Re: Request for sponsor

[Ksamak]

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:50:18AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> 
> Wouldn't it be easier to start directly from Ubuntu packages instead of
> outdated Knoppix ones?
> 
It probably would, yes. We have the upstream version packaged, we just
haven't run that many tests yet, that is why we chose to first push the
previous knoppiz version.

> A few random other things I noticed:
>
> * please build-depend on libjpeg-dev rather than libjpeg8-dev, while the
>   latter exists in unstable we really don't want anything to depend on
>   it in stretch
Ok, so we will try to depend on libjpeg-turbo, if that is the preferred

> * please build-depend on libpng-dev first (or solely)
The upstream version has already been packaged with libpng-dev. However,
there is a whole compiz plugin bound to managing jpeg, getting rid of libjpeg
would mean getting rid of that plugin.

> I didn't look any closer.
thank you for your time and your comments, we will test the upstream
version a little more intensely, try and make the libjpeg modification,
and we'll re-ask for input.

-- 
Ksamak
hypra.fr Team


pgp4ZXYu3JyDq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Request for sponsor

[Adam Borowski]

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:31AM +0100, Ksamak wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:50:18AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > * please build-depend on libjpeg-dev rather than libjpeg8-dev, while the
> >   latter exists in unstable we really don't want anything to depend on
> >   it in stretch
> Ok, so we will try to depend on libjpeg-turbo, if that is the preferred

It's best to depend on "libjpeg-dev" rather than a specific version, this
way you can use whatever future default may change to.

> > * please build-depend on libpng-dev first (or solely)
> The upstream version has already been packaged with libpng-dev. However,
> there is a whole compiz plugin bound to managing jpeg, getting rid of libjpeg
> would mean getting rid of that plugin.

I meant instead of "libpng12-dev | libpng-dev".  The buildds strip any
alternative dependencies but the first, thus your package will become
unbuildable when the png16 transition starts in a few days.

I did not mean "please drop libjpeg, libbmp or libpcx" :)


Meow!
-- 
A tit a day keeps the vet away.

Re: Request for sponser

[Adam Borowski]

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:24:52PM +0100, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> Le 16/02/2016 04:50, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:00:24AM +0100, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> >> Could a mentor have a look on this RFS please?
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/722451
> > 
> > Why do you rename an ITP to RFS?  Please file a separate bug.
> 
> Reallly!? But what about history? And how do we deal with 2 bug reports
> then: we close ITP? I'm afraid I don't understand. I really thought the
> bug needed to live its life until end. Could you explain to me how such
> bug reports should live (or tell me wether it's documented or not)?

ITP and RFS server different purposes:

ITP stakes your claim for the package, stating it's you who's working on it
and that others should talk/cooperate with you or risk work duplication or
worse.  The history on the ITP is important as it documents who's or was
interested in working on the package.  You don't close it until the package
actually enters Debian.  Packages should have exactly one ITP.

RFS is for requesting sponsoring a specific upload.  You file a new one
whenever you prepared a new version -- including updates to packages already
in Debian.  It's for coordinating with a sponsor about fixing problems in
the upload.

-- 
A tit a day keeps the vet away.

Bug#814919: RFS: opensmtpd/5.7.3p2-1 [RC] -- secure, reliable, lean, and easy-to configure SMTP server

[Ryan Kavanagh]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Control: block 813398 by -1
Control: tags 813398 + pending

Dear mentors,

My key expired and so I'm looking for someone to sponsor "opensmtpd".
(I've extended the expiry date on my key and uploaded it to keyring.d.o;
I'm just waiting for it to make it into debian-keyring).

