
License: CPL-1.0 or LGPL-2.1


Files: QtSingleApplication/*
Copyright: 2010 Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies)

License: BSD-3-clause

The discussion was at april 2012. The first public code was released
at march 2013. Then I think the author  wanted to keep confidential
your code for a while. I have no problem with that.


2013/11/16 Vincent Bernat :
>  ❦ 16 novembre 2013 12:14 CET, Dominik George  :
>> ** Please do a very, very careful license review! **
>>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJfCq5_GznU8=QhKwAbZq34AA5uLajNY=kate9hrokx...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

[Vincent Bernat]

 ❦ 16 novembre 2013 12:56 CET, Eriberto  :

> Well, ffmpeg was dropped by Debian and the replace is libav (#729147).
> Vokoscreen supports avconv since 18.0 version. Thus, I used
> libav-tools (avconv) as install dependency and tested it. Worked fine.
> However, we may have a user using ffmpeg in the future and vokoscreen
> will prefer it.
>
> There are three solutions:
>
> - Made vokoscreen conflictant with ffmpeg. Unstable haven't ffmpeg and
> Debian recommends the libav use. If the user installs ffmpeg by hand
> (compiling, not a .deb), it will provides all features and voko will
> work fine.
>
> - Write something about libav x ffmpeg in README.Debian.
>
> - Ask to upstream to make vokoscreen choose libav instead ffmpeg if both 
> exist.
>
> What is the better solution in your opinion?

I didn't notice that ffmpeg was removed from unstable. It is still
present on my system. I don't think the first option would work. The
third option seems to be the best (or a way to choose between avconv and
ffmpeg in the GUI, like for choosing the player). Meantime, we can just
keep the package as is.
-- 
Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
 http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

[Eriberto]

Yeap! Can you upload this version? Then, I will have the package as DM
and fix the problems easier. In parallel, I will talk with the
upstream about the problem. He is conscient of the libav in Debian and
we have a good dialog. See what he wrote me: "thanks that you package
vokoscreen to Debian. The last Release from vokoscreen is 1.8.0 and
supports now avconv.".




2013/11/16 Vincent Bernat :
>  ❦ 16 novembre 2013 12:56 CET, Eriberto  :
> I didn't notice that ffmpeg was removed from unstable. It is still
> present on my system. I don't think the first option would work. The
> third option seems to be the best (or a way to choose between avconv and
> ffmpeg in the GUI, like for choosing the player). Meantime, we can just
> keep the package as is.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjf-7z-t66brcrcfeptkrujxj_wnje_d1q9k-ujqnx0...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#729375: RFS: authprogs/0.5.1-1 [ITP #616126]

[Alex Mestiashvili]

The debian/copyright in the package I just downloaded from mentors still
has GPL-2.0+, are you sure this was fixed?


Sorry, the package on mentors was still the old one. ( it wasn't 
uploaded because of .upload file, and I somehow forgot to upload it 
again after I deleted the .upload file)


Now I really uploaded the new one with the mentioned fixes.



No, I mean that the URLs in the example are completely wrong due to
changes at github. If you could fix them that would be good.

https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#GitHub




What is considered the correct URL? the one in example did work for me.
Should they be changed on githubredir variant ?


Please ping the RFS bug when at least the first 3 things are fixed in 
the Debian package on mentors, preferably also fixed upstream. 



I am sorry to spam BTS, the new package is on the mentors and I will 
wait for the upstream.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/528767ae.7020...@biotec.tu-dresden.de

Bug#728758: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6

[Werner Detter]

Hi,

could anyone upload this package for me ?

Thanks,
Werner Detter



Am 05.11.13 09:26, schrieb Werner Detter:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
> 
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
> I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
> just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on
> installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage).
> Furthermore I've added a dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl.
> 
>  * Package name: policyd-weight
>Version : 0.1.15.2-6
>Upstream Author : Robert Felber
>  * URL : www.policyd-weight.org
>  * License : GPL-2+
>Section : mail
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
>   * Add 09_fix_net_dns_usage.patch which fixes infinite loop when dns
> resolver
> is reachable only via IPv6 (Closes: #726670)
>   * debian/control added dependency on libio-socket-inet6-perl
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
> policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
> 
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> 
>   dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc
> 
> It would be great if you could upload this package for me. Should this
> changes also hit stable?
> Thank you and happy working,
> Werner Detter
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52876db3.6030...@aloah-from-hell.de

Bug#729601: marked as done (RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:14:51 -0200
with message-id 

and subject line Re: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast 
creator
has caused the Debian Bug report #729601,
regarding RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
729601: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729601
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vokoscreen". I am a DM and
I need the first upload only.

