Bug#870009: marked as done (RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-4)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2017 20:55:24 + (UTC) with message-id <1767891794.2221096.1501275324...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #870009, regarding RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 870009: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870009 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop" * Package name: budgie-desktop Version : 10.3.1-4 Upstream Author : i...@solus-project.com * URL : https://github.com/budgie-desktop/budgie-desktop * License : LGPL-2.1/GPL2.0 Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: budgie-core - Core package for Budgie-Desktop budgie-core-dev - Development package for budgie-desktop budgie-desktop - Desktop package for budgie-desktop budgie-desktop-doc - documentation files for the budgie-desktop gir1.2-budgie-desktop-1.0 - GNOME introspection library for budgie-desktop libbudgie-plugin0 - Plugin library for budgie-desktop libbudgietheme0 - Theme library for budgie-desktop libraven0 - Raven library for budgie-desktop To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/budgie-desktop Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/budgie-desktop/budgie-desktop_10.3.1-4.dsc Notes: This resolves the bug-report marked 'important' in the changelog i.e. it supports the upcoming migration for unstable/buster to GTK+3.24. I have built this successfully via a pbuilder chroot of unstable. The request in bug report #869953 is "We intend to upload gnome-settings-daemon 3.24 to Debian unstable about 10 days from now on Sunday, August 6. I suggest uploading the fix to the DELAYED queue for that date so that this transition will be easy and smooth." Thus please can this package (if acceptable) be put in the DELAYED queue as described above? Changes since the last upload: * New release for unstable Use build 10.3.1-3 for experimental with the following changes: - enforce gnome-settings-daemon minimum version >= 3.24 - release ensures there is a migration path for budgie-core to GNOME stack 3.24 (Closes: #869953) Regards, David Mohammed --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop" in deferred/9, I don't think it is useful to have it before that time G.--- End Message ---
Bug#870009: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-4
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop" * Package name: budgie-desktop Version : 10.3.1-4 Upstream Author : i...@solus-project.com * URL : https://github.com/budgie-desktop/budgie-desktop * License : LGPL-2.1/GPL2.0 Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: budgie-core - Core package for Budgie-Desktop budgie-core-dev - Development package for budgie-desktop budgie-desktop - Desktop package for budgie-desktop budgie-desktop-doc - documentation files for the budgie-desktop gir1.2-budgie-desktop-1.0 - GNOME introspection library for budgie-desktop libbudgie-plugin0 - Plugin library for budgie-desktop libbudgietheme0 - Theme library for budgie-desktop libraven0 - Raven library for budgie-desktop To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/budgie-desktop Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/budgie-desktop/budgie-desktop_10.3.1-4.dsc Notes: This resolves the bug-report marked 'important' in the changelog i.e. it supports the upcoming migration for unstable/buster to GTK+3.24. I have built this successfully via a pbuilder chroot of unstable. The request in bug report #869953 is "We intend to upload gnome-settings-daemon 3.24 to Debian unstable about 10 days from now on Sunday, August 6. I suggest uploading the fix to the DELAYED queue for that date so that this transition will be easy and smooth." Thus please can this package (if acceptable) be put in the DELAYED queue as described above? Changes since the last upload: * New release for unstable Use build 10.3.1-3 for experimental with the following changes: - enforce gnome-settings-daemon minimum version >= 3.24 - release ensures there is a migration path for budgie-core to GNOME stack 3.24 (Closes: #869953) Regards, David Mohammed
Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1
Thank you Andrey for your help. My changes to your suggestions are commented below and can be found in the git repository. > You don't need to add your name in brackets if there are no other names. Removed >> * Debhelper compat version updated to 9 > The current recommended level is 10. Switched to 10, both in debian/compat and in Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10~) > And there are other changes (about python for example) that are not listed > in the changelog. I listed all the changes done to files in the "debian" folder. The other changes are all made by upstream and, in my understanding, are out of scope from the debian changelog. Please tell me if I misunderstood something. Regards -- Federico
Bug#864946: marked as done (RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:13:22 +0500 with message-id <20170728171322.3db5ulngkaeby...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#864946: RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #864946, regarding RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 864946: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864946 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsml" * Package name: libsml Version : 0.1.1+git20170608-1 Upstream Author : Juri Glass, Mathias Runge, Nadim El Sayed,DAI-Labor (TU-Berlin) * URL : https://github.com/dailab/libsml/ * License : GPL Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsml-dev - Header files for libSML libsml1- Library for the Smart Messaging Language (SML) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsml Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsml/libsml_0.1.1+git20170608-1.dsc Since this is the first upload, the changelog is minimal: libsml (0.1.1+git20170608-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release. (Closes: #864314) I look forward to any comments and reviews! Thanks! Regards, Andreas Moog -- PGP-encrypted mails preferred PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624 signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Uploaded, thanks! -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#864946: RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 [ITP]
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 09:45:35PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > The format URL in debian/copyright is, strictly speaking, wrong: it lacks > the trailing slash (you can also switch it to HTTPS while fixing that). Fixed and uploaded to mentors. Thanks again. -- PGP-encrypted mails preferred PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#864946: RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 [ITP]
