Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP
On 26 September 2016 at 23:12, wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "duperemove" > > * Package name: duperemove >Version : 0.11~beta3-3 Hi, First of all, thank you for your contribution. I am DD but can't sponsor you because my key expired. Some comments: - this is ITP bug so in d/changelog you should have one entry. with one version, with Initial release and (Closes: #). - in your patch there seems to be some UTF problem in the From: - can you push pristine tar branches to the git ? I can't build it. In d/control, the passage is not needed, options, arguments have place in a man page. "When given the -d option, duperemove will submit those extents for deduplication using the btrfs-extent-same ioctl."
useless lintian error?
Hi mentors, I did a doona upload, with "closes #foo" in changelog, getting a lintian error: E possible-missing-colon-in-closes closes #838630 since the bug is closed, because the system closes bugs even without the colon, isn't this time to drop that error? I'm not sure why something that works might need fixing... thanks, G.
Re: useless lintian error?
On 28/09/16 10:55, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi mentors, > I did a doona upload, with "closes #foo" in changelog, getting > a lintian error: > > E possible-missing-colon-in-closes > closes #838630 > > since the bug is closed It doesn't look closed to me. > because the system closes bugs even without the colon, isn't this time to drop > that error? The uses 'Closes:' with a colon to close bugs is required by Policy (section 4.4). James signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: useless lintian error?
Hi, >It doesn't look closed to me. Indeed, the bug was pending and then excluded from the list in BTS https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=doona&archive=no&pend-exc=pending-fixed&pend-exc=fixed&pend-exc=done&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious&repeatmerged=no this is why I didn't see it. thanks! G.
Bug#838566: RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
Hi Mattia, thanks for looking at the package! > so, this package is in DPMT, hence I'm looking only at the git repo. I removed it from mentors and, as you are not far from sponsoring it ;), did not re-upload the fixed version. In case the sponsorship will not work out, I will re-upload it to mentors for others. > > blocking things: > * this package doesn't seem to be using git-dpm, as mandate by DPMT. Sorry, I mistook a thread on debian-python as discouraging git-dpm. However, I fixed that now, and made the repo work with git-dpm. > > nice to have: > * properly sorted build-depends. `wrap-and-sort -ast` might help here > * the last debhelper compat level is 10 > * in Debian the standard MIT license is called Expat, see DEP-5. Done (all three). I verified the package still builds and is lintian clean. Cheers, Nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#838566: marked as done (RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:55:30 + with message-id <20160928115528.zrpxynnqdx5w6...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#838566: RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #838566, regarding RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 838566: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838566 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mimerender" * Package name: mimerender Version : 0.6.0-1 Upstream Author : Martin Blech * URL : https://github.com/martinblech/mimerender * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-mimerender - RESTful HTTP Content Negotiation for web frameworks (Python 2) python3-mimerender - RESTful HTTP Content Negotiation for web frameworks (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/mimerender Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mimerender/mimerender_0.6.0-1.dsc The package is a dependency of the soon to be added flask-restless package. Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX49MdMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW 5VcP/2d2QeKrmW4BjHgi/f47zf6sPuyaCI/J+K5LkIEo1giM09XGyXGj+qmJQgE1 o+PtW+Mgmzb2y+4SP8Oil39Rzs3w7DQd/2V8xV/MvrbWnnymQh2aqmv4r5aW4GKS N4TLMfKm0yPkEljg6e6tByG7RtFaIwwYD26j3qq6E8yn5FYVbQJZLQee222AeLVA U6L1JJvk+dwDW52HvS8yHjKexj5RxE34fRpJ3NFS82bHzUCRTY/mtB3SEqOHWBqf X23+LIjx0YcSM4/6Phe5ZZ1YhSPby5wtdHAvPBVLKo/SAvbrSzX02zeAzcrwm/vO AqNjAlReydi6p2WOrkWGj9yCQbTf/xMe/0RPY9HL+SuAOXjh5Fkwixj3WI/BXAUs mbGBPOfI9Kn9g88sVreVtnyaJmIJBGt++VjRCHlp3AOjkR+0rUTJFjrjTyNJEtIM CVrayIKxpOe8ozAWZRZPP7e/KoQDux3FPK643lQEf+f/n3tHTLmVoumTkspc5cWo nTCSdpBhL+SiOvI7o7IwyKFcr9CZMwSVY81cVpbhOipcQLVLbYrIvyJsoXDJHMOd Cu1Tj/PybMfcSeMxs+4cj3JWRmh1oDxpKjVSGZjumc0qlBr+sftGHfSQBSfJLJck /zLyIJpmxCjdMiUtElQsROBRusKD5ypnpIbWH6vZ780/4hqx =fkb9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 01:43:46PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > I verified the package still builds and is lintian clean. Great, uploaded! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#839065: RFS: pyzo/4.3-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo" * Package name: pyzo Version : 4.3-1 * License : BSD Section : science It builds those binary packages: iep - transitional dummy package for IEP pyzo - interactive editor for scientific Python pyzo-doc - documentation for Pyzo To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyzo Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyzo/pyzo_4.3-1.dsc Successful builds on debomatic: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/pyzo/4.3-1/buildlog Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * Change install dependencies for pyzo. - Remove dependency on pyzolib, now merged into pyzo. - Add transitive dependency on Qt via QtPy. * Sort install dependencies of iep. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant
Re: Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > On 26 September 2016 at 23:12, wrote: > > * Package name: duperemove > >Version : 0.11~beta3-3 > > "When given the -d option, duperemove will submit those extents for > deduplication using the btrfs-extent-same ioctl." It's a vital piece of information, as without this option duperemove does nothing but waste CPU and I/O. An user would be able to use it intuitively otherwise. I have no idea why dry run is the default (probably from early debug times?), but compared to most similar programs, the output is pretty useless for purposes other than deduplicating, as duperemove does some heurestics and thus its results are incomplete. Thus, this option is needed to get started. On the other hand, perhaps it could be better to make a patch to switch the logic and have a --dry-run option instead? -- A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, 1kg raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month. Filter out and throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, etc), let the drink age at least 3-6 months.
Bug#839065: RFS: pyzo/4.3-1
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo" ERR: --- pyzo-4.2.1/pyzo/util/qt/__init__.py 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ pyzo-4.3/pyzo/util/qt/__init__.py 2016-09-28 10:21:34.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- +# +# Copyright © 2009- The Spyder Development Team +# Copyright © 2014-2015 Colin Duquesnoy +# +# Licensed under the terms of the MIT License +# (see LICENSE.txt for details) + --- pyzo-4.2.1/pyzo/util/qt/QtCore.py 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ pyzo-4.3/pyzo/util/qt/QtCore.py 2016-09-28 10:21:34.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- +# +# Copyright © 2014-2015 Colin Duquesnoy +# Copyright © 2009- The Spyder Development Team +# +# Licensed under the terms of the MIT License +# (see LICENSE.txt for details) and so on G.
Bug#838801: RFS: zxcvbn-c/0.20150103-1 [ITP]
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Sean, >libzxcvbn-dev - password strength estimation library - development files >libzxcvbn0 - password strength estimation library I'm a little bit worried about the makefile :( CFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wdeclaration-after-statement CPPFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wextra this is a no-op I guess, maybe a "+=" might be better gcc $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -fPIC -shared -Wl,-soname,$(SONAME) -o $@ $^ -lm this is wrong in many places, e.g.: "gcc" might be a $(CC) with $(CC) ?= gcc as example (I don't see a good reason for forcing a gcc when people might want to try to build it with clang as example) LDFLAGS should be at the bottom of the ine, just before -lm, to avoid stripping with wl-asneeded flag (and build failures) blhc: CXXFLAGS missing (-g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security): g++ -std=c++11 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I. -o dictgen dict-generate.cpp LDFLAGS missing (-fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now): g++ -std=c++11 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I. -o dictgen dict-generate.cpp CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2): gcc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fPIE -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -I. -DUSE_DICT_FILE -c -o zxcvbn-file.o zxcvbn.c deb files: -rw-r--r-- root/root568880 2016-09-25 01:14 ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzxcvbn.a static library? ok if you think it is useful other stuff is good :) thanks! G.
