Bug#763819: hdf4 not ready for sponsering
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:53:21PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > > I'd like to sponsor this package as requested on SoB Wiki page but there > > are several lintian issues (including errors) which would cause an > > auto-reject: > > Thanks for taking time to review and sorry for your time. I'll try to > find out what went wrong because I'm pretty sure that at least the > lintian errors should not be present (they were present before and > thought I fixed them in this upload). OK, just touch the Wiki page if this is fixed or send an e-mail. > Just two more questions/comments: > > > > > W: libhdf4-alt-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > > W: libhdf4g-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > > W: libhdf4-doc: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > > > > seems to be easy to fix > > Not really, since this license refers to the debian packaging work. > The only reference points to this directory. I will ask the copyright > holders to choose a version. Strictly speaking they might even have > referred to different versions of the GPL. This warning would not really stop me from sponsering if I just know that it is somehow reflecting the history. > > W: libhdf4 source: debian-watch-file-in-native-package > > W: libhdf4 source: native-package-with-dash-version > > > > looks suspicious. There are other not that important things but I'd > > call the package in a bad state. > Indeed suspicious and strange, I didn't get these. Wonder what went > wrong. Probably something while rebasing. > > Just a final remark: I am planning to make more changes (build only > one library version without netcdf) after the freeze (it will require > a transition). This can make the d/rules files and patches much > easier. I'm now focusing on fixing bugs and ignoring some lintian > errors, since it seems more useful to fix them when a "proper" package > is built. Anyway, it had 134 lintian warnings before I started working > on it, so it is definitely improving :-) :-) I'm pretty sure that you improved the package. Thanks for your work on this Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141004062002.gg29...@an3as.eu
lintian overrides [Was: Bug#763540: Review of psocksxx/0.0.5-1]
On 04-10-14 00:44, Paul Wise wrote: > They are also not for > experimental, pedantic or info level issues. So all of these issues > should either be ignored or fixed but not overridden. I have seen this before and I (as a maintainer) don't understand this comment so bold as it is put here. I would say that overrides can help you to see which items you (or your sponsee¹ in case of sponsorship) already investigated. In the case of pedantic and info, you could even say that an override is allowed when the item might be still valid but for whatever reason is not going to be fixed (soon). I run the full lintian on nearly every build I do and it help me to keep track of the issue I think I still need to resolve. As long as each override has an extensive and valid explanation, I don't see anything wrong with that and I prefer it over having to scroll through items that are ignored anyways. As a sponsor, I always check all the overrides and only accept those I understand. Documenting the reason goes a long way for that (as well as it helps in the future to remember the original reasoning). Paul ¹ Sorry for my English in case this word is wrong, I mean the person that gets sponsored. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU
Hi, > cruft is orphaned (#763888), so you dont do a NMU, as technically there > is no maintainer. Instead, do a QA-upload. See > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-qa-upload Ok, it wasn't orphaned at the time I did the RFS. Here is a new package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/cruft > Of course, it would be even better if would consider adopting the > package... I would like to. > As a QA upload allows you to fix litteraly everything, it would be great > if you could reduce the bug count a little bit :) I already solved 3 bugs, they will be automaticaly closed by the amended changelog. Most others are not bugs, but feature requests; my own biggest complaint is that it is s slow, even on a new PC. After one week of thinkering, I had rewritten the cruft engine from scratch and it is already 30x to 100x faster. https://github.com/a-detiste/cruft-ng https://github.com/a-detiste/cruft-ng/wiki/Benchmark It tries to have an output identical to cruft. It doesn't support any command line argument at the moment but it is already usefull to myself for testing the cruft ruleset, and fix it faster. This let me also find new bugs in cruft: it doesn't grok multiarch, and can't realise that libc6:amd64 & libc6 are the same thing. I would like at first to package this as "cruft-ng (with Depends: cruft)" so that users can compare output. It's my first C++ program after 10 years of SQL & SAS, the code is ugly. This in not even real C++, just C + strings + vectors + lot of calls to C library; I would better rewrite it in plain C. Of course this won't be completed for Jessie. > (So, yes, I'm willing to sponsor you if you bring the package into > shape :-) Ok, that would be great. I've filled up the needed form for Debian Maintainer https://nm.debian.org/public/person/detiste > (Antonjy: You are listed as uploader... I assume that this is obsolete > as your last upload for this package was 1998. please confirm) Lintian complaints about that too. Thanks ! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#763540: Review of psocksxx/0.0.5-1