 * Package name: vokoscreen
   Version : 1.8.1-1
   Upstream Author : Volker Kohaupt
 * URL : https://github.com/vkohaupt/vokoscreen
 * License : GPL-2.0
   Section : video

  It builds this binary package: vokoscreen - easy to use screencast creator

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/vokoscreen

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vokoscreen/vokoscreen_1.8.1-1.dsc

  PS: the GIT repository is down but the package will be available at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/vokoscreen.git;a=summary

  Regards,
   Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Uploaded by Vincent Bernat.

Thanks a lot!

Eriberto--- End Message ---

Bug#729734: RFS: nlopt/2.4+dfsg-1

[Sergey B Kirpichev]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlopt"

 * Package name: nlopt
   Version : 2.4+dfsg-1
 * URL : http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt
 * License : MIT
   Section : math

It builds those binary packages:

 libnlopt-dev - nonlinear optimization library -- development package
 libnlopt-guile0 - nonlinear optimization library -- Guile bindings
 libnlopt0  - nonlinear optimization library
 octave-nlopt - nonlinear optimization library -- GNU Octave package
 python-nlopt - nonlinear optimization library -- Python bindings

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/nlopt

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nlopt/nlopt_2.4+dfsg-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream version
  * Fix lintian error: vcs-field-not-canonical
  * Fix permissions on debian/orig-tar.sh
  * Remove patches, applied by upstream
  * Refresh patches for the new upstream release
  * Update debian/libnlopt0.symbols
  * Change octave-nlopt priority to optional (See: #706761)
  * Override lintian error(X) shlib-calls-exit for libnlopt0


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20131116144255.ga11...@darkstar.order.hcn-strela.ru

Bug#729734: RFS: nlopt/2.4+dfsg-1

[Anton Gladky]

Uploaded. Thanks for contribution.

Anton


2013/11/16 Sergey B Kirpichev 

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlopt"
>
>  * Package name: nlopt
>Version : 2.4+dfsg-1
>  * URL : http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt
>  * License : MIT
>Section : math
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
>  libnlopt-dev - nonlinear optimization library -- development package
>  libnlopt-guile0 - nonlinear optimization library -- Guile bindings
>  libnlopt0  - nonlinear optimization library
>  octave-nlopt - nonlinear optimization library -- GNU Octave package
>  python-nlopt - nonlinear optimization library -- Python bindings
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/nlopt
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
>   dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nlopt/nlopt_2.4+dfsg-1.dsc
>
> More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
>   * New upstream version
>   * Fix lintian error: vcs-field-not-canonical
>   * Fix permissions on debian/orig-tar.sh
>   * Remove patches, applied by upstream
>   * Refresh patches for the new upstream release
>   * Update debian/libnlopt0.symbols
>   * Change octave-nlopt priority to optional (See: #706761)
>   * Override lintian error(X) shlib-calls-exit for libnlopt0
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/20131116144255.ga11...@darkstar.order.hcn-strela.ru
>
>

Bug#708237: RFS: regexxer/0.10-2 [ITA] -- friendly greeter

[Andrew Starr-Bochicchio]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Neil Wallace  wrote:
>   Dear mentors,
>
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "regexxer"

Hi Neil,

I'm willing to sponsor this package. A few comments first.

Lintian isn't happy with your changelog:

W: regexxer: debian-changelog-has-wrong-weekday 2013-08-26 is a Monday
N:
N:The date in the changelog entry is not consistent with the actual
N:weekday. Either the date is wrong or the weekday is wrong.
N:
N:To avoid problems like this, consider using a tool like dch(1) or
N:date(1) to generate the date. Example:
N:
N:  $ date -R -ud '2013-11-05 23:59:59'
N:  Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:59:59 +
N:
N:Severity: normal, Certainty: certain
N:
N:Check: changelog-file, Type: binary
N:


Also, you should close the ITA bug in the changelog using the format:
(Closes: #569345)

Since we're fixing the changelog anyway, it's a bit confusing that you say you:

Remove debian/patches/glib-single-include.patch

but then:

debian/patches/glib-single-include.patch:
Updated to fix one more include.

and of course that patch is present in the package.