Re: Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP
On 2016-09-28 14:07, Adam Borowski wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: On 26 September 2016 at 23:12, wrote: > * Package name: duperemove >Version : 0.11~beta3-3 "When given the -d option, duperemove will submit those extents for deduplication using the btrfs-extent-same ioctl." It's a vital piece of information, as without this option duperemove does nothing but waste CPU and I/O. An user would be able to use it intuitively otherwise. I have no idea why dry run is the default (probably from early debug times?), but compared to most similar programs, the output is pretty useless for purposes other than deduplicating, as duperemove does some heurestics and thus its results are incomplete. Thus, this option is needed to get started. On the other hand, perhaps it could be better to make a patch to switch the logic and have a --dry-run option instead? Thank you both for reviews, much appreciated. @Adam Make sense, I'll try to create patch for --dry-run and push it upstream @Dariusz I've removed -d from d/control for now and fixed d/changelog Pristine-tar branch has been pushed to github Upstream author released 0.11-beta4 so I could drop the patch with wrong utf8 coding altogether new version has been uploaded to mentors https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/duperemove/duperemove_0.11~beta4-1.dsc thanks Peter
Bug#838939: RFS: devtodo/0.1.20-6.1 [NMU]
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Fernando >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "devtodo" I would expect some changes more if you want (note: they are usually out of an NMU scope, but with a maintainer mostly MIA, and a package RC buggy since 3 years, I think some work might be nice). e.g. 1) you bumped std-version, please mention in changelog. 2) you might want to convert VCS fields in https mode and push changes on collab-maint Vcs-Git: https://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/devtodo.git Vcs-Browser: https://git.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/devtodo.git 3) you might consider a Team upload (collab-maint). It is not written in policy, but some people thinks collab-maint is a team, and then you can team upload if you are part of it. (really border-line thinking) 4) debhelper >=9 or 10 and compat 9 or 10 5) modernize rules file (a.k.a. drop mostly everything):q 6) d/clean should be useless now 7) check if d/dirs and so on are still useful other stuff is good (I suggest you to run meld on build log files and debdiff on built deb files to see if changes are good or not other than by testing the package :p ) Of course if you don't want, or you are out of time, I can sponsor it as-is, maybe with a revert of the std-version bump (or a mention in changelog, even if policy forbids changes of it for NMUs) G.
Re: it would be a felony to miss it
On May 31, 2016 2:14 PM, "WalmartNotice" < walpro...@mpls-executed.focusomes.com> wrote: >> >> Gratrs___sheliavarner47: Your__$ I000__Walmart GiftCard is Ready >>> >>> Get Your Card Here
Bug#838679: [Debian-science-sagemath] Fwd: Bug#838679: RFS: cysignals/1.1.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- interrupt and signal handling for Cython
Hey, nice work. I'm taking a look now. X Jerome BENOIT: > > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Bug#838679: RFS: cysignals/1.1.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- interrupt and signal > handling for Cython > Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:54:01 + > Resent-From: Jerome Benoit > Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org > Resent-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors > > Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:50:13 +0100 > From: Jerome Benoit > Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 838...@bugs.debian.org > To: Debian Bug Tracking System > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Sponsor, > > I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package cysignals [0]. > This package brings cysignals to Debian on behalf of the Debian > Python Modules Team. This is my very first Debian Python Module > package, so it might certainly be subject to some gross mistakes. > Its Alioth Git repository [1] has an experimental[-sage] branch > beside the master branch: the master branch is meant for the unstable > distribution, that is, to be exposed to a large audience; the > experimental[-sage] branch is meant to the Debian Sage[Math] Team [2]. > More information can be found in d/README.source and d/README.Debian > as expected. > > Thanks in advance, > Jerome > > [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834232 > [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/cysignals.git > [2] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: Jessie* > APT prefers stable > APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) > > > ___ > Debian-science-sagemath mailing list > debian-science-sagem...@lists.alioth.debian.org > https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath > -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
