Bug#865899: marked as done (RFS: dblatex/0.3.10-1)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:21:33 +0300 with message-id <20170630042133.z23xsfx4s7hbz4n3@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#865899: RFS: dblatex/0.3.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #865899, regarding RFS: dblatex/0.3.10-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 865899: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865899 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dblatex" Package name: dblatex Version : 0.3.10-1 Upstream Author : Benoît Guillon URL : http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL V2+ Section : text It builds those binary packages: dblatex - Produces DVI, PostScript, PDF documents from DocBook sources dblatex-doc - Documentation for dblatex To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dblatex Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dblatex/dblatex_0.3.10-1.dsc More information about dblatex can be obtained from http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release + Fix rendering of quotes and nested quotes with Greek language. Closes: #849679 + db2latex style: In level 4 sections don't start the first paragraph on the same line as the heading. Closes: #851145 * Drop patches that have been integrated upstream: + 20_xmultirow.patch * 20_pt_quote.patch: In Portuguese and Brazilian documents don't break on a " as last character in a table title. Thanks to Osamu Aoki for reporting. Closes: #863527 * Drop patch 10_dblatex_version.patch: it is not really necessary and could be forgotten in NMUs. * Refresh patches regarding line numbers. * Fix watch file (although changes in unversioned source dblatex-examples.tar.bz2 still can't be detected). * Standards-Version: 4.0.0 (no changes needed) Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Hoenen GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B 82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:48:35PM +0200, Andreas Hoenen wrote: >... > Changes since the last upload: > > * New upstream release > + Fix rendering of quotes and nested quotes with Greek language. > Closes: #849679 > + db2latex style: In level 4 sections don't start the first paragraph on > the same line as the heading. Closes: #851145 > * Drop patches that have been integrated upstream: > + 20_xmultirow.patch > * 20_pt_quote.patch: > In Portuguese and Brazilian documents don't break on a " as last character > in a table title. > Thanks to Osamu Aoki for reporting. Closes: #863527 > * Drop patch 10_dblatex_version.patch: it is not really necessary and could > be forgotten in NMUs. > * Refresh patches regarding line numbers. > * Fix watch file (although changes in unversioned source > dblatex-examples.tar.bz2 still can't be detected). > * Standards-Version: 4.0.0 (no changes needed) Thanks, uploaded. > Thanks, Andreas cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed--- End Message ---
Bug#854656: marked as done (RFS: roadfighter/1.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Relive a classic racing game with this remake)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jun 2017 04:20:18 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: roadfighter/1.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Relive a classic racing game with this remake has caused the Debian Bug report #854656, regarding RFS: roadfighter/1.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Relive a classic racing game with this remake to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 854656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854656 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roadfighter" * Package name: roadfighter Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL : https://github.com/coringao/roadfighter * License : GPL2+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: roadfighter - Relive a classic racing game with this remake To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/roadfighter Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roadfighter/roadfighter_1.0.0-1.dsc Regards, Carlos Donizete Froes --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package roadfighter has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#866545: marked as done (RFS: opencryptoki/3.7.0+dfsg-4 )
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:10:13 +0300 with message-id <20170630041013.q462dzobuxvveot2@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#866545: RFS: opencryptoki/3.7.0+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #866545, regarding RFS: opencryptoki/3.7.0+dfsg-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 866545: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866545 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opencryptoki" Package name: opencryptoki Version : 3.7.0+dfsg-4 Upstream Author : none URL : http://opencryptoki.sourceforge.net/ License : CPL Section : admin It builds those binary packages: libopencryptoki-dev - PKCS#11 implementation (development) libopencryptoki0 - PKCS#11 implementation (library) opencryptoki - PKCS#11 implementation (daemon) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/opencryptoki Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opencryptoki/opencryptoki_3.7.0+dfsg-4.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: opencryptoki (3.7.0+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix broken links for libopencryptoki0. Closes: #866152, 640812 * Change to compat level 10. * Update debian/rules with compat level 10 changes. Regards, Paulo Vital -- Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital "I like the impossible, because there is less competition" - Walt Disney --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:27:55PM -0300, Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital wrote: >... > Changes since the last upload: > > opencryptoki (3.7.0+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Fix broken links for libopencryptoki0. Closes: #866152, 640812 > * Change to compat level 10. > * Update debian/rules with compat level 10 changes. Uploaded. > Regards, > Paulo Vital cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed--- End Message ---
Bug#866545: RFS: opencryptoki/3.7.0+dfsg-4
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opencryptoki" Package name: opencryptoki Version : 3.7.0+dfsg-4 Upstream Author : none URL : http://opencryptoki.sourceforge.net/ License : CPL Section : admin It builds those binary packages: libopencryptoki-dev - PKCS#11 implementation (development) libopencryptoki0 - PKCS#11 implementation (library) opencryptoki - PKCS#11 implementation (daemon) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/opencryptoki Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opencryptoki/opencryptoki_3.7.0+dfsg-4.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: opencryptoki (3.7.0+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix broken links for libopencryptoki0. Closes: #866152, 640812 * Change to compat level 10. * Update debian/rules with compat level 10 changes. Regards, Paulo Vital -- Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital "I like the impossible, because there is less competition" - Walt Disney
Bug#864737: RFS: cid/9.0-1 [ITP]
Eduardo Moraes wrote...