If you clean these little things up, I'll upload the package. Lintian
points out a few other things that would be nice, but since the
package is already in Debian I don't consider them blockers. You
should look into fixing them in a future upload though:

W: regexxer: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/regexxer
N:
N:This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the "read-only
N:relocation" link flag. This package was likely not built with the
N:default Debian compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags. If built using
N:dpkg-buildflags directly, be sure to import LDFLAGS.
N:
N:Refer to http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening for details.
N:
N:Severity: normal, Certainty: certain
N:
N:Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb
N:
I: regexxer: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/regexxer
N:
N:This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc
N:functions. Either there are no potentially unfortified functions called
N:by any routines, all unfortified calls have already been fully validated
N:at compile-time, or the package was not built with the default Debian
N:compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags. If built using
N:dpkg-buildflags directly, be sure to import CPPFLAGS.
N:
N:NB: Due to false-positives, Lintian ignores some unprotected functions
N:(e.g. memcpy).
N:
N:Refer to http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening and
N:http://bugs.debian.org/673112 for details.
N:
N:Severity: normal, Certainty: wild-guess
N:
N:Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb
N:

Thanks!

-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

   Ubuntu Developer 
   Debian Developer 
   PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cal6k_awedeyxhn-seadblxahz9muufehfozww8lp1uywxvv...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#718486: RFS: python-meld3/0.6.10-1 [ITA]

[Andrew Starr-Bochicchio]

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Jackson Doak  wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-meld3"

Hi Jackson,

The package looks good. I'm going to go ahead and sponsor it. Feel
free to contact me directly if needed for future uploads of this
package.

You might want to consider maintaining the package as part of the
Debian Python Modules Team. Maintaining packages as part of a team
when there is one that fits is in the best interest of the package and
it also makes it much more likely you'll find a sponsor in a timely
manner. See:

https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin

Thanks for your work!

-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

   Ubuntu Developer 
   Debian Developer 
   PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAL6k_AzQWnVe=3WGN3_8KT_TgsG5+yARYfPHuJmAfU=eqef...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#718486: closing 718486

[Andrew Starr-Bochicchio]

close 718486 
thanks

Sponsored


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1384632572-1367-bts-...@debian.org

Bug#718486: RFS: python-meld3/0.6.10-1 [ITA]

[Jackson Doak]

I'm already in the python team, i'll see if this is able to be added.
Thanks.
Could you please look at my gthumb package? If someone is willing to
sponsor it, i can try and continue maintaining it.


On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Jackson Doak  wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-meld3"
>
> Hi Jackson,
>
> The package looks good. I'm going to go ahead and sponsor it. Feel
> free to contact me directly if needed for future uploads of this
> package.
>
> You might want to consider maintaining the package as part of the
> Debian Python Modules Team. Maintaining packages as part of a team
> when there is one that fits is in the best interest of the package and
> it also makes it much more likely you'll find a sponsor in a timely
> manner. See:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin
>
> Thanks for your work!
>
> -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
>
>Ubuntu Developer 
>Debian Developer 
>PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1
>

Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

[Eriberto]

A doubt: where is the ITP bug???

Thanks!

Regards,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjd-27oiv95q9fp2bdxk0dgh-t-31mbx_ebqhcewxau...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#712805: RFS: ctesf-console/1.0-1 ITP

[Eriberto]

Hi!

Your package has several warnings and hasn't an ITP number. It cannot
be uploaded.

Regards,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfokbvsm5eovzs9vhtv0v9ojumrsmhfruwt-7whrbk...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#712787: RFS: distkeys/1.0 -- distribute SSH keys

[Eriberto]

Hi,

Why you used "native" for the package? Where is the ITP bug?

Thanks.

Regards,

Eriberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcefvj6mzvxd7g3nt-awjbu3z5owdbyhczbjn1xy7d...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Debian/Ubuntu Package Developing with Docker

[gustavo panizzo]

On 11/11/2013 11:45 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:

> 
> This work is less useful for Daily developers, since schroot can do what
> docker does just fine (e.g. for sbuild, etc), but docker is going to be
> a huge win for a cluster of build nodes for debile.
i don't care for it to build packages, i'm happy with pbuilder for that
task.
i want to see if it can replace my lxc containers, i have many of them
in production,test,dev,etc environments, but i could use a better
management system for them

thanks!

> 
> Much love!
>   Paul
> 


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#729375: RFS: authprogs/0.5.1-1 [ITP #616126]

[Paul Wise]

On Sat, 2013-11-16 at 13:40 +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:

> Sorry, the package on mentors was still the old one. ( it wasn't 
> uploaded because of .upload file, and I somehow forgot to upload it 
> again after I deleted the .upload file)
> 
> Now I really uploaded the new one with the mentioned fixes.

