Bug#737208: RFS: linuxlogo/5.11-4

[Dariusz Dwornikowski]

I do not want to close old bugs. Just asking, what will happen with bugs
for older versions that e.g. are not used anywhere no more? Will these bugs
hang forever or is there a cleaning policy ?


On 2 February 2014 22:23, Jakub Wilk  wrote:

> * Dariusz Dwornikowski ,
> 2014-01-31, 21:02:
>
>  Should these bugs be then closed manually ?
>>
>
> Which bugs, and why do you want to close them?
>
>
> --
> Jakub Wilk
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140202212348.ga13...@jwilk.net
>
>


-- 
Pozdrawiam,
Dariusz Dwornikowski, Assistant
Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology
www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/
room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41

Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

[Jerome Charaoui]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Le 2014-02-03 00:27, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jerome Charaoui 
> wrote:
>> Le 2014-02-03 00:08, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
>>> Have you tried contacting the current maintainer prior to
>>> sending out this RFS? If they haven't responded in a timely
>>> manner, please ping the MIA team and go through the MIA
>>> process; if they did reply and simply don't have time to update
>>> their package, please get them to say so on a public list / bug
>>> report and include a link to it in your RFS bug. Otherwise,
>>> this would be considered a hostile NMU.
>> 
>> As the maintainer is listed in LowThresholdNmu, I thought it
>> would be okay to upload without delay. And I did leave a note in
>> bug #693150 announcing my intention and asking for feedback.
>> Could the upload still be considered as such in light of this?
> 
> No, low threshold NMUs doesn't give an unconditional license to
> upload new upstream releases and/or make 0-day uploads (it's also
> never been formalized in Policy, so there aren't exactly any
> clear-cut rules as to what low threshold NMUs do allow...).

This release was published upstream on Dec. 11, 2013 [1], so it's not
exactly a 0-day upload. Also, the last release packaged by the
maintainer was only uploaded over a year ago.

I followed the conditions outlined on LowThresholdNmu, which is :
upload must fix one or more bugs and publishing without delay is
acceptable. I would expect the maintainers who signed-on to agree with
these terms, which seem clear enough to me. However I was not aware
that this whole procedure wasn't sanctioned by the Debian Policy, so
thanks for bringing that up.


> Again, please try to get in contact with the maintainer, and if
> that fails, get in touch with the MIA team to get this package
> orphaned so you can adopt it and properly maintain it.

I did contact the maintainer [2]. albeit only very shortly before
uploading. Again, my understanding of the conditions in
LowThresholdNmu was that this procedure was acceptable.

In any event, I understand that a NMU is an exceptional procedure and
that LowThresholdNmu rules are not universally recognized, so I will
close this RFS and allow more time for the maintainer to respond.

Thanks,

  -- Jerome


[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/lightning/versions/
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693150#96

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS7zL6AAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtM8uUH/jlLgD924X8HZXh5ksAaQilE
qyKobvDNjU3uGdkerN4cqWKmRJSxmJd9Gi/TKuhNLAvtwnLj1RI0E09O7IKd4sV1
DWb6jGhDsNV1jzurYb+cE7wFl812ZelIn2BhcIZDlAXRJhUUVdYh3lRBozJCLGdv
IedJXcejuaDd9HuV3Eu7Wwy9Clj1cWboadM064WcU//WB1iysJ0bOrCKPytJVzk/
l+dvbGGKpHYEj12fEqOm2TJbw4YlsDL3/kh911OAGVMFz+/mUYpsI6/0kgNAwwK3
FZWOpOwy1ceGf3rIzy/C0TbnhWPbaKlKtPHHB1Wrxyiwl/lxKE3V52LrpeQe8R8=
=Q9Dd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ef32fa.8050...@riseup.net

Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

[Jerome Charaoui]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Le 2014-02-03 00:08, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
> Have you tried contacting the current maintainer prior to sending
> out this RFS? If they haven't responded in a timely manner, please
> ping the MIA team and go through the MIA process; if they did reply
> and simply don't have time to update their package, please get them
> to say so on a public list / bug report and include a link to it in
> your RFS bug. Otherwise, this would be considered a hostile NMU.

As the maintainer is listed in LowThresholdNmu, I thought it would be
okay to upload without delay. And I did leave a note in bug #693150
announcing my intention and asking for feedback. Could the upload still
be considered as such in light of this?

