Bug#868003: RFS: ircii/20170704-1 (QA Upload)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ircii" * Package name: ircii * Version : 20170704-1 * Upstream Author : Matthew R. Green * URL : http://ircii.warped.com/ * License : BSD-3-Clause * Section : net It builds those binary packages: ircii - Internet Relay Chat client To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ircii https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/ircii.git Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ircii/ircii_20170704-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://ircii.warped.com/ Changes since the last upload: * QA Upload. * New upstream release. * debian/control + Change debhelper to 10 in B-D. + Bump Standards-Version to 4.0.0 (no changes). * debian/compat + Switch compat level 9 to 10. * debian/copyright + Extend copyright holders years. + Add missing copyright holders. * debian/patches + Refresh 0008-fix-spelling-error.diff + Refresh 0006-fix-some-spelling-errors.patch + Refresh 0007-fix_security_problems.diff Regards, -- Daniel Echeverry http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry http://rinconinformatico.net Linux user: #477840 Debian user
Bug#868001: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.3.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfsmaintenance" * Package name: btrfsmaintenance Version : 0.3.1-1 Upstream Author : David Sterba * URL : https://github.com/kdave/btrfsmaintenance * License : GPL-2 Section : admin It builds this binary package: btrfsmaintenance - Automate btrfs maintenance tasks on mountpoints or directories To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfsmaintenance Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfsmaintenance/btrfsmaintenance_0.3.1-1.dsc Additionally, this package's repository can be cloned with this command: git clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/btrfsmaintenance.git Please note that I haven't pushed and upstream branch yet. Cheers, Nicholas
Bug#862755: RFS: golang-github-go-ini-ini/1.27.0-1
Hi!
Sorry for the delay, I was offline during the last weeks.
On 2017-06-15 22:15+0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>gbp clone --pristine-tar
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-go-ini-ini.git
>
> lets review (the mentors link)
> +golang-github-go-ini-ini (1.27.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium
> +
> + * New upstream version 1.27.0
> + * update Standards-Version and debhelper version
> + * add myself to the uploaders
> + * use https in the Vcs-Browser field
> +
> + -- Félix Sipma Tue, 16 May 2017 16:22:10 +0200
> +
> +golang-github-go-ini-ini (1.8.6-3) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> + * Team upload.
> + * Use a secure transport for the Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser URL
> +
> + -- Paul Tagliamonte Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:21:03 -0400
> +
>
> please merge the two changelog entries together
done
> please ask your comaintainers (in cc), if you can add yourself in uploaders
> list
will do
>>2017/05/16 18:21:46 FAILED: grafana_2.6.0+dfsg-3 (see
>> buildlogs/grafana_2.6.0+dfsg-3)
>>2017/05/16 18:21:46 FAILED: nomad_0.4.0+dfsg-1 (see
>> buildlogs/nomad_0.4.0+dfsg-1)
>>2017/05/16 18:21:46 FAILED: packer_0.10.2+dfsg-5 (see
>> buildlogs/packer_0.10.2+dfsg-5)
>>2017/05/16 18:21:46 FAILED: goiardi_0.11.4-1 (see
>> buildlogs/goiardi_0.11.4-1)
>>
>> grafana and nomad fails for unrelated reasons (see attached logs)
>>
>> I don't get why goiardi and packer fail.
>
> this should be sorted out before uploading in unstable, please ask upstream
> or relative maintainers
> and fix this
not done yet... I also changed the target from experimental to unstable.
>> If the person who sponsors the upload could also give me upload permissions
>> for
>> this package, that would be great!
>
> after updating it, prod me if I forget :)
>
> review:
>
> +Vcs-Browser:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-go/packages/golang-github-go-ini-ini.git;a=summary
>
> please use cgit
done
> + ${misc:Depends},
> + golang-go
>
> not mentioned in changelog
I just changed the indentation, this was already there :-).
> +version=3
> + https://github.com/go-ini/ini/releases \
> + .*/v?(\d[\d\.]*)\.tar\.gz
>
> please mention in changelog
I have not done anything to this...
> and then we should be good :)
>
> G.
