Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

[Herminio Hernandez Jr.]

Thanks again for the info. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Paul Wise  wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>> 
>> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of the
>> package yet.
> 
> There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new release.
> 
> James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
> pointed you to:
> 
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit
> 
> In addition to what James pointed out:
> 
> There are warnings from the build log checks:
> 
> http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html
> 
> The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
> it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
> something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
> the two build logs:
> 
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz
> 
> There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
> them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
> be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit
> 
> There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:
> 
> https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit
> 
> There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
> to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.
> 
> https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit
> 
> You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
> 
> You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
> find in other Linux distros to upstream.
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas
> 
> The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit
> 
> -- 
> bye,
> pabs
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

[Herminio Hernandez Jr.]

I am working on trying to get the lintian errors resolved. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Paul Wise  wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>> 
>> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of the
>> package yet.
> 
> There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new release.
> 
> James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
> pointed you to:
> 
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit
> 
> In addition to what James pointed out:
> 
> There are warnings from the build log checks:
> 
> http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html
> 
> The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
> it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
> something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
> the two build logs:
> 
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz
> 
> There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
> them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
> be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit
> 
> There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:
> 
> https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit
> 
> There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
> to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.
> 
> https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit
> 
> You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
> 
> You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
> find in other Linux distros to upstream.
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas
> 
> The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit
> 
> -- 
> bye,
> pabs
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

[Paul Wise]

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:

> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of the
> package yet.

There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new release.

James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
pointed you to:

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit

In addition to what James pointed out:

There are warnings from the build log checks:

http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html

The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
the two build logs:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz

There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit

There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:

https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit

There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.

https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit

You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git

You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
find in other Linux distros to upstream.

https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas

The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#827616: marked as done (RFS: libjreen/1.2.0-2 - bugfix)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Jun 2016 04:10:04 +0200
with message-id <20160619021004.ga22...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#827616: RFS: libjreen/1.2.0-2 - bugfix
has caused the Debian Bug report #827616,
regarding RFS: libjreen/1.2.0-2 - bugfix
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
827616: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827616
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a update of my package "jreen" to fix the
bug (https://bugs.debian.org/827585).

 * Package name: jreen
   Version : 1.2.0-2
   Upstream Author : Ruslan Nigmatullin 
 * URL : https://github.com/euroelessar/jreen
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : libs

 It builds those binary packages:

libjreen-dbg - Jabber/XMPP library (Qt 4) - debugging
libjreen-dev - Jabber/XMPP library (Qt 4) - development
libjreen-qt5-1 - Jabber/XMPP library implemented in Qt5/C++
libjreen-qt5-dbg - Jabber/XMPP library (Qt 5) - debugging
libjreen-qt5-dev - Jabber/XMPP library (Qt 5) - development
libjreen1 - Jabber/XMPP library implemented in Qt4/C++

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/jreen


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jreen/jreen_1.2.0-2.dsc


 Regards,
   Stefan Ahlers
   (https://launchpad.net/~justin-time)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 07:05:13PM +0200, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for a update of my package "jreen" to fix the
> bug (https://bugs.debian.org/827585).
> 
>  * Package name: jreen
>Version : 1.2.0-2

It's in.

-- 
An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy.--- End Message ---

Bug#827641: RFS: niceshaper/1.2.3-1 -- Dynamic Traffic Shaper

[Mariusz Jedwabny]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "niceshaper"

* Package name: niceshaper
  Version : 1.2.3-1
  Upstream Author : Mariusz Jedwabny 
* URL :http://niceshaper.jedwabny.net
* License : GPL-2
  Section : net

It builds those binary packages:

  niceshaper - Dynamic Traffic Shaper

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/niceshaper


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/niceshaper/niceshaper_1.2.3-1.dsc

More information about niceshaper can be obtained 
fromhttp://niceshaper.jedwabny.net.

Changes since the last upload:

niceshaper (1.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.

 -- Mariusz Jedwabny   Tue, 07 Jun 2016 23:14:29 +0200


Regards,
 Mariusz Jedwabny

Bug#827487: RFS: circle/2.2-1 [ITP]

[Jakub Wilk]

I had a quick look at this package too:

Vcs-Git is supposed to point to Debian packaging, not to upstream VCS.
(After you fix it, please also add Vcs-Browser.)

Where did the upstream tarball come from? There is no watch file, and 
debian/copyright points to , 
which doesn't have a release for version 2.2.


* Adam Borowski , 2016-06-18, 23:21:

debian/rules:
* please move flags exports before including dpkg/default.mk. The 
order matters -- your version doesn't use hardening.


