Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1

[Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)]

On 20 Oct 2016, at 2:33 PM, Peter Colberg  wrote:
> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:25:12AM +, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) 
> wrote:
>> Hi Peter.  I can sponsor the uploads for this and the other packages to 
>> jessie-backports
>> for you.  I'm in the middle of doing a large batch of uploads of this type 
>> am happy to
>> bundle them up with mine.
> 
> That would be great!

I just read the message a bit more closely, and you mention you have the 
backport ACL
already.  I just checked the PTS and you have the DM bit set for that package.  
Feel free to
upload it yourself to backports without having to go through anyone else.

I don't think that any special sponsorship should be required in this case, 
especially if you are
already an uploader (and primary author) for the package.


Tim.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1

[Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)]

Hi Peter.
> On 20 Oct 2016, at 1:15 PM, Peter Colberg  wrote:
> 
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
> "golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1" to jessie-backports. The package
> is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
> been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.
> 
> gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1.git

Hi Peter.  I can sponsor the uploads for this and the other packages to 
jessie-backports
for you.  I'm in the middle of doing a large batch of uploads of this type am 
happy to
bundle them up with mine.


Tim.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Hi Tim,

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:25:12AM +, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote:
> Hi Peter.  I can sponsor the uploads for this and the other packages to 
> jessie-backports
> for you.  I'm in the middle of doing a large batch of uploads of this type am 
> happy to
> bundle them up with mine.

That would be great!

Peter

Bug#841382: RFS: golang-github-mitchellh-go-wordwrap/0.0~git20150314.0.ad45545-2~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
"golang-github-mitchellh-go-wordwrap" to jessie-backports. The package
is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.

gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-mitchellh-go-wordwrap.git

Regards,
Peter

Bug#841381: RFS: golang-github-jmhodges-clock/1.0-2~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
"golang-github-jmhodges-clock" to jessie-backports. The package
is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.

gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jmhodges-clock.git

Regards,
Peter

Bug#841380: RFS: golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt/0.0~git20160520.0.9055324-2~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
"golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt" to jessie-backports. The package
is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.

gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt.git

Regards,
Peter

Bug#841379: RFS: golang-github-alecthomas-units/0.0~git20151022.0.2efee85-2~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
"golang-github-alecthomas-units" to jessie-backports. The package
is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.

gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-alecthomas-units.git

Regards,
Peter

Bug#841378: RFS: golang-github-ogier-pflag/0.0~git20160129.0.45c278a-2~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
"golang-github-ogier-pflag" to jessie-backports. The package
is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.

gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-ogier-pflag.git

Regards,
Peter

Bug#841377: RFS: golang-github-peterhellberg-link/1.0.0-2~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
"golang-github-peterhellberg-link" to jessie-backports. The package
is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.

gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-peterhellberg-link.git

Regards,
Peter

Bug#841376: RFS: golang-github-satori-go.uuid/1.1.0-2~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
"golang-github-satori-go.uuid" to jessie-backports. The package
is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.

gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-satori-go.uuid.git

Regards,
Peter

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

[gustavo panizzo]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:43:31PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2016, 14:15 +0800 schrieb gustavo panizzo:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35:42AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > 
> > > Please fix the lintian error, the d/copyright and then I'll upload.
> > > The *.la can be fixed in a subsequent upload, but maybe you can
> > > include
> > > it already in the revised packages.
> > 
> > 
> > I've pushed to alioth, please take a look
> > 
> 
> Please recheck, I can't see the changes here.

sorry about that. Can you try again?

thanks!

-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1

[Peter Colberg]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package
"golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1" to jessie-backports. The package
is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have
been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance.

gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1.git

Regards,
Peter

Bug#841366: RFS: task-spooler/1.0-1

[Sean Whitton]

Dear Alexander,

Some minor comments on your changelog entries.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:59:31PM +0300, Alexander Inyukhin wrote:
>* New upstream version 1.0

It's superfluous to say "1.0" since the version number is two lines above.

