Bug#826929: RFS: helm/1.9.7-1 -- Emacs incremental completion and selection narrowing framework
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an update to helm. * Package name: helm Version : 1.9.7-1 Upstream Author : Thierry Volpiatto * URL : https://emacs-helm.github.io/helm/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : lisp Changes since the last upload: * Package new upstream version. * Refresh patch. Download with dget: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/helm/helm_1.9.7-1.dsc Or build it with gbp: gbp clone --pristine-tar https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/helm.git cd helm gbp buildpackage Thanks. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#826661: RFS: groonga/6.0.4-1
Hi, Thank you for reviewing! > Hi, I did a debdiff between them, and I see some changes that might be ABI > breaking the library: > > -GRN_API grn_rc grn_timeval_now(grn_ctx *ctx, grn_timeval *tv); > -GRN_API grn_rc grn_timeval2str(grn_ctx *ctx, grn_timeval *tv, char *buf, > size_t buf_size); > -struct tm *grn_timeval2tm(grn_ctx *ctx, grn_timeval *tv, struct tm > *tm_buffer); > -grn_rc grn_str2timeval(const char *str, uint32_t str_len, grn_timeval *tv); > > > removing symbols might be an ABI break The above functions are kept in lib/time.c. They are not removed. > also adding a field to a struct > + grn_bool is_dirty; > > (not always) > > as well as adding them in the middle of a struct > - uint32_t reserved[1003]; > + uint32_t n_dirty_opens; > + uint32_t reserved[1002]; > grn_pat_delinfo delinfos[GRN_PAT_NDELINFOS]; > grn_id garbages[GRN_PAT_MAX_KEY_SIZE + 1]; The n_dirty_opens is added, but it is just allocated from reserved area. so it keeps compatibility. > so, please answer wrt ABI/API breakage. I've contacted upstream author, and heard the following policy about Groonga ABI. There are two kind of policy about ABI for Groonga. * experimental APIs Groonga is shipped every month. The new release sometimes contains experimental API. There is no guarantee for it. It may be suddenly changed. Even though such a case, it doesn't regarded as ABI breakage because it is experimental. * stable APIs if this kind of APIs are changed, it needs to be raise ABI version, but these APIs are not changed yet. pgpt7BMCWx_ZJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#821171: marked as done (RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #821171, regarding RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 821171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821171 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "growl-for-linux" * Package name: growl-for-linux Version : 0.8.1-2 Upstream Author : Yasuhiro Matsumoto * URL : http://mattn.github.com/growl-for-linux * License : BSD-2-clause Section : gnome It builds those binary packages: growl-for-linux - Notification system which is extendable by a plugin To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/growl-for-linux Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/growl-for-linux/growl-for-linux_0.8.1-2.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://mattn.github.com/growl-for-linux Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload to Debian (Closes: #816514) * debian/control - Fixed package-depends-on-hardcoded-libc lintian warning - Upgraded to debhelper 9 - Upgraded to standards-version 3.9.7 - Added missing TLS dependency - Updated package description about growl-for-linux * debian/copyright - Rewrited to machine-readable debian/copyright * debian/changelog - Fixed wrong email address * debian/rules - Fixed non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file lintian warning - Added hardening flags (+all,-pie) - Drop deprecated libtweets subscriber - Fixed not to call needless ldconfig * debian/patches/add-missing-desktop-keyword.patch - Added missing "Keywords=" field * debian/patches/add-pie-flags-for-gol.patch - Added hardening flags (-pie,-fPIE) for gol * debian/patches/disable-display-execstack.patch - Fixed needless executable stack lintian warning * debian/patches/fix-a-typo-about-recieved.patch - Fixed a typo in SQLite schema * debian/patches/fix-typo-about-faild.patch - Fixed a typo in error message Regards, HAYASHI Kentaro --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package growl-for-linux has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#819615: marked as done (RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool)
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool has caused the Debian Bug report #819615, regarding RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 819615: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819615 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the "spin" package: * Package name: spin Version : 6.4.5 Upstream Author : Gerard J. Holzmann * URL : http://spinroot.com * License : BSD-3-clause Section : devel It builds those binary packages: spin - formal software verification tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/spin N.B. no watchfile is present due to the naming strategy of the upstream tarball: uscan interprets the version number as "645" when the release is actually "6.4.5". if there's a way to teach uscan how to figure this out, I'm all ears! One can also download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spin/spin_6.4.5-1.dsc More information about spin can be obtained from http://spinroot.com Cheers, Tom --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package spin version 6.4.5-1 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/spin--- End Message ---
