Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/1.0.0-2 [ITP #864358]
On 07/25/2017 04:05 PM, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote:
> Hi Vitalie,
>
> I pick up the sponsoring process.
>
> V> Thank you very much for your help and comments.
>
>> libbitfield$SOVERSION (shared library)
>> libbitfield-dev (development files)
>
> V> Done. Package name changed from 'bitfield' to 'libbitfield' and
> SOVERSION is set
> V> to 1, so we get:
> V> libbitfield1
> V> libbitfield-dev
>
> This looks good now.
>
>> If you don't have soversioning in place, then it probably means that your
>> software is still too volatile for you to think about a stable ABI /
> API. If
>> that's the case, then it is not a good candidate for packaging in Debian
> just yet.
>
> V> Done. SO-versioning (and versioning policy in general) has been set. ABI
> /API
> V> has been stabilized. Version (1.0.0) has been released.
>
> That's also OK now.
>
> Some further problems with the packaging:
>
> - The link /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbitfield.so should go to
> the libbitfield-dev package.
> - A shared library should have a debian/.symbols file
> (see man dpkg-gensymbols).
> - The standards version should be updated to 4.0.0
> - The files README.{Debian,source} do not provide any real info. They should
> be dropped until they contain something useful.
> - Please also remove the unrelated comments at the end of debian/rules
> and the comments after the DH_VERBOSE line at the beginning.
> - The files debian/*.dirs are unnecessary . Please remove.
>
> Please fix your package and ping me when done, so I can recheck.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Roland
Some other comments.
* The debian/changelog should:
- Contain only the first line.
- Have 1.0.0-1 (and not -3) as Debian release, as no previous version
were uploaded to Debian.
* Is there a reason why you're using debhelper 9 and not 10?
* I would recommend the use of "wrap-and-sort -t -a" (from devscripts)
to make debian/control cleaner.
* Your long description is a bit too short. When searching on a search
engine, I can see there's lots of this type of library. Your long
description doesn't tell where your library differentiate. Also, your
long description for the -dev package is only 2 lines long, which even
triggers a lintian warning that you should have seen. I would recommend
copying the long desc of libbitfield1 on top of the 2 lines of
libbitfield-dev as well.
* There's some lintian errors about spelling in man pages. Please fix them.
* Have you considered using DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+all in
your debian/rules ? That's usually a good idea, and lintian also
complains about this.
* The .symbols file contains the debian revision. Typically, this
shouldn't be in, as the symbols are exported from the upstream version,
and wont change on debian revisions.
One last thing: what is your intention about packaging this library? Are
you going to upload a program that will actually use that lib? What is
the point in having it in Debian, and how will it be useful for our users?
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Bug#859778: [supp...@mentors.debian.net: xtrs uploaded to mentors.debian.net]
Hello Branden, On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 04:35:23PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > Please accept my apologies for letting this RFS sit for so long. Thank > you for all your work. Looking forward to uploading it soon. > > Here's a full review of dc84e1861798b3aba0969e2fe81a2431f2ee17de: Any progress on this? -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:42:02PM +0530, Harish Sriram wrote: > Here is the link to the uploaded package. > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/etcd/etcd_3.1.8+dfsg-2 > +nmu1.dsc No, the correct suffix for non-native package NMUs is .1, not +nmu1. Please use dch --nmu and read https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu Besides, there are three RC bugs in the package while this NMU solves only one. And you've even posted a patch to other one. While are you not including it here? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 07:41:12PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote: > cyclograph (1.9.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > > [ Federico Brega ] You don't need to add your name in brackets if there are no other names. > * Debhelper compat version updated to 9 The current recommended level is 10. And there are other changes (about python for example) that are not listed in the changelog. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]
Why is this not using dh(1)? It's also hardcoding /usr/lib and not the multiarch path in d/rules. Why is changelog-move-to-git-log.patch needed? There are a lot of strange and ancient things kept from the previous Debian package, yet d/changelog doesn't have the old entries. OTOH d/copyright doesn't list even the current maintainer or the current year. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "oprofile" Package name: oprofile Version : 1.2.0-1 URL : http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL2 Section : devel It builds those binary packages: libjvmti-oprofile0 - system-wide profiler for Linux systems (Java runtime library) libopagent1 - system-wide profiler for Linux systems (opagent runtime library) oprofile - system-wide profiler for Linux systems To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/oprofile Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oprofile/oprofile_1.2.0-1.dsc Regards, Roberto Oliveira
Re: Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/1.0.0-3 [ITP #864358]
On 07/25/2017 11:05 PM, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote:
Hi Roland,
Thank you very much for your reply.
> Some further problems with the packaging:
>
> - The link /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbitfield.so should go to the
> libbitfield-dev package.
> - A shared library should have a debian/.symbols file
> (see man dpkg-gensymbols).
> - The standards version should be updated to 4.0.0
> - The files README.{Debian,source} do not provide any real info. They should
> be dropped until they contain something useful.
> - Please also remove the unrelated comments at the end of debian/rules and
> the comments after the DH_VERBOSE line at the beginning.
> - The files debian/*.dirs are unnecessary . Please remove.
>
> Please fix your package and ping me when done, so I can recheck.
Fixed. Please, recheck.
