Re: Access to Debian Test Farm for s390 Testing
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2015-09-16 06:47, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I work with a free/open source project. We have a failure report from >> a Debian package maintainer on an s390. >> > > Hi Jeffrey, > > Thanks for your interest. :) > > I am directing you over to debian-mentors, since your enquiry is > probably better fitted there (debian-testing is intended for upgrade > reports etc.) > >> I have a lot of systems available to me for testing (including GCC's >> test farm), but none of them provide an s390 environment. I tried to >> add QEMU's qemu-system-s390x, but ran into Debian Bug 799120 >> (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799120). >> >> I'm guessing Debian has the test platform because a maintainer tested >> under it (he told me it was not QEMU based). But searching results in >> spurious noise (https://www.google.com/search?q=debian+test+farm), and >> nothing specific to Debian. >> >> I have three related questions: >> >> (1) Where is the Debian test farm? > > > > I suspect you are looking for our s390x porterbox[1]. :) > > >> (2) Does Debian provide access to non-Debian maintainers? >> (3) How can I acquire [possibly partial] access to it for s390 testing? >> >> If needed for (2), I'm willing to sign-up to be a Debain maintainer >> for the project which I have subject matter expertise. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> > > We have guest accounts[2] which might be what you are looking for. :) > If you get a guest account, you can use it to get a "chroot" for > building as described at [3]. > > As suggested in the beginning, if you have any further questions, please > follow up to debian-mentors. :) > Thanks Neils. I owe you a cold beer if you ever make it to my side of town (the east coast of the US). Jeff
Re: Access to Debian Test Farm for s390 Testing
On 2015-09-16 06:47, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I work with a free/open source project. We have a failure report from > a Debian package maintainer on an s390. > Hi Jeffrey, Thanks for your interest. :) I am directing you over to debian-mentors, since your enquiry is probably better fitted there (debian-testing is intended for upgrade reports etc.) > I have a lot of systems available to me for testing (including GCC's > test farm), but none of them provide an s390 environment. I tried to > add QEMU's qemu-system-s390x, but ran into Debian Bug 799120 > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799120). > > I'm guessing Debian has the test platform because a maintainer tested > under it (he told me it was not QEMU based). But searching results in > spurious noise (https://www.google.com/search?q=debian+test+farm), and > nothing specific to Debian. > > I have three related questions: > > (1) Where is the Debian test farm? I suspect you are looking for our s390x porterbox[1]. :) > (2) Does Debian provide access to non-Debian maintainers? > (3) How can I acquire [possibly partial] access to it for s390 testing? > > If needed for (2), I'm willing to sign-up to be a Debain maintainer > for the project which I have subject matter expertise. > > Thanks in advance. > We have guest accounts[2] which might be what you are looking for. :) If you get a guest account, you can use it to get a "chroot" for building as described at [3]. As suggested in the beginning, if you have any further questions, please follow up to debian-mentors. :) Thanks, ~Niels [1] https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=zelenka [2] https://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/ [3] https://dsa.debian.org/doc/schroot/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#770149: marked as done (RFS: python-instagram/1.3.0+git20150406~e885e7d-1 [ITP] -- A Python 2/3 client for the Instagram REST and Search APIs)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:24:46 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: python-instagram/1.3.0+git20150406~e885e7d-1 [ITP] -- A Python 2/3 client for the Instagram REST and Search APIs has caused the Debian Bug report #770149, regarding RFS: python-instagram/1.3.0+git20150406~e885e7d-1 [ITP] -- A Python 2/3 client for the Instagram REST and Search APIs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 770149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770149 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-instagram" Package name: python-instagram Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Instagram, Inc URL : http://github.com/Instagram/python-instagram License : BSD-3 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-instagram - Python 2 client for the Instagram REST and Search APIs python3-instagram - Python 3 client for the Instagram REST and Search APIs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-instagram Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-instagram/python-instagram_1.2.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #769928). Regards, Jörg Frings-Fürst -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package python-instagram has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#795347: marked as done (RFS: pkwalify/1.22-1 [ITP] -- parser, schema validator, and data-binding tool for YAML and JSON)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:24:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: pkwalify/1.22-1 [ITP] -- parser, schema validator, and data-binding tool for YAML and JSON has caused the Debian Bug report #795347, regarding RFS: pkwalify/1.22-1 [ITP] -- parser, schema validator, and data-binding tool for YAML and JSON to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 795347: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795347 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pkwalify" * Package name: pkwalify Version : 1.22 Upstream Author : Slaven Rezic * URL : https://github.com/eserte/p5-Kwalify/ * License : Artistic-2.0 Programming Lang: Perl