Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]
Hello Gabriele Giacone wrote: > haxe (1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Adopt as Debian Flash Team. > + Set maintainer to Debian Flash team, add myself to uploaders. > * Set Vcs-* fields to updated collab-maint git repo. > * Replace jquery-latest.min.js and swfobject.js with symlinks to system > ones. > + Remove sourceless files from upstream tarball (Closes: #736596). > + Add libjs-jquery and libjs-swfobject runtime dependencies. > * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes). You added a +dfsg suffix. Good. However, lintian is complaining about the +dfsg : debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version. You should update the watch file to match your change. Please also look at repacksuffix in uscan(1). When removing some non-free files, you should provide a get-orig-source target in your rules file. The easiest way to remove files is to use a DEP5 formated copyright file and to have a line Files-Excluded:. See uscan(1). Everything else is ok to me. It's nice that package finally fond an adoption team. :) -- Nirgal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/555f0438.6050...@debian.org
Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:26:00AM +, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > Hello Hi, thanks for reviewing. > Gabriele Giacone wrote: > > haxe (1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > * Adopt as Debian Flash Team. > > + Set maintainer to Debian Flash team, add myself to uploaders. > > * Set Vcs-* fields to updated collab-maint git repo. > > * Replace jquery-latest.min.js and swfobject.js with symlinks to system > > ones. > > + Remove sourceless files from upstream tarball (Closes: #736596). > > + Add libjs-jquery and libjs-swfobject runtime dependencies. > > * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes). > > You added a +dfsg suffix. Good. > > However, lintian is complaining about the +dfsg : > debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version. Fixed, pushed, re-uploaded. > You should update the watch file to match your change. > Please also look at repacksuffix in uscan(1). > > When removing some non-free files, you should provide a get-orig-source > target in your rules file. The easiest way to remove files is to use a > DEP5 formated copyright file and to have a line Files-Excluded:. See > uscan(1). Yeah I've just did it few days ago for ming, convenient. https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-flash/ming.git/commit/?id=f7531971a4dd6f37520bc3fe66421e9bea8ed396 In this case, I've changed packaging as little as possible: no new upstream release, no format 1.0 copyright, no Files-Excluded. Mainly just to fix RC bug #736596. > Everything else is ok to me. > > It's nice that package finally fond an adoption team. :) Well, unfortunately lately team is just me, also without upload rights. Haxe is not flash specific software but gnash testsuite depends on it. No problem about moving it to collab-maint if preferred. Thanks, -- G..e -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150522111520.GA29662@jessie01
Re: How to create a metapackage
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:25:39PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > i.e. tell apt-get to ignore recommends. > > > > In this case a metapackage using recommends does not seem very useful, > > I guess. > > apt-get --install-recommends --install-suggests install metapackage Ok, "marginally useful" then. If I have to write that to install a metapackage, it would be probably faster to copy the package list in the Recommends line and install the recommended packages directly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150522120918.ga8...@cantor.unex.es
Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]
Hi Gabriele Giacone wrote: >> You added a +dfsg suffix. Good. >> >> However, lintian is complaining about the +dfsg : >> debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version. > > Fixed, pushed, re-uploaded. > >> You should update the watch file to match your change. >> Please also look at repacksuffix in uscan(1). >> >> When removing some non-free files, you should provide a get-orig-source >> target in your rules file. The easiest way to remove files is to use a >> DEP5 formated copyright file and to have a line Files-Excluded:. See >> uscan(1). > > Yeah I've just did it few days ago for ming, convenient. > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-flash/ming.git/commit/?id=f7531971a4dd6f37520bc3fe66421e9bea8ed396 > > In this case, I've changed packaging as little as possible: no new > upstream release, no format 1.0 copyright, no Files-Excluded. > Mainly just to fix RC bug #736596. > (...) Cool, but I think your are missing my point. Because you had to remove two files from the original tar ball, both "d/rules get-orig-source" and uscan now returns an incorrect source tarball, I mean it does contain the files you removed. I'm afraid I'm uncomfortable with that. Option 1/ Switch to dep5 with Files-Excluded:, remove the get-orig-source target. Option 2/ Fix the get-orig-source target to remove the files you don't want from the orig.tar.xz. Right now, it does not do that. There are many example in existing packages: https://codesearch.debian.net/results/repack.sh/page_0 Then, the watch file should contain the extra (2nd and) 3rd parameters to call your repack script. See uscan(1). Option 3/ At the very least, if you absolutely don't want options 1 or 2, it would be nice to document that in a README.source file. See policy 4.14, item 4. I would remove the misleading get-orig-source target then. Or am I missing something? -- Nirgal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/555f298c.9000...@debian.org
Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:05:16PM +, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > Cool, but I think your are missing my point. > > Because you had to remove two files from the original tar ball, both > "d/rules get-orig-source" and uscan now returns an incorrect source > tarball, I mean it does contain the files you removed. I'm afraid I'm > uncomfortable with that. > > Option 1/ > Switch to dep5 with Files-Excluded:, remove the get-orig-source target. > > Option 2/ > Fix the get-orig-source target to remove the files you don't want from > the orig.tar.xz. Right now, it does not do that. > There are many example in existing packages: > https://codesearch.debian.net/results/repack.sh/page_0 > Then, the watch file should contain the extra (2nd and) 3rd parameters > to call your repack script. See uscan(1). > > Option 3/ > At the very least, if you absolutely don't want options 1 or 2, it would > be nice to document that in a README.source file. See policy 4.14, item > 4. I would remove the misleading get-orig-source target then. > > Or am I missing something? Yeah, forgot to make files removal automatic somehow. Switched to dep5. Pushed, reuploaded. -- G..e -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150522145359.GA27927@jessie01
Re: why dpkg-buildpackage doesn't care my build targets in debian/rule
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:31 AM, lumin wrote: > override_dh_auto_build: > # well. let's copy config back again. > cp ./debian/my/Makefile.config.cpuonly ./Makefile.config > debian/my/00-fix-caffe-include-path-debian.sh > $(MAKE) all > $(MAKE) test > $(MAKE) runtest also, that test things should go in a override_dh_auto_test target, not in the build one. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB more about me: http://mapreri.org Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri Ubuntu Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cahkymes4s6pn8b4fhqnlwxdc2ezfe3rek4srajdh+f4ga9e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: why dpkg-buildpackage doesn't care my build targets in debian/rule
+++ Mattia Rizzolo [2015-05-22 17:04 +0200]: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:31 AM, lumin wrote: > > override_dh_auto_build: > > # well. let's copy config back again. > > cp ./debian/my/Makefile.config.cpuonly ./Makefile.config > > debian/my/00-fix-caffe-include-path-debian.sh > > $(MAKE) all > > $(MAKE) test > > $(MAKE) runtest > > also, that test things should go in a override_dh_auto_test target, > not in the build one. Right, so that DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck works, which is often important for cross-building. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150522180834.go24...@halon.org.uk
Re: why dpkg-buildpackage doesn't care my build targets in debian/rule
* Wookey , 2015-05-22, 19:08: override_dh_auto_build: # well. let's copy config back again. cp ./debian/my/Makefile.config.cpuonly ./Makefile.config debian/my/00-fix-caffe-include-path-debian.sh $(MAKE) all $(MAKE) test $(MAKE) runtest also, that test things should go in a override_dh_auto_test target, not in the build one. Right, so that DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck works, which is often important for cross-building. Right. But keep in mind that putting stuff in override_dh_auto_test is not enough to make your d/rules honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck. See bug #568897. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150522182449.ga7...@jwilk.net
Bug#786558: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-2 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Jakub, I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "sequitur-g2p" * Package name: sequitur-g2p Version : 0.0.r1668-2 Upstream Author : Maximilian Bisani * URL : http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/web/Software/g2p.html * License : GPL-2 Section : science It builds those binary packages: sequitur-g2p - Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool You can download the package with git using this command: git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git More information about sequitur-g2p can be obtained from http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/web/Software/g2p.html. Would you like to review and upload it? Regards, Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/555f923f.4060...@gmail.com
Bug#786558: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-2 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool
Hi Giulio! Please use X-Debbugs-Cc instead of plain Cc when submitting bugs: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc * Giulio Paci , 2015-05-22, 22:31: git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git [...] Would you like to review and upload it? I'm sorry, but I don't do Python these days. Please seek another sponsor. Perhaps ask on debian-python@ldo? -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150522215335.ga4...@jwilk.net
Bug#786571: RFS: osm-gps-map/1.0.2-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osm-gps-map" * Package name: osm-gps-map Version : 1.0.2-3 Upstream Author : John Stowers * URL : http://nzjrs.github.io/osm-gps-map/ * License : GPL-2 Section : science It builds these binary packages: gir1.2-osmgpsmap-1.0 - GTK+ library to embed OpenStreetMap maps - Python bindings libosmgpsmap-1.0-0 - GTK+ library to embed OpenStreetMap maps libosmgpsmap-1.0-0-dbg - GTK+ library to embed OpenStreetMap maps - debugging symbols libosmgpsmap-1.0-0-dev - GTK+ library to embed OpenStreetMap maps - development files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/osm-gps-map Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osm-gps-map/osm-gps- map_1.0.2-3.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/nzjrs/osm- gps-map Debian Packaging is available at: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/osm-gps-map.git/ Changes since the last upload: * Start new Debian revision * Fix watch file * Bump standards version, no changes required * Update Vcs URL to use cgit instead of gitweb * Fix duplicate section in d/control * Drop file from d/copyright that is no longer shipped * Reveal hidden compile flags in buildlog * Fix CFLAG append in d/rules so default hardening options are used * Add upstream metadata * Add lintian override for hardening-no-fortify warning Regards, Ross Gammon -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers utopic-updates APT policy: (500, 'utopic-updates'), (500, 'utopic-security'), (500, 'utopic'), (100, 'utopic-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-38-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2015052159.32425.16414.reportbug@localhost