You can fetch opensmtpd from https://people.debian.org/~rak/opensmtpd/ :

dget -x https://people.debian.org/~rak/opensmtpd/opensmtpd_5.7.3p2-1.dsc

Description:
 opensmtpd  - secure, reliable, lean, and easy-to configure SMTP server
Closes: 813398
Changes:
 opensmtpd (5.7.3p2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
 + Fixes segfault when relaying mail (Closes: #813398)
   * Make Vcs-* URLs secure
   * 'fortify' hardening option no longer detects false-positive buffer
 overflow when processing offline queue. Reenabling.
 + Accordingly, drop unneeded hardening-no-fortify overrides.
Checksums-Sha1:
 12370c5f0cfeee8f99b787d7a0351aea6ad93ea2 3044 opensmtpd_5.7.3p2-1.dsc
 4d1edc5811a80ec26de040227a298a742c494e72 709074 opensmtpd_5.7.3p2.orig.tar.gz
 e5a3bfa6b2cc94762c88d6c8ae517f63d52247f7 24732 
opensmtpd_5.7.3p2-1.debian.tar.xz
 0377401981504d2faeaf49b4596cdcfda4386c49 983770 
opensmtpd-dbgsym_5.7.3p2-1_amd64.deb
 ae991159a1123ffcae1427684581c7d96b18e073 265380 opensmtpd_5.7.3p2-1_amd64.deb

Thanks and best wishes,
Ryan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_CA.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
|_)|_/  Ryan Kavanagh   | Debian Developer
| \| \  http://ryanak.ca/   | GPG Key 4A11C97A


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#814921: RFS: sphde/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- sphde -- Shared Persistent Heap Data Environment library

[Frederic Bonnard]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphde"

 Package name: sphde
 Version : 1.1.0-1
 Upstream Author : SPHDE team
 URL : https://github.com/sphde/sphde
 License : EPL-1
 Section : devel

It builds those binary packages:

  libsphde-dev - Shared Persistent Heap Data Environment library development 
files
  libsphde-doc - Shared Persistent Heap Data Environment library documentation 
files
  libsphde1  - Shared Persistent Heap Data Environment library

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/sphde


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sphde/sphde_1.1.0-1.dsc

More information about sphde can be obtained from https://github.com/sphde/sphde

Regards,
 Frederic Bonnard

Bug#808546: marked as done (RFS: node-restore/0.3.0-1 [ITP] -- simple RemoteStorage server written in Node.js)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:54:01 +0100
with message-id <56c35429.7050...@debian.org>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #808546,
regarding RFS: node-restore/0.3.0-1 [ITP] -- simple RemoteStorage server 
written in Node.js
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
808546: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808546
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-restore":

 * Package name: node-restore
   Version : 0.3.0-1
   Upstream Author : James Coglan 
 * URL : https://github.com/jcoglan/restore
 * License : MIT
   Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  node-restore - Simple remoteStorage server

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/node-restore

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-restore/node-restore_0.3.0-1.dsc

More information about node-restore can be obtained from 
https://github.com/jcoglan/restore.

A WNPP ITP bug has been filed for this package as #804507.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804507

Regards,
 Markus Sabadello
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

control: noowner -1 !
no answer, no interest, no need.

g.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=0ofz
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---

Bug#802530: RFS [ITP]: node-ast-util/0.6.0-1

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi, ping

g.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=QGRb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#799268: ITP missing for package python-ck with RFS 799268 with ITP in title

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ck

did you look at the errors?

please fix the ITP, and ping back when done.

g.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=T7u/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#802902: marked as done (RFS: vconnectstand/20151108a-1 ITP)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:57:07 +0100
with message-id <56c354e3.9000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#802902: RFS: vconnectstand/2.0.1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #802902,
regarding RFS: vconnectstand/20151108a-1 ITP
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
802902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802902
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vconnectstand"

 * Package name: vconnectstand
   Version : 2.0.1
   Upstream Author : Hal@shurabaP,kbinani
 * URL : http://hal-the-cat.music.coocan.jp/ritsu_e.html
 * License : GPLv3
   Section : sound

  It builds those binary packages:

vconnectstand - singing synthesis engine

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/vconnectstand


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vconnectstand/vconnectstand_2.0.1.dsc

  This is the first uploaded version of vconnectstand, I don't think that any
update will follow. This program is a Japanese singing synthesizer based on a
technique that is similar to the algorithms that MBROLA uses. Some sound
examples can be found at
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EMjbm39x40
 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLqALKuO2R4



  Regards,
   Tobias Platen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Control: noowner -1 !

no answer, no interest, no package, no updates...

closing.

