Bug#828166: RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

On Saturday, June 25 2016, Felix Krull wrote:

> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "speedcrunch"
>
> * Package name: speedcrunch
>   Version : 0.11-1
>   Upstream Author : Helder Correia & others
> * URL : http://speedcrunch.org
> * License : GPL-2+
>   Section : math

Hey, Felix,

Thanks for adopting this package.

FWIW, I reviewed it and everything looks fine.  I guess my only nitpick
would be about the use of VERBOSE when invoking make.  I personally
prefer to set it to 1 every time, because I don't like the way cmake
hides the command line that was used to compile objects.  But I realize
that is more a matter of taste.

Other than that, things look great.

Thanks

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#826063: marked as done (RFS: libu2f-host/1.0.0-2 [NMU] [RC] -- U2F host communication library)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2016 21:13:44 +0200
with message-id <20160625191344.ga29...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#826063: RFS: libu2f-host/1.0.0-2 [NMU] [RC] -- U2F 
host communication library
has caused the Debian Bug report #826063,
regarding RFS: libu2f-host/1.0.0-2 [NMU] [RC] -- U2F host communication library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
826063: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my upload for the libu2f-host package.
It fixes the following RC bug:
  #820686: FTBFS - missing build-dep libglib2.0-dev

The package's maintainer team, the Debian Authentication Maintainers, has
  not commented on the bug since it was opened, 2 months ago.


The dsc and build artifacts can be found in
  https://nicolas.braud-santoni.eu/tmp/deb/

They were produced, using pdebuild(1), from the source in
  https://github.com/nbraud/libu2f-host-dpkg/tree/bug-820686
  (signed commit 4e6802ca12362e415ee45fcab64f38a601b02420)

This changed has been submitted back to the packaging repo as a pull request:
  https://github.com/Yubico/libu2f-host-dpkg/pull/1

It ignores the commits that got added since the last version that was published
  in the archive (esp. the merging of a new upstream version).


Best,

  nicoo
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:45:27PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > I'm afraid that your upload removes data about an upload from the changelog:
> > 
> > .--
> > libu2f-host (1.0.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
> Yes indeed.

Strictly speaking, you still have a "\n" too much in the middle, but I've
fixed that too :þ

It's in, thanks for the fix!

-- 
An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy.--- End Message ---

Bug#826063: RFS: libu2f-host/1.0.0-2 [NMU] [RC] -- U2F host communication library

[Nicolas Braud-Santoni]

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:45:27PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> 
> I'm afraid that your upload removes data about an upload from the changelog:
> 
> .--
> libu2f-host (1.0.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium

Yes indeed.

It turns out that this upload wasn't commited in the packaging repo,
which is pretty frustrating.


> Also, your version number is bad for a non-native package: it should be
> 1.0.0-1.2.

OK.

Thanks a lot for all the feedback, and I uploaded one last go at this.
If this gets uploaded, I will see about getting it in the packaging VCS.


Best,

  nicoo


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#828166: RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]

[Felix Krull]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "speedcrunch"

* Package name: speedcrunch
  Version : 0.11-1
  Upstream Author : Helder Correia & others
* URL : http://speedcrunch.org
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : math

It builds those binary packages:

  speedcrunch - High precision calculator

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/speedcrunch

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/speedcrunch/speedcrunch_0.11-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

* New maintainer (closes: #826923).
* New upstream release (closes: #771440).
* debian/docs: update for new readme file.
* debian/patches: remove outdated patches.
* debian/speedcrunch.desktop: remove desktop file, upstream now includes
one.
* debian/control: Standards-Version, Vcs-*, update build dependencies.
* debian/install: PNG icon is now installed by upstream build process.
* debian/rules: adapt to changes in build system, make better use of dh
features, use Debian build flags.
* debian/menu: remove.
* debian/watch: update.
* Import .desktop file keywords from upstream (LP: #994190).

Regards,
Felix Krull

Bug#828157: RFS: lua-stdlib/41.2.0-1 [ITP #727169]

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-stdlib":

* Package name: lua-stdlib
  Version : v35
  Upstream Author : Reuben Thomas et al.
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/rrthomas/lua-stdlib
* License : MIT
  Description : Standard Lua libraries

It builds those binary packages:

  lua-stdlib - Standard Lua libraries
lua-stdlib-dev - Standard Lua libraries - development files
 
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-stdlib

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-stdlib/lua-stdlib_41.2.0-1.dsc

More information about lua-stdlib can be obtained from
.

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#828030: RFS: gdbm/1.12-3

[Sven Joachim]

On 2016-06-25 05:24 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:

>> On 2016-06-24 00:19 -0400, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>> 
>> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdbm"
>> >
>> > Changes since last upload:
>> >
>> >   * Separate translation files (/usr/share/locale/*) into new binary
>> > package 'libgdbm-l10n' to comply with Policy =A78.2 (Closes: #828005)
>> Thanks for the fast reaction to that bug report. :-)  There seem to be a
>> few minor problems.
>>
>> Since you are moving files between packages, libgdbm-l10n needs a
>> versioned Replaces on libgdbm4 to avoid file conflicts on upgrades.
>> Actually the same holds for libgdbm-dev, in 1.12-2 you moved files from
>> libgdbm4 to it.
>
> Fixed. But please review carefully.

