Bug#771361: RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1
On 29/11/2014 00:18, gregor herrmann wrote: On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:02 +, Tony Houghton wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm. I have also posted an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two bugs? Please add the requested information (i.e. a debdiff of the .dsc files) to #771358. It would make sense to have a yay/nay from the release team before uploading the new version to unstable. I've been asked to go ahead in #771358 so I'd be grateful for someone to proceed with the sponsorship. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547b1b28.7070...@realh.co.uk
Self-maintained Debian packages best practice
Hi, I'm currently hosting my self-maintained Debian packages on GitHub. Here is my dilemma: - It is commonly recommended not to put the `debian` folder within the source tree so as to make it easier for other distros. - So I did. I did not put my `debian` folder within the source tree on my GitHub. - However when building the Debian packages, the build mechanize anticipate a `debian` folder under the source tree. - This means my GitHub repo is not directly usable for my build. This is nuisance because as a self Debian maintainer, my only focus is Debian, and I'm building my Debian package all the time, not for other distros. - I've dealt with it and actually have a solution for myself, but when I tagged a release on GitHub, the release .tar.gz file will reflect my above folder structure, which means the release .tar.gz file from GitHub is not a good candidate for upstream source. I'm OK with it, but worry it might confuse others. Is there any easy way to manage it? E.g.., can I tell GitHub only treat a sub-folder for my release .tar.gz file? Or anything? The last thing I want to do is to separate my current arrangement into two, because when I change things, the changes will equally spread between the source and `debian` folder. Separate them into two will lost such internal connection/logic, E.g., https://github.com/suntong001/dbab/commit/ ebfb08674cb4446d05bca5a36d28d76c89c6f9b9 Any suggestions? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/m5f896$hfd$1...@ger.gmane.org
Bug#771361: marked as done (RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1)
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:47:08 +0100 with message-id 20141130144708.gy7...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at and subject line Re: Bug#771361: RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #771361, regarding RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 771361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771361 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm. I have also posted an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two bugs? * Package name: roxterm * Version : 2.9.5-1 * Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2+, LGPL-3+ * Section : x11 It builds these binary packages: roxterm - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - virtual package for GTK3 roxterm-common - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - common files roxterm-gtk2 - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - GTK2 version roxterm-gtk2-dbg - Debugging symbols for GTK2 version of roxterm roxterm-gtk3 - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - GTK3 version roxterm-gtk3-dbg - Debugging symbols for GTK3 version of roxterm To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/roxterm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_2.9.5-1.dsc More information about roxterm can be obtained from http://roxterm.sourceforge.net Changes since the last upload: roxterm (2.9.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Recognise _NET_WM_DESKTOP special value 0x correctly. * Don't crash if EDITOR env variable is unset when editing shortcuts (Closes: #771022). -- Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:20:06 + Regards, Tony Houghton ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:27:04 +, Tony Houghton wrote: On 29/11/2014 00:18, gregor herrmann wrote: On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:02 +, Tony Houghton wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm. I have also posted an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two bugs? Please add the requested information (i.e. a debdiff of the .dsc files) to #771358. It would make sense to have a yay/nay from the release team before uploading the new version to unstable. I've been asked to go ahead in #771358 so I'd be grateful for someone to proceed with the sponsorship. Excellent! 2.9.5-1 built uploaded; thanks for your work. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Eric Clapton: Signe signature.asc Description: Digital Signature ---End Message---
Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice
❦ 30 novembre 2014 14:06 GMT, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com : I'm currently hosting my self-maintained Debian packages on GitHub. Here is my dilemma: - It is commonly recommended not to put the `debian` folder within the source tree so as to make it easier for other distros. In the past, having a `debian/` directory upstream was a pain because we didn't have a proper way to remove a file if needed. Nowadays, it is perfectly fine if you use a 3.0 format. -- printk(KERN_WARNING Warning: defective CD-ROM (volume sequence number). Enabling \cruft\ mount option.\n); 2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/isofs/inode.c signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice
Hello Forum, On 30/11/14 16:30, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 30 novembre 2014 14:06 GMT, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com : I'm currently hosting my self-maintained Debian packages on GitHub. Here is my dilemma: - It is commonly recommended not to put the `debian` folder within the source tree so as to make it easier for other distros. In the past, having a `debian/` directory upstream was a pain because we didn't have a proper way to remove a file if needed. Nowadays, it is perfectly fine if you use a 3.0 format. Fine in which way ? Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547b4644.9010...@rezozer.net
Bug#771372: marked as done (RFS: libchemps2/1.4-1 [ITP] -- spin-adapted DMRG for ab initio quantum chemistry)
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:26:54 + with message-id e1xv7ko-0003je...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: libchemps2/1.4-1 [ITP] -- spin-adapted DMRG for ab initio quantum chemistry has caused the Debian Bug report #771372, regarding RFS: libchemps2/1.4-1 [ITP] -- spin-adapted DMRG for ab initio quantum chemistry to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 771372: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771372 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libchemps2 * Package name: libchemps2 Version : 1.4-1 Upstream Author : Sebastian Wouters sebastianwout...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/SebWouters/CheMPS2 * License : GPLv2 Section : libs It builds the binary packages: libchemps2-1 - spin-adapted DMRG for ab initio quantum chemistry libchemps2-dev - C++ headers, static library, and symlink for libchemps2-1 and would thereby close the following bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771112 libchemps2 will be needed for psi4 (http://www.psicode.org/) horton (http://theochem.github.io/horton/) pyscf (https://github.com/sunqm/pyscf) psi4 is, and horton will be, packaged for debian. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libchemps2 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libchemps2/libchemps2_1.4-1.dsc More information about libchemps2 can be obtained from: https://github.com/SebWouters/CheMPS2 http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2415 http://sebwouters.github.io/CheMPS2/index.html Best regards, Sebastian Wouters ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package libchemps2 has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#742309: marked as done (RFS: libvarnam/3.1.4-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:26:54 + with message-id e1xv7ko-0003ji...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: libvarnam/3.1.4-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #742309, regarding RFS: libvarnam/3.1.4-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 742309: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742309 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libvarnam * Package name: libvarnam Version : 3.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Navaneeth K N navaneet...@gmail.com * URL : http://varnamproject.com * License : MIT Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libvarnam - Varnam 3 shared library libvarnam-dev - Varnam 3 development files varnamc- Commandline interface to libvarnam To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libvarnam Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libv/libvarnam/libvarnam_3.1.3-1.dsc More information about libvarnam can be obtained from http://www.varnamproject.com. Changes since the last upload: libvarnam (3.1.3-1) stable; urgency=low * varnam_init_from_lang will make the suggestions directory * Fixed varnam_init_from_lang() to set errors correctly * Adding MultiArch directories to varnamc search path * Added uninstall target * MultiArch support to the build system * Added manpages for varnamc Regards, Navaneeth K N -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers saucy-updates APT policy: (500, 'saucy-updates'), (500, 'saucy-security'), (500, 'saucy'), (100, 'saucy-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11.0-18-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package libvarnam has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 05:31:00PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: On 30/11/14 16:30, Vincent Bernat wrote: In the past, having a `debian/` directory upstream was a pain because we didn't have a proper way to remove a file if needed. Nowadays, it is perfectly fine if you use a 3.0 format. Fine in which way ? It's fine because, for a 3.0 quilt package, dpkg-source -x unpacks the .orig.tar.gz, removes all the debian/* files coming from upstream tarball, if any, and then unpacks the *.debian.tar.xz file. Previously, the end result was an ugly .diff.gz containing the difference between upstream debian/* files and the new debian/* files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141130171206.GA2784@nuc
Bug#770875: Sponsorship for saga package