Thanks,

 -- Jerome


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS7yc7AAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtMoOwH/isKBzQSsXwE9mtsXjHx7Gxf
nUJRKzc+cyb26pT6iucFc3dPHdvm8Y07Nk50Mkt+bXGWRB4nRPBoFQE2I0sWk+Cp
yyOy042Gd3ltoxvt/iYJz6tUkO5gXK85VGfrux5W1HPCTx5K8yv1lpnLDaPvryKv
ZXr5sZDm8/pZPJH8EvlieEHVQckSuHEoa1eiopNCnf9rJk+ZjD6WsbWLU47j6VK3
W6EOza/VXSwTDOnMFMQcEL4hY4hM96NjQjsogjJ1A+pEQHrNhU8jeiujwl662AzB
8qKIiS0cIuEPIKpit13afC8yf6ImnFiPDx12bZ141+2PgMYuxJOj2gftUVkB8HM=
=Q85O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ef273b.9050...@riseup.net

Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

[Vincent Cheng]

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jerome Charaoui  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 2014-02-03 00:08, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
>> Have you tried contacting the current maintainer prior to sending
>> out this RFS? If they haven't responded in a timely manner, please
>> ping the MIA team and go through the MIA process; if they did reply
>> and simply don't have time to update their package, please get them
>> to say so on a public list / bug report and include a link to it in
>> your RFS bug. Otherwise, this would be considered a hostile NMU.
>
> As the maintainer is listed in LowThresholdNmu, I thought it would be
> okay to upload without delay. And I did leave a note in bug #693150
> announcing my intention and asking for feedback. Could the upload still
> be considered as such in light of this?

No, low threshold NMUs doesn't give an unconditional license to upload
new upstream releases and/or make 0-day uploads (it's also never been
formalized in Policy, so there aren't exactly any clear-cut rules as
to what low threshold NMUs do allow...).

Again, please try to get in contact with the maintainer, and if that
fails, get in touch with the MIA team to get this package orphaned so
you can adopt it and properly maintain it.

Regards,
Vincent


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CACZd_tCMXUCtPWasrmc284TgFd=-QJV_mC=Nac=HNQH6=zc...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

[Jerome Charaoui]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iceowl-l10n"

 * Package name: iceowl-l10n
   Version : 2.6.4-1
   Upstream Author : Mozilla Calendar Project
 * URL : http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/projects/calendar/
 * License : MPL
   Section : localization

 It builds those binary packages:

iceowl-l10n-ca - Catalan/Valencian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-cs - Czech language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-da - Danish language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-de - German language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-en-gb - British English language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-es-ar - Spanish (Argentina) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-es-es - Spanish (Spain) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-et - Estonian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-eu - Basque language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-fi - Finnish language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-fr - French language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-fy-nl - Western Frisian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-ga-ie - Irish (Ireland) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-gd - Scottish Gaelic language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-hr - Croatian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-hu - Hungarian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-is - Icelandic language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-it - Italian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-ja - Japanese language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-ko - Korean language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-lt - Lithuanian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-nb-no - Bokmaal (Norway) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-nl - Dutch language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-nn-no - Nynorsk (Norway) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-pl - Polish language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-pt-pt - Portuguese (Portugal) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-ru - Russian language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-sk - Slovak language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-zh-cn - Chinese (China) language package for Iceowl
 iceowl-l10n-zh-tw - Chinese (Taiwan) language package for Iceowl


To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/iceowl-l10n


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iceowl-l10n/iceowl-l10n_2.6.4-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * New upstream version : 2.6.4 (Closes: #693150)
  * Rebase patches for new version
  * Dropped languages : Albanian, Bulgarian, Galician, Swedish, Turkish
Ukrainian


This is my first upload, I fully expect it will need (hopefully minor)
adjustments before being accepted. I will gladly work with my sponsor
to fix any issues that are raised.


