Bug#863461: marked as done (RFS: python-agate/1.6.0-2 [experimental])

2017-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2017 04:27:36 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: python-agate/1.6.0-2 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #863461,
regarding RFS: python-agate/1.6.0-2 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
863461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: python-agate
  Version : 1.6.0-2
  Upstream Author : Christopher Groskopf
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/agate
* License : Expat
  Section : python

One can check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-agate.git

Changes since the last upload:

  * Force use of UTF-8 locale when running the tests
  * Fixup the watch regex
  * Build the docs using the upstream Makefile

Best regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package python-agate version 1.6.0-2 is in experimental now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/python-agate--- End Message ---


Bug#864142: marked as done (RFS: python-imageio/2.2.0-1)

2017-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2017 04:27:36 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: python-imageio/2.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #864142,
regarding RFS: python-imageio/2.2.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
864142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: python-imageio
  Version : 2.2.0-1
  Upstream Author : Almar Klein 
* URL : https://github.com/imageio/imageio
* License : BSD
  Section : python

One can check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/python-imageio.git

Changes since last upload:

  * Fix typo in watch regex
  * New upstream version 2.2.0
  * Repacking
is no longer required
  * Drop numbering of the patch queue
- 0001-
Use-system-libraries.patch -> Use-the-system-libraries.patch
  * Fixup
the nodoc build profile
  * Build the docs using the upstream Makefile

Best regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package python-imageio version 2.2.0-1 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/python-imageio--- End Message ---


Bug#864013: marked as done (RFS: dcm2niix/1.0.20170528-1 [experimental])

2017-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2017 04:27:37 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: dcm2niix/1.0.20170528-1 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #864013,
regarding RFS: dcm2niix/1.0.20170528-1 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
864013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864013
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: dcm2niix
  Version : 1.0.20170528-1
  Upstream Author : Chris Rorden
* URL : https://github.com/rordenlab/dcm2niix
* License : BSD
  Section: science

One can check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/dcm2niix.git

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream version 1.0.20170528

Best regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package dcm2niix version 1.0.20170528-1 is in experimental now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/dcm2niix--- End Message ---


Bug#863108: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game

2017-06-04 Thread Carlos Donizete Froes
Em dom, 2017-06-04 às 22:02 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves escreveu:
> I'm merging your two RFS bugs. I did a quick test to see if it was
> possible to overwrite a 0.1-1 with a new 0.1-1, because 0.1-1 is the
> version that will be uploaded to the Debian archive; a 0.1-2 cannot be
> uploaded until after 0.1-1 has been sponsored and accepted.  I'm happy
> to see you're maintaining this package in a VCS :-)

Hi Nicholas,

Many thanks, I'm glad a sponsor saw the package. :D

If you want, I'll remove this 0.1-2 package leaving just 0.1-1 with the 
included VCS if needed.
Thanks!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao]
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀  2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF  D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Bug#862371: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1

2017-06-04 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:32:02AM +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
> Not quite sure I understand why since I dont recognise that locale -
> some-sort of special "C language" unicode locale? - but it works so
> thats the main thing.

C.UTF-8 is a locale that's same as C except for assigning a meaning to bytes
above 127 and declaring what wide-char functions do -- both of which are
undefined in C.

On Debian it's guaranteed to be available no matter what packages you have
installed or configured.

It's even a good choice for regular human use: en_US.UTF-8 in glibc for
example has pants-on-the-head sanity-challenged collation:

0 9
0.9.0
0.9.0-a0-foo-bar
({---=[ 0.9.0-a11 ]=---})
0.9.0-a17-quux
(0.9.0-a2)
0.9.0+a99-1
0.9.0-rc1
0.9.1
0 9 9
({---=[ 0.9-a11 ]=---})
0.9 ab

while other systems, and C.UTF-8, do:

(0.9.0-a2)
({---=[ 0.9.0-a11 ]=---})
({---=[ 0.9-a11 ]=---})
0 9
0 9 9
0.9 ab
0.9.0
0.9.0+a99-1
0.9.0-a0-foo-bar
0.9.0-a17-quux
0.9.0-rc1
0.9.1

Besides the debatable choice of case-sensitivity, this works for all
languages which match the Unicode order, such as English and Russian, but
not Polish were a < ą < b.


-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ A tit a day keeps the vet away.
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ (Rejoice as my small-animal-murder-machine got unbroken after
⠈⠳⣄ nearly two years of no catch!)