Bug#839065: RFS: pyzo/4.3-1
On 28/09/16 14:58, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo" ERR: --- pyzo-4.2.1/pyzo/util/qt/__init__.py 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ pyzo-4.3/pyzo/util/qt/__init__.py 2016-09-28 10:21:34.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- +# +# Copyright © 2009- The Spyder Development Team +# Copyright © 2014-2015 Colin Duquesnoy +# +# Licensed under the terms of the MIT License +# (see LICENSE.txt for details) + --- pyzo-4.2.1/pyzo/util/qt/QtCore.py 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ pyzo-4.3/pyzo/util/qt/QtCore.py 2016-09-28 10:21:34.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- +# +# Copyright © 2014-2015 Colin Duquesnoy +# Copyright © 2009- The Spyder Development Team +# +# Licensed under the terms of the MIT License +# (see LICENSE.txt for details) and so on G. Argh, I though Almar did not embed QtPy in the codebase. My bad. I pushed a new version on mentors with the updated d/copyright. Ghis
Bug#838575: marked as done (RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:26:46 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #838575, regarding RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 838575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838575 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress" * Package name: flask-compress Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : William Fagan * URL : https://github.com/libwilliam/flask-compress * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in a Flask app with gzip (Python 2) python3-flask-compress - Compress responses in a Flask app with gzip (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/flask-compress Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flask-compress/flask-compress_1.3.1-1.dsc Flask-Compress is an extension for the popular Flask micro-framework for web applications. Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX4/Q2MRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW EHQP/RlBk46ylNURHGc+Q9S1GznIsFC60YH+sEq1Kb0jZ+go2sDRCO6zoQBG06OH 19OQxa+u/KVdlw23J78sckeFC9Q/Z5vmGKG9f73SfEBSwkwJT1jJLJCr66OyXu1j RYvD1yebcHMGDuvVkK8NOHN+Trd4TA9EA9OG3DGMLRlj5jbkmEoayH1VP4J/kSZd 3Cn3RqwKifACCTOzRuQzUik5rE5rQ+5pBHFdkZM8zRkjwHxWDOmKcGp6+2uYx2ep Qu9GH2nZsuQF/+Quw9etiU1f9K3Dj872SpOU78zCHtjsxlYEmOlsmi1vCK89JDDp kobKTwc9mXiG/aTevKhJBPmaT4JTmKSNXk1gJUxiTaHPnDK+W3J2MSUODJAf4Yzd +kaz5lLAh3iLeiFloowVSZ78QhZAboaaRpoZrJ4DlDahMupkflHpj9q72f0RvFIq NLR4sm44D2xegYLOjJdYVYMXxANoSQM9nYGU/vgNBUiihE+z7tR143zyJT2Lya9m pJWlbaGLMyIVm0UmGJnNFom+vcuElrlEo6m9Gx5sJCi8bjbPfeL4OIhmQW1KNFd4 3duqOAYDQUzlvrdSOIzsuuWqAV8xvmgFIRJcLREE4QVj9TyDwayXDUdu+TGkI7Ib yA0XIvXulNrs3VZ4pfhv2dzG/JuJI2CjrTni+7i+Zjf71LWH =jWru -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package flask-compress has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#839065: marked as done (RFS: pyzo/4.3-1)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:30:03 + (UTC) with message-id <1644257473.553742.1475080203...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#839065: RFS: pyzo/4.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #839065, regarding RFS: pyzo/4.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 839065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839065 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo" * Package name: pyzo Version : 4.3-1 * License : BSD Section : science It builds those binary packages: iep - transitional dummy package for IEP pyzo - interactive editor for scientific Python pyzo-doc - documentation for Pyzo To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyzo Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyzo/pyzo_4.3-1.dsc Successful builds on debomatic: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/pyzo/4.3-1/buildlog Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * Change install dependencies for pyzo. - Remove dependency on pyzolib, now merged into pyzo. - Add transitive dependency on Qt via QtPy. * Sort install dependencies of iep. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Ghislain, >Argh, I though Almar did not embed QtPy in the codebase. My bad. > >I pushed a new version on mentors with the updated d/copyright. is that embedded copy used or not? while waiting for the answer, I pushed it in deferred/5 G.--- End Message ---
Bug#838575: RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
Hi Dominik >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress" where did the package go? G.