Or remove the include and DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS, and let debhelper do 
the job...


Also, I wonder if there's a better place for the URL than 
/usr/share/doc/README.


(I hope this path is a typo...) The better place is the Homepage field; 
and in fact this very URL is already there, ...


Other stuff in that file are build instructions which are irrelevant 
for packaged software.


...so I'd recommend not shipping README in the binary package at this 
time.


Typo in the manpage:
easy of use -> ease of use

Also, "ascii" is normally spelled "ASCII".

Please forward the manpage upstream.



Spell-checking was brought to you by mwic:
http://jwilk.net/software/mwic


--
Jakub Wilk

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

[Herminio Hernandez, Jr.]

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 2:10 PM, James Cowgill  wrote:

> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 13:28 -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >  Dear mentors,
> >
> >  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luakit"
>
> It seems the only change you've made to the package is to set the
> Maintainer field to yourself. I doubt you will get sponsorship for this
> because you haven't actually improved anything.
>
> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of the
package yet.


> There are bug reports here you could look at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/luakit
>
> This bug might be an issue for the stretch release:
> https://bugs.debian.org/790207
>
> Also the lintian errors here:
> https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packa...@qa.debian.org.html#luakit
>
> I see from this bug that luakit has been recently revived using the
> contents of a fork:
> https://github.com/luakit/luakit/issues/299
>
> You should try and get them to make an official release which you could
> then package.
>
> Thanks for the info will definately take a look!

> Thanks,
> James

Bug#827487: RFS: circle/2.2-1 [ITP]

[Adam Borowski]

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Roberto S. Galende wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bytes-circle"
> 
> Package name: bytes-circle
> Version : 2.2-2

Hi!
Looks almost good, I found just three minor issues.  None of them is a
show-stopper, but let's have the package in a better shape from the start.

debian/changelog:
* why the Debian revision is -2 rather than -1?  That's appropriate only of
  there's a -1 in the changelog.  And that would make sense only if the
  packaging had a meaningful history in the wild (like, import from a
  derivative or a public repository).

debian/control:
* please say what the program is for (ie, the first and last paragraphs)
  rather than describing its use and output.  That's what the man page
  and/or README are for.

debian/rules:
* please move flags exports before including dpkg/default.mk.  The order
  matters -- your version doesn't use hardening.

Also, I wonder if there's a better place for the URL than
/usr/share/doc/README.  Other stuff in that file are build instructions
which are irrelevant for packaged software.

BTW, ♥ the "circulos meos" reference.


Meow!
-- 
An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy.

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

[James Cowgill]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi,

On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 13:28 -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
>  Dear mentors,
> 
>  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luakit"

It seems the only change you've made to the package is to set the
Maintainer field to yourself. I doubt you will get sponsorship for this
because you haven't actually improved anything.

There are bug reports here you could look at:
https://bugs.debian.org/luakit

This bug might be an issue for the stretch release:
https://bugs.debian.org/790207

Also the lintian errors here:
https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packa...@qa.debian.org.html#luakit

I see from this bug that luakit has been recently revived using the
contents of a fork:
https://github.com/luakit/luakit/issues/299

You should try and get them to make an official release which you could
then package.

Thanks,
James

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#827624: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA

[Herminio Hernandez, Jr.]

Control: merge 827624 827623

Thus was a duplicate of the other.

Thanks
Herminio

Bug#827624: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA

[Herminio Hernandez, Jr.]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luakit"

  Package name: luakit
  Version : 2012.09.13-r1-9
  Upstream Author : Mason Larobina 
  URL : https://github.com/luakit/luakit
  License : GPLv3
  Section : web

  It builds those binary packages:

luakit - fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/luakit


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/luakit/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-9.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

* Updated Maintainer field in debian/control



  Regards,

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

[Herminio Hernandez, Jr.]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luakit"

  Package name: luakit
  Version : 2012.09.13-r1-9
  Upstream Author : Mason Larobina 
  URL : https://github.com/luakit/luakit
  License : GPLv3
  Section : web

  It builds those binary packages:

luakit - fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/luakit


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/luakit/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-9.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

  [your most recent changelog entry]


  Regards,
   Herminio Hernandez Jr

Bug#824466: RFS: setop/0.1-1 [ITP]

[Frank Stähr]

Hello Gianfranco,

I think we are nearly ready, don’t give up.