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 13:36 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > New package is uploaded to mentors[1]. The package looks good to me. I don't have time for sponsorship but I would encourage the regular sponsors on debian-mentors to upload this. > The reason is that I want use GPL-3+ for my work. But for your intention > I set the patch to the license of the source file(s). I thinks that's a > good way, especially by sources with more then one licenses. Fair enough. > I have move the build part to override_dh_auto_build. > I want to copy the doxygen generated docu in a subdir (docs). With > d/*.docs are all files in doc directory. A second parameter link in > d/*.install are not supported. I see. > Is a override necessary? Until now I only know the only errors and > warnings are to be overwritten. lintian overrides are only for scenarios where lintian is incorrect, not for actual issues that you don't intend to fix. They are also not for experimental, pedantic or info level issues. So all of these issues should either be ignored or fixed but not overridden. > This duplicate files comes from doxygen. If you would like to fix this, please checkout this tip: https://wiki.debian.org/dedup.debian.net#Tips_for_reducing_duplication_in_packages For debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature there isn't much you can do because upstream isn't releasing tarballs and Debian's infrastructure for dealing with such upstreams isn't up to scratch yet (help welcome). However you could ask upstream to OpenPGP-sign their git tags and commits. Please point them at the following links too. http://mikegerwitz.com/papers/git-horror-story https://help.riseup.net/en/security/message-security/openpgp/best-practices http://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html https://wiki.debian.org/Subkeys > I have written a a patch to comment out this vars You might want to adopt the upstream patch for this: https://github.com/uditha-atukorala/psocksxx/commit/8c94cd9e7fe22ee6411bc9ed07419f4236577ea8.patch > > $ cppcheck --enable=all -j8 --quiet -f . ... > No changes Please do forward the warnings upstream. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#763819: hdf4 not ready for sponsering
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Johan, > > I'd like to sponsor this package as requested on SoB Wiki page but there > are several lintian issues (including errors) which would cause an > auto-reject: Thanks for taking time to review and sorry for your time. I'll try to find out what went wrong because I'm pretty sure that at least the lintian errors should not be present (they were present before and thought I fixed them in this upload). Just two more questions/comments: > > W: libhdf4-alt-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > W: libhdf4g-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > W: libhdf4-doc: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > > seems to be easy to fix Not really, since this license refers to the debian packaging work. The only reference points to this directory. I will ask the copyright holders to choose a version. Strictly speaking they might even have referred to different versions of the GPL. > > W: libhdf4 source: debian-watch-file-in-native-package > W: libhdf4 source: native-package-with-dash-version > > looks suspicious. There are other not that important things but I'd > call the package in a bad state. Indeed suspicious and strange, I didn't get these. Wonder what went wrong. Probably something while rebasing. Just a final remark: I am planning to make more changes (build only one library version without netcdf) after the freeze (it will require a transition). This can make the d/rules files and patches much easier. I'm now focusing on fixing bugs and ignoring some lintian errors, since it seems more useful to fix them when a "proper" package is built. Anyway, it had 134 lintian warnings before I started working on it, so it is definitely improving :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nqnqOGTmtR=sn73kx85znm3hh8x+nybxiku3bex5f...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#763819: hdf4 not ready for sponsering
Hi Johan, I'd like to sponsor this package as requested on SoB Wiki page but there are several lintian issues (including errors) which would cause an auto-reject: E: libhdf4-doc: doc-base-file-references-missing-file libhdf4-ref:13 /usr/share/doc/libhdf4/html-reference/UG_Top.html E: libhdf4-doc: doc-base-file-references-missing-file libhdf4-user:20 /usr/share/doc/libhdf4/html-userguide/UG_Top.html should be fixed in any case W: libhdf4-alt-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file usr/share/common-licenses/GPL W: libhdf4g-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file usr/share/common-licenses/GPL W: libhdf4-doc: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file usr/share/common-licenses/GPL seems to be easy to fix W: libhdf4-doc: postinst-has-useless-call-to-install-docs W: libhdf4-doc: prerm-has-useless-call-to-install-docs is probably related to the errors above and W: libhdf4 source: debian-watch-file-in-native-package W: libhdf4 source: native-package-with-dash-version looks suspicious. There are other not that important things but I'd call the package in a bad state. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141003203348.gb29...@an3as.eu
Bug#763810: RFS: cruft/0.9.16+nmu1 NMU