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cid"
The packaging looks sane besides the maintainer scripts, more on that
below. However, the entire package scares me. It seems to fiddle a lot
with several config files that come from other packages (like
/etc/ntp.conf), it contains hundreds of lines of complex shell
operations that all run as root, it seems to re-implement mechanisms to
control daemon processes, including on-the-fly creation of systemd
service files, does things in an overly complex way (in Debian, once ntp
is configured, you may assume /var/lib/ntp/ exists and belongs to
ntp:ntp), and finally there is very little explanation in the code. So
I'm concerned this package might introduce a huge bunch of security
issues. Not my department, though.
The two maintainer scripts cid-base.postinst and .postrm confuse me.
They do quite many things but don't provide an explanation.
Just a few points, there might be more:
| USRLIBDIR=/usr/lib/cid
[ postinst:18 ]
This directory isn't populated by the cid-base package, and therefore
checks for files there will fail. Which makes me wonder whether major
parts of postinst are actually dead code.
| elif [ -s "/opt/cid/lib/domain.conf" ]; then
[ postinst:23 ]
cid-base doesn't ship files in /opt/, so it shouldn't probe for one in
that place (imagine somebody created that file, by accident, or even
with malicious intent).
postinst:69 defines a list of files that are copied around later. It's
more out of curiousity: What happens here, why is this done? Is the
backup used later? Is the actual e.g. /etc/group affected by this?
So, postinst leaves me in a bad feeling. I didn't thourogly check what
actually is supposed to happen but I doubt all these things have to take
place in postinst.
In postrm, you (hopefully) load the variables $SUDODIR, $PROFILEDIR
and $SYSTEMDDIR from '/var/lib/cid/databases/station.db' which is
created in postinst without these. Unless the file is modified before
the postinst run - something you cannot rely on - none of the three
variables are set, and postrm will happily purge /cid-sudo-allusers,
/cid_DomainUsersLogon.sh and perhaps /cid.service if they exist.