Am 20.05.2016 um 21:59 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:

I deleted the dependence libboost-dev as suggested, ALTHOUGH I am not
sure if that is correct.
The documentation just says “This package provides headers.” Besides
regex and program-options I indeed need some other headers and now I
don’t know if these are installed for sure.



each sublibrary has its headers and its libraries, so you need just the minimum 
set
needed.


Nevertheless, I don’t see why e. g. boost/algorithm/string/trim.hpp is 
guaranteed to be installed. It might be a coincidence that it is 
included by regex or program-options. In my case e. g. libboost1.58-dev 
was automatically installed together with regex/program-options.

(But you do not need to explain. I just wanted to exclude an error.)



Changed the text according to the examples.



I still don't get why having two licenses.


There is a good reason, but I see that it is unnecessarily tortuous to 
do so. That’s why everything under GPL-2+ now.




you need a LICENSE file inside your tarball, with the license text inside,
otherwise the package will be probably rejected.


Really?
 says, 
common licenses may just be refered.




(BTW std-version is 3.9.8 now)


Ok.


Thx for all the work and your patience,
Frank

Bug#827487: RFS: circle/2.2-1 [ITP]

[Roberto S. Galende]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bytes-circle"

Package name: bytes-circle
Version : 2.2-2
Upstream Author : Roberto S. Galende 
URL :
https://circulosmeos.wordpress.com/2015/10/10/statistics-circle-for-analysing-byte-entropy-in-files/
License : GPL 3
Section : math

It builds those binary packages:

bytes-circle - Show byte statistics as an ascii circle graph

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/bytes-circle


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget 
-xhttps://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bytes-circle/bytes-circle_2.2-2.dsc

More information about circle can be obtained from
https://circulosmeos.wordpress.com/2015/10/10/statistics-circle-for-analysing-byte-entropy-in-files/.


Regards,
Roberto S. Galende


2016-06-18 20:33 GMT+02:00 Roberto S. Galende :

> Hi Adam,
>
> Thank you for your review.
>
> I've hopefully patched all issues.
> As per #827555 
> suggestion, I've changed package name to bytes-circle.
>
> Greetings
>
> 
>
> 2016-06-17 1:06 GMT+02:00 Adam Borowski :
>
>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Roberto S. Galende wrote:
>> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "circle"
>> >
>> > Package name: circle
>> > Version : 2.2-1
>> > URL : http://wp.me/p2FmmK-96
>> >
>> > circle - Show byte statistics as an ascii circle graph
>>
>> Hi!
>> First, please file an ITP bug (via "reportbug wnpp").  This is no mere
>> formality, as it lets readers of debian-devel make comments with respect
>> to
>> your plans.
>>
>>
>> debian/changelog:
>> * "This is my first Debian package." is a comment that doesn't belong in
>> the
>>   changelog.
>> * please "(Closes: #>
>> debian/README.Debian:
>> debian/README.source:
>> * please delete, there's no non-boilerplate content
>>
>> debian/control:
>> * please set Standards-Version to 3.9.8
>> * typo: ascci -> ascii
>> * the long description could use some elaboration
>>
>> debian/copyright:
>> * please delete the boilerplate comments, they don't apply
>> * [nitpick] Files: * already includes Files: debian/*
>>
>> debian/rules:
>> * all commented out boilerplate other than #DH_VERBOSE = 1 (somewhat
>> useful
>>   as a reminder while debugging) should be axed
>> * you may want to uncomment some, though: hardening, -Wall
>>
>> debian/circle/1:
>> * s/SECTION/1/
>> * again, s/ascci/ascii/
>>
>> Otherwise, the package builds correctly and seems to work.
>>
>>
>> Please use "lintian" both on source and binary packages and address
>> problems
>> it reports before uploading.  Using "lintian -i" will give quite helpful
>> hints how to fix them.
>>
>>
>> Meow!
>> --
>> An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy.
>>
>
>

Bug#827487: RFS: circle/2.2-1 [ITP]

[Roberto S. Galende]

Hi Adam,

Thank you for your review.

I've hopefully patched all issues.
As per #827555 
suggestion, I've changed package name to bytes-circle.