The format URL in debian/copyright is, strictly speaking, wrong: it lacks the trailing slash (you can also switch it to HTTPS while fixing that). -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#864946: RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 08:17:23PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Hello, thanks for your review. > Please use Priority: optional. Done. > CONTRIBUTION.pdf should be removed from the orig tarball as it doesn't > have a source and I doubt is even free (actually license texts we ship are > also non-free, but still we have the requirement to ship PDF sources). Ok, removed it during the repack-step of get-orig-source. > The upstream "make all" runs the tests, we usually don't do that, but I > don't know in this case why can that be bad. The upstream build system unfortunately isn't very sophisticated, but it does its job and running the tests is quick and useful. > Otherwise the package is good. Yay. Updated package uploaded to mentors. -- PGP-encrypted mails preferred PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2.1 [NMU]
Hi Andrey, Please find the link to new upload. https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/etcd/etcd_3.1.8+dfsg-2.1.dsc Still we do not have patches for the other RC bugs. That is why is other RC's are not addressed here. Thanks, Harish
Bug#854249: News regarding the ITP for python-coloredlogs
Hi, > This issue is currently blocking my work on the spyder-terminal plugin, > for which coloredlogs is a dependency. Could you guys keep me updated > on the progress. > > I'd be happy to take over if the motivation is gone. It would be better if you take over the package. You can start from the last push to alioth. -- Regards, Gaurav Juvekar
Bug#854115: RFS: python-verboselogs/1.5-1 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Please change the distribution to unstable. Please update Standards-Version. Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. Please drop the python2 subpackage unless some app in Debian needs it. *:Recommends and *:Suggests substvars don't exist. The license text in d/copyright contains the copyright line, it shouldn't be there. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#858733: RFS: clickhouse/1.1.54190-1 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Some preliminary remarks: Why B-D specifically on gcc-6, g++-6? Version in Depends: lsb-base (>= 3.2-14) can be dropped. Current Standards-Version is 4.0.0. Current debian/compat is 10. Are you sure this Pre-Depends usage is correct? Have you discussed it as required by the Policy? I suppose it's because clickhouse-client.postinst uses the user created in clickhouse-common.postinst but I don't think it is needed in this case. Besides, I think you shouldn't use chown to change ownership, see https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-permissions-owners Besides, I don't think it's advisable to have a dir in /etc owned by a service user (while the group will remain root? why?). The current consensus is to not delete users on purge. AUTHORS and README.md are included in several subpackages, this seems wrong. And in debian/clickhouse-utils.docs they are listed twice. There seems to be a typo in the PID file name in debian/clickhouse-server.service Some of the descriptions miss the trailing period. Is debian/copy_clang_binaries.sh unused? debian/libclickhouse1.symbols is empty. debian/copyright is very wrong with a single copyright and license for the entire project: it lacks licenses and copyrights for all bundled third-party code, there are several MIT-licensed files in the main code and docs, and that's without doing a full analysis. Now to debian/rules. Why --max-parallel=4? override_dh_auto_clean runs dh_clean, not dh_auto_clean, and it also does a bunch of rm's while dh_clean can do that with debian/clean. I think removing embedded copies should be done in clean, not in build. dh_auto_configure should run cmake, not override_dh_auto_build. Manual make -j`grep -c ^processor /proc/cpuinfo` is wrong. "will wait for the ability to use system libs instead of contrib ones" comment is worrying, so did that already happen or not? copy_headers.sh seems wrong. dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp is the default, isn't it? In any case it shouldn't be run in override_dh_auto_install. Creating dirs should be done by dh_installdirs. And the build fails in sbuild: ./debian/tests_wrapper.sh /<> grep: ../../debian/clickhouse-server-config-tests-preprocessed.xml: No such file or directory grep: /etc/clickhouse-server/config-preprocessed.xml: No such file or directory Running stateless tests. 1_select_1:[ FAIL ] - return code 232 /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Yekaterinburg: No such file or directory Poco::Exception: Exception: Cannot load time zone Asia/Yekaterinburg [...] 00039_inserts_through_http:[ FAIL ] - return code 7 curl: (7) Failed to connect to localhost port 8123: Connection refused [...] Having 58 errors! ./debian/tests_wrapper.sh: line 30: 31404 Aborted (core dumped) PATH=$PATH:./build/dbms/src/Server ./build/dbms/src/Server/clickhouse-server --config-file=./debian/clickhouse-server-config-tests.xml 2> /dev/null (wd: /<>) ./debian/tests_wrapper.sh: line 18: kill: (31404) - No such process debian/rules:31: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:10:35PM +0530, Harish Sriram wrote: > > No, the correct suffix for non-native package NMUs is .1, not +nmu1. > > Please use dch --nmu and read > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu > > Uploaded a new version with proper name. Thanks! Please include the new link and also retitle the bug accordingly. > > Besides, there are three RC bugs in the package while this NMU solves > only > > one. And you've even posted a patch to other one. While are you not > > including it here? > > This NMU is olny for one RC bug. Is it mandatory to fix all RC bugs. No, but what's the reason to upload a NMU to fix just one? Do you need that fix on some unstable system? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-2+nmu1 [NMU]
> No, the correct suffix for non-native package NMUs is .1, not +nmu1. > Please use dch --nmu and read > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu Uploaded a new version with proper name. Thanks! > Besides, there are three RC bugs in the package while this NMU solves only > one. And you've even posted a patch to other one. While are you not > including it here? This NMU is olny for one RC bug. Is it mandatory to fix all RC bugs. Regarding the other Bug, the patch fixes the integration related tests only. At the time of attaching to the Bug. That was the only issue observed while running tests. Now, I observe that few other tests also fails which does not close the Bug. Hence, I have excluded that patch. Thanks. Harish
