Bug#864988: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.22.1-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2017 13:12:40 + (UTC) with message-id <1885408982.1178184.1497791560...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#864988: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.22.1-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync has caused the Debian Bug report #864988, regarding RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.22.1-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 864988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864988 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "pidgin-sipe", whose source code is at: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/pidgin-sipe.git or you may also: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-sipe/pidgin-sipe_1.22.1-1.dsc It builds this binary package: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync Changes since the last upload: pidgin-sipe (1.22.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release (Closes: #853612). - Feature #93: Support for Lync Autodiscover - Feature #6: Application Sharing Viewer - Fixed #315: Crash when contact list is empty - Fixed #314: sipe login problems with long pw - Fixed #320: Multiple client detection broken - separate logging and debugging output - speed up Lync Autodiscover by using AccessLocation - purple: avoid rare SSL read deadlock - crypto: make code compile with OpenSSL 1.1.0 - drop references to Reuters Messaging - new translations: Greek (el), Lithuanian (lt), Russian (ru), Swedish (sv), Turkish (tr) * Add libfarstream-0.2-dev and libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev to Build-Depends. * Recommend remmina RDP client plugin. -- Jakub Adam Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:57:42 +0200 Regards, Jakub signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, >I am looking for a sponsor for package "pidgin-sipe", whose source code is at: sponsored, after updating debian/copyright: please update copyright years -2007-2014, SIPE Project +2007-2017, SIPE Project cheers, G. signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#864988: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.22.1-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "pidgin-sipe", whose source code is at: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/pidgin-sipe.git or you may also: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-sipe/pidgin-sipe_1.22.1-1.dsc It builds this binary package: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync Changes since the last upload: pidgin-sipe (1.22.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release (Closes: #853612). - Feature #93: Support for Lync Autodiscover - Feature #6: Application Sharing Viewer - Fixed #315: Crash when contact list is empty - Fixed #314: sipe login problems with long pw - Fixed #320: Multiple client detection broken - separate logging and debugging output - speed up Lync Autodiscover by using AccessLocation - purple: avoid rare SSL read deadlock - crypto: make code compile with OpenSSL 1.1.0 - drop references to Reuters Messaging - new translations: Greek (el), Lithuanian (lt), Russian (ru), Swedish (sv), Turkish (tr) * Add libfarstream-0.2-dev and libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev to Build-Depends. * Recommend remmina RDP client plugin. -- Jakub Adam Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:57:42 +0200 Regards, Jakub signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#864944: RFS: zimg/2.5.1-1 [ITP]
Changed package name from z.lib to zimg. Sanjeev On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:20:54 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Yes, drop z.lib in favor or zimg. > > Besides, users would typically discover the library via pkg-config > with the `zimg` keyword or use it with the link flag -lzimg. Based on > that, it sounds to me that the canonical name for the library should > be (lib)zimg, not z.lib. > > Naming is hard. > > Ghis > > > On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 14:39 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > > yes, it can be confusing since the package name is just 'z' library > > and '.' emphasis the space z and lib. > > should i revert it back it zimg? > > this package closes > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864888 looks like > > i forget to mention in request template,but added it in > > debian/changelog > > > > On 18 June 2017 at 14:27, Ghislain Vaillant > > wrote: > > > On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 00:54 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zimg" > > > > > > > > * Package name: zimg > > > > Version : 2.5.1-1 > > > > Upstream Author : sekrit-twc > > > > * URL : https://github.com/sekrit-twc/zimg > > > > * License : WTFPL > > > > Section : libs > > > > > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > > > > > libzimg-dev - devel file for z.lib library > > > > libzimg-examples - examples using z.lib library > > > > libzimg2 - z.lib shared library > > > > > > Am I the only one concerned about the confusion between the > > > standard zlib library and this z.lib? > > > > > > > To access further information about this package, please visit > > > > the following URL: > > > > > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/zimg > > > > > > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > > > > command: > > > > > > > > dget -x > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zimg/zimg_2.5.1-1.dsc > > > > > > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > > > > > add file to copyright > > > > > > This looks wrong. What is the ITP bug you are supposed to close > > > with this initial upload? It should be referenced in the change > > > log. > > > > > > Ghis pgpXdGHsemCIv.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#864944: RFS: zimg/2.5.1-1 [ITP]
Changed package from z.lib to zimg. Sanjeev On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:20:54 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Yes, drop z.lib in favor or zimg. > > Besides, users would typically discover the library via pkg-config > with the `zimg` keyword or use it with the link flag -lzimg. Based on > that, it sounds to me that the canonical name for the library should > be (lib)zimg, not z.lib. > > Naming is hard. > > Ghis > > > On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 14:39 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > > yes, it can be confusing since the package name is just 'z' library > > and '.' emphasis the space z and lib. > > should i revert it back it zimg? > > this package closes > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864888 looks like > > i forget to mention in request template,but added it in > > debian/changelog > > > > On 18 June 2017 at 14:27, Ghislain Vaillant > > wrote: > > > On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 00:54 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zimg" > > > > > > > > * Package name: zimg > > > > Version : 2.5.1-1 > > > > Upstream Author : sekrit-twc > > > > * URL : https://github.com/sekrit-twc/zimg > > > > * License : WTFPL > > > > Section : libs > > > > > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > > > > > libzimg-dev - devel file for z.lib library > > > > libzimg-examples - examples using z.lib library > > > > libzimg2 - z.lib shared library > > > > > > Am I the only one concerned about the confusion between the > > > standard zlib library and this z.lib? > > > > > > > To access further information about this package, please visit > > > > the following URL: > > > > > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/zimg > > > > > > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > > > > command: > > > > > > > > dget -x > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zimg/zimg_2.5.1-1.dsc > > > > > > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > > > > > add file to copyright > > > > > > This looks wrong. What is the ITP bug you are supposed to close > > > with this initial upload? It should be referenced in the change > > > log. > > > > > > Ghis pgpIvFyVqsLI3.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#852935: marked as done (RFS: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel/3-1 ITP: 852164 -- combines the dash and the GNOME main panel into a single panel)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:20:16 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel/3-1 ITP: 852164 -- combines the dash and the GNOME main panel into a single panel has caused the Debian Bug report #852935, regarding RFS: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel/3-1 ITP: 852164 -- combines the dash and the GNOME main panel into a single panel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 852935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852935 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-trash": * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel Version : 3-1 Upstream Author : Jason DeRose * URL : https://github.com/jderose9/dash-to-panel * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: JavaScript Description : moves the dash into the gnome main panel so that the application launchers and system tray are combined into a single panel It builds the following binary package: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel - combines the dash and the GNOME main panel into a single panel To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel/gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel_3-1.dsc You can also find me (highvoltage) on #debian-mentors. Thanks for your time and patience! -Jonathan --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" d/copyright - please set the years to include 2016, 2017. there are some files owned by RH which are copyright 2016 but in d/copyright it only says 2015 - src/Tests/Makefile.in, src/Tests/test-driver are copyright FSF - would be cool to run files-without-copyright.sh - src/Tests/USB/data/0001.bin src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/root.tar.xz what's the source of that file? please regenerate them at build time - please clarify copyright for src/Tests/custom.supp d/control - You have a d/gbp.conf but not Vcs-* headers on d/control would be cool if you publish your git packaging, and documented it on d/control if you do that, please use pristine-tar to publish the tarballs d/changelog - please fix spelling in 'neede kernek' * New upstream version 0.7.0 This release contains a backwards incompatible change because it changes how the device hash is computed for Linux root hub devices Please create a NEWS.Debian file, also please make a note to add a notice in the release manual for buster (i know, looong time) Users hate when things change without notice (i'm an usbguard user :) -- IRC: gfa GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333 signature.asc Description: Digital Signature