Bug#863108: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game

2017-06-04 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
control: merge 863108 864169
control: retitle -1 RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to 
easily install Minecraft game

Hi Carlos,

I'm merging your two RFS bugs. I did a quick test to see if it was
possible to overwrite a 0.1-1 with a new 0.1-1, because 0.1-1 is the
version that will be uploaded to the Debian archive; a 0.1-2 cannot be
uploaded until after 0.1-1 has been sponsored and accepted.  I'm happy
to see you're maintaining this package in a VCS :-)

The new 0.1-1 can be this simple:

minecraft-installer (0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Initial release (Closes: #863105)

 -- Carlos Donizete Froes   Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:31:13 -0300

CC'ing debian-devel-games in case they're not aware of this RFS.

Here is how the other bug updates this one:

Package name: minecraft-installer
Version : 0.1-2_should_be-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes 
URL : https://github.com/coringao/minecraft-installer
License : BSD-2-Clause
Section : contrib/games

It builds this binary package:

  minecraft-installer - Unofficial way to easily install game

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/minecraft-installer

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/m/minecraft-
installer/minecraft-installer_0.1-2_should_be-1.dsc

Alternatively, clone the git repo:

  git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/minecraft-installer.git

Changes since the initial 0.1-1 RFS:

minecraft-installer (0.1-2_should_be-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * debian/control:
- Change maintainer Debian Games Team
- Add myself as Uploader
- Add Vcs URLs pkg-games

 -- Carlos Donizete Froes   Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:31:13 -0300

Sincerely,
Nicholas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#862371: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1

2017-06-04 Thread foss.freedom
Tim,

  absolutely superb - that worked very nicely :D

Not quite sure I understand why since I dont recognise that locale -
some-sort of special "C language" unicode locale? - but it works so
thats the main thing.


Gianfranco,

  A new version of the package has been uploaded with Tim's
suggestion.  Tested by building in a Stretch chroot.

In addition - as requested - the .installs have been simplified.

I also doubled checked this and threw this up on a launchpad PPA.

cheers

David

On 4 June 2017 at 22:15, Tim Dengel  wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I haven't specifically looked into your issue and the build log doesn't
> seem to be available anymore, but it sounds like you're having trouble
> with meson being unable to deal with Unicode symbols inside a pbuilder
> chroot.
> I also have a package that builds with meson and had a FTBFS due to
> Unicode support (gnome-twitch), although admittedly it is a much simpler
> package than budgie. I fixed my issue by adding LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 in the
> d/rules file[0]. Maybe it helps.
>
> [0] https://github.com/dengelt/gnome-twitch/blob/debian/sid/debian/rules
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim
>
>
> Am 04.06.2017 um 19:46 schrieb foss.freedom:
>> Hi Gianfranco,
>>
>>   I'm struggling with this - any thoughts on my investigations below.
>>
>> On Debian Stretch I've created a chroot for unstable and installed the
>> build dependencies for budgie-desktop + locales + meson
>>
>> In debian/rules I've changed the two export LANG and LANGUAGE vars to
>> en_US.UTF-8
>>
>> Then manually (in the chroot) I have run the following:
>>
>> debconf-set-selections <<< 'locales locales/default_environment_locale
>> select en_US.UTF-8'
>>
>> dpkg-reconfigure locales
>>
>> update-locale LANGUAGE='en_US.UTF-8'
>>
>> N.B. the debconf-set-selections is to ensure dpkg-reconfigure locales
>> runs without the user having to manually select en_US.UTF-8 to the two
>> questions asked.
>>
>> That's enough to convince the dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc to work
>> correctly within the chroot
>>
>> The question I have is how to tuck the three commands above into the
>> Debian package to run before the main meson callout in debian/rules ?
>> i.e. I'm hoping this is the answer how to get the Debian build system
>> to default to a UTF-8 locale.
>>
>> I added the three commands within override_dh_auto_configure: but I
>> get a "sh:1  Syntax error: redirection unexpected" - so I'm kind of
>> stuck on how to move forward.
>>
>> I was hoping to find an existing Debian package that uses meson
>> building Vala within the archives to see how the maintainer did
>> something similar but my Google-fu has failed to find such a package
>> :(
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 12 May 2017 at 19:09, foss.freedom  wrote:
>>> Thanks Gianfranco for the review.  Much appreciated.
>>>
>>> I have completely redone the licenses and files in debian/copyight and
>>> double checked via "check-all-the-things"
>>>
>>> For the .install files - all debian/tmp has been removed.
>>>
>>> the FTBFS is concerning.  I don't understand why there is a difference
>>> between the build systems of launchpad (it works) and Debian (it
>>> doesnt).
>>>
>>> I asked this question here -
>>> https://github.com/budgie-desktop/budgie-desktop/issues/921
>>>
>>> The advice is to ensure the environment variables LANG and LANGUAGE is
>>> set to en_US - I've added two export lines for these environment vars
>>> at the top of the debian/rules
>>>
>>> I've tested the rules changes on launchpad.  However I dont have
>>> access to the debian build system so I cannot verify.
>>>
>>> I have rebuilt on my debian stretch VM and this is OK.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 11 May 2017 at 22:27, Gianfranco Costamagna  
>>> wrote:
 control: owner -1 !
 control: tags -1 moreinfo