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:27:52 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
 wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
> 
> Hi, I still fail to see the update on mentors.
> 
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/vconnectstand
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Gianfranco
> 
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:33:23 +0100 Tobias Platen 
>  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 06.11.2015 15:44, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> ping, if you are still interested, please answer and fix the
>>> above :
> )
>>> (or ask about how to fix it)
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> 
>>> G.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:05:52 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna 
>>>  wrote:
 Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo
 
 Hi
 
 I looked at the mentors page. 
 https://mentors.debian.net/package/vconnectstand
 
 please fix the warnings/errors on that page, and then remove
 the mo
> rei
>>> nfo
 tag, and I'll look at it again
 
 showstoppers: 1) please use an ITP bug and close in
 changelog 2) the package shouldn't be native, but quilt
 format instead 3) add a watch file, and point to the correct
 source location ...
 
 some other stuff.
 
 cheers,
 
 G.
 
 
 
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=+yJs
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---

Bug#809449: marked as done (RFS: gsimplecal/2.0-2 [ITA])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:58:32 +0100
with message-id <56c35538.4040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#809449: RFS: gsimplecal/2.0-2 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #809449,
regarding RFS: gsimplecal/2.0-2 [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
809449: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809449
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gsimplecal"

 Package name    : gsimplecal
 Version : 2.0-2
 Upstream Author : Dmitry Medvinsky 
 URL : https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal
 License : BSD license
 Section : misc

 It builds those binary packages:

    gsimplecal - lightweight GUI calendar application

 To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/gsimplecal


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsimplecal/gsimplecal_2.0-2.dsc

 More information about gsimplecal can be obtained from 
https://github.com/yoann-dev/gsimplecal_Debian.

 Changes since the last upload:
    * Fix Hyphen error in manpage

  Best regards,
  
  Yoann GAUTHIER

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

control: noowner -1 !

no answer, no care, no package, nothing to sponsor.

closing.

g.

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:57:45 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
 wrote:
> Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> unstable and testing have version 2.1, while you are asking to
> sponsor version 2.0-2.
> 
> Please test your fix against the latest unstable version, and
> upload on mentors if still needed a new package.
> 
> (please start with a
> 
> dget -x
> http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsimplecal/gsimplecal_2.1-1.
dsc
> ) to avoid missing or having unwanted changes in the packaging.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> G.
> 
> 
> Il Mercoledì 30 Dicembre 2015 20:39, "yoann_...@net-c.com"
>  ha scritto:
> 
> 
> 
> Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gsimplecal"
> 
> Package name: gsimplecal Version : 2.0-2 Upstream
> Author : Dmitry Medvinsky  URL :
> https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal License : BSD
> license Section : misc
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
> gsimplecal - lightweight GUI calendar application
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
> 
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/gsimplecal
> 
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
> command:
> 
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsimplecal/gsimplecal_2.0
- -2.dsc
>
>  More information about gsimplecal can be obtained from
> https://github.com/yoann-dev/gsimplecal_Debian.
> 
> Changes since the last upload: * Fix Hyphen error in manpage
> 
> Best regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=/Dul
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---

Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Control: noowner -1

Hi, almost two months have been passed, and I still don't see progresses

Bug#808141: marked as done (RFS: eclipse-titan/5.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Compiler for TTCN-3 and for ASN.1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:34:37 +
with message-id <20160216173437.gc30...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#808141: sponsorship-requests: Dear mentors, I am 
looking for a sponsor for my package eclipse-titan.
has caused the Debian Bug report #808141,
regarding RFS: eclipse-titan/5.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Compiler for TTCN-3 and for ASN.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
808141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipse-titan":

Package name: eclipse-titan
Version : 5.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Eclipse Foundation
URL : www.eclipse.org
License : Eclipse Public License - v 1.0
Section : java

It builds this binary package:

eclipse-titan

TTCN-3 is a standardized, modular language specifically designed for testing.
Eclipse Titan offers a free and open source (FOSS) compiler both for TTCN-3 and
for ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One).