Also,
| [ -f "${SYSTEMDDIR}/cid.service" -a `command -v systemctl` ] && systemctl
disable cid.service && rm -f "${SYSTEMDDIR}/cid.service" && systemctl
daemon-reload
[ postrm:12 ]
looks a lot like a hand-crafted systemd service file handling. The tools
provided by dh_systemd are certainly the better choice.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Requesting a sponsor for Polybar
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:51:02AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > you should start by contacting the person already trying to package it > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856179 Thank you, I will contact them. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Requesting a sponsor for Polybar
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:45:02PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Please file a RFS bug as described in > https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers instead of directly > emailing debian-mentors with a RFS. > And I suggest that if you are going to propose a git repository please > use gbp (this implies using the usual 3 branches for upstream, debian > packaging and pristine-tar) instead of just adding the packaging on the > upstream master. Thank you for the info. I actually did read that but had already sent the email. Reading https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors first lead me to believe I was supposed to contact the mailing list. Sean signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#866527: marked as done (RFS: slick-greeter/1.0.8-1)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:54:26 +0200
with message-id <20170629215426.mbzjkrrlhebvi...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#866527: RFS: slick-greeter/1.0.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #866527,
regarding RFS: slick-greeter/1.0.8-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
866527: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866527
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slick-greeter"
* Package name: slick-greeter
Version : 1.0.8-1
Upstream Author : Clement Lefebvre
* URL : https://github.com/linuxmint/slick-greeter/
* License : GPL-3+
Section : x11
It builds those binary packages:
slick-greeter - Slick-looking LightDM greeter
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/slick-greeter
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/slick-greeter/slick-greeter_1.0.8-1.dsc
Notes:
I have run lintian -i -I on the built changes file and double checked
check-all-the-things (which picked up the copyright change mentioned
in the change log)
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release
- do not start onboard and orca on session startup since these do
not work with this greeter
- improve contrast, test color and font style to improve readability
for those with any form of visual impairment
- improve clarity of session badges for HiDPI users
- fix GTK+3.20 and later issues with the prompt display
- Improve man page and README for slick-greeter to describe all the
slick-greeter.conf options
* Packaging changes:
- update debian/copyright for the budgie-desktop greeter icon
file name; changed from .png to .svg in the source
Regards,
David Mohammed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:56:31PM +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
> * Package name: slick-greeter
>Version : 1.0.8-1
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * New upstream release
> - do not start onboard and orca on session startup since these do
> not work with this greeter
> - improve contrast, test color and font style to improve readability
> for those with any form of visual impairment
> - improve clarity of session badges for HiDPI users
> - fix GTK+3.20 and later issues with the prompt display
> - Improve man page and README for slick-greeter to describe all the
> slick-greeter.conf options
> * Packaging changes:
> - update debian/copyright for the budgie-desktop greeter icon
> file name; changed from .png to .svg in the source
That files/usr/{share,bin}/ directory in the source looks weird, but it
comes from the upstream tarball and appears to be just some odd layout.
Still, it seems weird enough to warrant a look.
Uploaded though.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ A dumb species has no way to open a tuna can.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ A smart species invents a can opener.
⠈⠳⣄ A master species delegates.--- End Message ---
Bug#866527: RFS: slick-greeter/1.0.8-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slick-greeter" * Package name: slick-greeter Version : 1.0.8-1 Upstream Author : Clement Lefebvre * URL : https://github.com/linuxmint/slick-greeter/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: slick-greeter - Slick-looking LightDM greeter To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/slick-greeter Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/slick-greeter/slick-greeter_1.0.8-1.dsc Notes: I have run lintian -i -I on the built changes file and double checked check-all-the-things (which picked up the copyright change mentioned in the change log) Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release - do not start onboard and orca on session startup since these do not work with this greeter - improve contrast, test color and font style to improve readability for those with any form of visual impairment - improve clarity of session badges for HiDPI users - fix GTK+3.20 and later issues with the prompt display - Improve man page and README for slick-greeter to describe all the slick-greeter.conf options * Packaging changes: - update debian/copyright for the budgie-desktop greeter icon file name; changed from .png to .svg in the source Regards, David Mohammed