 Hello, I will sponsor it,
 but please have a deep look at missing copyrights for a next upload, e.g.
 + * Copyright (C) 2017 taaem 


 other things:
 I don't understand why you prepended debian/tmp to install files, but as 
 you wish

 2) FTBFS
 http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1/buildlog

 G.
>>



Bug#864014: Pristine tar for python-pydap is missing

2017-06-04 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/python-pydap.git/commit/?h=pristine-tar

?

On Sun, 2017-06-04 at 23:14 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Ghislain,
> 
> see subject.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>   Andreas.
> 



Bug#864014: Pristine tar for python-pydap is missing

2017-06-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ghislain,

see subject.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de




Bug#862371: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1

2017-06-04 Thread Tim Dengel
Hi David,

I haven't specifically looked into your issue and the build log doesn't
seem to be available anymore, but it sounds like you're having trouble
with meson being unable to deal with Unicode symbols inside a pbuilder
chroot.
I also have a package that builds with meson and had a FTBFS due to
Unicode support (gnome-twitch), although admittedly it is a much simpler
package than budgie. I fixed my issue by adding LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 in the
d/rules file[0]. Maybe it helps.

[0] https://github.com/dengelt/gnome-twitch/blob/debian/sid/debian/rules


Regards,

Tim


Am 04.06.2017 um 19:46 schrieb foss.freedom:
> Hi Gianfranco,
> 
>   I'm struggling with this - any thoughts on my investigations below.
> 
> On Debian Stretch I've created a chroot for unstable and installed the
> build dependencies for budgie-desktop + locales + meson
> 
> In debian/rules I've changed the two export LANG and LANGUAGE vars to
> en_US.UTF-8
> 
> Then manually (in the chroot) I have run the following:
> 
> debconf-set-selections <<< 'locales locales/default_environment_locale
> select en_US.UTF-8'
> 
> dpkg-reconfigure locales
> 
> update-locale LANGUAGE='en_US.UTF-8'
> 
> N.B. the debconf-set-selections is to ensure dpkg-reconfigure locales
> runs without the user having to manually select en_US.UTF-8 to the two
> questions asked.
> 
> That's enough to convince the dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc to work
> correctly within the chroot
> 
> The question I have is how to tuck the three commands above into the
> Debian package to run before the main meson callout in debian/rules ?
> i.e. I'm hoping this is the answer how to get the Debian build system
> to default to a UTF-8 locale.
> 
> I added the three commands within override_dh_auto_configure: but I
> get a "sh:1  Syntax error: redirection unexpected" - so I'm kind of
> stuck on how to move forward.
> 
> I was hoping to find an existing Debian package that uses meson
> building Vala within the archives to see how the maintainer did
> something similar but my Google-fu has failed to find such a package
> :(
> 
> David
> 
> 
> On 12 May 2017 at 19:09, foss.freedom  wrote:
>> Thanks Gianfranco for the review.  Much appreciated.
>>
>> I have completely redone the licenses and files in debian/copyight and
>> double checked via "check-all-the-things"
>>
>> For the .install files - all debian/tmp has been removed.
>>
>> the FTBFS is concerning.  I don't understand why there is a difference
>> between the build systems of launchpad (it works) and Debian (it
>> doesnt).
>>
>> I asked this question here -
>> https://github.com/budgie-desktop/budgie-desktop/issues/921
>>
>> The advice is to ensure the environment variables LANG and LANGUAGE is
>> set to en_US - I've added two export lines for these environment vars
>> at the top of the debian/rules
>>
>> I've tested the rules changes on launchpad.  However I dont have
>> access to the debian build system so I cannot verify.
>>
>> I have rebuilt on my debian stretch VM and this is OK.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 11 May 2017 at 22:27, Gianfranco Costamagna  
>> wrote:
>>> control: owner -1 !
>>> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>>
>>> Hello, I will sponsor it,
>>> but please have a deep look at missing copyrights for a next upload, e.g.
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 taaem 
>>>
>>>
>>> other things:
>>> I don't understand why you prepended debian/tmp to install files, but as 
>>> you wish
>>>
>>> 2) FTBFS
>>> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1/buildlog
>>>
>>> G.
> 



Bug#864174: RFS: wallpaperdownloader/2.7-1 [ITP] -- Download wallpapers from the Internet and more

2017-06-04 Thread Eloy García Almadén
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wallpaperdownloader":

 * Package name: wallpaperdownloader
   Version : 2.7-1
   Upstream Author : Eloy García Almadén 
 * URL : https://bitbucket.org/eloy_garcia_pca/wallpaperdownloader
 * License : GPL-3
   Section : misc

  What is WallpaperDownloader? What can it do for you?

  Ok, lets see: Are you bored with the set of the default wallpapers which come
with your desktop environment? Are you tired of wasting time going to different
web sites to search and download wallpapers of your taste?. WallpaperDownloader
is a graphical tool to automate this workflow. It is Java based and is as easy
as typing the keywords you want to use to search for your favorite wallpapers,
select the providers you want to dig in and you are done! WallpaperDownloader
will search and download those wallpapers for you periodically and you will be
able to set them as favorite, remove those you don't like or just ignore them
to randonmly be replaced.

  It supports different Desktop Environments (currently MATE, XFCE, GNOME
Shell, Plasma 5.8 and greater and Unity), so you can change the wallpaper
directly from the application when you want or schedule a background process to
do it for you.

  WallpaperDownloader is currently packaged in AUR for Arch Linux users
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wallpaperdownloader/) and as a snap package
in the Ubuntu Store (https://uappexplorer.com/app/wallpaperdownloader.egarcia)
but I would like to publish the application in Debian's repository because it
works better natively (snap packages are great but some functionalities don't
work at all) and Debian is one of the most respected, long-lived distributions
out there.

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  https://bitbucket.org/eloy_garcia_pca/wallpaperdownloader/wiki/Home

  Regards,
  Eloy García Almadén



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)


Bug#862371: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1

2017-06-04 Thread foss.freedom
Hi Gianfranco,

  I'm struggling with this - any thoughts on my investigations below.

On Debian Stretch I've created a chroot for unstable and installed the
build dependencies for budgie-desktop + locales + meson

In debian/rules I've changed the two export LANG and LANGUAGE vars to
en_US.UTF-8

Then manually (in the chroot) I have run the following:

debconf-set-selections <<< 'locales locales/default_environment_locale
select en_US.UTF-8'

dpkg-reconfigure locales

update-locale LANGUAGE='en_US.UTF-8'

N.B. the debconf-set-selections is to ensure dpkg-reconfigure locales
runs without the user having to manually select en_US.UTF-8 to the two
questions asked.

That's enough to convince the dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc to work
correctly within the chroot

The question I have is how to tuck the three commands above into the
Debian package to run before the main meson callout in debian/rules ?
i.e. I'm hoping this is the answer how to get the Debian build system
to default to a UTF-8 locale.

I added the three commands within override_dh_auto_configure: but I
get a "sh:1  Syntax error: redirection unexpected" - so I'm kind of
stuck on how to move forward.

I was hoping to find an existing Debian package that uses meson
building Vala within the archives to see how the maintainer did
something similar but my Google-fu has failed to find such a package
:(

David


On 12 May 2017 at 19:09, foss.freedom  wrote:
> Thanks Gianfranco for the review.  Much appreciated.
>
> I have completely redone the licenses and files in debian/copyight and
> double checked via "check-all-the-things"
>
> For the .install files - all debian/tmp has been removed.
>
> the FTBFS is concerning.  I don't understand why there is a difference
> between the build systems of launchpad (it works) and Debian (it
> doesnt).
>
> I asked this question here -
> https://github.com/budgie-desktop/budgie-desktop/issues/921
>
> The advice is to ensure the environment variables LANG and LANGUAGE is
> set to en_US - I've added two export lines for these environment vars
> at the top of the debian/rules
>
> I've tested the rules changes on launchpad.  However I dont have
> access to the debian build system so I cannot verify.
>
> I have rebuilt on my debian stretch VM and this is OK.
>
> David
>
> On 11 May 2017 at 22:27, Gianfranco Costamagna  
> wrote:
>> control: owner -1 !
>> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> Hello, I will sponsor it,
>> but please have a deep look at missing copyrights for a next upload, e.g.
>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 taaem 
>>
>>
>> other things:
>> I don't understand why you prepended debian/tmp to install files, but as you 
>> wish
>>
>> 2) FTBFS
>> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1/buildlog
>>
>> G.