More information about eclipse-titan can be obtained from
https://github.com/eclipse/titan.core

This is the first upload so there isn’t any changelog.


Best Regards,
Gergely Pilisi



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:49:08PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Given that I like this more, can I upload this instead? :)

Followed up today privately and uploaded.

Thanks for your contribution to Debian!


-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#797864: marked as done (RFS: eclipse-titan/5.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Compiler for TTCN-3 and for ASN.1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:34:37 +
with message-id <20160216173437.gc30...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#808141: sponsorship-requests: Dear mentors, I am 
looking for a sponsor for my package eclipse-titan.
has caused the Debian Bug report #808141,
regarding RFS: eclipse-titan/5.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Compiler for TTCN-3 and for ASN.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
808141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipse-titan":

Package name: eclipse-titan
Version : 5.3-1
Upstream Author : Eclipse Foundation
URL : www.eclipse.org
License : Eclipse Public License - v 1.0
Section : utils

It builds this binary package:

eclipse-titan

TTCN-3 is a standardized, modular language specifically designed for testing. 
Eclipse Titan offers a free and open source (FOSS) compiler both for TTCN-3 and 
for ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One).

You can download the package with wget using this command:

wget https://www.dropbox.com/s/qkzdjefpp2ura11/eclipse-titan_5.3.tar.gz

More information about eclipse-titan can be obtained from 
https://github.com/eclipse/titan.core

This is the first upload so there isn't any changelog.


Best Regards,
Gergely Pilisi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:49:08PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Given that I like this more, can I upload this instead? :)

Followed up today privately and uploaded.

Thanks for your contribution to Debian!


-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#794209: marked as done (RFS: eclipse-titan/5.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Compiler for TTCN-3 and for ASN.1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:34:37 +
with message-id <20160216173437.gc30...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#808141: sponsorship-requests: Dear mentors, I am 
looking for a sponsor for my package eclipse-titan.
has caused the Debian Bug report #808141,
regarding RFS: eclipse-titan/5.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Compiler for TTCN-3 and for ASN.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
808141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: eclipse-titan
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipse-titan":

Package name: eclipse-titan
Version : 5.3-1
Upstream Author : Eclipse Foundation
URL : www.eclipse.org
License : Eclipse Public License - v 1.0
Section : utils

It builds this binary package:

eclipse-titan

TTCN-3 is a standardized, modular language specifically designed for testing. 
Eclipse Titan offers a free and open source (FOSS) compiler both for TTCN-3 and 
for ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One).

You can download the package with wget using this command:

wget https://www.dropbox.com/s/qkzdjefpp2ura11/eclipse-titan_5.3.tar.gz

More information about eclipse-titan can be obtained from 
https://github.com/eclipse/titan.core

This is the first upload so there isn't any changelog.


Best Regards,
Gergely Pilisi



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:49:08PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Given that I like this more, can I upload this instead? :)

Followed up today privately and uploaded.

Thanks for your contribution to Debian!


-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#814919: marked as done (RFS: opensmtpd/5.7.3p2-1 [RC] -- secure, reliable, lean, and easy-to configure SMTP server)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:52:38 +0100
with message-id <20160216175238.ga22...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#814919: RFS: opensmtpd/5.7.3p2-1 [RC] -- secure, 
reliable, lean, and easy-to configure SMTP server
has caused the Debian Bug report #814919,
regarding RFS: opensmtpd/5.7.3p2-1 [RC] -- secure, reliable, lean, and easy-to 
configure SMTP server
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814919
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Control: block 813398 by -1
Control: tags 813398 + pending

Dear mentors,

My key expired and so I'm looking for someone to sponsor "opensmtpd".
(I've extended the expiry date on my key and uploaded it to keyring.d.o;
I'm just waiting for it to make it into debian-keyring).