Hallo Alexandre, cruft is orphaned (#763888), so you dont do a NMU, as technically there is no maintainer. Instead, do a QA-upload. See https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-qa-upload Of course, it would be even better if would consider adopting the package... As a QA upload allows you to fix litteraly everything, it would be great if you could reduce the bug count a little bit :) (So, yes, I'm willing to sponsor you if you bring the package into shape :-) (Antonjy: You are listed as uploader... I assume that this is obsolete as your last upload for this package was 1998. please confirm) -- tobi On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 07:02 +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > Dear Maintainer, Uploaded, User > > I am looking for a sponsor for my updated "cruft" package. > > This includes fixes for all the changes that happened in Debian since 2011, > like devtmpfs, systemd, grub2, cupsys -> cups ... > > * Package name: cruft > Version : 0.9.16+nmu1 > * URL : https://github.com/a-detiste/cruft > * License : no change > Section : admin > > Here is a colordiff: > https://github.com/porridge/cruft/pull/3/files > > It builds those binary packages: > cruft - program that finds any cruft built up on your system > > > My plan was not to touch the "cruft" engine at all, only update the ruleset, > but the current source won't even build without removing non existent > directories > "filters-frbn filters-miss" from DATADIRS in Makefile.in . > > If this update succeds, I'll then have a look a the build & packaging too; > using Lintian output as a starting point. > > > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/cruft > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cruft/cruft_0.9.16+nmu1.dsc > > Alexandre Detiste > > -- > > By the way, reportbug is itself broken at the moment (758619), > so I didn't manage to CC you to the original RFS bug repport; > you'll have to subscribe yourself manually to this bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1412366901.3620.17.ca...@edoras.loewenhoehle.ip
upstream changes release zip
hi, upstream Freeplane wants to replace the release zips/.tar.gzs because they contain a freeplane-1.3.12_pre06/ instead of a freeplane-1.3.12/ directory. The software will be re-compiled (md5 changes), but There will be absolutely no source code change. I already packaged freeplane 1.3.12; I guess I don't need to change the package because the upstream branch in git won't change? Thanks and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/878ukxf5e1@bitburger.home.felix
Bug#763819: marked as done (RFS: spatialite-gui/1.7.1-5 [RC])
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:25:08 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: spatialite-gui/1.7.1-5 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #763819, regarding RFS: spatialite-gui/1.7.1-5 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 763819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763819 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spatialite-gui" * Package name: spatialite-gui Version : 1.7.1-5 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri * URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/spatialite_gui/index * License : GPL-3+ Section : utils It builds these binary packages: spatialite-gui - user-friendly graphical user interface for SpatiaLite spatialite-gui-dbg - user-friendly graphical user interface for spatialite - debugging To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/spatialite-gui Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spatialite-gui/spatialite-gui_1.7.1-5.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/spatialite_gui/home. Changes since the last upload: [ Ross Gammon ] * Team upload. * Add patch to fix crash when loading shapefiles. Thanks to Alessandro Furieri (Closes: #761629) * Add .gitignore file to ignore quilt files [ Bas Couwenberg ] * Reorder and refrash patches. Regards, Ross Gammon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package spatialite-gui version 1.7.1-5 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/spatialite-gui--- End Message ---
Bug#762536: marked as done (RFS: psensor/1.1.3-1)
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:25:12 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: psensor/1.1.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #762536, regarding RFS: psensor/1.1.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 762536: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762536 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "psensor" * Package name: psensor Version : 1.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Orsini * URL : http://wpitchoune.net/psensor * License : GPL-2.0 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: psensor- display graphs for monitoring hardware temperature psensor-common - common files for Psensor and Psensor server psensor-server - Psensor server for monitoring hardware sensors remotely To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/psensor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psensor/psensor_1.1.2-1.dsc More information about psensor can be obtained from http://wpitchoune.net/psensor. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * debian/control + added dep to libxnvctrl-dev or nvidia-settings to enable nvidia support and ease ubuntu sync. + removed build dep to gconf which is no more needed. + added build dep to libudisks2-dev. + removed hddtemp from "Recommends" field (psensor is using udisks2 by default now but not psensor-server). * debian/psensor.install + removed gconf schema. * debian/copyright + added copyright information about checkpatch.pl. * debian/watch + added location of the release signature. * added debian/upstream/signing-key.asc Regards, Jean-Philippe Orsini signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package psensor version 1.1.3-1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/psensor--- End Message ---