Regards,
  Jerome Charaoui

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS7yFOAAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtMFCYIAIHSDgXW1u2bqaWP7m/h/Qxr
ZFr2JudNypusyPQyDQea6t/YOS5pDJGMY/A8I8RluCZfUZ1OS4kbwiMvdp4uAMFZ
Y57osNGLKEOT20a8vbB1iT/N/9mqm6zCsTemOH8JnVkt7wjC79S+my9HIeAAnLP8
iDoIvYuUwPoeo+tFPoH8EgH9rmzd+O5C+Oki2igC8azcjbGDDJidvGhDSQ8qcsNS
wB56Fl7RbyepyUON3c99qUJfidfbRtcb/0bUpV8/tuTblHRXo/f5t2IAET7hq0Ev
lcooJnosBEeNObeSo1JqXAyQbzYyjZnmEivR4fNYnjBhJOzaIWx5vLqUrLOwMrc=
=SpTe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ef214e.8040...@riseup.net

Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]

[Vincent Cheng]

Hi Jerome,

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Jerome Charaoui  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iceowl-l10n"
>
>  * Package name: iceowl-l10n
>Version : 2.6.4-1
>Upstream Author : Mozilla Calendar Project
>  * URL : http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/projects/calendar/
>  * License : MPL
>Section : localization
>
>  It builds those binary packages:
>
> iceowl-l10n-ca - Catalan/Valencian language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-cs - Czech language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-da - Danish language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-de - German language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-en-gb - British English language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-es-ar - Spanish (Argentina) language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-es-es - Spanish (Spain) language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-et - Estonian language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-eu - Basque language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-fi - Finnish language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-fr - French language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-fy-nl - Western Frisian language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-ga-ie - Irish (Ireland) language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-gd - Scottish Gaelic language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-hr - Croatian language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-hu - Hungarian language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-is - Icelandic language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-it - Italian language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-ja - Japanese language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-ko - Korean language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-lt - Lithuanian language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-nb-no - Bokmaal (Norway) language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-nl - Dutch language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-nn-no - Nynorsk (Norway) language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-pl - Polish language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-pt-pt - Portuguese (Portugal) language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-ru - Russian language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-sk - Slovak language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-zh-cn - Chinese (China) language package for Iceowl
>  iceowl-l10n-zh-tw - Chinese (Taiwan) language package for Iceowl
>
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/iceowl-l10n
>
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
>   dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iceowl-l10n/iceowl-l10n_2.6.4-1.dsc
>
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
>   * Non-maintainer upload.
>   * New upstream version : 2.6.4 (Closes: #693150)
>   * Rebase patches for new version
>   * Dropped languages : Albanian, Bulgarian, Galician, Swedish, Turkish
> Ukrainian
>
>
> This is my first upload, I fully expect it will need (hopefully minor)
> adjustments before being accepted. I will gladly work with my sponsor
> to fix any issues that are raised.

Have you tried contacting the current maintainer prior to sending out
this RFS? If they haven't responded in a timely manner, please ping
the MIA team and go through the MIA process; if they did reply and
simply don't have time to update their package, please get them to say
so on a public list / bug report and include a link to it in your RFS
bug. Otherwise, this would be considered a hostile NMU.

Regards,
Vincent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caczd_tca_f0byesw1rdcdxfmjv1ex-kdvecjaufkpjzatam...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Bug#717995: marked as done (RFS: rawdog/2.18-1 [ITA])

[Vincent Cheng]

Hi Adam,

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Adam Sampson  wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 10:49:51PM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> Adam, please re-upload rawdog to mentors and I promise you that I'll
>> take a look at it (and upload it, unless there are some problems with
>> your packaging)
>
> That's very kind of you -- thank you!
>
> I've just uploaded a new version to mentors:
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/rawdog

One minor nitpick: uscan now checks for upstream's key in
debian/upstream/signing-key.{pgp,asc}. The previous location
(debian/upstream-signing-key.pgp) is now deprecated. [1]

Anyways, built, signed, and uploaded; thanks for your contribution to Debian!

Regards,
Vincent

[1] 
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/devscripts.git;a=blob;f=debian/NEWS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CACZd_tD=xaX54zzYT7vpCvxd=a-_vchcnevz+wvmg+x9cnu...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Moving a package (to non-free)

[Craig Small]

On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 05:19:12PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 136,
> in binary_component_func
> .join(Component).one()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/query.py", line
> 2193, in one
> "Multiple rows were found for one()")
> MultipleResultsFound: Multiple rows were found for one()
The program was expecting only one row but there was more than one
there in the database.  I personally don't like one() for this reason.

Checking the count and/or using first() is usually better, unless
this is pointing to something else breaking (e.g. the thing that let the
database have duplicate rows in the first place.)

> (assuming you haven't implemented it already)
Indeed.

Not really the uploaders fault though, to answer his question.