Hi Johan, I checked your package and I am willing to sponsor its upload. I noticed that you are not accepting parallel building. Is this done on purpose? Just for testing it, I added --parallel the the first dh command in debian/rules and build time went from 18 to about 7 minutes when running dpkg-buildpackage with -j8 option on amd64 arch. I would not change your package now, but I suggest you to investigate if with a parallel build the resulting package is ok or if anything is wrong. In a next version you might then add this option. Would you like me to upload your package, or have you already another sponsor or a different planning? Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1417370141.14099.5.ca...@debian.org
Bug#770875: Sponsorship for saga package
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Giuseppe Sacco eppes...@debian.org wrote: Hi Johan, I checked your package and I am willing to sponsor its upload. I noticed that you are not accepting parallel building. Is this done on purpose? Just for testing it, I added --parallel the the first dh command in debian/rules and build time went from 18 to about 7 minutes when running dpkg-buildpackage with -j8 option on amd64 arch. I would not change your package now, but I suggest you to investigate if with a parallel build the resulting package is ok or if anything is wrong. In a next version you might then add this option. I was not aware of the option. I will definitely investigate this. Would you like me to upload your package, or have you already another sponsor or a different planning? Go ahead and sponsor! Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35njp-96sa2nun9sdieysof1ypmoo4r8vf582r1trgg...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:12:06 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: In the past, having a `debian/` directory upstream was a pain because we didn't have a proper way to remove a file if needed. Nowadays, it is perfectly fine if you use a 3.0 format. Fine in which way ? It's fine because, for a 3.0 quilt package, dpkg-source -x unpacks the .orig.tar.gz, removes all the debian/* files coming from upstream tarball, if any, and then unpacks the *.debian.tar.xz file. Ok, good to know, but that's more targeting towards package building, not source code developing and maintaining. Does it imply that I should put the `debian` folder within my source tree now? Because as mentioned before, the last thing I want to do is to separate my source and my `debian` folder into two git repos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/m5fusq$hfd$2...@ger.gmane.org
Bug#769810: Bug#669841: phamm: transition towards Apache 2.4
tags 769810 pending thanks Hi, I uploaded the NMU made by Jean-Michel with 2-delay days. Regards, Eriberto 2014-11-18 20:58 GMT-02:00 Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère jmv_...@nirgal.com: Today, at 15:24, Alessandro De Zorzi wrote: Hi All, at this time I do not have enough time for Phamm's packaging. If someone want to propose a NMU, will be much appreciated. Upstream (me) released new Phamm the version0.6.3 this month (2014-11-12). I do propose a NMU, but I need a DD to sponsor it: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/phamm/phamm_0.6.2-1.1.dsc Your package will be removed from testing on December 3rd if no authorized person moves. -- Nirgal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjez1owhn0fcn_x7rowadmh0vo8yehecotc1acto9uv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:32 AM, T o n g wrote: Ok, good to know, but that's more targeting towards package building, not source code developing and maintaining. Does it imply that I should put the `debian` folder within my source tree now? Because as mentioned before, the last thing I want to do is to separate my source and my `debian` folder into two git repos. Personally I prefer to separate packaging from upstream development because they are two different things. When I use a VCS for packaging it contains only the debian/ directory. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6G9B5Zd3=AJ4UOEcP3ZvRHEL2e1ZXXUi4tCA=dzxz7...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice
T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com writes: Ok, good to know, but that's more targeting towards package building, not source code developing and maintaining. Does it imply that I should put the `debian` folder within my source tree now? Because as mentioned before, the last thing I want to do is to separate my source and my `debian` folder into two git repos. http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/debian/git.html#combine may (or may not) be helpful. This is a little out of date with current tools, unforunately. The major change is use of --upstream-vcs-tag in git-import-orig. Some people do find this approach too complicated. I guess I'm just used to it, but it works for me. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87mw78t7dr@hope.eyrie.org
Bug#771637: RFS: dbab/1.1.1-1 [ITP] - dnsmasq-based ad-blocking