Bug#838801: RFS: zxcvbn-c/0.20150103-1 [ITP]
control: tags -1 -moreinfo Hello Gianfranco, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 02:29:42PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! Thank you for your interest! > > CFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wdeclaration-after-statement > CPPFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wextra > > > this is a no-op I guess, maybe a "+=" might be better As discussed on IRC, I'd prefer to keep it this way -- these are upstream's choice of flags, and we have our own set which can be allowed to override them. They're there in case someone wants to build the library outside of Debian. > > gcc $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -fPIC -shared -Wl,-soname,$(SONAME) -o $@ $^ > -lm > > this is wrong in many places, e.g.: > > "gcc" might be a $(CC) > with > > $(CC) ?= gcc > as example (I don't see a good reason for forcing a gcc when people might want > to try to build it with clang as example) > > LDFLAGS should be at the bottom of the ine, just before -lm, to avoid > stripping > with wl-asneeded flag (and build failures) > > > blhc: > > CXXFLAGS missing (-g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security): g++ -std=c++11 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I. > -o dictgen dict-generate.cpp > LDFLAGS missing (-fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now): g++ -std=c++11 > -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I. -o dictgen dict-generate.cpp > CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2): gcc -g -O2 > -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fPIE -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -I. -DUSE_DICT_FILE -c -o zxcvbn-file.o zxcvbn.c All fixed, thanks. > deb files: -rw-r--r-- root/root 568880 2016-09-25 01:14 > ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzxcvbn.a > > static library? ok if you think it is useful I've pushed a new tag debian/0.20160925-1 to my git repository, and updated mentors: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zxcvbn-c/zxcvbn-c_0.20160925-1.dsc -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#838801: marked as done (RFS: zxcvbn-c/0.20150103-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:51:25 + (UTC) with message-id <2060439112.627156.1475081485...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#838801: RFS: zxcvbn-c/0.20150103-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #838801, regarding RFS: zxcvbn-c/0.20150103-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 838801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838801 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 838492 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zxcvbn-c". This is a shlib dependency of a Haskell library I want to package, on the way to packaging keysafe, the latest cool project from Joey Hess: https://joeyh.name/code/keysafe/ * Package name: zxcvbn-c Version : 0.20150103-1 Upstream Author : Tony Evans * URL : https://github.com/tsyrogit/zxcvbn-c * License : BSD-3-clause Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libzxcvbn-dev - password strength estimation library - development files libzxcvbn0 - password strength estimation library Mentors information page: https://mentors.debian.net/package/zxcvbn-c Download with dget: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zxcvbn-c/zxcvbn-c_0.20150103-1.dsc Or build it with gbp: gbp clone --pristine-tar https://git.spwhitton.name/zxcvbn-c git checkout debian/0.20150103-1 git verify-tag debian/0.20150103-1 # my key is in DM keyring gbp buildpackage -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, it is on its way for new queue G.--- End Message ---
Bug#839065: RFS: pyzo/4.3-1
On 28/09/16 17:30, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi Ghislain, Argh, I though Almar did not embed QtPy in the codebase. My bad. I pushed a new version on mentors with the updated d/copyright. is that embedded copy used or not? while waiting for the answer, I pushed it in deferred/5 G. It is currently used and in a way that makes bypassing the vendoring not trivial. I filed a bug upstream [1] to ask for a better solution. [1] https://github.com/pyzo/pyzo/issues/440 Ghis
Bug#839065: RFS: pyzo/4.3-1
Hi, >It is currently used and in a way that makes bypassing the vendoring >not trivial. I filed a bug upstream [1] to ask for a better solution. I'm sure you already know why this is bad, so I'll leave it in deferred/5, maybe in the meanwhile upstream writes a patch :) G.
Bug#838679: [Debian-science-sagemath] Fwd: Bug#838679: RFS: cysignals/1.1.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- interrupt and signal handling for Cython
Ximin Luo: > Hey, nice work. I'm taking a look now. > Hey, it looks good! I couldn't spot any problems. Just the following minor things: (1) d/rules: override_dh_install-arch: true Could you add a comment explaining this? I didn't look in too much detail but I couldn't figure out the reason for this. I did run dpkg-buildpackage -A and -B checked they still work, so that's good. It would be good to add a comment, so future readers don't get confused. (2) Instead of maintaining two separate git branches, I suggest using build profiles: https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec I've pushed some commits to the git repo that makes this work already, see if you like them, or revert if you don't :p The default build will leave out the -pari stuff. To enable the pari stuff, you can either : a. use `(dpkg-buildpackage|gbp buildpackage) -Ppkg.cysignals.pari` or b. set DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=pkg.cysignals.pari for lower-level tools like `debian/rules` I had to use a slight hack in debian/tests/control but I thought it was still worth it, to avoid switching between branches all the time. If you like this, please also edit debian/README.source to describe this new workflow. (3) You tagged debian/1.1.1+ds-1 already in the git repo. I suggest not doing this yet, and delete the current tag - we have some newer unreleased commits anyway. My preferred workflow is to keep UNRELEASED in d/changelog, then when everything is ready I git push, then `dch -r`, commit, build, dput and wait for the ACCEPTED email from ftp-masters. Only after I get email, do I then run `gbp buildpackage --git-tag-only` and then push this last commit plus the tag that was just created. Sometimes (like now) there's no point using UNRELEASED if d/changelog already says something else, but the rest of the above still works. X -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
Bug#838575: RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
Control: reopen -1 Hi, >>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress" > > >where did the package go? It went to "found a sponsor, had to change something, did not reupload because sponsor does not use mentors" ;). -nik
Bug#838004: marked as done (RFS: rear/1.18-1 ITP: rear -- Bare metal disaster recovery and system migration framework)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:38:59 + (UTC) with message-id <1232100538.715019.1475087939...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#838004: RFS: rear/1.18-1 ITP: rear -- Bare metal disaster recovery and system migration framework has caused the Debian Bug report #838004, regarding RFS: rear/1.18-1 ITP: rear -- Bare metal disaster recovery and system migration framework to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 838004: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838004 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rear" Package name: rear Version : 1.18-1 Upstream Author : Schlomo Schapiro, Gratien D'haese, Stefan Semmelroggen, Peer Heinlein, Dag Wieers, Jeroen Hoekx URL : https://github.com/rear/rear/ License : GPL-3+, LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+, CC-BY-ND-3.0 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: rear - Bare metal disaster recovery and system migration framework rear-doc - Bare metal disaster recovery and system migration framework (documentation) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/rear Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rear/rear_1.18-1.dsc More information about rear can be obtained from http://relax-and-recover.org/ Note: There is a load of Info lintians but this is due to the fact that rear embeds skeleton files/dirs that won't be use by the system installing rear, but those files will be used by the rear OS created to be booted later. Regards, Frederic Bonnard --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rear" I see many "copyright matches no file" lintian warnings, but files are there. Not sure what is wrong, but I sponsored it anyway. cheers, G.--- End Message ---
Bug#838575: marked as done (RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:42:00 + (UTC) with message-id <1779962806.714628.1475088120...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#838575: RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #838575, regarding RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 838575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838575 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress" * Package name: flask-compress Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : William Fagan * URL : https://github.com/libwilliam/flask-compress * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in a Flask app with gzip (Python 2) python3-flask-compress - Compress responses in a Flask app with gzip (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/flask-compress Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flask-compress/flask-compress_1.3.1-1.dsc Flask-Compress is an extension for the popular Flask micro-framework for web applications. Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX4/Q2MRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW EHQP/RlBk46ylNURHGc+Q9S1GznIsFC60YH+sEq1Kb0jZ+go2sDRCO6zoQBG06OH 19OQxa+u/KVdlw23J78sckeFC9Q/Z5vmGKG9f73SfEBSwkwJT1jJLJCr66OyXu1j RYvD1yebcHMGDuvVkK8NOHN+Trd4TA9EA9OG3DGMLRlj5jbkmEoayH1VP4J/kSZd 3Cn3RqwKifACCTOzRuQzUik5rE5rQ+5pBHFdkZM8zRkjwHxWDOmKcGp6+2uYx2ep Qu9GH2nZsuQF/+Quw9etiU1f9K3Dj872SpOU78zCHtjsxlYEmOlsmi1vCK89JDDp kobKTwc9mXiG/aTevKhJBPmaT4JTmKSNXk1gJUxiTaHPnDK+W3J2MSUODJAf4Yzd +kaz5lLAh3iLeiFloowVSZ78QhZAboaaRpoZrJ4DlDahMupkflHpj9q72f0RvFIq NLR4sm44D2xegYLOjJdYVYMXxANoSQM9nYGU/vgNBUiihE+z7tR143zyJT2Lya9m pJWlbaGLMyIVm0UmGJnNFom+vcuElrlEo6m9Gx5sJCi8bjbPfeL4OIhmQW1KNFd4 3duqOAYDQUzlvrdSOIzsuuWqAV8xvmgFIRJcLREE4QVj9TyDwayXDUdu+TGkI7Ib yA0XIvXulNrs3VZ4pfhv2dzG/JuJI2CjrTni+7i+Zjf71LWH =jWru -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >It went to "found a sponsor, had to change something, did not reupload because >sponsor does not use mentors" ;). well, so in this case it is good to have it close, avoiding double reviews since you already have somebody who picked up the work! G.--- End Message ---
Bug#838575: marked as done (RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP])