 - Craig
-- 
Craig Small (@smallsees)   http://enc.com.au/   csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux   http://www.debian.org/   csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint:5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2  0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140202215456.ga4...@enc.com.au

Bug#737208: RFS: linuxlogo/5.11-4

[Jakub Wilk]

* Dariusz Dwornikowski , 2014-01-31, 
21:02:

Should these bugs be then closed manually ?


Which bugs, and why do you want to close them?

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140202212348.ga13...@jwilk.net

Re: Bug#717995: marked as done (RFS: rawdog/2.18-1 [ITA])

[Adam Sampson]

Hi Vincent,

On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 10:49:51PM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Adam, please re-upload rawdog to mentors and I promise you that I'll
> take a look at it (and upload it, unless there are some problems with
> your packaging)

That's very kind of you -- thank you!

I've just uploaded a new version to mentors:
  https://mentors.debian.net/package/rawdog

Cheers,

-- 
Adam Sampson  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140202162450.gu6...@cartman.at.offog.org

Bug#737407: RFS: htpdate/1.0.7-1 [ITP] -- HTTP based time synchronization tool

[Joao Eriberto Mota Filho]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "htpdate". I am a DM and I need the
  first upload only.

 * Package name: htpdate
   Version : 1.0.7-1
   Upstream Author : Eddy Vervest 
 * URL : http://www.vervest.org/fiki/bin/view/HTP/WebHome
 * License : GPL-2.0+
   Section : net

  It builds those binary packages:

htpdate- HTTP based time synchronization tool

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/htpdate


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/htpdate/htpdate_1.0.7-1.dsc


  The Git repository is available at:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/htpdate.git


  Thanks in advance.

  Regards,
   Joao Eriberto Mota Filho


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20140202160307.5166.77256.report...@canopus.eriberto.pro.br

Re: Bug#736379: RFS: python-aosd/0.2.3-1 [ITP]

[Armin Häberling]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

I'm still looking for a sponsor or a mentor with comments or
suggestions how to improve my package "python-aosd".

For the package see:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-aosd

python-aosd is a Python binding for libasod2, an on screen display
library, making it easy to render anti-aliased text or drawing images
with pycairo on the screen.

Thanks and regards,
Armin


On 01/22/2014 11:25 PM, Armin Häberling wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-aosd"
> 
> * Package name: python-aosd Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream
> Author : Armin Häberling  * URL :
> https://code.google.com/p/python-aosd/ * License : expat 
> Section : python
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
> python-aosd - Python bindings for libaosd2
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the 
> following URL:
> 
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-aosd
> 
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
> command:
> 
> dget -x 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-aosd/python-aosd_0.2.3-1.dsc
>
>
> 
More information about hello can be obtained from
> http://code.google.com/p/python-aosd/.
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
> * Initial release. (Closes: 735604)
> 
> 
> Regards, Armin Häberling
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS7kcjAAoJEKSkJb3OOZjUSGAH/RThH2U8Oxen+AbPjVRHo8wb
aAq6DQkDBThC5RkpsSproxOhB9fi5yOPSAGW3lrk7y3tF79Wm4rP6iidvsFuZ/+Q
dkvMyS5wQkVggfCeZSDRjg7/dm17YIfyMyCeFajQ3+JTfMg6GsR1kokvotb+cRB6
ijDkC6JqHcWEYInnATfMF5nFbx+z2BbNiibRbPKbn2XObFNH91V0LAH2rolpdBEP
e9mvw0108viqiGqikwYNvYv+OpOnBb9EyDVZ2JKS4a1GhYT2gRXxGI3i7bNaC+8+
7hU7XCvpW+ozOsntfaOqwgMFFe2vUJ38p/s135VMGZiaVaWapSaeLA7y2cgdg/M=
=LCaS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ee4727.8010...@gmail.com

Bug#737390: RFS: kerneltop/0.91-1 [ITA]

[Dariusz Dwornikowski]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kerneltop"

 * Package name: kerneltop
   Version : 0.91-1
   Upstream Author : Randy Dunlap 
 * URL :  http://www.infradead.org/~rdunlap/src/
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : devel

It builds those binary packages:

kerneltop  - shows Linux kernel function usage in a style like top

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kerneltop

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kerneltop/kerneltop_0.91-1.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Closes orphaned bug (closes: #729381)
  * Migration to dh
  * Updated copyright and FSF address
  * Migration to format 3.0
  * Restored proper versioning
  * New upstream version
  * Updated project homepage


-- 
Pozdrawiam,
Dariusz Dwornikowski, Assistant
Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology
www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/
room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41

Re: which package do I need ? and how do I find out this ?