>
>* Update patches

What do you mean?  Do you mean refresh them so they apply to the new
upstream version?  It's conventional to write "Refresh patches" in that
case.

>* Change homepage to http://viric.name/soft/ts/

Why?  Did the upstream site move?

If you write "Update homepage" it's implied that they moved it.

HTH :)

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#841366: RFS: task-spooler/1.0-1

[Alexander Inyukhin]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler"

 * Package name: task-spooler
   Version : 1.0-1
   Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel 
 * URL : http://viric.name/soft/ts/
 * License : GPLv2+
   Section : misc

It builds those binary packages:

  task-spooler - personal job scheduler

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/task-spooler

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task-spooler/task-spooler_1.0-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream version 1.0
   * Update patches
   * Change homepage to http://viric.name/soft/ts/
   * Bump standards version to 3.9.8 (no changes)


Regards,
   Alexander Inyukhin

Bug#838939: RFS: devtodo/0.1.20-6.1 [NMU]

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi,

>One thing I noticed here was the bash-completion file which is not being

>packaged for some reason.
>Is that expected?


I don't know, if it works... you can add it!
Just open a  new bug, propose a patch and then ask for a new NMU if you want :)

>I will look into that and reupload.

somebody already uploaded the package, so I guess I have nothing left to 
sponsor ;)

(sorry for not answering before!)

G.

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

[Tobias Frost]

Hi Gustavo,

Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2016, 14:15 +0800 schrieb gustavo panizzo:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35:42AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > 
> > Please fix the lintian error, the d/copyright and then I'll upload.
> > The *.la can be fixed in a subsequent upload, but maybe you can
> > include
> > it already in the revised packages.
> 
> 
> I've pushed to alioth, please take a look
> 

Please recheck, I can't see the changes here.

tobi@edoras:~/workspace/deb/nm/gustavo/uptimed/uptimed$ git remote get-
url origin
git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/uptimed.git
tobi@edoras:~/workspace/deb/nm/gustavo/uptimed/uptimed$ git log | head
-n 10
commit 1490651ea12e9db47e839c947da867971bab9b18
Author: Holger Wansing 
Date:   Tue Oct 18 22:41:44 2016 +0200

German translation: proofreading by Markus Hiereth, thanks!

commit 118d01074feb3dee9079950d6976634e391255b9
Author: Holger Wansing 
Date:   Sat Oct 15 15:36:50 2016 +0200



> (archive-gfa@nm.d.o is bcc'ed)
> 
> 
> 

Re: On Drupal8 packaging

[Andreas Cadhalpun]

Hi Gunnar,

On 19.10.2016 18:33, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So... Does this sound sensible? Were you in my place, would you submit
> this package to ftp-masters? What would you change about it?

What you describe sounds quite sensible to me, though I haven't
actually looked at the repository.

What's important for ftp-masters about NEW packages is conveniently
documented in the REJECT-FAQ [1].

>From your description of drupal8 I think you should pay special attention
to the following items:
 * PHP License: "The PHP license must only be used for PHP and PHP add-ons."
 * Generated files: In particular some Javascript things seem to require
build tools not packaged in Debian.
 * Lintian: "Lintian errors and warnings, without a good reason to ignore
 them, can get you a reject."

About bundling lots of stuff, I think it's not really nice, but sometimes
can't reasonably be avoided. For example, chromium bundles many third-party
projects. The important thing here is to reuse stuff already packaged in
Debian wherever possible to make the work of the Security Team easier.

Best regards,
Andreas


1: https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html

On Drupal8 packaging

[Gunnar Wolf]

Hello world,

  [ Please keep me and David in the replies; we are not subscribed to
-mentors ]

I don't know if I should be writing this directly to the ftpmasters,
but I'd like to have input by the rest of the project before that. And
I'd also like to know if we are doing it perfectly wrong.

