Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]
On 10 Oct 2017, Andreas Henriksson wrote: >You seem to have missed to incorporate all the NMUs of >bash-completion... (atleast they where not part of the >debian/changelog) Is there any reason why you did not include those >changes? Won't your updated version conflict with packages who now >ships their own bash completion files (that where dropped in the >bash-completion NMUs)? I just uploaded a new version with all three NMUs incorporated [1]. (I also updated the git repository (one commit per NMU) [2]). Could you review the package, again, please? [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/bash-completion [2] http://git.inconstante.eti.br/?p=bash-completion-debian.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/unstable
Bug#879572: marked as done (RFS: osmose-emulator/1.2-1 [QA] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Oct 2017 02:22:44 +0200 with message-id <20171023002244.nb5e3mrqh5pbn...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#879572: RFS: osmose-emulator/1.2-1 [QA] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator has caused the Debian Bug report #879572, regarding RFS: osmose-emulator/1.2-1 [QA] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 879572: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879572 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmose-emulator" * Package name: osmose-emulator Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL : https://github.com/coringao/osmose-emulator/wiki * License : GPL-3+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: osmose-emulator - Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/osmose-emulator Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osmose-emulator/osmose-emulator_1.2-1.dsc More information about Osmose Emulator can be obtained from https://github.com/coringao/osmose-emulator Changes since the last upload: version: 1.2 * Fixed bug in audio alsa * Fixed installation on architectures 'arm' Regards, Carlos Donizete Froes --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 09:29:46PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > * Package name: osmose-emulator >Version : 1.2-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > version: 1.2 > * Fixed bug in audio alsa > * Fixed installation on architectures 'arm' Uploaded. Untested beyond compiling and seeing if it starts -- I've already deleted the roms I pirated before, I'm not risking losing days to _this_ trap. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters ⠈⠳⣄ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.--- End Message ---
Bug#879172: marked as done (RFS: osmose-emulator/1.1-1 [QA] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator)
Em dom, 2017-10-22 às 21:03 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu: > You'd need to either: > * put the differences as a patch: have the previous .orig tarball in the > parent directory and do "dpkg-source --commit", or > * release a new upstream tarball with a bumped version (as you're upstream) As you guided me, I changed the version of the emulator and put it in 'mentors.d.n' in version 1.2-1 https://mentors.debian.net/package/osmose-emulator https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879572 Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#879572: RFS: osmose-emulator/1.2-1 [QA] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmose-emulator" * Package name: osmose-emulator Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL : https://github.com/coringao/osmose-emulator/wiki * License : GPL-3+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: osmose-emulator - Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/osmose-emulator Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osmose-emulator/osmose-emulator_1.2-1.dsc More information about Osmose Emulator can be obtained from https://github.com/coringao/osmose-emulator Changes since the last upload: version: 1.2 * Fixed bug in audio alsa * Fixed installation on architectures 'arm' Regards, Carlos Donizete Froes
Bug#878804: RFS: shotwell/0.26.3-1
On 22/10/17 21:12, Jeremy Bicha wrote: Jörg, I can sponsor this for you since I have been maintaining shotwell in Ubuntu this year. 1. Please add a Breaks to shotwell instead of just a Replaces. It wouldn't hurt to bump the version too like this: Breaks: shotwell-common (<< 0.26.3-1) Replaces: shotwell-common (<< 0.26.3-1) I think you can remove this line though Breaks: shotwell (<< 0.26.2-1) 2. Please remove all the obsolete patches from your debian/patches/ instead of just disabling them. 3. I'm attaching a patch to fix the install of appstream metadata. You'll also need to modify debian/shotwell.install to install the metadata. --- debian/shotwell.install2017-09-22 17:26:18.0 -0400 +++ ../debian/shotwell.install2017-10-22 15:59:36.667571371 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ usr/bin usr/lib usr/share/applications +usr/share/appdata From the AppStream guidelines [1], the metadata are to be installed under /usr/share/metainfo not /usr/share/appdata. Otherwise, Lintian will trigger a warning [2]. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/AppStream/Guidelines [2] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/appstream-metadata-in-legacy-location.html Ghis