Thanks for your review! Other people have expressed interest in getting an
updated restic in sid, so I hope to get help to fix the build failures... I've
uploaded the new package to mentors.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1
On 06/29/2017 05:35 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > Hello, apologies for the late response no worries, as you can see i'm not very fast myself oke, so... On 06/18/2017 11:23 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > d/copyright > > - please set the years to include 2016, 2017. there are some files owned > by RH which are copyright 2016 but in d/copyright it only says 2015 fixed > - src/Tests/Makefile.in, src/Tests/test-driver are copyright FSF added in d/copyright > - would be cool to run files-without-copyright.sh you mean in d/rules? >>> - src/Tests/USB/data/0001.bin src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/root.tar.xz >>> what's the source of that file? please regenerate them at build time >> i'm not sure how to deal with this- the 0001.bin is a copy of a binary >> USB Descriptor of one of upstreams devices. > which device? is it a physical device? is it a virtual device? upstream says: > This is a copy of a binary USB descriptor of one of my devices. I don't think I know anymore which one but i've removed those files from the archive for now, patched the relevant testscripts and created a bug report to create the testdata from source [0] > - please clarify copyright for src/Tests/custom.supp done so in [1] and upstream added a public domain header [2]. i've added a paragraph about that file to d/copyright, although it does not yet contain that public domain header in this release (the file containing the public domain header is not part of a relaese) > d/control > > - You have a d/gbp.conf but not Vcs-* headers on d/control > would be cool if you publish your git packaging, and documented it on > d/control fixed > if you do that, please use pristine-tar to publish the tarballs oke, i've imported the tarballs using pristine-tar commit ../usbguard_0.7.0+ds1.orig.tar.gz and used --git-pristine-tar with gbp > d/changelog > > - please fix spelling in 'neede kernek' fixed > * New upstream version 0.7.0 > This release contains a backwards incompatible > change because it changes how the device hash is > computed for Linux root hub devices > > Please create a NEWS.Debian file, also please make a note to add a > notice in the release manual for buster (i know, looong time) > Users hate when things change without notice (i'm an usbguard user :) i've added a d/NEWS file (dch --create --news) and added the information there. did you mean i should make a note for myself or did you mean a note in d/NEWS and if the latter, what is the syntax? new version is on mentors ;) cheers, muri [0] https://github.com/dkopecek/usbguard/issues/188 [1] https://github.com/dkopecek/usbguard/issues/175 [2] https://github.com/dkopecek/usbguard/commit/faa84a648a575db7d8e382729ea7dcea079afe3a signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#867158: Feedback
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:49:42AM -0500, Simon Quigley wrote: > What's the reasoning for debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp ? See lintian-info -t debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature > I see jquery.js in the files that are installed in the package. No, it's a symlink. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:09:35PM +0600, Daniel Manila wrote: > debuild requires a signing key to be added to the package. It fails if I > remove that file. I don't think so. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#867158: Feedback
Oops, it generated a lintian error, but didn't fail the build. I forgot exactly what happend. Daniel On 07/10/2017 05:21 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:09:35PM +0600, Daniel Manila wrote: >> debuild requires a signing key to be added to the package. It fails if I >> remove that file. > I don't think so. >
Bug#867158: Feedback
Hello, Thanks for your input, Simon. I'll get on the git-repository, I may contact you about that once I get it set up. Just to clarify, the run and run-gui executables are later symlinked to "weresync" and "weresync-gui". The original names only exist in the package's private directory and it just helps to differentiate them from the other files named "weresync". I had to do this to make sure the executables could find the package code. debuild requires a signing key to be added to the package. It fails if I remove that file. I'm not sure about the jquery.js file. I'm guessing sphinx added that (it's not my code that creates it). The Python Library Guide includes a bit on how to install sphinx documentation but doesn't mention removing the jquery.js file, so I'm guessing it's alright but I am certainly new to this so I could be wrong. I'll update the various versions ASAP, I was building this under debian stable, and just learned I should change to sid. I'm upgrading now and will be posting an update to the package using sid tools in a day or so. Thanks again! Sincerely, Daniel Manila On 07/10/2017 04:49 PM, Simon Quigley wrote: > Hello! > > I'm not a Debian Developer, so I don't have access to upload this, but > here's some feedback that you can use to improve it before someone does: > > wrap-and-sort is a really great tool for automatically sorting > debian/control files, I would highly suggest updating your packaging > with it. Also, there's a lot of whitespace in debian/control (and some > in debian/changelog etc.) that needs cleaning. > > You haven't mentioned a Git repository anywhere, but I suggest you > create one, as it will really make your life a lot easier. I have access > to collab-maint if you would like me to push your Git repository, but a > Git repository needs to exist before I can do that. :) > I suggest using git-buildpackage to create your repository. > > I would suggest shortening the descriptions for the packages in > debian/control but that could just be my personal preference... > > Standards-version 4.0.0 was released, you should probably update your > package to use that. > > Your debian/rules file looks a bit peculiar, so I'll leave that for a > more experienced packager to leave feedback on. > > Your debian/watch file could probably be updated to version 4. > > What's the reasoning for debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp ? > > I see jquery.js in the files that are installed in the package. I'm not > a Debian Archive Administrator by any degree, but I believe shipping > that sort of thing goes against Debian Policy. Feel free to correct me > if I'm wrong, though. > > Shipping an executable called "run" or "run-gui" seems a bit weird to > me, as running those applications would be executing "run" in a terminal... > > Once those things are dealt with, in my opinion, it should be ready to > upload. > > Thank you for your efforts! >