Description : perl kwalify schema validator Kwalify is a Perl implementation for validating data structures against the Kwalify schema. For a schema definition, see http://www.kuwata-lab.com/kwalify/ruby/users-guide.01.html . Note that there is no support for validator hooks (section 1-7 of the user guide document). There is already a kwalify package[0] but it's implemented in Ruby and this allows the user not to install another interpreter I'm planing to push this to pkg-perl team repo [0] https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/kwalify It builds those binary packages: pkwalify - perl kwalify validator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pkwalify Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pkwalify/pkwalify_1.22-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: pkwalify (1.22-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial Release (closes: #792031). -- Victor Seva Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:41:05 +0200 Regards, Victor Seva -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package pkwalify has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#798423: marked as done (RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:24:49 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages has caused the Debian Bug report #798423, regarding RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 798423: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798423 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "alien" * Package name: alien Version : 8.95 Upstream Author : Joey Hess * URL : http://joeyh.name/code/alien/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: alien - convert and install rpm and other packages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/alien Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/alien/alien_8.95.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: alien (8.95) unstable; urgency=medium * QA upload. * Created a patch named fix-removepatchdir to remove empty patch directory \ from Makefile.PL extrainstall. * debian/control: - Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.6. - Removed duplicated section field. * debian/copyright: - Replaced protocol from http to https in the Format field. - Replaced GPL-2+ license reference by acual GPL-2+ license. * Created a patch named fix-spellingerrors to fix spelling errors. -- Fabiano Antunes Tue, 08 Sep 2015 16:49:43 -0300 Regards, Fabiano Antunes --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package alien version 8.95 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/alien--- End Message ---
Bug#783302: marked as done (RFS: entityx/1.1.2-1 [ITP] -- fast, type-safe C++ Entity Component System)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:24:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: entityx/1.1.2-1 [ITP] -- fast, type-safe C++ Entity Component System has caused the Debian Bug report #783302, regarding RFS: entityx/1.1.2-1 [ITP] -- fast, type-safe C++ Entity Component System to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 783302: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783302 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for reviews (and possibly a sponsor) for my package "entityx": * Package name: entityx Version : 1.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Alec Thomas * URL : https://github.com/alecthomas/entityx * License : Expat Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libentityx-doc : fast, type-safe C++ Entity Component System (API documentation) libentityx-dev : fast, type-safe C++ Entity Component System (development files) libentityx1 : fast, type-safe C++ Entity Component System libentityx1-dbg : Debug symbols for libentityx1 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/entityx Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/entityx/entityx_1.1.2-1.dsc For people who prefer working with git, there is also a git repository of the packaging files available at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/entityx.git -- one can clone it using git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/entityx.git More information about entityx can be obtained from https://github.com/alecthomas/entityx Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #772414) Additionnal notes: 1. I added a lintian-override for the symbols file in libentityx1. The generated symbols were different between i386 and amd64, and since I can't test for other architectures myself I couldn't tell if they were different on say armel for example. Any help on that is appreciated. 2. To make the build reproducible, I had to use a newer version of dh-strip-nondeterminism than what's available in unstable right now. (This was to remove timestamps from PNG files) I built the git version available here: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/strip-nondeterminism.git (I assume it'll get uploaded to unstable after jessie release). This means my package cannot be included in Debian right now, but I'd be happy if someone could review my package until dh-strip-determinism is in unstable. Thanks ! -- Jason Pleau --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package entityx has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#793332: marked as done (RFS: glipper/2.4-6 [RC] - Clipboard manager for GNOME)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:24:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: glipper/2.4-6 [RC] - Clipboard manager for GNOME has caused the Debian Bug report #793332, regarding RFS: glipper/2.4-6 [RC] - Clipboard manager for GNOME to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 793332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793332 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glipper" * Package name: glipper Version : 2.4-6 Upstream Author : Laszlo Pandy * URL : http://launchpad.net/glipper * License : GPL-2+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: glipper- Clipboard manager for GNOME To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/glipper Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/glipper/glipper_2.4-6.dsc More information about glipper can be obtained from http://launchpad.net/glipper. Changes since the last upload: * debian/control: - Changed Maintainer's email. (Closes: #793088). Regards, José Ernesto Dávila Pantoja --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package glipper version 2.4-6 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/glipper--- End Message ---