You can fetch opensmtpd from https://people.debian.org/~rak/opensmtpd/ :

dget -x https://people.debian.org/~rak/opensmtpd/opensmtpd_5.7.3p2-1.dsc

Description:
 opensmtpd  - secure, reliable, lean, and easy-to configure SMTP server
Closes: 813398
Changes:
 opensmtpd (5.7.3p2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
 + Fixes segfault when relaying mail (Closes: #813398)
   * Make Vcs-* URLs secure
   * 'fortify' hardening option no longer detects false-positive buffer
 overflow when processing offline queue. Reenabling.
 + Accordingly, drop unneeded hardening-no-fortify overrides.
Checksums-Sha1:
 12370c5f0cfeee8f99b787d7a0351aea6ad93ea2 3044 opensmtpd_5.7.3p2-1.dsc
 4d1edc5811a80ec26de040227a298a742c494e72 709074 opensmtpd_5.7.3p2.orig.tar.gz
 e5a3bfa6b2cc94762c88d6c8ae517f63d52247f7 24732 
opensmtpd_5.7.3p2-1.debian.tar.xz
 0377401981504d2faeaf49b4596cdcfda4386c49 983770 
opensmtpd-dbgsym_5.7.3p2-1_amd64.deb
 ae991159a1123ffcae1427684581c7d96b18e073 265380 opensmtpd_5.7.3p2-1_amd64.deb

Thanks and best wishes,
Ryan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_CA.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
|_)|_/  Ryan Kavanagh   | Debian Developer
| \| \  http://ryanak.ca/   | GPG Key 4A11C97A


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:15:22AM -0500, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> My key expired and so I'm looking for someone to sponsor "opensmtpd".
> (I've extended the expiry date on my key and uploaded it to keyring.d.o;
> I'm just waiting for it to make it into debian-keyring).

Uploaded.

Meow!
-- 
A tit a day keeps the vet away.--- End Message ---

Re: Request for sponser

[MENGUAL Jean-Philippe]

Hi,


Le 16/02/2016 04:50, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:00:24AM +0100, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
>> Could a mentor have a look on this RFS please?
>> http://bugs.debian.org/722451
> 
> Why do you rename an ITP to RFS?  Please file a separate bug.

Reallly!? But what about history? And how do we deal with 2 bug reports
then: we close ITP? I'm afraid I don't understand. I really thought the
bug needed to live its life until end. Could you explain to me how such
bug reports should live (or tell me wether it's documented or not)?

Regards,

Bug#814859: RFS: runescape/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Set in a fantasy world of war, landscapes and sinister powers

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

I have a few comments on this pavkage.

Firstly although it's clear you've put some work into this, I'm not so
sure packaging this client is that useful. I'm using Google Chrome, and
going to www.runescape.com and clicking "Play Now" launches the client
(through an external jar which autolaunches). Does this package do
anything more than that? When a linux runescape client is mentioned,
it's usually referring to Hikari Knight's client which has lots of
other features - https://launchpad.net/rsu-client

On the upstream code:
rs-lang/*:
 * Downloading over http is a security risk - use https.
 * Why not use $(mktemp -d)?
 * There's a lot of duplication between the files here which could be
   improved.