Bug#878941: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-1~experimental3
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:37 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Well, if there are so many people in Ubuntu relying on this package, > it might be a good idea to step up and help the Debian maintainer of > the package. I do help Jörg (and Debian) with improvements when I can. I have submitted several improvements to the shotwell package for instance and would like to help with simple-scan too. > I feel like Joerg deserves an apology. He received lots of thrashing > even though he kept the 1.0.27 version in experimental to avoid such > issues. Yes, he (and me, too) overlooked this particular issue with > the package rename (although there was #870078), but I think that > could have been communicated better. I apologize for the reactions he got on that bug. I'll leave a comment there to encourage people to keep respectful. >> For Ubuntu 17.10, it looks like the best solution now is to add a >> transitional package since the Provides didn't work. But for 18.04 we >> could probably rename the package back to libsane since it doesn't >> look like there is any need to rename the package (considering there >> are third-party debs out there). > > I think we should make a list to see how many third-party packages > are actually affected. I don't think it's acceptable to force > staying at a certain package name due to certain third party > software. Should we really keep such kludges around forever? Why change the name in the first place? As I commented earlier, my guess is that it was only changed to fix a non-urgent lintian warning. My vote is to keep the old name in Debian until we actually need to do a soname transition. Jeremy
Bug#878941: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-1~experimental3
On 10/22/2017 10:21 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Yeah, Jörg wasn't happy about Ubuntu's (my) decision either but I > didn't think it was good for Ubuntu to keep shipping an outdated git > snapshot of sane-backends. > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends Well, if there are so many people in Ubuntu relying on this package, it might be a good idea to step up and help the Debian maintainer of the package. sane-backends isn't quite a trivial package and the package was unmaintained in Debian for quite some time. Joerg adopted the package and fixed many issues it had. Now reading through the comments in the Launchpad bug report is very daunting, lots of nasty comments like "This is not a bug IMHO, renaming the package is "operator error", and an insane decision." and "How can ubuntu make such mistakes? I hope a patch comes immediately, because for a new release is very shameful!" I feel like Joerg deserves an apology. He received lots of thrashing even though he kept the 1.0.27 version in experimental to avoid such issues. Yes, he (and me, too) overlooked this particular issue with the package rename (although there was #870078), but I think that could have been communicated better. > For Ubuntu 17.10, it looks like the best solution now is to add a > transitional package since the Provides didn't work. But for 18.04 we > could probably rename the package back to libsane since it doesn't > look like there is any need to rename the package (considering there > are third-party debs out there). I think we should make a list to see how many third-party packages are actually affected. I don't think it's acceptable to force staying at a certain package name due to certain third party software. Should we really keep such kludges around forever? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Bug#878941: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-1~experimental3
Adding Jörg to the CC since I forgot the first time. On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:14 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/22/2017 09:56 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> Please see my comments from this past week on https://bugs.debian.org/870078 > > Ugh, that's a nasty problem. I did not expect that Ubuntu was pulling > experimental packages and rebuilding them for unstable. I feel a bit > overwhelmed and pressured by Ubuntu's decision, to be honest. > > I will discuss the issue with Joerg to figure out the best solution. > > Adrian > > -- > .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org > `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de > `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 Yeah, Jörg wasn't happy about Ubuntu's (my) decision either but I didn't think it was good for Ubuntu to keep shipping an outdated git snapshot of sane-backends. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends For Ubuntu 17.10, it looks like the best solution now is to add a transitional package since the Provides didn't work. But for 18.04 we could probably rename the package back to libsane since it doesn't look like there is any need to rename the package (considering there are third-party debs out there). Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