Ah, ok.

Further issues while you are waiting for upstream:

For the expanduser patch I meant these instead of what you put:

os.path.expanduser('~/.ssh/authorized_keys')
os.path.expanduser('~/.ssh/authprogs.yaml')
os.path.expanduser('~/.ssh/authprogs.d') 

Vcs-* fields are for the Debian packaging VCS, not the upstream one.
Create a debian/upstream file if you want to refer to the upstream VCS.

http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-VCS-fields
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata

Priority should be optional.

The Homepage link redirects to the same URL but without .git on it,
please just strip the .git from it.

debhelper build-dep can just be 9 instead of 9.0.0.

Did you mean to leave DH_VERBOSE=1 uncommented?

You might want to run wrap-and-sort -sa to make debdiffs easier.

You changed GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0 but didn't change the license stanza at
the bottom of debian/copyright, it still reads "or (at your option) any
later version." which is incorrect. Please use the exact wording as
upstream uses but keep the bit about where it is on Debian.

The authprogs.html file is the same as the manual page, I would
recommend not building and installing it if possible. If not possible
maybe ask upstream for a way to turn that off.

> What is considered the correct URL? the one in example did work for me.
> Should they be changed on githubredir variant ?

Oh, I missed that /tags still exists, I thought /releases had
replaced /tags. It is a much better idea to use /releases than /tags I
think, maybe there is some difference between the two.

githubredir is completely obsolete, please don't use it.

So revert to your original debian/watch with fixes.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

How to determine build dependency

[T o n g]

Hi, 

How to determine build dependencies? 

I was using 'dpkg-depcheck -d ./configure ...', but that seems to have 
included much more than necessary. 

For example for emacs, using motif instead of gtk3, I get [1], but I 
don't think x11proto-randr-dev, libxinerama-dev, libxrandr-dev, libgl1-
mesa-glx, libexpat1, libpopt0, & libxdmcp6, etc should be in the list. 

Any help? 

Thanks


[1]

dpkg-depcheck -d ./configure --prefix=/usr --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --
program-suffix="-snapshot" --with-x=yes --with-x-toolkit=motif  --with-
toolkit-scroll-bars  --without-all --with-compress-info --with-gpm --with-
x --with-xft --with-libotf --with-xim --with-dbus 
Packages needed:
  x11proto-randr-dev
  mime-support
  lesstif2-dev
  libglib2.0-0:i386
  libpthread-stubs0-dev:i386
  libxau6:i386
  liblockfile-dev
  libxcb1:i386
  libxau-dev:i386
  libgpm-dev:i386
  mawk
  libxft-dev
  x11proto-xext-dev
  libxinerama-dev:i386
  pkg-config
  libdbus-1-dev:i386
  libfreetype6-dev
  libxdmcp-dev:i386
  tzdata
  x11proto-kb-dev
  libxext6:i386
  x11proto-xinerama-dev
  libfontconfig1-dev
  libotf-dev
  libxrandr-dev
  libgl1-mesa-glx:i386
  libexpat1:i386
  libdbus-1-3:i386
  libxcb1-dev:i386
  xutils-dev
  libncurses5-dev
  x11proto-render-dev
  libpopt0:i386
  libxdmcp6:i386



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/l69flj$4td$1...@ger.gmane.org

Re: Help with bug #728027

[Paul Wise]

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Jose G. López wrote:

> I was looking for a solution and I saw that ubuntu uses build1 as version's 
> end name [0].

That is how they version rebuilds, in Debian we use something
different for that:

https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU

> Is this aproach ok in debian?

A binNMU won't fix the issue due to the .dsc/.debian.tar.gz

> Reading documentation I don't find a proper versioning scheme that fits this 
> problem.

The simplest solution would be to just bump the version to 1:1.2.1-11.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6Gk6EO6EK8SzjtCuuUCe2pDo4_MJaN9DZA-b=yi4ms...@mail.gmail.com

Re: How to determine build dependency

[Russ Allbery]

T o n g  writes:

> How to determine build dependencies? 

Well, the best way is to read upstream documentation and possibly the
configure script and figure out what the dependencies are stated to be.
But if you're looking for more of an automatically-determined method, I
have been known to start with the empty set and just keep building and
adding dependencies to fix each failure or each missing feature in
configure.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y54n3ant@windlord.stanford.edu