I am working on this together with David Flores, Cc:ed in this
mail. We have taken bits of time to get Drupal8 in a packaged
form. This release is a huge departure from previous Drupal releases —
Debian has packaged Drupal since version 4.5.2 (accepted back in 2005,
according to snapshot.d.o). Each Drupal release can be seen as a new
project, and since version 5 it was so packaged in Debian, because:

- Drupal provides no real, automated migration path between major
  versions; it's up to the sysadmin to resolve.

- Drupal's development cycles are more a project rewrite than an
  evolution. Part of the code is kept, of course, but there are *huge*
  architectural changes.

- And, as every webapp nowadays, it includes swathes of Javascript
  code, bundled in the "main" project.

The deepest reaching (for me) architectural change for D8 is that it
is no longer self-contained, but is built upon a PHP framework
(Symfony) and many related tools. This is, surprisingly, a *good*
thing, as Drupal itself is becoming smaller and easier to grasp for
its own developers, and there is a separation of concerns. BUT it
makes my life as a developer harder.

So, the current situation is:

- drupal8 8.2.1 is packaged, although still with many important
  Lintian warnings, by following the upstream Git tree, and hosted at
  collab-maint:

https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/drupal8.git

  David has been helping me make sense of the Drupal oddities, and
  helping me avoid or route around costly mistakes.

- We started by checking which Javascript libraries are provided by
  Debian with versions compatible with the shipped ones. This was done
  by following the provided core/core.libraries.yml file:


https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/drupal8.git/tree/core/core.libraries.yml

  Sadly, very few libraries comply: Only ckeditor, libjs-jquery-cookie
  and libjs-underscore. For the rest, we will be providing the
  upstream-bundled ones, providing its sources (as they are all
  minified/browserified) in debian/missing-sources.

- Then, the PHP dependencies are based upon an ugly Composer file:

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/drupal8.git/tree/composer.lock

  We have gone through them, and the outlook for using project-wide
  libraries is much better; you can see debian/control for php-*
  packages depended upon. But still, there are way too many PHP
  packages it uses which are not in Debian; we have copied them all
  into debian/vendors, and installing them at install time. It is 15MB
  of... Stuff.

We still have pending documenting all of it in debian/copyright, as
well as some other minor issues. But I want others to confirm if this
is not deemed as excessive and a no-go.

Of course, I understand the "right" answer would be to separately
package each of the complete provided PHP packages. We have decided
against it mainly for the following reasons:

- At this time of the release, we don't want to press on the PHP team
  to package that many libraries (and have them in time for the
  NEW-processing freeze). David is a Drupal guy, I am the Debian guy,
  and I *know* I don't have time to prepare (or properly review and
  upload) all of them as individual packages.

- Even if they are useful as stand-alone libraries, I am wary to
  promise support to them. If they are shipped only as utility
  libraries for Drupal, I can trust and follow Drupal's development,
  and they have a very good track record at replying to any needed
  adequation. Of course, if during the course of the following years
  (between Debian 9 and 10) the PHP team packages the remaining
  libraries and they are kept at a compatible level, I should be
  updating to depend on them instead of bundling.

- According to Drupal's release policies, they might require strict
  dependencies on specific versions. Those versions remain stable over
  the course of a minor release (minor releases happen ≈ every six
  months; 8.2.x has just been opened).

- I toyed with the idea of splitting this into two packages, drupal8
  and drupal8-support... But it gains us very little, if anything at
  all.

So... Does this sound sensible? Were you in my place, would you submit
this package to ftp-masters? What would you change about it?