Bug#878804: RFS: shotwell/0.26.3-1
Jörg, I can sponsor this for you since I have been maintaining shotwell in Ubuntu this year. 1. Please add a Breaks to shotwell instead of just a Replaces. It wouldn't hurt to bump the version too like this: Breaks: shotwell-common (<< 0.26.3-1) Replaces: shotwell-common (<< 0.26.3-1) I think you can remove this line though Breaks: shotwell (<< 0.26.2-1) 2. Please remove all the obsolete patches from your debian/patches/ instead of just disabling them. 3. I'm attaching a patch to fix the install of appstream metadata. You'll also need to modify debian/shotwell.install to install the metadata. --- debian/shotwell.install2017-09-22 17:26:18.0 -0400 +++ ../debian/shotwell.install2017-10-22 15:59:36.667571371 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ usr/bin usr/lib usr/share/applications +usr/share/appdata Thanks, Jeremy Bicha From 15cc83b25c44939571d42210cbb02a7825756b8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Moschny Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 09:47:00 + Subject: Fix rules for appstream files The appdata file is neither created nor installed, as the rules in @APPSTREAM_XML_RULES@ expect files to be listed in $(appstream_XML) rather than in $(appdata_XML). https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784883 --- misc/Makefile.am | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/misc/Makefile.am b/misc/Makefile.am index 711b06f..aa9a2bd 100644 --- a/misc/Makefile.am +++ b/misc/Makefile.am @@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ gsettings_SCHEMAS = \ org.yorba.shotwell.gschema.xml \ org.yorba.shotwell-extras.gschema.xml -appdata_in_files = $(srcdir)/shotwell.appdata.xml.in -appdata_XML = \ +appstream_in_files = $(srcdir)/shotwell.appdata.xml.in +appstream_XML = \ shotwell.appdata.xml desktopdir = $(datadir)/applications desktop_DATA = shotwell.desktop shotwell-viewer.desktop -$(appdata_XML) : $(appdata_in_files) +$(appstream_XML) : $(appstream_in_files) $(AM_V_GEN) $(MSGFMT) --xml --template $< -d $(top_srcdir)/po -o $@ %.desktop.in : %.desktop.in.in @@ -21,12 +21,12 @@ $(appdata_XML) : $(appdata_in_files) @GSETTINGS_RULES@ @APPSTREAM_XML_RULES@ -CLEANFILES = $(appdata_XML) $(desktop_DATA) $(desktop_in_files) +CLEANFILES = $(appstream_XML) $(desktop_DATA) $(desktop_in_files) dist_noinst_DATA = \ $(srcdir)/shotwell.desktop.in.in \ $(srcdir)/shotwell-viewer.desktop.in.in \ $(gsettings_SCHEMAS) \ - $(appdata_in_files) + $(appstream_in_files) -include $(top_srcdir)/git.mk
Bug#878941: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-1~experimental3
On 10/22/2017 09:56 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Please see my comments from this past week on https://bugs.debian.org/870078 Ugh, that's a nasty problem. I did not expect that Ubuntu was pulling experimental packages and rebuilding them for unstable. I feel a bit overwhelmed and pressured by Ubuntu's decision, to be honest. I will discuss the issue with Joerg to figure out the best solution. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Bug#878941: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-1~experimental3
Adrian, Please see my comments from this past week on https://bugs.debian.org/870078 Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
Bug#879172: marked as done (RFS: osmose-emulator/1.1-1 [QA] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator)
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 03:24:06PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > Em dom, 2017-10-22 às 14:53 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu: > > Alas, the version on mentors.d.n is 1.1-1, same as in unstable. > > You'd need to bump it -- the previous upload is already there, set in stone, > > and it can be only superseded but not changed. > Hi, > > I added mentors.d.n to version 1.1-2 of the package, I hope it is correct. > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/osmose-emulator Unfortunately, the .orig tarball is different from what is in the archive. And it's not just a harmless repacking: the contents do differ. You'd need to either: * put the differences as a patch: have the previous .orig tarball in the parent directory and do "dpkg-source --commit", or * release a new upstream tarball with a bumped version (as you're upstream) Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters ⠈⠳⣄ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#879172: marked as done (RFS: osmose-emulator/1.1-1 [QA] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator)