Bug#798458: marked as done (RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:24:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server has caused the Debian Bug report #798458, regarding RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 798458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798458 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mini-httpd" * Package name: mini-httpd Version : 1.21-1 Upstream Author : Jef Poskanzer * URL : http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd * License : BSD-2-clause Section : web It builds those binary packages: mini-httpd - Small HTTP server To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mini-httpd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mini-httpd/mini-httpd_1.21-1.dsc More information about mini-httpd can be obtained from http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * New Maintainer.(Closes: #780194) * Fix CVE-2015-1548. (Closes: #778925) * d/control: - Bumped Standart-Version to 3.9.6 - Bumped debhelper to 9 - Remove deprecated dpatch upgrade packaging format "3.0 (quilt)". (Closes: #664363) - Remove article in description synopsis. - Changed depends * d/copyright - Updated format dep5. - Formating copyright. * d/rules: - Clean and upgrade rules for simple. - Added Changelog upstream extracted of website mini-httpd * d/mini-httpd.init.d: - Fix error restart (Closes: #510905, #755892) - Fix error set -e and no install htpasswd (Closes: #520941) * d/patches: - Fixed tested patch of sugestion the Steffen Grunewald (Closes: #491078) - Fixe and added SCRIPT_FILENAME in patch 03-cgi-php (Close: #569599) - Hardening for minit_httpd.c and to function. * d/mini-httpd.init.d - Add . /lib/lsb/init-functions in script - Add options status in script * d/mini-httpd.install - Changed the default document root, for var/www/html. (Closes: #730373) * d/config/mini-httpd.conf: - Changed the default data_dir, for var/www/html. * d/mini-httpd.default: - Changed default start with daemon, for start minial config. Regards, J.S.Júnior pgp5_utyx2Srt.pgp Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package mini-httpd version 1.21-1 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/mini-httpd--- End Message ---
Bug#786641: marked as done (RFS: tap.py/1.4-2 [ITP] -- Test Anything Protocol (TAP) tools for Python)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:24:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: tap.py/1.4-2 [ITP] -- Test Anything Protocol (TAP) tools for Python has caused the Debian Bug report #786641, regarding RFS: tap.py/1.4-2 [ITP] -- Test Anything Protocol (TAP) tools for Python to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 786641: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786641 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Debian Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the tap.py package: * Package name: tap.py Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Matt LAYMAN * URL : https://github.com/mblayman/tappy * License : BSD-2 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-tappy - TAP producer/consumer tools for Python unittest -- Python 2 version python3-tappy - TAP producer/consumer tools for Python unittest -- Python 3 version python-tappy-doc - TAP producer/consumer tools for Python unittest -- documentation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tap.py Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tap.py/tap.py_1.4-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Fixed READMEs not shipped in the python3 version of the package. * Added upstream changelog to the packages. Binary packages are available at: http://www.caniart.net/debian/NEW/ More information about tap.py can be obtained from http://tappy.readthedocs.org/en/latest/. The corresponding ITP bug is #786636 [1] Regards, Nicolas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786636 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package tap.py has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#783308: marked as done (RFS: mediagoblin/0.7.1+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- web application for sharing photos, video and other media)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:24:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: mediagoblin/0.7.1+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- web application for sharing photos, video and other media has caused the Debian Bug report #783308, regarding RFS: mediagoblin/0.7.1+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- web application for sharing photos, video and other media to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 783308: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783308 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mediagoblin" * Package name: mediagoblin Version : 0.7.1+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Various persons, GNU * URL : http://mediagoblin.org/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: mediagoblin - web application for sharing photos, video and other media mediagoblin-doc - web application for sharing photos, video and other media - documentation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mediagoblin Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mediagoblin/mediagoblin_0.7.1+dfsg1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. (Closes: #657405) Regards, Simon signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package mediagoblin has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Re: RFS: eviacam