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, Ever want to remove Ads and speed up your (iphone/ipad) mobile device browsing without installing any apps to them? Sounds too good to be true? Yes, but unless you install to your server my `dbab`. It will make the magic happen. Please sponsor my wonderful dnsmasq-based ad-blocking package, so that more people can benefit from it. More details at http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/use-new-dbab-to-set-proxy-automatically/#advantages Once again, I am looking for a sponsor for my newly upgraded package dbab * Package name: dbab Version : 1.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : https://github.com/suntong001/dbab * License : BSD Section : net It builds those binary packages: dbab - dnsmasq-based ad-blocking using pixelserv To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dbab Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbab/dbab_1.1.1-1.dsc More information about dbab can be obtained from http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/use-new-dbab-to-set-proxy-automatically/#advantages. Thanks for your help. Best Regards, Tong Sun -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAMmz1Odvc2H4bxg0DOWwe077i2K+vFZcwA4Zx_C1+HYgjLoo=q...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Arasan
Hi Peter, is there any progress on that? Should I try to rebase my work on the current git version of arasan? And did you decide on the format of the git repo (upstream git inclusion etc)? Thanks to bringing this forward Norbert On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Peter, On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Peter Pentchev wrote: Ahhh, I just filed ITP #771057 a couple of hours ago after Michel Ah, good idea, sorry that I didn't see that. [snip some interesting issues that I would have probably run into once I started actually packaging it...] I think it is only a trivial thing, compilation works, but the final linking with libz somehow does not find a few references. SO either libz in the package is much older and some names change, or something else shabby is happening. Would you mind using a pkg-games repo for this? I think we might even want to base our work on a clone of the upstream repo at https://github.com/jdart1/arasan-chess I could set up a pkg-games repo if you're okay with going this way... Sure, all fine with me, just let me know what I should do. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141126230338.gs17...@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141201040632.gf17...@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at
Bug#771288: RFS: sleepenh/1.4-1
Dear Tobi, some remarks: - Please add a homepage field to d/control and d/copyright pointing to https://gitorious.org/sleepenh/sleepenh, to be consistent with d/watch. as your're declaring yourself upstream; I guess thats was your intention when pointing d/watch to gitorious. done. - as you do not have any patches left, remove d/patches entirely. done. Longer-term: Please (as you're upstream) please consider adding an upstream changelog. Yes, I will do. Thanks again for your review and helpful hints! Kind regards, Nicolas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#770875: marked as done (RFS: saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1)
Your message dated Mon, 01 Dec 2014 04:27:17 + with message-id e1xvizx-uw...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #770875, regarding RFS: saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 770875: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770875 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package saga * Package name: saga Version : 2.1.4+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Olaf Conrad, Volker Wichmann, other contributors * URL : http://www.saga-gis.org * License : LPGLv2.1+ GPLv2 Section : science It builds those binary packages: libsaga- SAGA GIS shared libraries libsaga-dev - SAGA GIS development files python-saga - SAGA GIS Python bindings saga - System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/saga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.1.4+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Update to new upstream version * Fix order in copyright file Regards, Johan Van de Wauw ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package saga version 2.1.4+dfsg-1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/saga---End Message---
Bug#771288: marked as done (RFS: sleepenh/1.4-1)
Your message dated Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:21:14 +0100 with message-id 1417414874.25814.0.ca...@frost.de and subject line Re: Bug#771288: RFS: sleepenh/1.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #771288, regarding RFS: sleepenh/1.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 771288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771288 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sleepenh * Package name: sleepenh Version : 1.4-1 Upstream Author : Nicolas Schier nico...@hjem.rpa.no * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: sleepenh - Sleep until a given date with subsecond resolution To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sleepenh Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sleepenh/sleepenh_1.4-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release: + Makefile: update and allow compile flag changes via command line. + Command line options for help and version. + Add time warp option. * Purge obsolete patch makefile--use-debian-compiler-flags. * Add debian/watch file. * Update copyright file. * Remove obsolete buildflags lines from debian/rules. Kind regards, Nicolas signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- uploaded! Many thanks! -- tobi---End Message---