[Игорь Пашев]

Hi, Roelof!

2014-02-02 Roelof Wobben :
> When I compile I see this :
>
> checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
> checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
> checking for initscr in -lncurses... no
> checking for new_form in -lform... no
> checking for new_panel in -lpanel... no

You can try using apt-file:

"apt-file find libpanel"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALL-Q8wxrOO4fdpmPd_4UoRTN_ywq-eFCfzyMaie3xNQ=wq...@mail.gmail.com

which package do I need ? and how do I find out this ?

[Roelof Wobben]

When I compile I see this : 

checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for initscr in -lncurses... no
checking for new_form in -lform... no
checking for new_panel in -lpanel... no


What is the right way to know which package I need to add to the Buildreq 

Roelof

  

Bug#736376: RFS: comixcursors/0.8.2-1 -- X11 mouse pointer themes with a comic art feeling

[Ben Finney]

tags 726615 + pending
block 726615 by 736376
tags 684869 + pending
block 684869 by 736376
tags 708133 + pending
block 708133 by 736376
tags 648965 + pending
block 648965 by 736376
thanks

On 23-Jan-2014, Ben Finney wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for release 0.8.2-1 of “comixcursors”.
> […]
>
> This release fixes these bugs:
> 
> * bug#726615: New upstream version available, 0.8.2
> * bug#684869, bug#708133: Background rendered as semi-transparent grey
>   square for all cursors
> * bug#648965: update-alternatives not used

These bugs have a fix, in a new release pending upload to Debian. Resolving
bug#736376 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736376>, by
sponsoring the upload, will resolve these bugs.

-- 
 \ “Please leave your values at the front desk.” —hotel, Paris |
  `\   |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

[Vincent Cheng]

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Joseph Herlant  wrote:
> Dear Vincent,
>
> I first understood that I needed --with quilt and then lintian was
> complaining about a missing build-dep for quilt. That's why I added
> them.
> But I doubled checked, tested on the package and you're right I don't
> need this!   <:-)
> That's great, I removed them.

Source format '3.0 (quilt)' means that dpkg-source will automatically
deal with (un-)applying patches, so you don't need to use
dh_quilt_{patch,unpatch} to do so. If you were using an older source
format (e.g. 1.0), then yes, you would need to explicitly declare a
build-dep on quilt.

> Yep, you guessed why priority was extra: I let them to the default
> value of dh_make. Changed that! :-)
>
> I didn't know this wrap-and-sort script. This is a great tool in its
> way! It even cleans up the commented Vcs-*! :-D
>
> Thanks a lot for all your help and time. I know feel I have a pretty
> awesome package thanks to you! ;-)
>
> I have to make a big sticky note with all your advises for next
> package with a lot of smileys!

Great, thanks for fixing all those rather pedantic complaints!

One last nitpick (sorry!) is that other gnome-shell extensions
packaged in Debian seem to prefix their packages with
"gnome-shell-extension-" (e.g. gnome-shell-extension-weather,
gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar), so can you please do the same
for your binary package as well, i.e. rename it
gnome-shell-extension-pomodoro?

Vincent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caczd_tbgzrhvmilk-zrq8bx2xcoudsqekw9v4hlkqnhyfrz...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

[Joseph Herlant]

Dear Vincent,

I first understood that I needed --with quilt and then lintian was
complaining about a missing build-dep for quilt. That's why I added
them.
But I doubled checked, tested on the package and you're right I don't
need this!   <:-)
That's great, I removed them.

Yep, you guessed why priority was extra: I let them to the default
value of dh_make. Changed that! :-)

I didn't know this wrap-and-sort script. This is a great tool in its
way! It even cleans up the commented Vcs-*! :-D

Thanks a lot for all your help and time. I know feel I have a pretty
awesome package thanks to you! ;-)

I have to make a big sticky note with all your advises for next
package with a lot of smileys!

Thanks again,
Joseph


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/capqicox8--qpq1s7gy4squs1sacsqk9jg7aulaxlwz-et2s...@mail.gmail.com