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitfield/bitfield_1.0.0-3.dsc
Best regards,
Vitalie Ciubotaru
Bug#864532: marked as done (RFS: tss2/1045-1 [ITP] -- IBM's TCG Software Stack (TSS))
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:20:36 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: tss2/1045-1 [ITP] -- IBM's TCG Software Stack (TSS) has caused the Debian Bug report #864532, regarding RFS: tss2/1045-1 [ITP] -- IBM's TCG Software Stack (TSS) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 864532: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864532 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tss2" * Package name: tss2 Version : 851-2 Upstream Author : Ken Goldman * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss/files/NotForUsers_DebianSource/ * License : BSD Section : admin It builds those binary packages: libtss-dev - Development headers for IBM's TSS 2.0 libtss0- Development library for IBM's TSS 2.0 tss2 - IBM's TCG Software Stack (TSS) for TPM 2.0 and related utilities To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/tss2 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tss2/tss2_851-2.dsc More information about tss2 can be obtained from https://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss. Changes since the last upload: * debian/rules: - modified to use automatic debugging symbol packages. * debian/control: - renamed the library package name and the development header package name. - removed the 'Priority: important' from the library package. - added the 'Section: libdevel' to the development header package. - removed the manual library dependencies. -- Hon Ching (Vicky) Lo Fri, 09 Jun 2017 19:42:00 + Regards, Hon Ching (Vicky) Lo --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package tss2 version 1045-1 is in NEW now, and the package at mentors is not newer (2017-07-26) than the package in NEW (2017-07-26), so there is currently no package to sponsor. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/tss2_1045-1.html https://mentors.debian.net/package/tss2 Please remove the package from mentors or mark it "needs sponsor = no". If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW, then you can upload an updated package to mentors and feel free to reopen this RFS 864532 or open a new RFS.--- End Message ---
Bug#869898: RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3-1 [ITP]
2017-07-27 22:47 GMT+08:00 Liang Guo :
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:25 PM, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:30:52PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
>>> Alioth packaging repository:
>>>
>>> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/dtkcore.git
>>
>> * The copyrights in src/log/* are different from other files, please
>> check copyright header of every file and list them in
>> debian/copyright.
>>
>> * This symbol control file for libdtkcore.so is missing. Please help to
>> add it.
>
> Agree, beside these problem, please notice:
>
> * debian/docs is empty please remove
>
> * Their should be an short license declaration in each *.{c,h,cpp}
> file. For GPL3 license files, the short license should like this:
>
> Copyright (C)
>
> This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
> it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
> (at your option) any later version.
>
> This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> GNU General Public License for more details.
>
> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> along with this program. If not, see
Bug#869898: RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:25 PM, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:30:52PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
>> Alioth packaging repository:
>>
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/dtkcore.git
>
> * The copyrights in src/log/* are different from other files, please
> check copyright header of every file and list them in
> debian/copyright.
>
> * This symbol control file for libdtkcore.so is missing. Please help to
> add it.
Agree, beside these problem, please notice:
* debian/docs is empty please remove
* Their should be an short license declaration in each *.{c,h,cpp}
file. For GPL3 license files, the short license should like this:
Copyright (C)
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see
Bug#869898: RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:30:52PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Alioth packaging repository:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/dtkcore.git
* The copyrights in src/log/* are different from other files, please
check copyright header of every file and list them in
debian/copyright.
* This symbol control file for libdtkcore.so is missing. Please help to
add it.
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#869898: RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3-1 [ITP]
Interesting, I'll have a look On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: czc...@debian.org > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dtkcore". > > This source package provides a library used by various software from Deepin > Linux. This is the dependency of many Deepin software and DDE (Deepin Desktop > Environment). > > This package is parallel with previous "dtksettings" thus can be uploaded at > the same time without conflicts/dependency problems. > > * Package name: dtkcore > Version : 0.3.3-1 > Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co., Ltd. > * URL : https://www.deepin.org/ >Section : devel > > It builds those binary packages: > > libdtkcore-dev - Deepin Tool Kit Core Devel library > libdtkcore1 - Deepin Tool Kit Core library > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/dtkcore > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dtkcore/ > dtkcore_0.3.3-1.dsc > > Alternatively, one can retrieve more information from debomatic-amd64: > > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/dtkcore/0.3.3-1/ > > Alioth packaging repository: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/dtkcore.git > >More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/ > linuxdeepin/dtkcore . > > Changes since the last upload: > > dtkcore (0.3.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Initial release (Closes: #869894) > > Regards, > Boyuan Yang -- Liang Guo http://guoliang.me/
Bug#869898: RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: czc...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dtkcore". This source package provides a library used by various software from Deepin Linux. This is the dependency of many Deepin software and DDE (Deepin Desktop Environment). This package is parallel with previous "dtksettings" thus can be uploaded at the same time without conflicts/dependency problems. * Package name: dtkcore Version : 0.3.3-1 Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co., Ltd. * URL : https://www.deepin.org/ Section : devel It builds those binary packages: libdtkcore-dev - Deepin Tool Kit Core Devel library libdtkcore1 - Deepin Tool Kit Core library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dtkcore Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dtkcore/ dtkcore_0.3.3-1.dsc Alternatively, one can retrieve more information from debomatic-amd64: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/dtkcore/0.3.3-1/ Alioth packaging repository: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/dtkcore.git More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/ linuxdeepin/dtkcore . Changes since the last upload: dtkcore (0.3.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #869894) Regards, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