On the packaging itself:
d/README.Debian:
 * If you haven't changed the original source at all, you don't need
   this file.

d/control:
 * Since the program downloads non-free jars and executes them, the
   package must go into contrib and not main.
 * I think you've got the Build-Depends and Depends fields mixed up.
   Surely you need default-jre to RUN runescape rather than build the
   debian package?
 * The short description doesn't mention that this is a game.
 * The extended description should mention the non-freeness of the game
   itself.

d/copyright:
 * I'm not sure any of this code is copyright Jagex. Please use the
   correct Source and Files: * copyright.
 * Copyright is needed for runescape.xpm. I suspect this image is non-
   free.
 * Do not use "GPL-2" as the shortname if the license is not exactly
   the GPL-2.
 * You could probably shorten that section a bit with a reference to
   the common license in /usr/share/common-licenses.

d/rules:
 * The rules are very overcomplicated for what the package need to do.
   You could probably replace all of it with "%: dh $@".

d/runescape-docs.docs:
 * This file does nothing.

Thanks,
James

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for sponser

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi, ITP is closed on upload accepted on unstable, while RFS is closed by the 
sponsor when the upload is performed.

>Reallly!? But what about history? And how do we deal with 2 bug reports
>then: we close ITP? I'm afraid I don't understand. I really thought the
>bug needed to live its life until end. Could you explain to me how such
>bug reports should live (or tell me wether it's documented or not)?

ITP means "I want to package it"
RFS means "I want people to review and eventually sponsor it".

Two different meanings, so you need two bugs.

cheers,

G.

Bug#814956: RFS: paredit-el/24-1 [ITA] -- Emacs minor mode for structurally editing Lisp code

[Sean Whitton]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my adoption of paredit-el.

Paredit is an Emacs minor mode for editing LISP.  It enforces
consistency between opening and closing parentheses, and provides
various commands for structurally editing code.  It is in very wide use
by Emacs users.

* Package name: paredit-el
  Version : 24-1
  Upstream Author : Taylor R. Campbell
* URL : http://mumble.net/~campbell/emacs/paredit.el
* License : GPL-3+
  Section : lisp

Changes since the last upload:
 
  * Adopt paredit in Debian.  (Closes: #736380)
  * New upstream release.  (Closes: #564616)
  * Convert package build to use dh_elpa.  (Closes: #513048, #582062, #526598)
Binary package renamed paredit-el -> elpa-paredit with
transitional binary package provided.
  * New machine-readable debian/copyright file.  (Closes: #814825)
  * Change source format to 3.0 (quilt).
  * Bump debhelper compat level to 9 (no additional changes required)
  * Bump standards version to 3.9.7 (no additional changes required).
  * Add gbp.conf.
  * Change package section editors -> lisp to comply with dh_elpa
packaging conventions.
  * Add Vcs-* fields to debian/control.
  * Install upstream changelog.
  * Generate and install HTML documentation.
  * Register HTML documentation with doc-base.
  * Install CREDITS file.
  * Run upstream test suite as part of package build.
 
Download with dget:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/paredit-el/paredit-el_24-1.dsc

Or build it with gbp:

git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/paredit-el.git
git checkout pristine-tar  # to create this branch locally, so gbp uses it
git checkout debian/24-1
git verify-tag debian/24-1 # if you have my key
gbp buildpackage

Thanks.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#814662: marked as done (RFS: tweepy/3.5.0-1 [RC])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:37:06 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: tweepy/3.5.0-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #814662,
regarding RFS: tweepy/3.5.0-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tweepy"

 * Package name: tweepy
   Version : 3.5.0-1
   Upstream Author : Joshua Roesslein 
 * URL : http://www.tweepy.org/
 * License : MIT
   Section : python

It builds these binary packages:

 python-tweepy - Twitter library for Python
 python-tweepy-doc - Documentation for python-tweepy module
 python3-tweepy - Twitter library for Python 3

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/tweepy


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tweepy/tweepy_3.5.0-1.dsc

The Debian packaging can be found here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/tweepy.git

Changes since the last upload:

  * Team upload
  * New upstream release
  * Disable upstream tests (Closes: #804558)
The tests fail as they need internet access
  * Use secure URL for Vcs
  * Make Python 3 package short description unique


Regards,
Ross Gammon



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package tweepy version 3.5.0-1 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/tweepy--- End Message ---