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:36:47AM AEST, Cesar Mauri wrote: > Hi, > > I've managed to upload eviacam again to mentors site and appears to be > lintian clean. > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/eviacam Hey folks. We in the Ubuntu desktop team have been contacted by Cesar once again about getting this into Ubuntu and Debian. It seems that this was left by the wayside back in 2011. Such things often happen, but perhaps we can take another look, ahd hoefully get a DD to sponsor this. Seems this URL doesn't take me to a page where I can download the package and have a look. Cesar, do you have a recent revision of this package anywhere? I am not a DD, but I am happy to take a look and comment on how ready it is for upload to Debian. Luke
Re: Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2
Le mar. 15 sept. 2015 à 22:59, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Hello Jerome, On 15/09/15 22:50, Vincent Blut wrote: Le mar. 15 sept. 2015 à 22:33, Paul Gevers a écrit : On 15-09-15 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote: On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote: Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹? Sure, my dashboard told me that there was a new chrony, so I was expecting this e-mail. Surprisingly it was not to package that. Could you also fix the watch file, as you seem to be not following the 2.x branch? And I may have asked before, why aren't you? Looking at the version numbers and their timing, you are just lagging, not really following an other branch are you? What is the plan? So if you want to switch to 2.x, you don't need to update the watch file, and I can upload as is (after checking). Well, I didn’t start packaging the 2.x upstream release, because I wanted to smoothly upgrade chrony in Debian to catch regressions more easily, but don’t worry, 2.0 (and 2.1.1 soon after) is in the pipe. The changes from 1.3x and 2.x are quite huge (NTP v4 support, etc.), so it will take some times to be in good shape, but I’m currently working on this and hope to send you some stuff to review in october. You may want to put the 2 branch in experiemental to begin with. Indeed, depending on how tests will go, I’ll either push it to master or as you say, create an experimental branch for it. Jerome Cheers, Vincent
Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2
Hello Vincent, > In 1.31.1-1, the NEWS.Debian file wasn’t copied by dh_installchangelogs > to /usr/share/doc/chrony because it seems that tool can’t cope with that > filename. So I renamed it to NEWS, and also removed an unnecessary call to > dh_installchangelogs in d/rules. Consequently, apt-listchanges is now > able the read that file at install time. for clarifying: The NEWS.Debian file will be used while updating the package: If you write a new entry into NEWS.Debian, this new entry will be shown while running apt-get install. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 15/09/15 22:50, Vincent Blut wrote: > Le mar. 15 sept. 2015 à 22:33, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> On 15-09-15 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote: Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹? >>> >>> Sure, my dashboard told me that there was a new chrony, so I was >>> expecting this e-mail. Surprisingly it was not to package that. Could >>> you also fix the watch file, as you seem to be not following the 2.x >>> branch? >> >> And I may have asked before, why aren't you? Looking at the version >> numbers and their timing, you are just lagging, not really following an >> other branch are you? What is the plan? So if you want to switch to 2.x, >> you don't need to update the watch file, and I can upload as is (after >> checking). > > Well, I didn’t start packaging the 2.x upstream release, because I wanted to > smoothly upgrade chrony in Debian to catch regressions more easily, but don’t > worry, 2.0 (and 2.1.1 soon after) is in the pipe. The changes from 1.3x and > 2.x > are quite huge (NTP v4 support, etc.), so it will take some times to be in > good > shape, but I’m currently working on this and hope to send you some stuff to > review > in october. > You may want to put the 2 branch in experiemental to begin with. Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV+IasAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjFBwIAIumA/5ykTkNN7iHHZTzFYHX sJFH3dH0hud+BJ+WrlThT45Gw78DSbHBcEDrfg+1DkdT33CjloBI/BaIL2yY/kx3 W5tqOoWzIlBweL4pcHAxFxnDRAUN0/IQisW9xUfZlDVuKLch3iXOhbI5GY7Hs38q lq4i3fWG3oRRMDdpSe81tMM3rZ4bKUNeQDOKqyqyPUNHmNlv3oRs97K+ELJznDnf TLSa2HzvUGnu9Ft/9YcFVwE+DhoW0qyqnBh0+RoIs/g5+/HbsT2F8bJ8E7H8Gb/l TKhHyLNzV5SB3tKtTORkhBHvodcN54KDFCvvlG5F2D5Z4SQKDjmw0eWj7M53VSo= =TvA2 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2
Le mar. 15 sept. 2015 à 22:33, Paul Gevers a écrit : On 15-09-15 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote: On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote: Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹? Sure, my dashboard told me that there was a new chrony, so I was expecting this e-mail. Surprisingly it was not to package that. Could you also fix the watch file, as you seem to be not following the 2.x branch? And I may have asked before, why aren't you? Looking at the version numbers and their timing, you are just lagging, not really following an other branch are you? What is the plan? So if you want to switch to 2.x, you don't need to update the watch file, and I can upload as is (after checking). Well, I didn’t start packaging the 2.x upstream release, because I wanted to smoothly upgrade chrony in Debian to catch regressions more easily, but don’t worry, 2.0 (and 2.1.1 soon after) is in the pipe. The changes from 1.3x and 2.x are quite huge (NTP v4 support, etc.), so it will take some times to be in good shape, but I’m currently working on this and hope to send you some stuff to review in october.
Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2
On 15-09-15 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote: >> Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹? > > Sure, my dashboard told me that there was a new chrony, so I was > expecting this e-mail. Surprisingly it was not to package that. Could > you also fix the watch file, as you seem to be not following the 2.x branch? And I may have asked before, why aren't you? Looking at the version numbers and their timing, you are just lagging, not really following an other branch are you? What is the plan? So if you want to switch to 2.x, you don't need to update the watch file, and I can upload as is (after checking). Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1
(replying just to the issues I raised) On 2015-09-15 21:00, Geoff wrote: >> - It is helpful to be more explicit about some changes. You mention, >> for example, that the package has been converted to Python 3. The >> fact that the Python 2 package has been dropped is merely implied. >> That is IMHO a significant change, and should be worth a hint > Indeed, though, this is not a python module but only an application. Oh, my bad! Sorry about that. (Hence also why I hadn't posted my notes earlier -- the review was still somewhat rough) >> d/NEWS: >> - The upgrade path suggestion for the conffile in /etc isn't >> really the prettiest solution, although I really don't know what >> other path I could suggest that wouldn't seem like overkill. How >> did upstream handle this change? Do they perhaps have a script or >> tool that could assist in this process? > > Well, I'm actually upstream, I did not write any tool to migrate the > conf. Oh -- another thing I seem to have missed. > Since the package is not that popular (popcon ~ 100) and because > target users are quite probably advanced users and command line lovers, > I did not try to handle a nice and smoothly conf upgrade. > > Well I think the current tradeoff to be acceptable given the package > popularity and users profile. I believe you are right. After all, you are preserving possible user changes to the conffile, in accordance with the Policy. Regards, Christian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server
❦ 15 septembre 2015 17:10 -0300, J.S.Júnior : >> > Send for mentor with new changes. >> >> OK, this looks good to me. However, your debian/changelog has many >> English errors and is sometimes difficult to read. I propose to apply >> the following patch to fix that. If you are OK with the patch, I can >> upload. >> > > All patch applied. > > Send mentors ok Thanks, just uploaded! -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#799092: RFS: haxe/1:3.2.0+dfsg-1
❦ 16 septembre 2015 03:46 +0800, Andy Li : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haxe". > I'm a member of the Haxe Foundation. I would like to maintain the > package in the long term to improve haxe's debian support. [...[ > * Adopt package. > + Set maintainer to myself. Hi Andy! The package isn't flagged up for adoption. Did you discuss with the current maintainers? The package has recently been adopted by the Debian Flash Team. I am sure they would welcome your help and accept that you maintain the package, but please, ask them. -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server
Em Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:36:09 +0200 Vincent Bernat escreveu: > ❦ 14 septembre 2015 11:49 -0300, J.S.Júnior : > > > Send for mentor with new changes. > > OK, this looks good to me. However, your debian/changelog has many > English errors and is sometimes difficult to read. I propose to apply > the following patch to fix that. If you are OK with the patch, I can > upload. > All patch applied. Send mentors ok thanks for your patience, and I learned very much with you. Thanks. JJ pgpKD65Ps6BLR.pgp Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP
Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2
Control: owner -1 ! Hi Vincent, On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote: > Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹? Sure, my dashboard told me that there was a new chrony, so I was expecting this e-mail. Surprisingly it was not to package that. Could you also fix the watch file, as you seem to be not following the 2.x branch? > In 1.31.1-1, the NEWS.Debian file wasn’t copied by dh_installchangelogs > to /usr/share/doc/chrony because it seems that tool can’t cope with that > filename. So I renamed it to NEWS, and also removed an unnecessary call to > dh_installchangelogs in d/rules. Consequently, apt-listchanges is now > able the read that file at install time. Shame on me that I didn't check that it was really installing... Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#799094: RFS: node-kerberos/0.0.14-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-kerberos" * Package name: node-kerberos Version : 0.0.14-1 Upstream Author : Christian Amor Kvalheim * URL : https://github.com/christkv/kerberos * License : Apache-2.0 Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-kerberos - Kerberos library for Node.js To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/node-kerberos Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-kerberos/node-kerberos_0.0.14-1.dsc More information about node-kerberos can be obtained from https://github.com/christkv/kerberos Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #798183) Regards, Christopher Hoskin
Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello Paul, Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹? In 1.31.1-1, the NEWS.Debian file wasn’t copied by dh_installchangelogs to /usr/share/doc/chrony because it seems that tool can’t cope with that filename. So I renamed it to NEWS, and also removed an unnecessary call to dh_installchangelogs in d/rules. Consequently, apt-listchanges is now able the read that file at install time. Cheers, Vincent ¹ dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chrony/chrony_1.31.1-2.dsc I also pushed the changes to the git repository. Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Bug#799092: RFS: haxe/1:3.2.0+dfsg-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haxe". I'm a member of the Haxe Foundation. I would like to maintain the package in the long term to improve haxe's debian support. * Package name: haxe Version : 1:3.2.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Haxe Foundation * URL : http://haxe.org/ * License : GPLv2+, MIT, LGPLv2+ Section : devel It builds those binary packages: haxe - A multi-target universal programming language To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/haxe Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/haxe/haxe_3.2.0+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: haxe (1:3.2.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * Adopt package. + Set maintainer to myself. * New upstream version. + Update neko version dependency. * Remove outdated and discontinued emacs haxe mode. * Clean up copyright. + Remove entries of removed files. * Remove d/watch and get-orig-source target because the archive at Github is missing submodules. -- Andy Li Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:01:06 +0800 Regards, Andy Li
Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server
❦ 14 septembre 2015 11:49 -0300, J.S.Júnior :
> Send for mentor with new changes.
OK, this looks good to me. However, your debian/changelog has many
English errors and is sometimes difficult to read. I propose to apply
the following patch to fix that. If you are OK with the patch, I can
upload.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 5379434b9076..653a42ece37e 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,39 +1,35 @@
mini-httpd (1.21-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
- * New Maintainer.(Closes: #780194)
+ * New maintainer. (Closes: #780194)
* Fix CVE-2015-1548
- patch fix-add_to_response-buffer-overflow. (Closes: #778925)
+ - Patch fix-add_to_response-buffer-overflow. (Closes: #778925)
* d/control:
- - Bumped Standart-Version to 3.9.6
- - Bumped debhelper to 9
- - Remove deprecated dpatch upgrade packaging
- format "3.0 (quilt)". (Closes: #664363)
+ - Bump Standard-Version to 3.9.6.
+ - Bump debhelper to 9.
+ - Remove deprecated dpatch.
+ - Upgrade packaging format "3.0 (quilt)". (Closes: #664363)
- Remove article in description synopsis.
- - Changed depends
+ - Add ${misc:Depends}.
* d/copyright
- - Updated format dep5.
- - Formating copyright.
+ - Update to DEP5 format.
+ - Formatting copyright.
* d/rules:
- - Clean and upgrade rules for simple.
- - Added Changelog upstream extracted of website mini-httpd
+ - Upgrade to dh sequencer.
+ - Added upstream changelog extracted from mini-httpd website.
* d/mini-httpd.init.d:
- - Fix error restart (Closes: #510905, #755892)
+ - Fix restart error. (Closes: #510905, #755892)
* d/patches:
- - Fixe and added SCRIPT_FILENAME in patch 03-cgi-php (Close: #569599)
- - Hardening for minit_httpd.c and to function.
- - Remove install htpasswd.1
- - Added index.mini-httpd.html for find mini-httpd
+ - Fix and add SCRIPT_FILENAME in patch 03-cgi-php. (Closes: #569599)
+ - Ensure hardening is enabled for mini_httpd.c.
+ - Don't install htpasswd.1.
+ - Add index.mini-httpd.html to the list of index names.
* d/mini-httpd.init.d
- - Add . /lib/lsb/init-functions in script
- - Add options status in script
- * d/mini-httpd.postinstall
- - Changed the default document root, for var/www/html in postinstall
- and rename index for index.mini-httpd.html in
- fix-change-index-document-root. (Closes: #730373)
-- Fix error set -e and no install htpasswd (Closes: #520941)
-- Added post instal for default root copy index.html to var/www/html
- Thanks Sr.Vicent Bernat
+ - Source /lib/lsb/init-functions.