Re: SBuild: Post-build fails to fetch some packages
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 03:49:33AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > The trouble I'm having is a persistent failure during the post-build > step: attempting to fetch the packages needed for the test bed, some > packages fail to download, until SBuild gives up. > > E: Failed to fetch > http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian/pool/main/r/readline/readline-common_7.0-2_all.deb > 404 Not Found > E: Failed to fetch > http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian/pool/main/r/readline/libreadline7_7.0-2_amd64.deb > 404 Not Found Your sbuild-environment has outdated mirror information. For example the current libreadline version in unstable is 7.0-3. Does the build work after running sbuild-update? -- PGP-encrypted mails preferred PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
SBuild: Post-build fails to fetch some packages
Howdy all, I'm using ‘sbuild’ to build my packages, and it is able to fetch packages for performing ‘debian/rules’ actions. The trouble I'm having is a persistent failure during the post-build step: attempting to fetch the packages needed for the test bed, some packages fail to download, until SBuild gives up. = $ sbuild --dist unstable pyrlp_0.5.1-1.dsc […] Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0 Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0 […] Need to get 6606 kB/6620 kB of archives. After this operation, 23.2 MB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 file:/tmp/autopkgtest.if4ZUh/binaries python-rlp 0.5.1-1 [13.3 kB] Get:2 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 libpython2.7-minimal amd64 2.7.13-2 [389 kB] Get:3 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 python2.7-minimal amd64 2.7.13-2 [1383 kB] Get:4 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 python-minimal amd64 2.7.13-2 [40.5 kB] Get:5 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 mime-support all 3.60 [36.7 kB] Get:6 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 libexpat1 amd64 2.2.0-2 [83.3 kB] Get:7 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 libffi6 amd64 3.2.1-6 [20.4 kB] Err:8 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 readline-common all 7.0-2 404 Not Found Err:9 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 libreadline7 amd64 7.0-2 404 Not Found Err:10 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 libsqlite3-0 amd64 3.16.2-2 404 Not Found Err:11 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 libssl1.1 amd64 1.1.0e-1 404 Not Found Get:12 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 libpython2.7-stdlib amd64 2.7.13-2 [1895 kB] Get:13 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 python2.7 amd64 2.7.13-2 [285 kB] Get:14 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 libpython-stdlib amd64 2.7.13-2 [20.0 kB] Get:15 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 python amd64 2.7.13-2 [154 kB] Get:16 http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian unstable/main amd64 python-pkg-resources all 33.1.1-1 [166 kB] Fetched 4473 kB in 8s (499 kB/s) E: Failed to fetch http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian/pool/main/r/readline/readline-common_7.0-2_all.deb 404 Not Found E: Failed to fetch http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian/pool/main/r/readline/libreadline7_7.0-2_amd64.deb 404 Not Found E: Failed to fetch http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian/pool/main/s/sqlite3/libsqlite3-0_3.16.2-2_amd64.deb 404 Not Found E: Failed to fetch http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.1_1.1.0e-1_amd64.deb 404 Not Found E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing? adt-run: WARNING: apt failed to download packages, retrying in 10s... [… retries several times, until …] adt-run [09:06:07]: ERROR: testbed failure: apt repeatedly failed to download packages E: Command 'adt-run --changes /home/bignose/Projects/debian/ethereum/pyrlp/build-area/pyrlp/pyrlp_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes --- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild' failed to run. = I have attached an uninterrupted log of that section of the output. +--+ | Post Build Commands | +--+ adt-run --changes /home/bignose/Projects/debian/ethereum/pyrlp/build-area/pyrlp/pyrlp_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes --- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild - adt-run: WARNING: "adt-run" is deprecated, please use "autopkgtest" (see manpage) adt-run [09:05:28]: version 4.4 adt-run [09:05:28]: host lantana; command line: /usr/bin/adt-run --changes /home/bignose/Projects/debian/ethereum/pyrlp/build-area/pyrlp/pyrlp_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes --- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild adt-run [09:05:31]: testbed dpkg architecture: amd64 adt-run [09:05:31]: testbed running kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.30-2 (2017-06-12) adt-run [09:05:32]: source /home/bignose/Projects/debian/ethereum/pyrlp/build-area/pyrlp/pyrlp_0.5.1-1.dsc dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package (/tmp/autopkgtest.if4ZUh/pyrlp_0.5.1-1.dsc) dpkg-source: info: extracting pyrlp in pyrlp-0.5.1 dpkg-source: info: unpacking pyrlp_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: unpacking pyrlp_0.5.1-1.debian.tar.xz adt-run [09:05:32]: testing package pyrlp version 0.5.1-1 adt-run [09:05:32]: build not needed adt-run [09:05:32]: test smoke-python2: preparing testbed Get:1 file:/tmp/autopkgtest.if4ZUh/binaries InRelease Ign:1 file:/tmp/autopkgt
Re: Making a srouce package Bug - #859130 ITP: lina -- iso- Forth interpreter
Paul Wise schreef op 2017-06-29 15:55: On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote: I'm working on packaging lina and I'm stuck. I do have a correct .deb but that seems not to be enough. Yes, as I suggested in my last mail, you need a source package for Debian: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1485153702.23889.7.ca...@debian.org The biggest issue I listed in the upstream source was that you have not published the source code for ssort, just the binary. While looking at the binary I discovered that the source code for ssort was a C++ file called ssort.cc that was not available. Here we disagree. That should not be an issue, because ssort.cc is not part of the source for lina. It isn't even part of the system that generates it all: lina wina xina mina, standalone Forth's for harddisks, floppies, 16bit 32 bit 64 bit, you name it. The github is for reference. The 5 files from the original message is the upstream source package. ssort.cc is merely one of the tools used. The source of m4 that is equally essential to generating the source isn't either. I appreciate the concern of Debianists that they cannot build a package because tools are missing. That situation is far off here. As soon as I can wrap my head around it, the usage of ssort will be replaced by a small Forth program, run by lina itself. It really plays a minute role, think of it as an emacs script that I run while I'm editing the documentation. You don't want that kind of thing clutter up packages, do you? If this keeps a source of confusion you, I will give top priority to making it into a Forth script. P.S. ssort.cc is free software in its own right and it is published on my website. Now I realize that debian wants to build itself, based on a possibly adapted upstream source package. Definitely, sorry if I didn't make that clear. Don't apologize. You made that as clear as could be. That is entirely my stupidity. -- Suffering is the prerogative of the strong, the weak -- perish. Albert van der Horst
Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1
Hello, apologies for the late response
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:49:51PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:
Hi,
On 06/18/2017 11:23 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
- src/Tests/USB/data/0001.bin src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/root.tar.xz
what's the source of that file? please regenerate them at build time
i'm not sure how to deal with this- the 0001.bin is a copy of a binary
USB Descriptor of one of upstreams devices.
which device? is it a physical device? is it a virtual device?
The root.tar.xz is an
archive containing the files from
src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/{bus,devices}, which itself is a copy of
upstreams /sys/bus/usb and /sys/devices, containing also some binary
files. And the files are only there for the tests.
looks to me like a bunch of mkdir, touch, etc can replace it easily
i would compare this with a JPG-file thats part of a graphics library
test-routine or something like that...
we try to generate those at build time
PS: i forgot to add to the last email we should target unstable instead
of experimental :)
cheers,
muri
--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
Re: Requesting a sponsor for Polybar
>I'd like to keep this package up to date inside the Debian repos. > >Polybar is a status bar similar in functionality to i3bar, it aims to be >a replacement for your system status bar and is commonly used in window> >managers such as i3 and bspwm. you should start by contacting the person already trying to package it https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856179 G.
Re: Requesting a sponsor for Polybar
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 06:25:01AM -0400, Sean Behan wrote: > Hello, I forked this repository here: > https://git.uggedal.com/pkg/polybar > > My fork is located here: > https://github.com/codebam/polybar > > I'd like to keep this package up to date inside the Debian repos. > > Polybar is a status bar similar in functionality to i3bar, it aims to be > a replacement for your system status bar and is commonly used in window > managers such as i3 and bspwm. Please file a RFS bug as described in https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers instead of directly emailing debian-mentors with a RFS. And I suggest that if you are going to propose a git repository please use gbp (this implies using the usual 3 branches for upstream, debian packaging and pristine-tar) instead of just adding the packaging on the upstream master. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Requesting a sponsor for Polybar
Hello, I forked this repository here: https://git.uggedal.com/pkg/polybar My fork is located here: https://github.com/codebam/polybar I'd like to keep this package up to date inside the Debian repos. Polybar is a status bar similar in functionality to i3bar, it aims to be a replacement for your system status bar and is commonly used in window managers such as i3 and bspwm. Thanks, Sean signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#858538: fadecut package review
Hi Anton, I have ready the fadecut package for upload after stretch release. May you have again a look into it: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fadecut/fadecut_0.2.0-1.dsc Thank you for feedback, Marco On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Friday, 28 April 2017 22:13:38 CEST Anton Gladky wrote: > > I do not understand, what you mean with "killed my orbis-tools|lame rule". > > As far as I see, dependencies were just aligned. > Marco meant that running "cme fix dpkg" removes "vorbis-tools|lame" from the > Dependency list of fadecut. > This is a bug in libconfig-model-dpkg-perl which is being fixed. > All the best signature.asc Description: Digital signature
