Bug#873136: New upstream release
Hi,I have uploaded a new xz tarball to mentors.debian.org version 0.5-1 ~Adam
Bug#873132: RFS: dav-text/0.8.6-2 [ITA] -- minimal ncurses-based text editor
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:09:17PM +0200, Adam Bilbrough wrote: > Package name: dav-text > Version: 0.8.6-2 > Changes since the last upload: > > * Wishlist bug implemented (closes: #872848) This changelog entry is quite useless. Could you please describe what the change is? Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Vat kind uf sufficiently advanced technology iz dis!? ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- Genghis Ht'rok'din ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#873136: xmltoman_0.4-5_source.changes REJECTED
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:24:47PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > xmltoman_0.4-5.dsc: Refers to non-existing file 'xmltoman_0.4.orig.tar.xz' > Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload? Turns out your orig tarball differs from what's in the archive. Since they use different compression (.gz vs .xz), both the previous and new versions of the source built okay on my side, the problem didn't show up on debdiff, etc. When using the unmodified 0.4 tarball, the source fails to build: dpkg-source -b xmltoman-0.4 dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building xmltoman using existing ./xmltoman_0.4.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: xmltoman-0.4/Makefile xmltoman-0.4/xmlmantohtml xmltoman-0.4/xmltoman dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source --commit dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see /tmp/xmltoman_0.4-5.diff.SHeBKD As you're using the quilt format, you'd need to either: * put the changes as a patch (dpkg-source --commit can be helpful), or * (as you're the new upstream) release a new upstream version Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Vat kind uf sufficiently advanced technology iz dis!? ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- Genghis Ht'rok'din ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#873136: marked as done (RFS: xmltoman/0.4-5 [ITA])
Your message dated Fri, 25 Aug 2017 01:09:10 +0200 with message-id <20170824230910.guezbnv7rdzuv...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#873136: RFS: xmltoman/0.4-5 [ITP] -- simple XML to man converter has caused the Debian Bug report #873136, regarding RFS: xmltoman/0.4-5 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 873136: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873136 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xmltoman": Package name: xmltoman Version: 0.4-5 Upstream Author: Adam BilbroughURL: https://gitlab.com/atsb/xmltoman License: GPL-2+ Section: devel It builds these binary packages: xmltoman - simple XML to man converter To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xmltoman Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmltoman/xmltoman_0.4-5.dsc More information about xmltoman can be obtained from: https://gitlab.com/atsb/xmltoman Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer. (Closes: #647716). * Added Multi-Arch: foreign to debian/control. (Closes: #862196). * Updated debian/watch to point to new upstream location. * Updated debian/control with maintainer information. * Updated debian/copyright with new maintainer and date. * Added strict and warnings to Perl files. * Fixed code for strict and warnings. Regards, Adam --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:29:07PM +0200, Adam Bilbrough wrote: > Package name: xmltoman > Version: 0.4-5 > Changes since the last upload: > > * New maintainer. (Closes: #647716). > * Added Multi-Arch: foreign to debian/control. (Closes: #862196). > * Updated debian/watch to point to new upstream location. > * Updated debian/control with maintainer information. > * Updated debian/copyright with new maintainer and date. > * Added strict and warnings to Perl files. > * Fixed code for strict and warnings. ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Vat kind uf sufficiently advanced technology iz dis!? ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- Genghis Ht'rok'din ⠈⠳⣄ --- End Message ---
Bug#873113: RFS: xssproxy/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:02:38PM +, t...@timakro.de wrote: > The upstream signature is already included in the debian directory You are confusing the signing key with the actual signature. > what is further needed to add it to the source package? From dpkg-source(1): "each original tarball can be accompanied by a detached upstream signature (.orig.tar.ext.asc and .orig-component.tar.ext.asc)" > The man page contains everything the README.md contains and more, should the > README.md file be also shipped in that case? In that case it's OK to not ship it. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#873113: RFS: xssproxy/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. Please update to the current Standards-Version. Please remove or uncomment Vcs-* Please remove commented out sample lines from debian/rules. Please add the upstream sig to the source package. Please ship README.md. -- WBR, wRAR Thanks for your feedback. The upstream signature is already included in the debian directory, what is further needed to add it to the source package? The man page contains everything the README.md contains and more, should the README.md file be also shipped in that case? Regards, Tim Schumacher bin5vC5TMlT1C.bin Description: PGP Public Key pgpdfaxlgT41f.pgp Description: PGP Digital Signature
Bug#872996: RFS: node-unicode-tr51/9.0.0-1 ITP