+ - Add "status" command.
+ * d/mini-httpd.postinst
+ - Copy index.mini-httpd.html. (Closes: #730373)
+ - Use "set -e" and don't install htpasswd. (Closes: #520941)
-- Jose dos Santos Junior Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:59:53 -0300
diff --git a/debian/patches/fix-add_to_response-buffer-overflow b/debian/patches/fix-add_to_response-buffer-overflow
index 8ebd0e93c846..33c90ac9528a 100644
--- a/debian/patches/fix-add_to_response-buffer-overflow
+++ b/debian/patches/fix-add_to_response-buffer-overflow
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Description: Fix buffer overflow in add_to_response bug Thanks Peter Kasza
Author: Jose dos Santos Junior
-Last-Update: 2015-09-02Index: mini-httpd-1.21/mini_httpd.c
+Last-Update: 2015-09-02
Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/778925
===
Index: mini-httpd-1.21/mini_httpd.c
diff --git a/debian/patches/fix-append-portno-to-vhost b/debian/patches/fix-append-portno-to-vhost
index 58e6c0ad473c..13e4df616b92 100644
--- a/debian/patches/fix-append-portno-to-vhost
+++ b/debian/patches/fix-append-portno-to-vhost
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Description: Append port number to vhost.
Thanks Steffen Grunewald
Author: Jose dos Santos Junior
Last-Update:2015-09-05
-Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/491078Index: mini-httpd-1.21/mini_httpd.c
+Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/491078
===
Index: mini-httpd-1.21/mini_httpd.c
===
diff --git a/debian/patches/fix-change-index-document-root b/debian/patches/fix-change-index-document-root
index 6865870319a7..4ba29adcf503 100644
--- a/debian/patches/fix-change-index-document-root
+++ b/debian/patches/fix-change-index-document-root
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Description: Change the default document root to /var/www/html
and added index.mini-httpd.html in /var/www/html
Author: Jose dos Santos Junior
Last-Update: 2015-09-14
-Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/730373Index: mini-httpd-1.21/mini_httpd.c
+Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/730373
===
Index: mini-httpd-1.21/mini_httpd.c
==
Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1
Hi Christian, Gianfranco
First,t hanks for your careful reviews :)
git repo and package on mentors are updated.
Here follows my answers.
Le 14/09/2015 20:37, Christian Kastner wrote :
> Gianfranco already beat me to the review; nevertheless, here are some
> additional notes I had prepared, based on the package I saw on Sunday
> (the package is no longer visible on mentors.d.n).
>
> On 2015-09-14 12:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> lets review:
>>
>> 1) you dropped 0.10.0-2 entry from changelog
Fixed, it disappeared somehow in the process :/
>> 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly
I don't get what you mean.
>> 3) bump compat level not mentioned in changelog
Done
>> 4) according to setup.py
>> install_requires=['python-musicpd>=0.4.1', 'requests>= 2.0.2'],
>> so I guess there is no need to specify them to runtime dependencies
It is indeed useless to specify them explicitly, dh_python3 and
${python3:Depends}.
>> 5) please mention copyright updates
>> 6) mpd-sima.default
>> "+## NOTA BENE:"
>> this seems to be italian, please use english
Done
>>
>> 7)
>> +## only works with SysV init
>> +## With systemd init: "touch /etc/mpd-sima_not_to_be_run" to prevent
>> mpd-sima from being started
>>
>>
>> well, can't you use some systemd facilities to do the same?
I did specify the systemd way to disable the script in mpd-sima.default.
I also removed support for this file in service file, this was only an
attempt to have systemd to work as SysV did.
I don't believe this is relevant.
> d/control:
> - The Vcs-Browser URL refers to the gitweb viewer, whereas the current
> viewer seems to be cgit (the gitweb URL just redirects there)
Done
> d/changelog:
> - typo: convertion -> conversion
> - When bumping S-V, while not necessary, it is good practice to
> indicate what changes were made in the process, or "no changes
> needed" if that was the case
Done
> - It is helpful to be more explicit about some changes. You mention,
> for example, that the package has been converted to Python 3. The
> fact that the Python 2 package has been dropped is merely implied.