Greetings



2016-06-17 1:06 GMT+02:00 Adam Borowski :

> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Roberto S. Galende wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "circle"
> >
> > Package name: circle
> > Version : 2.2-1
> > URL : http://wp.me/p2FmmK-96
> >
> > circle - Show byte statistics as an ascii circle graph
>
> Hi!
> First, please file an ITP bug (via "reportbug wnpp").  This is no mere
> formality, as it lets readers of debian-devel make comments with respect to
> your plans.
>
>
> debian/changelog:
> * "This is my first Debian package." is a comment that doesn't belong in
> the
>   changelog.
> * please "(Closes: #
> debian/README.Debian:
> debian/README.source:
> * please delete, there's no non-boilerplate content
>
> debian/control:
> * please set Standards-Version to 3.9.8
> * typo: ascci -> ascii
> * the long description could use some elaboration
>
> debian/copyright:
> * please delete the boilerplate comments, they don't apply
> * [nitpick] Files: * already includes Files: debian/*
>
> debian/rules:
> * all commented out boilerplate other than #DH_VERBOSE = 1 (somewhat useful
>   as a reminder while debugging) should be axed
> * you may want to uncomment some, though: hardening, -Wall
>
> debian/circle/1:
> * s/SECTION/1/
> * again, s/ascci/ascii/
>
> Otherwise, the package builds correctly and seems to work.
>
>
> Please use "lintian" both on source and binary packages and address
> problems
> it reports before uploading.  Using "lintian -i" will give quite helpful
> hints how to fix them.
>
>
> Meow!
> --
> An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy.
>

Bug#827616: RFS: libjreen/1.2.0-2 - bugfix

[Stefan Ahlers]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a update of my package "jreen" to fix the
bug (https://bugs.debian.org/827585).

 * Package name: jreen
   Version : 1.2.0-2
   Upstream Author : Ruslan Nigmatullin 
 * URL : https://github.com/euroelessar/jreen
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : libs

 It builds those binary packages:

libjreen-dbg - Jabber/XMPP library (Qt 4) - debugging
libjreen-dev - Jabber/XMPP library (Qt 4) - development
libjreen-qt5-1 - Jabber/XMPP library implemented in Qt5/C++
libjreen-qt5-dbg - Jabber/XMPP library (Qt 5) - debugging
libjreen-qt5-dev - Jabber/XMPP library (Qt 5) - development
libjreen1 - Jabber/XMPP library implemented in Qt4/C++

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/jreen


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jreen/jreen_1.2.0-2.dsc


 Regards,
   Stefan Ahlers
   (https://launchpad.net/~justin-time)

Bug#827612: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-3 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library

[Roger Shimizu]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcork"

 * Package name: libcork
   Version : 0.15.0+ds-3
   Upstream Author : Douglas Creager 
 * URL : http://libcork.readthedocs.io
 * License : BSD-3-clause
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

 libcork-dev - simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library (development
 libcork-doc - simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library (documentatio
 libcork15  - simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcork

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcork/libcork_0.15.0+ds-3.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * debian/patches:
 - Add build support for kFreeBSD and GNU/Hurd. Thanks to Aaron M. Ucko.
   (Closes: #826263)

I pushed my changes to git repo: https://github.com/rogers0/libcork
(except the final releasing commit)

Thanks and looking forward to your sponsor!

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 17B3ACB1

Bug#825693: RFS: nlohmann-json/1.1.0-1 [ITP]

[Muri Nicanor]

hi,

On 06/17/2016 03:03 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> "No embedded code copies" is not a blind rule, it has its reasons, and I
> think none of them applies here. It would be nice to use the Debian copy
> after it is updated but I don't think it's a blocker. 
oke, sounds like a good plan

> If nobody voices
> their objections I can sponsor the package.
great, thanks! if there's anything i have to/should do now, just tell me ;)

cheers,
-- 
muri



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#827590: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1 [ITP]

[Lumin]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-trepl"

 * Package name: lua-torch-trepl
   Version : 0~20160613-g06128f9-1
   Upstream Author : Torch Developers
 * URL : github.com/torch/trepl
 * License : BSD-3-Clause
   Section : interpreters

  It builds those binary packages:

lua-torch-trepl - REPL Package for Troch Framework
torch-trepl - REPL Package for Troch Framework

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-torch-trepl


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-torch-trepl/lua-torch-trepl_0~20160613-g06128f9-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com

Bug#827582: RFS: lua-torch-xlua/0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1 [ITP]

[Lumin]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-xlua"

 * Package name: lua-torch-xlua
   Version : 0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1
   Upstream Author : Torch Devs
 * URL : github.com/torch/xlua
 * License : BSD-3-Clause
   Section : interpreters

  It builds those binary packages:

lua-torch-xlua - Lua Extension Package for Torch Framework

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-torch-xlua


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-torch-xlua/lua-torch-xlua_0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1.dsc


  Changes since the last upload:
lua-torch-trepl (0~20160613-g06128f9-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * Initial release. Closes: #826791



-- 
Best,
Lumin