Bug#867883: marked as done (RFS: python-schema/0.6.6-2)
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:51:17 + (UTC) with message-id <1752860886.3066480.1499683877...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#867883: RFS: python-schema/0.6.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #867883, regarding RFS: python-schema/0.6.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 867883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867883 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: python-schema Version : 0.6.6-2 Upstream Author : Vladimir Keleshev * URL : https://github.com/keleshev/schema * License : Expat Section : python One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-schema.git Changes since the last upload: * Upgrade watch file to version 4 * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required * Release to unstable Best regards, Ghis --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello Ghislain, >I am looking for a sponsor for the following packages: >python-schema, xtensor, xtenros-python all done! G.--- End Message ---
Bug#867878: marked as done (RFS: xtensor/0.10.6-1)
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:51:17 + (UTC) with message-id <1752860886.3066480.1499683877...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#867883: RFS: python-schema/0.6.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #867878, regarding RFS: xtensor/0.10.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 867878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867878 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: xtensor Version : 0.10.6-1 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille, Sylvain Corlay and Wolf Vollprecht * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor.git Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 0.10.6 * Install the pkgconfig file * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required Best regards, Ghis --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello Ghislain, >I am looking for a sponsor for the following packages: >python-schema, xtensor, xtenros-python all done! G.--- End Message ---
Bug#867880: marked as done (RFS: xtensor-python/0.12.1-2)
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:51:17 + (UTC) with message-id <1752860886.3066480.1499683877...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#867883: RFS: python-schema/0.6.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #867880, regarding RFS: xtensor-python/0.12.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 867880: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867880 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: xtensor-python Version : 0.12.1-2 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille and Sylvain Corlay * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor-python.git Changes since the last upload: * Fix autopkgtest failure with multiple Py3 versions. Thanks to Dmitry Shachnev (Closes: #867026) * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required Best regards, Ghis --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello Ghislain, >I am looking for a sponsor for the following packages: >python-schema, xtensor, xtenros-python all done! G.--- End Message ---
Bug#867158: Feedback
Hello! I'm not a Debian Developer, so I don't have access to upload this, but here's some feedback that you can use to improve it before someone does: wrap-and-sort is a really great tool for automatically sorting debian/control files, I would highly suggest updating your packaging with it. Also, there's a lot of whitespace in debian/control (and some in debian/changelog etc.) that needs cleaning. You haven't mentioned a Git repository anywhere, but I suggest you create one, as it will really make your life a lot easier. I have access to collab-maint if you would like me to push your Git repository, but a Git repository needs to exist before I can do that. :) I suggest using git-buildpackage to create your repository. I would suggest shortening the descriptions for the packages in debian/control but that could just be my personal preference... Standards-version 4.0.0 was released, you should probably update your package to use that. Your debian/rules file looks a bit peculiar, so I'll leave that for a more experienced packager to leave feedback on. Your debian/watch file could probably be updated to version 4. What's the reasoning for debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp ? I see jquery.js in the files that are installed in the package. I'm not a Debian Archive Administrator by any degree, but I believe shipping that sort of thing goes against Debian Policy. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though. Shipping an executable called "run" or "run-gui" seems a bit weird to me, as running those applications would be executing "run" in a terminal... Once those things are dealt with, in my opinion, it should be ready to upload. Thank you for your efforts! -- Simon Quigley tsimo...@ubuntu.com tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC 5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8 C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4
Bug#867883: RFS: python-schema/0.6.6-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: python-schema Version : 0.6.6-2 Upstream Author : Vladimir Keleshev * URL : https://github.com/keleshev/schema * License : Expat Section : python One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-schema.git Changes since the last upload: * Upgrade watch file to version 4 * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required * Release to unstable Best regards, Ghis
Bug#867880: RFS: xtensor-python/0.12.1-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: xtensor-python Version : 0.12.1-2 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille and Sylvain Corlay * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor-python.git Changes since the last upload: * Fix autopkgtest failure with multiple Py3 versions. Thanks to Dmitry Shachnev (Closes: #867026) * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required Best regards, Ghis
Bug#867878: RFS: xtensor/0.10.6-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: xtensor Version : 0.10.6-1 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille, Sylvain Corlay and Wolf Vollprecht * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor.git Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 0.10.6 * Install the pkgconfig file * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required Best regards, Ghis