> That is IMHO a significant change, and should be worth a hint
Indeed, though, this is not a python module but only an application.
It is not as important as it might be for python modules.
I did rephrase a bit the changelog anyway.
And I'll try to be more verbose in the future.
> d/copyright:
> - The Upstream-Source URL lists something completely different to the
> the Homepage field in d/control. Could it be that one of them needs
> to be updated?
It does, thanks.
Fields updated.
> d/NEWS:
> - The upgrade path suggestion for the conffile in /etc isn't
> really the prettiest solution, although I really don't know what
> other path I could suggest that wouldn't seem like overkill. How
> did upstream handle this change? Do they perhaps have a script or
> tool that could assist in this process?
Well, I'm actually upstream, I did not write any tool to migrate the
conf. Since the package is not that popular (popcon ~ 100) and because
target users are quite probably advanced users and command line lovers,
I did not try to handle a nice and smoothly conf upgrade.
Well I think the current tradeoff to be acceptable given the package
popularity and users profile.
> d/
> - I encountered a lintian warning when building your package
>
> Apologies for not providing more accurate references and/or possibly
> outdated information. I had your package source in /tmp, which of course
> didn't survive a reboot...
This was a lintian warning command-with-path-in-maintainer-script.
https://lintian.debian.org/full/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#mpd-sima_0.10.0-2
I fixed it using which instead of a test:
http://git.kaliko.me/?p=mpd-sima-debian.git;a=commitdiff;h=214b4926
Thanks again for the review.
Geoff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: lintian errors: source-is-missing though is present
On Monday 14 September 2015 15:21:56 Sabniveesu Shashank wrote: > Running lintian on '.dsc' says: > > E: variety source: source-is-missing data/panoramio/underscore-min.js > > However, I do see that the path shown is right and it is present in > the source tarball. > Am I reading it wrong? This file is a minified version of underscore.js. A minified file is not considered a source file (for good reasons). You should: * remove data/panoramio/underscore-min.js from your source package * have your package depend on libjs-underscore or node-underscore * tweak your package to use underscore-min.js provided the dependency set up above HTH -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org
Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP
Hi Daniel, (please upload on mentors.debian.net next time) 1) changelog: you need to open an ITP bug and set the target distribution to unstable. 2) control: std-version should be 3.9.6 3) copyright should be in dep5 format https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ and include the license. 4) rules: please use a debian/install file for installing the binary and build documentation at runtime (or fix the upstream Makefile) 5) install the manpage too. 6) use debian/dirs to create directories, or fix the Makefile :) I'm not sure about perl:Depends, since there is no perl in build dependencies. (also shlibs:depends and so on, because you don't have any shared library) cheers, Gianfranco
Bug#799022: RFS: mgba/0.3.0 [ITP] -- Game Boy Advance emulator
Control: owner -1 ! Hi Sérgio, 1) changelog: please do not mention "Bug" (nitpick) 2) sed 's/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/g well, using -DLIBDIR= in cmake configure will simplify a lot this stuff I guess. look e.g. http://codesearch.debian.net/results/-DLIBDIR%3D%20path%3A%2Frules%24/page_0 the other stuff looks good, even if I need to build and run the game :) cheers, G.
Bug#798976: marked as done (RFS: dhcpcd5/6.9.3-1 [ITA] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support)
Your message dated Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:15:48 + (UTC) with message-id <2040885728.210376.1442312148557.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#798976: RFS: dhcpcd5/6.9.3-1 [ITA] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support has caused the Debian Bug report #798976, regarding RFS: dhcpcd5/6.9.3-1 [ITA] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 798976: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798976 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcpcd5" * Package name: dhcpcd5 Version : 6.9.3-1 Upstream Author : Roy Marples * URL : http://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd * License : BSD-2 Section : net It builds those binary packages: dhcpcd5- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dhcpcd5 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dhcpcd5/dhcpcd5_6.9.3-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * New maintainer (Closes: #770082) * Fix Multiplication of IPv6 addresses for upstream (Closes: #791582) * Fix dhcpcd doesn't configure chrony for upstream (Closes: #791583) * Remove lintian overrides. * d/dhcpd5.init: - Added $remote_fs for script init.d Regards, J.S.Júnior pgpRQLitCmqN_.pgp Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, the packaging LGTM Built&Signed&Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian! cheers, G.--- End Message ---