The changes in debian/control look good to me, but your changelog says
you added Breaks when it's actually Replaces.

There is one change in 1.8.3-14 which you have not incorporated, namely
making libgdbm-dev "Multi-Arch: same".  Please check whether the files
outside of /usr/lib are identical across architectures and re-add the
Multi-Arch field if they are.

Cheers,
   Sven

Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1 [ITP]

[Roger Shimizu]

Dear G,

Here's a slightly updated version, with my comment.
(pkg already uploaded to mentors)

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
 wrote:
>
>>>It's runtime config file, which will be installed to: etc/shadowsocks-libev
>>
>> not sure about hardcoding passwords that way... maybe generate them at 
>> install
>> time with apg or similar?
>> (postinst or similar)
>>
>> I don't want all the userbase to have the same tool with the same default 
>> password.
>
>>Done.
>>Add postinst script to handle this.
>
>
>>I like that solution!
>
>
> but shouldn't this be executed only during install?
> the place where you put suggests the code will be executed and re-executed 
> during all
> the calls (configure deconfigure abort upgrade and so on)
>
> I would do it in configure, and don't care about the upgrade, because even 
> re-running
> it will be a no-op (unless apg generates the same "barfoo!" password :) )
> LOL, in that case it will be changed during an apt-get {dist-}upgrade :)

It's my intention, to do it when upgrading/reinstall.
Because before this ITP/RFS, user may already build deb themselves,
and have this fixed passwd on system.
Here I want to make sure the fixed passwd will be gone.


>>Hope you cannot find a nitpick this time :-P
>
> there is always something to nitpick :)
>
> e.g.
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/shadowsocks-libev
> "W debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version
> line 7"
>
> what does it mean?
> I admit I didn't investigate it

It means false positive and a lintian bug: https://bugs.debian.org/505857#40

Besides your request, I have some other changes:
- upgrade to compat 10
- remove autoreconf setting in d/rules, because compat 10 already enables this
- use library libcorkipset (instead of libredjackipset)
- update patch, also use library libcorkipset
- update "Homepage" in d/control to use "https"

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1

Bug#824466: marked as done (RFS: setop/0.1-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2016 08:20:50 + (UTC)
with message-id <1852935935.2008983.1466842850128.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#824466: RFS: setop/0.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #824466,
regarding RFS: setop/0.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
824466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist


Dear mentors,


I am looking for a sponsor for my package "setop":

 * Package name: setop
   Version : 0.1-1
   Upstream Author : Frank Stähr
 * URL : 
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : utils


This mail is just for administration, as my last try didn’t open an RFS bug.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
control: tags -1 pending

Hi,

[some stuff]

some missing things:
W timewarp-standards-version
(2016-02-03 < 2016-04-06)
I vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri
vcs-git git://github.com/phisigma/setop.git

I fixed them both and uploaded on deferred/2, so you can diff the attached 
tarball.

(I also removed the "this is my first package, users shouldn't care about that 
:p )


I hope to see fixed the hardening stuff once the package enters unstable
I hardening-no-bindnow
usr/bin/setop
I hardening-no-pie
usr/bin/setop

https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough

cheers,

G.


setop_0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Description: application/xz
--- End Message ---

Bug#828029: marked as done (RFS: surf/0.7-2~bpo8+1 )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2016 08:08:56 + (UTC)
with message-id <939397812.1996763.1466842136445.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828029: RFS: surf/0.7-2~bpo8+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #828029,
regarding RFS: surf/0.7-2~bpo8+1 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
828029: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828029
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for backporting package "surf" with
acknowledgement of Reiner Herrmann 

* Package name: surf
  Version : 0.7-2~bpo8+1
  Upstream Author : Reiner Herrmann 
* Url : http://surf.suckless.org
* Licenses: MIT
  Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community

To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/surf

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/surf/surf_0.7-2~bpo8+1.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:

https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/surf.git

More information about surf can be obtained from http://surf.suckless.org

Changes since last upload:

  * Rebuild for jessie-backports.

Regards,
  Dmitry Bogatov
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---


Hi,

sponsoring shortly

G.--- End Message ---

Bug#828024: marked as done (RFS: libretro-beetle-wswan [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:59:24 +0200
with message-id <576e39dc@debian.org>
and subject line RFS: libretro-beetle-wswan [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #828024,
regarding RFS: libretro-beetle-wswan [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
828024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Hey dear mentors!

I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "libretro-beetle-wswan"

This is the libretro port of Beetle/Mednafen WSWAN module, a
WonderSwan emulator.

It's a fork of Mednafen to fit better with the libretro API, so it's
not possible to use the same source code of Mednafen package.


* Package name : libretro-beetle-wswan
  Version  : 0.9.35.1+git20160623

  Upstream Author  : Ryphecha / The RetroArch Team (beetle fork)

* URL  : https://github.com/libretro/beetle-wswan-libretro
* License  : GPL-2+
  Programming Lang : C/C++
  Description  : port of Beetle/Mednafen WSWAN to libretro API


It builds those binary packages:

libretro-beetle-wswan - Libretro wrapper for the Beetle WSWAN core


To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/libretro-beetle-wswan


More information about RetroArch and the libretro API can be obtained from 
http://www.libretro.com/index.php/api/

--
sergio-br2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
sponsored :)

G.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---