Thanks a lot!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#838939: marked as done (RFS: devtodo/0.1.20-6.1 [NMU])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:24:42 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: devtodo/0.1.20-6.1 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #838939,
regarding RFS: devtodo/0.1.20-6.1 [NMU]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
838939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838939
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: bren...@br.ibm.com

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "devtodo"

* Package name: devtodo
  Version : 0.1.20-6.1
  Upstream Author : Alec Thomas 
* URL : http://swapoff.org/DevTodo
* License : GPLv2
  Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

  devtodo- hierarchical, prioritised todo list manager

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

 https://mentors.debian.net/package/devtodo

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/devtodo/devtodo_0.1.20-6.1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * debian/control: added dh-autoreconf as build-dep, removed its
dependencies and added libtool-bin to fix ftbfs. (Closes: #779551, #723964)
  * debian/rules
- added usage of dh-autoreconf
- expanded dh clean to include dh_autoreconf_clean before dh_clean

Regards,
Fernando Seiti Furusato




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package devtodo has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---

Bug#840526: marked as done (RFS: python-gimmik/2.1-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:28:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: python-gimmik/2.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #840526,
regarding RFS: python-gimmik/2.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
840526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-gimmik"

* Package name: python-gimmik
  Version : 2.1-1
  Upstream Author : Freddie Witherden 
* URL : https://github.com/vincentlab/GiMMiK
* License : BSD
  Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python3-gimmik - generator of matrix multiplication kernels (Python 3)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-gimmik

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-gimmik/python-gimmik_2.1-1.dsc


Successful test build on debomatic:


http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/python-gimmik/2.1-1/buildlog

Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #840509)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package python-gimmik has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---

Re: HELP: python-3to2 is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi,

>Not sure why is this on -mentors when -python exists, but oh well...


it is also on -python, but with a bad subject that made it almost hide from
the automatic messages :)
>I'd put my bets on:
>https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1206c64de875


thanks!
>Have fun updating gen_printargs() or maybe map_printargs() in 
>lib3to2/fixes/fix_print.py. I tried, but it only made my head hurt.


thanks for trying! I forwarded to lib3to2 developers the hint :)

I hope somebody will come with some alternative solution then ;)


Gianfranco

Re: HELP: python-3to2 is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Jakub Wilk]

Not sure why is this on -mentors when -python exists, but oh well...

* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-10-18, 21:14:

838974: python-3to2: FTBFS: AssertionError: 'print(*args)\n\n' != 'print 
*args\n\n'

Does anybody have any clue why that test is now failing?


I'd put my bets on:
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1206c64de875


I'm also considering a Python bug here, because it seems a regression to me


Nope.

Have fun updating gen_printargs() or maybe map_printargs() in 
lib3to2/fixes/fix_print.py. I tried, but it only made my head hurt.


--
Jakub Wilk

Re: [ANOUNCE] Debtemplate

[Paul Wise]

On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 10:19 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:

> Does reportbug collects information from debian/?

Not sure but I don't think it does yet.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#841270: RFS: debrequest/0.2 ITP

[Dmitry Bogatov]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "debrequest"

* Package name: debrequest
  Version : 0.2
  Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov 
* Url : 
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/debrequest.git
* Licenses: GPL-3+
  Section : devel

It builds those binary packages:

  * debrequest

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/debrequest

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/debrequest/debrequest_0.2.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/debrequest.git

More information about debrequest can be obtained from
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/debrequest.git

Regards,
  Dmitry Bogatov

Re: [ANOUNCE] Debtemplate

[Dmitry Bogatov]

[2016-10-19 00:23] Paul Wise 
>
> part   text/plain 408
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > I would like to anounce debtemplate, script I use to fill in RFS and
> > ITP requests. The common method according to mentors.debian.org is to
> > copy-and-edit template, which often results in incomplete or
> > inconsistent requests.
>
> Seems like this duplicates at least the wnpp handling in reportbug?

Does reportbug collects information from debian/?

-- 
X-Web-Site: https://sinsekvu.github.io | Note that I process my email in batch,
Accept-Languages: eo,ru,en | at most once every 24 hours. If matter
Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff| is urgent, you have my phone number.

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

[gustavo panizzo]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35:42AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> 
> Please fix the lintian error, the d/copyright and then I'll upload.
> The *.la can be fixed in a subsequent upload, but maybe you can include
> it already in the revised packages.

I've pushed to alioth, please take a look


(archive-gfa@nm.d.o is bcc'ed)


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature