Bug#786641: RFS: tap.py/1.4 [ITP] -- Test Anything Protocol (TAP) tools for Python
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Debian Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the tap.py package: * Package name: tap.py Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Matt LAYMAN * URL : https://github.com/mblayman/tappy * License : BSD-2 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-tappy - TAP producer/consumer tools for Python unittest -- Python 2 version python3-tappy - TAP producer/consumer tools for Python unittest -- Python 3 version python-tappy-doc - TAP producer/consumer tools for Python unittest -- documentation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tap.py Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tap.py/tap.py_1.4-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Fixed READMEs not shipped in the python3 version of the package. * Added upstream changelog to the packages. Binary packages are available at: http://www.caniart.net/debian/NEW/ More information about tap.py can be obtained from http://tappy.readthedocs.org/en/latest/. The corresponding ITP bug is #786636 [1] Regards, Nicolas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786636 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caowzrlalf-i3kk5cdw_asigo2na0yjuutve954y8vblzc8b...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#781847: marked as done (RFS: python-tappy/1.3-1 [ITP] -- Test Anything Protocol (TAP) tools for Python)
Your message dated Sat, 23 May 2015 22:34:28 +0200 with message-id caowzrlabxgejsf+khrha4-nofq0tm8gppdaomql9k4j+sxk...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#781847: RFS: python-tappy/1.3-1 [ITP] -- Test Anything Protocol (TAP) tools for Python has caused the Debian Bug report #781847, regarding RFS: python-tappy/1.3-1 [ITP] -- Test Anything Protocol (TAP) tools for Python to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 781847: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781847 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Debian Mentors, I have packaged tap.py: * Package name: tap.py Version : 1.3-1 Upstream Author : Matt LAYMAN * URL : https://github.com/mblayman/tappy * License : BSD-2 Section : python tap.py is a python package that provides: - a test runner that produces a TAP compliant output; - facilities to load and parse the output produced by TAP compliant test runners. - Provides a lexer to colorize TAP output with Pygments. There are a few other python packages that do similar stuff, but none yet in Debian. Compared to other packages that I could find: - It is very easy to integrate in your tests, and plays well with the standard unittest framework; - It is actively maintained; - It is compatible with python from 2.6 to 3.4 (covers all python versions found in Debian); I have packaged it because I use it myself and having it packaged eases its deployment on the development and CI systems I maintain. I now hope that it will be useful to someone else... Packages are available for review on debian mentors and here: http://www.caniart.net/debian/NEW/ Relevant ITP bug report can be found here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781832 Regards, Nicolas. -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Thanks to comments on the on from Mònica on mentors and to yours, I finally understood where the confusion came from: Use of python-tappy (binary package name) in the subject, but of tap.py in the RFS mail body, plus I used of the binary package name in the ITP bug as well. To make things clearer I have closed the old ITP bug and am closing this bug as well. Relevant bugs are now #786636 [ITP] and #786641 [RFS]. Thanks again for pointing out my mistake. Also Andrey, binary packages are back online at [1] (for good this time hopefully, double checked). I would be glad if either of you would consider sponsoring the package. Regards, Nicolas. [1]: http://www.caniart.net/debian/NEW/ 2015-05-13 20:39 GMT+02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org: On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 08:33:59PM +0200, Nicolas CANIART wrote: I am sorry, but I am not sure I completly understand what the issue is. dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tap.py/tap.py_1.4-2.dsc RFS says python-tappy and it didn't contain the .dsc URL so I couldn't find it. You should send the .dsc URL to the bug. -- WBR, wRAR---End Message---
Re: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ not accessible any more
Hi Andreas Tille wrote: I noticed that the ftpnew gatherer for UDD is currently broken. (...) Location: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ [following] HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden There is a related issue with deferred packages: Link non-NEW uploads are available on the bottom of https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html is now broken (403). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5560783c.6030...@debian.org
Bug#782074: RFS: ublock/0.9.3.0-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker
Sorry for the delay, I've patched filter-lists.json to have nonfree filters disabled by default. Nonfree filters will only be downloaded if the user enables them. The latest package can be downloaded here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/ublock/ublock_0.9.4.0+dfsg1-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150523110651.GA4218@uranium
Re: RFS: self-serve photo booth software
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 04:24:19AM +, Adam Roses Wight wrote: * Not sure why the copyright file is not linting. In the documentation, I see that repeated licenses only need to be specified once. [2] There are three files with the same license, and I only give the standalone paragraph for the third. The second file causes a lint warning! Possibly a bug in the lintian job? [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#stand-alone-license-paragraph Solved by reading the lintian source. To reuse a license, it must be declared as a License: short-name and full text, but with no Files. I think the docs at [2] should be updated to mention this fact. -a -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150524045515.gb14...@ludd.net
Re: why dpkg-buildpackage doesn't care my build targets in debian/rule
I got it. Thank you, Santiago, Jakub, Johannes, Mattia and Wookey ! :) -- Regards, C.D.Luminate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432439429.7146.3.ca...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: self-serve photo booth software
A few more small questions, otherwise the photo-booth package is ready for another review. [1] Thanks for all the help so far! * The package name has changed since I filed the ITP bug. How can I update the bug with a new package name, should I just reply with a human-readable note to that effect? * I accidentally ran dput without a host argument, which pushed my package files to the production upload box. I've sent some commands to dcut rm, hopefully that works correctly. It looks like the commands were consumed with no effect on the photo-booth* files. * Not sure why the copyright file is not linting. In the documentation, I see that repeated licenses only need to be specified once. [2] There are three files with the same license, and I only give the standalone paragraph for the third. The second file causes a lint warning! Possibly a bug in the lintian job? -Adam [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/photo-booth [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#stand-alone-license-paragraph On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:07:00AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Also, is it standard procedure to upload locally built packages to mentors.d.n, or is that not necessary if I already have hosting for the files? [4] mentors does not distribute binary packages, which is what you have uploaded to github. Some sponsors are fine interacting with random git trees but others like to use the Debian source package (.dsc), which you haven't uploaded anywhere. Personally I'd suggest uploading the source package to mentors. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6Gua8ao9B+XcF8Af1PfzCCNF+gvmHk8Q1e7snmFtu=f...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150524042419.ga14...@ludd.net