Em dom, 2017-10-22 às 14:53 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu: > Alas, the version on mentors.d.n is 1.1-1, same as in unstable. > You'd need to bump it -- the previous upload is already there, set in stone, > and it can be only superseded but not changed. Hi, I added mentors.d.n to version 1.1-2 of the package, I hope it is correct. https://mentors.debian.net/package/osmose-emulator Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#874725: RFS: tz-converter/1.0.1-1
Thank you for the feedback! I see now why I was not able to find these issues. I need to update my current developer box, as it looks to not have the up-to-date toolset. I will look at this, plus the initial notes proved and update this thread in the next week or so. Thanks again! Dave From: Andrey Rahmatullin Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 11:04 PM To: マイリノデイヴィッド; 874...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#874725: RFS: tz-converter/1.0.1-1 On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:38:22PM +0900, マイリノデイヴィッド wrote: > Hello again, > > I made further changes to the current RFS, and made sure lintian errors have > been resolved: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/tz-converter > > dave@DESKTOP > lintian tz-converter_1.0.1-1_all.deb You need to run lintian against the binary .changes. You also need to run it with -EI --pedantic or make an appropriate .config/lintian/lintianrc. W: tz-converter changes: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature tz-converter_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz W: tz-converter source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.8 (current is 4.1.1) I: tz-converter source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing P: tz-converter: no-upstream-changelog > There was just one Pedantic message I could not fix, and that was > “no-upstream-changelog”. I think this might be ignored, as I do have the > “changelog.Debian.gz” built in. It's fine to ignore it but not because you have changelog.Debian.gz. The upstream changelog and the Debian changelog are separate things. > Would it be possible to request a further review for this update? Apart from two Lintian warnings: Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. Calling the GPL license "GNU" in d/copyright is wrong, please the correct short name which is "GPL-2+". I'd drop empty debian/source/include-binaries. You probably want to update the years in d/copyright. Depending on python-dateutil instead of python3-dateutil (via debian/py3dist-overrides) seems incorrect. Why do you ship the icons in /usr/share/icons/ AND /usr/share/tz-converter/icons/? -- WBR, wRAR
Bug#874725: RFS: tz-converter/1.0.1-1
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:38:22PM +0900, マイリノデイヴィッド wrote: > Hello again, > > I made further changes to the current RFS, and made sure lintian errors have > been resolved: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/tz-converter > > dave@DESKTOP > lintian tz-converter_1.0.1-1_all.deb You need to run lintian against the binary .changes. You also need to run it with -EI --pedantic or make an appropriate .config/lintian/lintianrc. W: tz-converter changes: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature tz-converter_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz W: tz-converter source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.8 (current is 4.1.1) I: tz-converter source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing P: tz-converter: no-upstream-changelog > There was just one Pedantic message I could not fix, and that was > “no-upstream-changelog”. I think this might be ignored, as I do have the > “changelog.Debian.gz” built in. It's fine to ignore it but not because you have changelog.Debian.gz. The upstream changelog and the Debian changelog are separate things. > Would it be possible to request a further review for this update? Apart from two Lintian warnings: Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. Calling the GPL license "GNU" in d/copyright is wrong, please the correct short name which is "GPL-2+". I'd drop empty debian/source/include-binaries. You probably want to update the years in d/copyright. Depending on python-dateutil instead of python3-dateutil (via debian/py3dist-overrides) seems incorrect. Why do you ship the icons in /usr/share/icons/ AND /usr/share/tz-converter/icons/? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#874725: RFS: tz-converter/1.0.1-1
Hello again, I made further changes to the current RFS, and made sure lintian errors have been resolved: https://mentors.debian.net/package/tz-converter dave@DESKTOP > lintian tz-converter_1.0.1-1_all.deb dave@DESKTOP > There was just one Pedantic message I could not fix, and that was “no-upstream-changelog”. I think this might be ignored, as I do have the “changelog.Debian.gz” built in. Would it be possible to request a further review for this update? - Dave From: Andrey Rahmatullin Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 4:27 AM To: マイリノデイヴィッド Cc: 874...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#874725: RFS: tz-converter/1.0.1-1 On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 11:34:49PM +0900, マイリノデイヴィッド wrote: > Hello, > > I have gone over the build process and corrected the previous issues. The > latest request as been updated at the following: > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tz-converter/tz-converter_1.0.1-1.dsc > https://mentors.debian.net/package/tz-converter > > Would it be possible to request a further review for this update? You still have unfixed problems detected by lintian so no, not yet. W: tz-converter changes: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature tz-converter_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz W: tz-converter source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.8 (current is 4.1.1) X: tz-converter: application-in-library-section python usr/bin/tz-converter -- WBR, wRAR