Bug#745721: marked as done (RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.99.20140929-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:55:54 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1) has caused the Debian Bug report #745721, regarding RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.99.20140929-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 745721: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745721 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hi All, I am looking for a sponsor for libzhuyin: * Package name: libzhuyin Version : 0.9.93 Upstream Author : Peng Wu * URL : https://github.com/libzhuyin/libzhuyin * License : GPL2 Programming Lang: C++ Description : Zhuyin input method library It builds the following packages: - libzhuyin4 - libzhuyin4-data - libzhuyin4-dev - libzhuyin4-dbg To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzhuyin/libzhuyin_0.9.93-1.dsc Please help to review if there is any problem in this package, and help to upload if everything is okay. Also, please help to give me DM permission so that I can help to maintain this package, thanks. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-03 11:31 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) : > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 09:38:15AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: >> New situation: we already have a new Lintian (since yesterday). >> Please, update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. > > Just update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Looks like nothing need to > change for 3.9.5 ~ 3.9.6. The package is in mentor [0], please help to > review and sponsor, thanks. > > [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin > -- > ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) > http://czchen.info/ > Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D--- End Message ---
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-03 11:31 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) : > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 09:38:15AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: >> New situation: we already have a new Lintian (since yesterday). >> Please, update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. > > Just update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Looks like nothing need to > change for 3.9.5 ~ 3.9.6. The package is in mentor [0], please help to > review and sponsor, thanks. > > [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin > -- > ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) > http://czchen.info/ > Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfta7-6mh4crtqekqsmpmbqdmi2_kvfsvbnhj5xv5d...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 09:38:15AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: > New situation: we already have a new Lintian (since yesterday). > Please, update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Just update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Looks like nothing need to change for 3.9.5 ~ 3.9.6. The package is in mentor [0], please help to review and sponsor, thanks. [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
New situation: we already have a new Lintian (since yesterday). Please, update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-03 9:36 GMT-03:00 Eriberto : > 2014-10-03 9:28 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) : >>> >>> Why you did a lintian override to amd64 only? >> >> The path contains multiarch tuple, so it only works on amd64. I tried to >> build i386 package via pbuilder, and there is no "tEH" in library. So I >> think it only happens in amd64. > > > My last question: do you thought in other archs? Do you want keep > [amd64]? (I will accept yes) > > Cheers, > > Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcqrvjbvuejmko3gq3vpy87urqvyfu9h1v8zhuxpqs...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
2014-10-03 9:28 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) : >> >> Why you did a lintian override to amd64 only? > > The path contains multiarch tuple, so it only works on amd64. I tried to > build i386 package via pbuilder, and there is no "tEH" in library. So I > think it only happens in amd64. My last question: do you thought in other archs? Do you want keep [amd64]? (I will accept yes) Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfyk13qqznhvn4fag2cu+hjtzp_csnnh2cjjp8ggz9...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:20:17PM -0300, Eriberto wrote: > Do you removed V=1 from d/rules? Why? > > Please, review my last mail saying about blhc and test the command to > you understand the issue. Try to learn, not execute a command only. Sorry about that, I just used to use DH_VERBOSE=1 to disable silent rules for autotools. As I know, the problem is due to autotools silent rules. To disable it, we can pass "--disable-silent-rules" during configure or set V=1. Since V=1 is less verbose and shorter then DH_VERBOSE=1, I change to use V=1 now. As for blhc, I use it with the following command. blhc --all libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140929-1_amd64.build > > Why you did a lintian override to amd64 only? The path contains multiarch tuple, so it only works on amd64. I tried to build i386 package via pbuilder, and there is no "tEH" in library. So I think it only happens in amd64. If anyone know how to use wildcard in lintian-overrides, I can update this override. As usual, the package is in mentor [0], please help to review and sponsor, thanks. The change is using "V=1" instead of "DH_VERBOSE=1" to disable silent rules. [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#763540: Review of psocksxx/0.0.5-1
Hello Paul,
Hello Harlan,
thanks for the review.
Am Mittwoch, den 01.10.2014, 12:50 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
>
[...]
> Some more minor issues that you might want to fix at some point:
>
> The build process doesn't include -Wall in the build flags for gcc.
changed in d/rules.
>
> libpsocksxx0 is missing a Pre-Depends on multiarch-support as it
> doesn't use ${misc:Pre-Depends}.
added
> You might want to build-dep on libcppunit-dev so that the build-time
> test suite is enabled.
added
>
> The git repository mentioned in Vcs-* does not exist.
My opinion was to prevent a repository with a not publish packet and to
save space. So i would create the repository shortly before upload into
the new queue. But I have done it now.
>
> Is there any particular reason you chose GPL-3+ for the Debian
> packaging instead of using the same as the upstream code (LGPL-3+)? If
> you ever develop patches that would mean the resulting binary packages
> are GPL-3+ not LGPL-3+ as upstream had intended and there is a very
> very slight chance this could cause license incompatibility issues as
> a result.
The reason is that I want use GPL-3+ for my work. But for your intention
I set the patch to the license of the source file(s). I thinks that's a
good way, especially by sources with more then one licenses.
>
> compression = xz is the default for format 3.0 source packages, no
> need for it in debian/source/options. compression-level = 9 has no
> advantage (exact same size for the debian.tar.xz) over the default
> compression level for this tiny package so I wouldn't bother with it,
> removing this file might even reduce the size of the debian.tar.xz.
Removed
>
> override_dh_installdocs should be removed, the make part should be in
> override_dh_auto_build and the cp part in libpsocksxx-doc.docs.
I have move the build part to override_dh_auto_build.
I want to copy the doxygen generated docu in a subdir (docs). With
d/*.docs are all files in doc directory. A second parameter link in
d/*.install are not supported.
>
> You can pass arguments to dpkg-gensymbols like this: dh_makeshlibs --
> -plibpsocksxx0
I have removed the complete override
>
> You should move the contents of README.Debian into a comment in
> libpsocksxx-doc.lintian-overrides since it isn't useful to users of
> the binary package looking for documentation.
ok. Done
>
> I would suggest not installing the static library (remove *.a from
> debian/*.install) unless someone files a bug asking for it.
Removed
>
> README.md is not needed in the libpsocksxx0 library package since that
> will only be installed as a dep of other things.
Removed
>
> The suggests from libpsocksxx0 to libpsocksxx-doc is not needed since
> that will only be installed as a dep of other things, please move that
> to libpsocksxx-dev since developers will install the -dev package and
> might also want the -doc package.
Ok. Done
>
> The upstream test suite is hardcoding paths to test sockets in to
> /tmp, it should create those sockets in the test/build directory
> instead
Under work
> .
>
> Automated checks:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian#Check_points_for_any_package
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
>
> $ lintian
> P: psocksxx source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/all_f.js
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/functions_d.js
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/all_5.js
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/functions_3.js
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/all_2.js
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/functions_1.js
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/all_3.js
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/functions_2.js
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2doc.png
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2link.png
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/all_b.js
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/functions_9.js
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2blank.png
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2lastnode.png
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2node.png
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2vertline.png
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2plastnode.png
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2pnode.png
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2mlastnode.png
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/ftv2mnode.png
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/all_0.js
> usr/share/doc/libpsocksxx-doc/docs/search/variables_0.js
> X: libpsocksxx-doc: duplicate-files
> usr/sha
Bug#763853: RFS: python-trezor/0.5.3-1 ITP#763376 Python library for communicating with TREZOR Bitcoin Hardware wallet
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trezor" Package name: python-trezor Version : 0.5.3-1 Upstream Author : Pavol Rusnak URL : https://github.com/trezor/python-trezor License : public domain Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-trezor - Python library for communicating with TREZOR Bitcoin Hardware wallet To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/trezor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/trezor/trezor_0.5.3-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.bitcointrezor.com/. It would be best if you could also review the two packages it depends on in the same go: * http://mentors.debian.net/package/hidapi * http://mentors.debian.net/package/mnemonic I have some questions: * The name for the binary package is clear to me: python-trezor, but I'm not so certain about the correct name for the source package. It's called python-trezor on github, but only trezor on pypi, where the release tarball is from. * Is there a better way to install the udev rule? * There is a binary deb package from https://mytrezor.com that installs the same udev rule. Should I choose another name to avoid conflicts? Regards, Richard Ulrich signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#762015: Subject: RFS: s3fs-fuse/1.78-1 [ITP #601789] -- FUSE-based file system backed by Amazon S3
* Andrii Senkovych , 2014-10-02, 22:44: Is it ok to look for a sponsor in some user lists? It seems readers of debian-cloud@lists.d.o may be interested in the package. I think asking at debian-cloud@ is indeed your best bet. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141003081334.ga5...@jwilk.net