> >It went to "found a sponsor, had to change something, did not reupload > >because sponsor does not use mentors" ;). > > > well, so in this case it is good to have it close, avoiding double reviews > since > you already have somebody who picked up the work! well, or put an Owner on the bug, which would be me... anyway, nevermind, I'll handle it as soon as you poke me on IRC. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#838859: marked as done (RFS: clipf/0.4-2 [QA])
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:36:57 + (UTC) with message-id <1332832103.805778.1475095017...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#838859: RFS: clipf/0.4-2 [QA] has caused the Debian Bug report #838859, regarding RFS: clipf/0.4-2 [QA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 838859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clipf" * Package name: clipf Version : 0.4-2 Upstream Author : Galtsev Denis * URL : http://code.google.com/p/clipf/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : misc It builds those binary packages: clipf - command line minimalistic personal finance manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/clipf Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clipf/clipf_0.4-2.dsc Regards, Gustavo Soares de Lima --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >clipf done :) G.--- End Message ---
Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications
Hi > They are both used in the build. But if I understand you right, are you > suggesting to drop the explicit dependencies since dh-autoreconf already > depends on automake and libtool? If this is the customary way then I'll > drop the explicit dependencies on automake and libtool. I think so. dh-autoreconf should be enough (with an added pkg-config if needed, IIRC) > This file is made obsolete by the pkg-config file, and it was creating a > problem for multiarch packages: it would install in > /usr/bin/cgicc-config, making it impossible to install two architectures > of this package. this is a problem when the files are not bit-bit identical between architecture, and this seems to be this case ## Host information --host)echo "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" && exit 0 ;; this changes. You can patch that change out, as example you can grab what we did for libpng1.6[1] or try to print the triplet at runtime, when the user asks for it maybe dpkg-architecture has something interesting for you [1] https://sources.debian.net/src/libpng1.6/1.6.25-1/debian/patches/libpng-config.patch/ > | Using this kind of system to pass compile file is obsolete and will > likely introduce bugs in a multi-arch system. > | Particularly, this kind of script could only belong to a package that > is not Multi-Arch. > > So I took this as excuse to remove the file from the package. > > One possible solution (suggested by lintian) is to move the file out of > the way (to /usr/share/doc, I presume) so it is still shipped, but it >won't be found by build tools, which kind of defeats its purpose. I'm >doubtful there is any benefit in shipping this file. I think patching it to be architecture independent might be the best solution >As far as I can see from the CVS changes, the 'current' value in the >soname was increased in the early 2000's, presumably due to ABI changes. >Then in 2013 the soname was decreased from 5 to 3 in order to match the >library version. This was done as part of these bugs: > >I presume the package should follow the upstream soname. And this would >probably also justify the renamed package, as you were musing in your >mail. If there are no objections, I will rename the packages from >libcgicc5 to libcgicc. libcgicc3 you mean :) >This should be fixed by the renaming from libcgicc5* -> libcgicc*. always a final 3 >Raised as https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49120 >Thinking again, I guess that's not correct. This would require the >packages to be renamed to libcgicc3. oops you got it already >I have uploaded a new build to debian mentors for further review. I'll have a look if you can provide an answer to my above comments :) thanks! Gianfranco signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#839114: RFS: [ITA] Hi, I'd like to adopt systemd-shim
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, Hello. I'd like to adopt the systemd-shim package. I suppose I would need a sponsor/mentor to do that? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832508 It looks like it's up for adoption. To sell myself a little I have a bachelors in compsci. Hopefully this will be a fairly low-effort package requiring only sporadic attention. Thanks, Alex
Bug#839114: marked as done (RFS: [ITA] Hi, I'd like to adopt systemd-shim)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:05:23 -0700 with message-id <20160929040523.4k2x6radukoqi...@hephaestus.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#839114: RFS: [ITA] Hi, I'd like to adopt systemd-shim has caused the Debian Bug report #839114, regarding RFS: [ITA] Hi, I'd like to adopt systemd-shim to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 839114: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839114 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, Hello. I'd like to adopt the systemd-shim package. I suppose I would need a sponsor/mentor to do that? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832508 It looks like it's up for adoption. To sell myself a little I have a bachelors in compsci. Hopefully this will be a fairly low-effort package requiring only sporadic attention. Thanks, Alex --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Dear Ab, You need to prepare a proposed upload of the package, and upload it somewhere (usually mentors.debian.net), before filing the RFS bug. Please see: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---