Bug#879172: marked as done (RFS: osmose-emulator/1.1-1 [QA] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator)
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 04:17:48AM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > Em sex, 2017-10-20 às 20:40 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu: > > As my arm64 laptop is currently out, I tried via x-forwarding on a headless > > Pine64. It seems to work! > > > > Thus, unless someone comes with evidence to the contrary, it seems > > reasonable to assume the package works on all architectures where it > > compiles. > > Thanks for testing, I was encouraged to fix the emulator to run all the > architectures (except non-linux). > > I posted 'mentors.debian.net' could you help me again? > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/osmose-emulator Alas, the version on mentors.d.n is 1.1-1, same as in unstable. You'd need to bump it -- the previous upload is already there, set in stone, and it can be only superseded but not changed. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters ⠈⠳⣄ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.
Bug#879492: marked as done (RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.1-1)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:49:42 +0200 with message-id <20171022124942.nxvuzipiur5fx...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#879492: RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #879492, regarding RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 879492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879492 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wxmaxima" * Package name: wxmaxima Version : 17.10.1-1 Upstream Author : Andrej Vopodivec * URL : http://andrejv.github.io/wxmaxima/ * License : GPL Section : math It builds those binary packages: wxmaxima - GUI for the computer algebra system Maxima To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/wxmaxima Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wxmaxima/wxmaxima_17.10.1-1.dsc wxMaxima is a feature-rich but fast graphical frontend for maxima, a program that can do arbitrary precision maths, maths with exact numbers, with machine floating point nunbers - but is specialized in doing symbolic maths. One example: (%i1) poly:a*x^2+b*x=c; (poly) a*x^2+b*x=c (%i2) solve(poly,x); (%o2) [x=-(sqrt(4*a*c+b^2)+b)/(2*a),x=(sqrt(4*a*c+b^2)-b)/(2*a)] More information about wxMaxima can be obtained from http://andrejv.github.io/wxmaxima/ and maxima.sourceforge.net Changes since the last upload: * A new upstream release that incorparates all the debian patches and enables the tooltips for the more exotic worksheet features. * Dropped all the debian patches. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:26:19AM +0200, Gunter Königsmann wrote: > * Package name: wxmaxima >Version : 17.10.1-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > * A new upstream release that incorparates all the debian patches and >enables the tooltips for the more exotic worksheet features. > * Dropped all the debian patches. ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters ⠈⠳⣄ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.--- End Message ---
Bug#879492: RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wxmaxima" * Package name: wxmaxima Version : 17.10.1-1 Upstream Author : Andrej Vopodivec * URL : http://andrejv.github.io/wxmaxima/ * License : GPL Section : math It builds those binary packages: wxmaxima - GUI for the computer algebra system Maxima To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/wxmaxima Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wxmaxima/wxmaxima_17.10.1-1.dsc wxMaxima is a feature-rich but fast graphical frontend for maxima, a program that can do arbitrary precision maths, maths with exact numbers, with machine floating point nunbers - but is specialized in doing symbolic maths. One example: (%i1) poly:a*x^2+b*x=c; (poly) a*x^2+b*x=c (%i2) solve(poly,x); (%o2) [x=-(sqrt(4*a*c+b^2)+b)/(2*a),x=(sqrt(4*a*c+b^2)-b)/(2*a)] More information about wxMaxima can be obtained from http://andrejv.github.io/wxmaxima/ and maxima.sourceforge.net Changes since the last upload: * A new upstream release that incorparates all the debian patches and enables the tooltips for the more exotic worksheet features. * Dropped all the debian patches.