Bug#811426: marked as done (RFS: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/1.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #811426, regarding RFS: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 811426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811426 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize" * Package name: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Kenny Grant * URL : https://github.com/kennygrant/sanitize * License : BSD Section : devel It builds those binary packages: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize-dev - Functions for sanitizing text in golang strings To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize_1.0-1.dsc More information about sanitize can be obtained from https://github.com/kennygrant/sanitize. Regards, Nathan Osman --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#791724: marked as done (RFS: w1retap/1.4.4-1 [ITP] -- Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors)
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: w1retap/1.4.4-1 [ITP] -- Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors has caused the Debian Bug report #791724, regarding RFS: w1retap/1.4.4-1 [ITP] -- Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 791724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791724 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "w1retap": * Package name: w1retap Version : 1.4.2 Upstream Author : Jonathan Hudson * URL : http://www.zen35309.zen.co.uk/wx/tech.html * License : GPL with some Expat Programming Lang: C Description : Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors It builds those binary packages: libw1retap0 - Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors libw1retap0-mongo - Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors libw1retap0-odbc - Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors libw1retap0-pgsql - Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors libw1retap0-sqlite - Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors w1retap - Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/w1retap Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/w1retap/w1retap_1.4.2-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.zen35309.zen.co.uk/wx/tech.html. Changes since the last upload: w1retap (1.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #787770) Kind Regards -- Tom --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package w1retap has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#808249: marked as done (RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU])
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:46 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #808249, regarding RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 808249: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808249 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libirman" * Package name: libirman Version : 0.5.1 Upstream Author : Tom Wheeley * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libirman/ * License : GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libirman-dev - library for accessing the Irman InfraRed hardware libirman0 - Shared library to access the libirman hardware. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libirman Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libi/libirman/libirman_0.5.1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: libirman (0.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Update to latest upstream, closes: #801588. * Handle conditional build of lirc plugin when lirc >= 0.9.4. -- Alec Leamas Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:16:26 +0100 Regards, Alec Leamas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package libirman has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Re: Importing ubuntu package
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > What is common practice about adopting ubuntu packages? I want to > adopt ubuntu `btpd' package, but it already have it's changelog. I > think it would be impolite to just discard it. What is recommended way > to follow Debian policy and still make a credit to previous > maintainer? Normally I would suggest: Discuss it with Cesare Falco, who appears to have done most of the work in Ubuntu. Download the Ubuntu source package and continue from there, keeping the changelog entries. However, Cesare hasn't done anything since 2010 so you probably don't need to contact him. http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/b/btpd/btpd_0.16-0ubuntu2/changelog > X-Keep-In-CC: yes FYI, usually this is expressed with these mail headers: Reply-To Mail-Followup-To -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Re: phonetisaurus in unstable
* Giulio Paci , 2016-06-08, 11:48: In #825236, Giulio asked me about uploading phonetisaurus to unstable. If I were the maintainer, I would hesitate to make such upload until the following is done: I forgot one thing: * phonetisaurus-calculateER should escape arguments before passing them to shell. Or, better, it should use the subprocess module instead of os.system(). * 1001_fix_binaries_return_values.patch is accepted upstream. (Are they alive?) They are alive (latest commit in their repository is from 3 months ago), although they have not made any proper release since a long time. Hmm, I had a look at the repo. "!WARNING: In Flux!"[0] and "What happened to this project?"[1] don't make me confident that this software is mature enough for a stable Debian release... [0] https://github.com/AdolfVonKleist/Phonetisaurus#readme [1] https://github.com/AdolfVonKleist/Phonetisaurus/issues/3 -- Jakub Wilk
Importing ubuntu package
Hello! What is common practice about adopting ubuntu packages? I want to adopt ubuntu `btpd' package, but it already have it's changelog. I think it would be impolite to just discard it. What is recommended way to follow Debian policy and still make a credit to previous maintainer? -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language: eo,en,ru X-Keep-In-CC: yes X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io