Bug#786571: RFS: osm-gps-map/1.0.2-3 [uploaded]
Hi Ross, Thanks for your work on this package. On 05/23/2015 12:21 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osm-gps-map" I've sponsored the uploaded, but there are a couple of unused substitution variables in the control file you may want to have a look at. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/555fd18e.7040...@xs4all.nl
Bug#786571: marked as done (RFS: osm-gps-map/1.0.2-3)
Your message dated Sat, 23 May 2015 04:35:50 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: osm-gps-map/1.0.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #786571, regarding RFS: osm-gps-map/1.0.2-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 786571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786571 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osm-gps-map" * Package name: osm-gps-map Version : 1.0.2-3 Upstream Author : John Stowers * URL : http://nzjrs.github.io/osm-gps-map/ * License : GPL-2 Section : science It builds these binary packages: gir1.2-osmgpsmap-1.0 - GTK+ library to embed OpenStreetMap maps - Python bindings libosmgpsmap-1.0-0 - GTK+ library to embed OpenStreetMap maps libosmgpsmap-1.0-0-dbg - GTK+ library to embed OpenStreetMap maps - debugging symbols libosmgpsmap-1.0-0-dev - GTK+ library to embed OpenStreetMap maps - development files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/osm-gps-map Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osm-gps-map/osm-gps- map_1.0.2-3.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/nzjrs/osm- gps-map Debian Packaging is available at: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/osm-gps-map.git/ Changes since the last upload: * Start new Debian revision * Fix watch file * Bump standards version, no changes required * Update Vcs URL to use cgit instead of gitweb * Fix duplicate section in d/control * Drop file from d/copyright that is no longer shipped * Reveal hidden compile flags in buildlog * Fix CFLAG append in d/rules so default hardening options are used * Add upstream metadata * Add lintian override for hardening-no-fortify warning Regards, Ross Gammon -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers utopic-updates APT policy: (500, 'utopic-updates'), (500, 'utopic-security'), (500, 'utopic'), (100, 'utopic-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-38-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package osm-gps-map version 1.0.2-3 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/osm-gps-map--- End Message ---
Bug#785737: marked as done (RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC])
Your message dated Sat, 23 May 2015 04:35:51 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #785737, regarding RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 785737: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785737 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haxe" * Package name: haxe Version : 1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse * URL : http://haxe.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : devel It builds those binary packages: haxe - Web-oriented universal programming language DSC: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/haxe/haxe_3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1.dsc Git repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/haxe.git Changes since the last upload: haxe (1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Adopt as Debian Flash Team. + Set maintainer to Debian Flash team, add myself to uploaders. * Set Vcs-* fields to updated collab-maint git repo. * Replace jquery-latest.min.js and swfobject.js with symlinks to system ones. + Remove sourceless files from upstream tarball (Closes: #736596). + Add libjs-jquery and libjs-swfobject runtime dependencies. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes). Thanks, -- G..e --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package haxe version 1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/haxe--- End Message ---
Bug#774413: marked as done (RFS: libcmime/0.1.15-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sat, 23 May 2015 04:35:50 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libcmime/0.1.15-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #774413, regarding RFS: libcmime/0.1.15-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 774413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774413 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcmime" * Package name: libcmime Version : 0.1.15 Upstream Author : Axel Steiner, Werner Detter, Robin Doer, * URL : http://www.libcmime.org * License : Expat Programming Lang: C Description : libcmime is a lightweight mime library, written in C It builds those binary packages: libcmime-dev - lightweight C mime library - development files libcmime0.1 - lightweight C mime library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcmime Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcmime/libcmime_0.1.15-1.dsc More information about libcmime can be obtained from http://www.libcmime.org As this is my first package which contains a shared library I ask for help and assistance about the current state of the package and improvements/adjustments which could or should be made. The library uses cmake, I currently do use cdbs as build system for the package. Currently I've split the package into a -dev and a regular package. I still have some lintian messages left, e.g libcmime-dev: package-contains-broken-symlink usr/lib/libcmime.so libcmime.so.0.1 Is this something which should be fixed with a lintian override? The -dev package refers to libcmime.so.0.1 which is provided by the regular package? Any help/comments welcome :) Thank you, Werner Detter --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package libcmime has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