Bug#864169: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-2 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game

2017-06-04 Thread Carlos Donizete Froes
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minecraft-installer"

 * Package name: minecraft-installer
   Version : 0.1-2
   Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes 
 * URL : https://github.com/coringao/minecraft-installer
 * License : BSD-2-Clause
   Section : contrib/games

  It builds those binary packages:

minecraft-installer - Unofficial way to easily install game

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/minecraft-installer

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/m/minecraft-
installer/minecraft-installer_0.1-2.dsc

  More information about Minecraft Installer can be obtained from
https://github.com/coringao/minecraft-installer/wiki.

  This package does NOT contain the Minecraft itself as that would breach
copyright
  laws and the wishes of authors of Minecraft/Mojang and Microsoft.

  Changes since the last upload:

  minecraft-installer (0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * debian/control:
- Change maintainer Debian Games Team
- Add myself as Uploader
- Add Vcs URLs pkg-games

 -- Carlos Donizete Froes   Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:31:13
-0300

  minecraft-installer (0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Initial release (Closes: #863105)

 -- Carlos Donizete Froes   Sun, 21 May 2017 16:47:14
-0300

  Regards,
   Carlos Donizete Froes



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-06-04 Thread Muri Nicanor
Hi,

On 06/01/2017 11:54 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> Hello
> 
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> 
>>  * New upstream version 0.7.0
>>This release contains a backwards incompatible
>>change because it changes how the device hash is
>>computed for Linux root hub devices
> 
> How is it handled for users that already have a config file? do they
> need to create a new configuration file?
kind of. the hashes of the devices in the usbguard rules file will have
to be set to new values. in the old versions of usbguard, the Linux root
hub bcdDevice value was included in the hash value of the device- but
this value changes every new kernel release. so it is now excluded from
calculating the hash.

> Can the update to the config file by done automatically? (postinst)
i don't think so- postinst would have to calculate new hashes for every
device listed in the rules file but most devices won't be present at the
time of upgrading.

> does this version need a newer kernel than older versions?
no



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

2017-06-04 Thread Muri Nicanor
hi,

On 06/01/2017 12:07 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i try to
> build using sbuild.
thanks for the pointer, i totally missed that only using pbuilder. now i
also have a working sbuild schroot ;)

> FAIL UseCase/001_cli_policy.sh (exit status: 1)
hm, i'm not sure yet why this test is failing, looking into thath

> 
> some tests are skipped, i feel they should run
> 
> 
> perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo?
> 
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n dd bs=4096 count=1
> if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/usbguard_disk
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line 81:
> sudo: command not found
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n modprobe dummy_hcd
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line 82:
> sudo: command not found
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n rmmod g_mass_storage
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line 83:
> sudo: command not found
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + sudo -n modprobe g_mass_storage
> file=/tmp/usbguard_disk iSerialNumber=555666111
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  ./UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh: line 84:
> sudo: command not found
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + '[' 127 -ne 0 ']'
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  + exit 77
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log:  SKIP UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh (exit
> status: 77)

i tried with removing the sudo, but debian doesn't have dummy_hcd or
g_mass_storage included in the kernel, so these tests won't work at all :(

> 
> 
> this should be easy to fix
> 
> Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  Skipping test because some dependecies
> are missing
> Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  ASPELL: Packaging/spell-check.sh.log: 
> PANDOC: /usr/bin/pandoc
> Packaging/spell-check.sh.log:  SKIP Packaging/spell-check.sh (exit
> status: 77)

thanks! i've added aspell to the build-dependencies!

cheers,
muri



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#864142: RFS: python-imageio/2.2.0-1

2017-06-04 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: python-imageio
  Version : 2.2.0-1
  Upstream Author : Almar Klein 
* URL : https://github.com/imageio/imageio
* License : BSD
  Section : python

One can check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/python-imageio.git

Changes since last upload:

  * Fix typo in watch regex
  * New upstream version 2.2.0
  * Repacking
is no longer required
  * Drop numbering of the patch queue
- 0001-
Use-system-libraries.patch -> Use-the-system-libraries.patch
  * Fixup
the nodoc build profile
  * Build the docs using the upstream Makefile

Best regards,
Ghis