control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi, Le 23/08/2017 à 22:05, roucaries bastien a écrit : > * debian/control: >+ section is javascript Done. >+ you should use package.json version in source depends I use the currently available mocha in Debian, as it looks like it's enough ; apart from this remark : done. >+ Description is too short. Define emoji for instance. What contain > emoji data ? Done, hopefully to your satisfaction. > * copyright: > please mention in general comment what I have just opened #873028 > for adding emoji to unicode-data Done. > * rules > They are no guarantee that .js file are overwritten by script > and even in this case your package does not build cleanly. Better is > to create a debian/build directory (rm -rf during clean) that will get > a symlink of script and data. Than run script on it. Done. > * debian/test/mocha: please you a copy on my runtestsuite script. It > will use installed version instead of source Done, but you might still want to check what I did with it :-/ > * debian/watch is 4 Done. Snark on #debian-js
Bug#872828: RFS: node-regjsgen/0.3.0-1 ITP
Hi, Le 24/08/2017 à 21:07, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > example.js should not be installed with dh_installdoc but with > dh_installexample thus supply a file debian/examples with > debian/example.js. > > This is the last remark Done. I didn't know about the example vs documentation nuance. Snark on #debian-js
Bug#873113: RFS: xssproxy/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. Please update to the current Standards-Version. Please remove or uncomment Vcs-* Please remove commented out sample lines from debian/rules. Please add the upstream sig to the source package. Please ship README.md. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]
Hi Andrey, I think I did all the changes you suggested, can you take a look on it again, please? > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > I still see a lot of old junk in debian/control: > - did you write that Build-Depends? if no, please write them from scratch, > making sure they are complete and necessary. I Checked all the dependencies and now just the required dependencies are in control file. > - why Conflicts: oprofile-modules*? There are no such packages in last > releases. Fixed. > - Replaces: oprofile-common? Suggests: oprofile-gui? Replaces: oprofile > (<< 0.9.6-1ubuntu1)? The same. Fixed. > - oprofile gets a Depends: binutils via libbfd-2.29-system.so, it > shouldn't also Recommend it. Fixed. > You don't need .shlibs when you use .symbols. Fixed. > Why does the oprofile user need /bin/bash as a shell? It doesn't need it, fixed. > Why do you need the debconf snippet in postrm? Actually don't need this step in purge as it doesn't store any configuration and it doesn't use the debconf. As postrm was just doing that, I removed it. > What is /usr/doc/oprofile which is removed in prerm? It seems a deprecated file and oprofile doesn't install it. As prerm was just doing that, I removed it. > Please don't mix debhelper files with and without package prefixes (this > is about maintainer script files). > Instead of editing .la you should delete it. Fixed. > Instead of manually installing to debian/oprofile and manually moving to > other package dirs you should use dh_install to move from debian/tmp to > package dirs. Fixed. > Please upgrade to the current Standards-Version. Fixed. > Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. Fixed. > Is libjvmti_oprofile intended to be a public shared library? It looks like > a plugin. Yes, it is a plugin, I moved it to the correct location. > -- > WBR, wRAR
Bug#873136: RFS: xmltoman/0.4-5 [ITP] -- simple XML to man converter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xmltoman": Package name: xmltoman Version: 0.4-5 Upstream Author: Adam BilbroughURL: https://gitlab.com/atsb/xmltoman License: GPL-2+ Section: devel It builds these binary packages: xmltoman - simple XML to man converter To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xmltoman Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmltoman/xmltoman_0.4-5.dsc More information about xmltoman can be obtained from: https://gitlab.com/atsb/xmltoman Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer. (Closes: #647716). * Added Multi-Arch: foreign to debian/control. (Closes: #862196). * Updated debian/watch to point to new upstream location. * Updated debian/control with maintainer information. * Updated debian/copyright with new maintainer and date. * Added strict and warnings to Perl files. * Fixed code for strict and warnings. Regards, Adam
Bug#873132: RFS: dav-text/0.8.6-2 [ITA] -- minimal ncurses-based text editor
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dav-text": Package name: dav-text Version: 0.8.6-2 Upstream Author: Adam BilbroughURL: https://gitlab.com/atsb/dav-text License: GPLv2 Section: text It builds these binary packages: dav-text - minimal ncurses based text editor To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dav-text Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dav-text/dav-text_0.8.6-2.dsc More information about dav-text can be obtained from: https://gitlab.com/atsb/dav-text Changes since the last upload: * Wishlist bug implemented (closes: #872848) Regards, Adam
Bug#872828: RFS: node-regjsgen/0.3.0-1 ITP
example.js should not be installed with dh_installdoc but with dh_installexample thus supply a file debian/examples with debian/example.js. This is the last remark On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Bastien ROUCARIESwrote: > Any news of dfsg version ?
Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash/4.3.2493-1 [ITP] -- IBM Data Engine for NoSQL Software Libraries
Hi Andrey, > There are a lot of errors in the install_root_man1 target. > There are warnings about unused ${perl:Depends}. We've made changes that should fix these errors. Could you check it, please? -> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2528-1.dsc Thanks, Rodrigo R. Galvao
Bug#873113: RFS: xssproxy/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xssproxy" * Package name: xssproxy Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Tim Schumacher* URL : https://github.com/timakro/xssproxy * License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: xssproxy - Forward freedesktop.org Idle Inhibition Service calls to Xss To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xssproxy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xssproxy/xssproxy_1.0.0-1.dsc Regards, Tim Schumacher binePBg954qb9.bin Description: PGP Public Key pgpWn4WZML0Uk.pgp Description: PGP Digital Signature
Bug#873105: RFS: find-file-in-project/5.4.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist I am looking for a sponsor for my package "find-file-in-project" * Package name: find-file-in-project Version : 5.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Will Farrington et al, Chen Bin is the current maintainer * URL : https://github.com/technomancy/find-file-in-project * License : GPL-3+ Section : lisp It builds those binary packages: elpa-find-file-in-project - Quick access to project files in Emacs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/find-file-in-project Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/find-file-in-project/find-file-in-project_5.4.1-1.dsc One can also clone it from this remote: git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-emacsen/pkg/find-file-in-project.git More information about ffip can be obtained from https://github.com/technomancy/find-file-in-project Regards, Nicholas
Bug#873094: RFS: granite/0.4.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "granite" * Package name: granite Version : 0.4.1-1 Upstream Author : elementary OS * URL : https://launchpad.net/granite * License : LGPLv3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: gir1.2-granite-1.0 - extension of GTK+ libraries (introspection files) granite-demo - extension of GTK+ libraries (demo binary) libgranite-common - extension of GTK+ libraries (common files) libgranite-dev - extension of GTK+ libraries (development files) libgranite3 - extension of GTK+ libraries libgranite3-dbg - extension of GTK+ libraries (debugging symbols) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/granite Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/granite/granite_0.4.1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/elementary/granite . Changes since the last upload: granite (0.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release (Closes: #872919) Regards, Yangfl
Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash/4.3.2493-1 [ITP] -- IBM Data Engine for NoSQL Software Libraries
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:19:29AM -0300, Rodrigo wrote: > >> I was able to build from the link I sent to you using 'debuild -us -uc'. > >> Could you share with us what's the error, please? > > cflash_block_kern_mc.c:59:10: fatal error: scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h: No such > file or directory > > We made some changes that fix this build problem. Here is the link to the > .dsc -> > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2524-1.dsc There are a lot of errors in the install_root_man1 target. There are warnings about unused ${perl:Depends}. > Other doubt about the 'non-free' section: after read the link you shared > with us, it says to send an email toexplaining > why the package can be auto-built. So, should we send this email right now > or wait for this process of sponsorship? After the package is sponsored. By the way, even if you ship non-free binaries you still need to describe their copyrights and licenses. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash/4.3.2493-1 [ITP] -- IBM Data Engine for NoSQL Software Libraries
Hi Andrey, >> I was able to build from the link I sent to you using 'debuild -us -uc'. >> Could you share with us what's the error, please? > cflash_block_kern_mc.c:59:10: fatal error: scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h: No such file or directory We made some changes that fix this build problem. Here is the link to the .dsc -> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2524-1.dsc Other doubt about the 'non-free' section: after read the link you shared with us, it says to send an email toexplaining why the package can be auto-built. So, should we send this email right now or wait for this process of sponsorship? Thanks, Rodrigo R. Galvao
Bug#872996: RFS: node-unicode-tr51/9.0.0-1 ITP
Le 23 août 2017 14:43:53 GMT+02:00, Julien Puydta écrit : >Package: sponsorship-requests >Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-unicode-tr51" > > * Package name: node-unicode-tr51 > Version : 9.0.0-1 > Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens > * URL : https://mths.be/unicode-tr51 > * License : Expat > Section : web > > It builds those binary packages: > >node-unicode-tr51 - Emoji data for Node.js Will get a look ans sponsor > To access further information about this package, please visit the >following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-unicode-tr51 > > >Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this >command: > >dget -x >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-unicode-tr51/node-unicode-tr51_9.0.0-1.dsc > > It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers team: >Vcs-Git: >https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-unicode-tr51.git >Vcs-Browser: >https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-unicode-tr51.git > >Snark on #debian-js -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
Bug#873072: RFS: xtensor/0.10.11-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: xtensor Version : 0.10.11-1 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille, Sylvain Corlay and Wolf Vollprecht * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs Please check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor.git Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 0.10.11 * Fixup the Vcs-Browser URI * Bump the standards version to 4.1.0 Regards, Ghis
Bug#873067: RFS: dcm2niix/1.0.20170818-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: dcm2niix Version : 1.0.20170818-1 Upstream Author : Chris Rorden * URL : https://github.com/rordenlab/dcm2niix * License : BSD Section : science One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/dcm2niix.git Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 1.0.20170818 * Add pigz to Suggests * Bump standards version to 4.1.0 Regards, Ghis