Re: Bug#864944: RFS: zimg/2.5.1-1 [ITP]
yes, it can be confusing since the package name is just 'z' library and '.' emphasis the space z and lib. should i revert it back it zimg? this package closes https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864888 looks like i forget to mention in request template,but added it in debian/changelog On 18 June 2017 at 14:27, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 00:54 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> Severity: wishlist >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zimg" >> >> * Package name: zimg >> Version : 2.5.1-1 >> Upstream Author : sekrit-twc >> * URL : https://github.com/sekrit-twc/zimg >> * License : WTFPL >> Section : libs >> >> It builds those binary packages: >> >> libzimg-dev - devel file for z.lib library >> libzimg-examples - examples using z.lib library >> libzimg2 - z.lib shared library > > Am I the only one concerned about the confusion between the standard > zlib library and this z.lib? > >> To access further information about this package, please visit the >> following URL: >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/zimg >> >> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this >> command: >> >> dget -x >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zimg/zimg_2.5.1-1.dsc >> >> Changes since the last upload: >> >> add file to copyright > > This looks wrong. What is the ITP bug you are supposed to close with > this initial upload? It should be referenced in the change log. > > Ghis
Re: Bug#864944: RFS: zimg/2.5.1-1 [ITP]
Yes, drop z.lib in favor or zimg. Besides, users would typically discover the library via pkg-config with the `zimg` keyword or use it with the link flag -lzimg. Based on that, it sounds to me that the canonical name for the library should be (lib)zimg, not z.lib. Naming is hard. Ghis On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 14:39 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > yes, it can be confusing since the package name is just 'z' library > and '.' emphasis the space z and lib. > should i revert it back it zimg? > this package closes https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864888 > looks like i forget to mention in request template,but added it in > debian/changelog > > On 18 June 2017 at 14:27, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 00:54 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zimg" > > > > > > * Package name: zimg > > > Version : 2.5.1-1 > > > Upstream Author : sekrit-twc > > > * URL : https://github.com/sekrit-twc/zimg > > > * License : WTFPL > > > Section : libs > > > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > > > libzimg-dev - devel file for z.lib library > > > libzimg-examples - examples using z.lib library > > > libzimg2 - z.lib shared library > > > > Am I the only one concerned about the confusion between the standard > > zlib library and this z.lib? > > > > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > > following URL: > > > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/zimg > > > > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > > > command: > > > > > > dget -x > > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zimg/zimg_2.5.1-1.dsc > > > > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > > > add file to copyright > > > > This looks wrong. What is the ITP bug you are supposed to close with > > this initial upload? It should be referenced in the change log. > > > > Ghis
Re: Bug#864944: RFS: zimg/2.5.1-1 [ITP]
On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 00:54 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zimg" > > * Package name: zimg > Version : 2.5.1-1 > Upstream Author : sekrit-twc > * URL : https://github.com/sekrit-twc/zimg > * License : WTFPL > Section : libs > > It builds those binary packages: > > libzimg-dev - devel file for z.lib library > libzimg-examples - examples using z.lib library > libzimg2 - z.lib shared library Am I the only one concerned about the confusion between the standard zlib library and this z.lib? > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/zimg > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zimg/zimg_2.5.1-1.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > add file to copyright This looks wrong. What is the ITP bug you are supposed to close with this initial upload? It should be referenced in the change log. Ghis
