Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi James, On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:52 AM, James Lu glol...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, Okay. Forget what I said about quilt, I don't think it'd fix this particular issue either. Right now, the problem is in the original source (aka the .orig.tar). The INSTALL file isn't even installed in the final binary, but just having a symlink in the original source is enough to make Lintian complain. Adding a debian/clean file only removes the INSTALL file from the extracted tree, but not the .orig.tar.gz. I could add a Lintian override if this is appropriate. Just from what you've said above, I'd ignore the lintian error entirely; if INSTALL is never used during the build process or installed into any of the binary packages produced by your source package, then source-contains-unsafe-symlink is quite harmless. It _is_ a valid lintian error though, since the orig tarball upstream presumably contains an INSTALL file symlinked above the root of the source package, and removing it via debian/clean doesn't change that. Where did you obtain this orig tarball? I can't seem to find a tarball versioned as 1.0.3+14.04.20140109 at [1]; if you actually are rolling your own tarball instead of using one provided upstream, then why not get rid of that symlink in your tarball? Also, this may seem to be a formality, but is this package actually orphaned? Neither the maintainer nor the MIA team filed #717044; a random user deciding to ITA the package out of the blue is more or less hijacking the package. Please follow the steps outlined in devref 5.9.4/5.9.5 [2] to properly orphan a package and adopt it. Regards, Vincent [1] https://launchpad.net/unico [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#orphaning -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caczd_tdft4pt0+owugxpvfadhcgz8pmyomalfo3orsh1svd...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#784749: marked as done (RFS: gamera/3.4.2-1 -- document analysis framework)
Your message dated Tue, 12 May 2015 00:29:50 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tBiY-s6ApHthcGLdtiG-M1ofbv+9esvhyB1Ko=gtz5...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#784749: RFS: gamera/3.4.2-1 -- document analysis framework has caused the Debian Bug report #784749, regarding RFS: gamera/3.4.2-1 -- document analysis framework to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 784749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784749 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I'm searching for a sponsor/uploader for a new package of Gamera. The changelog is: cut gamera (3.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. * Added constant-seed-for-docs.diff to make build reproducible by using constant seed for generation of example/documentation images (Closes: #775228). * Added docs-no-modified-timestamp.diff (Closes: #784680). * deb/control: + added dh-python to build-deps. + updated Vcs fields (moved to git). * deb/copyright: updated. * deb/patches: + fix-typos.diff: corrected path error. + dropped avoid_mktemp.diff, gendoc-version-parsing.diff, suppress- wxdebug-assertion-messages.diff, wxpython3.0-transition.diff (applied upstream). + added gendoc-no-sflogo.diff (dropped sflogo removal from deb/rules). * Added deb/gbp.conf. -- Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com Fri, 08 May 2015 14:16:58 +0200 /cut In the main it's the new upstream release (which incorporated several patches towards the wxpython 3.0 transition) plus two new patches for reproducible building. Buildlog: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/gamera_3.4.2-1_amd64-20150508-1418.build The repo has moved to Git: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/gamera.git git://anonscm.debian.org/python-modules/packages/gamera.git Mentors upload: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gamera/gamera_3.4.2-1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/package/gamera I'm DM, thus alternatively/additionally upload rights could be granted. Thanks for consideration, DS -- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Daniel, On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I'm searching for a sponsor/uploader for a new package of Gamera. Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian! Regards, Vincent---End Message---
Bug#773810: marked as done (RFS: averell/1.0a-1 (ITP: 773793))
Your message dated Tue, 12 May 2015 16:27:33 + with message-id e1ysd1p-0006io...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: averell/1.0a-1 (ITP: 773793) has caused the Debian Bug report #773810, regarding RFS: averell/1.0a-1 (ITP: 773793) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 773810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773810 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package averell * Package name: averell Version : 1.0a-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : httpd It builds those binary packages: averell- An incredibly stupid web server To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/averell Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/averell/averell_1.0a-1.dsc More information about averell can be obtained from http://github.com/jeanparpaillon/averell . Regards, Jean Parpaillon ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package averell has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#777068: RFS: libtoxcore/0+git20150203-1
You have Vcs-* fields commented out in d/control. Uncomment them (creating the repos if they don't exist) or remove them. Is License: GPL-3 in d/copyright a typo? Looks like it should be GPL-3+. Why are build-time tests disabled? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#775532: RFS: citeproc-py/0.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Python library for CSL based bibliography processing
I'm afraid the license for citeproc/data/schema/ is not DFSG-free: Permission to freely use, copy and distribute. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#783200: marked as done (RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.5.0-1 [ITP] Fuzzy string matching in Python)
Your message dated Tue, 12 May 2015 21:27:16 +0500 with message-id 20150512162716.ge2...@belkar.wrar.name and subject line Re: Bug#783200: RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.5.0-1 [ITP] Fuzzy string matching in Python has caused the Debian Bug report #783200, regarding RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.5.0-1 [ITP] Fuzzy string matching in Python to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 783200: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783200 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fuzzywuzzy * Package name: fuzzywuzzy Version : 0.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Adam Cohen a...@seatgeek.com * URL : https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-fuzzywuzzy - Fuzzy string matching in Python python3-fuzzywuzzy - Fuzzy string matching in Python (Python 3 version) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fuzzywuzzy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fuzzywuzzy/fuzzywuzzy_0.5.0-1.dsc Regards, -- Edward. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:03:45PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: Thanks. I added the missing Build-Depends, the package now builds with sbuild. Uploaded and tagged, thanks. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#781952: RFS:complexity/1.2-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the complexity of C program functions
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:51:48PM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: To access futher information about this package, please visit following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/complexity Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/complexity/complexity_1.2-1.dsc The package doesn't exist on mentors. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#784732: RFS: liquidprompt/1.9-1 [ITP]
[I don't intend to sponsor this] You should put the Debian repo, not the upstream one into Vcs-* control fields. Recommending both screen and tmux looks strange. Recommending acpi which is useful only for laptops looks strange too. Suggesting zsh looks wrong. d/copyright misses a section for debian/* AGPL-3 should probably be AGPL-3+. I don't like the idea of multiple invocations of the liquidprompt_activate command may pollute ~/.bashrc and/or ~/.zshrc files even if it's mentioned in the manpage. I think a manpage in the section 1 is expected to correspond to an executable with the same name which is not the case here. Maybe I am wrong here. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: self-serve photo booth software
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 05:20:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: i18n would definitely be a good idea, I'd suggest using gettext. I slogged through the gettext support, noticing too late that QT comes with its own i18n library. If my ad-hoc gettext integration eventually rabbitholes, I might try that instead: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:How_To_Build_Qt4_Software#Translations None of the files appear to have copyright/license information: http://lu.is/blog/2012/03/17/on-the-importance-of-per-file-license-information/ I think it's unlikely that any file would be taken out of this project in isolation, so I'll assume the top-level LICENSE is obvious enough for now. $ cppcheck -j1 --quiet -f . | grep -vF 'cppcheck: error: could not find or open any of the paths given.' [sound.hpp:40]: (error) Mismatching allocation and deallocation: buf That was a real memory leak, fantastic! I think I worked through all your other points, looking forward to the next iteration. Thanks, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150512090622.ga31...@ludd.net