Bug#864961: marked as done (RFS: groonga-normalizer-mysql/1.1.1-3)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2017 07:22:14 + (UTC) with message-id <591003501.917849.1497770534...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#864961: RFS: groonga-normalizer-mysql/1.1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #864961, regarding RFS: groonga-normalizer-mysql/1.1.1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 864961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864961 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga-normalizer-mysql" * Package name: groonga-normalizer-mysql Version : 1.1.1-3 Upstream Author : Kouhei Sutou * URL : https://github.com/groonga/groonga-normalizer-mysql * License : LGPL-2 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: groonga-normalizer-mysql - MySQL derived normalizer for Groonga To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/groonga-normalizer-mysql Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga-normalizer-mysql/groonga-normalizer-mysql_1.1.1-3.dsc More information about groonga-normalizer-mysql can be obtained from https://github.com/groonga/groonga-normalizer-mysql Changes since the last upload: * debian/tests/control - Add missing dependency to use dpkg-architecture correctly. Thanks to Charles Plessy. Regards, Kentaro Hayashi -- Kentaro Hayashi pgpv353eBFz70.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga-normalizer-mysql" I like it :) G. Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga-normalizer-mysql" * Package name: groonga-normalizer-mysql Version : 1.1.1-3 Upstream Author : Kouhei Sutou * URL : https://github.com/groonga/groonga-normalizer-mysql * License : LGPL-2 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: groonga-normalizer-mysql - MySQL derived normalizer for Groonga To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/groonga-normalizer-mysql Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga-normalizer-mysql/groonga-normalizer-mysql_1.1.1-3.dsc More information about groonga-normalizer-mysql can be obtained from https://github.com/groonga/groonga-normalizer-mysql Changes since the last upload: * debian/tests/control - Add missing dependency to use dpkg-architecture correctly. Thanks to Charles Plessy. Regards, Kentaro Hayashi -- Kentaro Hayashi Untitled Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#864962: marked as done (RFS: groonga/7.0.3-2)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2017 07:20:06 + (UTC) with message-id <147531535.918050.1497770406...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#864962: RFS: groonga/7.0.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #864962, regarding RFS: groonga/7.0.3-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 864962: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864962 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" * Package name: groonga Version : 7.0.3-2 Upstream Author : Groonga Project * Url : http://groonga.org/ * Licenses: LGPL-2.1 Section : database It builds those binary packages: * groonga * groonga-server-common * groonga-server-gqtp * libgroonga-dev * libgroonga0 * groonga-tokenizer-mecab * groonga-token-filter-stem * groonga-plugin-suggest * groonga-bin * groonga-httpd * groonga-doc * groonga-examples * groonga-munin-plugins To access further information about this package, visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/groonga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga/groonga_7.0.3-2.dsc More information about groonga can be obtained from http://groonga.org/ Changes since last upload: * New upstream release. * debian/patches/fix-nginx-FTBFS-on-kfreebsd.patch - Refresh patch to fix FTBFS on kFreeBSD. * debian/copyright - Add missing copyright about benchmark. Regards, -- Kentaro Hayashi pgpSbTUaqBMy3.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, > * New upstream release. > * debian/patches/fix-nginx-FTBFS-on-kfreebsd.patch >- Refresh patch to fix FTBFS on kFreeBSD. > * debian/copyright >- Add missing copyright about benchmark. looking at the diff, this was more a "no change upload to unstable" such diff was for the previous upload (experimental only). But I sponsored it anyway, "repetita iuvant" :) (please avoid it next time) G. Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" * Package name: groonga Version : 7.0.3-2 Upstream Author : Groonga Project * Url : http://groonga.org/ * Licenses: LGPL-2.1 Section : database It builds those binary packages: * groonga * groonga-server-common * groonga-server-gqtp * libgroonga-dev * libgroonga0 * groonga-tokenizer-mecab * groonga-token-filter-stem * groonga-plugin-suggest * groonga-bin * groonga-httpd * groonga-doc * groonga-examples * groonga-munin-plugins To access further information about this package, visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/groonga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga/groonga_7.0.3-2.dsc More information about groonga can be obtained from http://groonga.org/ Changes since last upload: * New upstream release. * debian/patches/fix-nginx-FTBFS-on-kfreebsd.patch - Refresh patch to fix FTBFS on kFreeBSD. * debian/copyright - Add missing copyright about benchmark. Regards, -- Kentaro Hayashi Untitled Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
