Bug#884339: RFS: deepin-movie-reborn/3.1.1-1 [ITP]

2017-12-13 Thread Yangfl 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-deepin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deepin-movie-reborn"

 * Package name: deepin-movie-reborn
   Version : 3.1.1-1
   Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co., Ltd.
 * URL : https://www.deepin.org/
 * License : GPLv3
   Section : video

  It builds those binary packages:

deepin-movie - Deepin movie player
 libdmr-dev - Deepin movie player - widget library (development files)
 libdmr0.1  - Deepin movie player - widget library

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/deepin-movie-reborn


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/deepin-movie-reborn/deepin-movie-reborn_3.1.1-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

  [your most recent changelog entry]


  Regards,
   Yangfl

Bug#884338: RFS: plasma-gmailfeed/1.1-1 [ITP]

2017-12-13 Thread Nicholas D Steeves 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plasma-gmailfeed"

Package name: plasma-gmailfeed
Version : 1.1-1
Upstream Author : Anthony Vital 
URL : https://github.com/anthon38/gmailfeed
License : GPL-3+
Section : kde

It builds this binary package:

plasma-gmailfeed - plasmoid that shows your Gmail feed with notifications

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/plasma-gmailfeed

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plasma-gmailfeed/plasma-gmailfeed_1.1-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from 
https://github.com/anthon38/gmailfeed

Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves

Bug#884336: RFS: libsimpleini/4.17+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2017-12-13 Thread Yangfl 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-deepin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsimpleini"

 * Package name: libsimpleini
   Version : 4.17+dfsg-1
   Upstream Author : brofield
* URL : https://github.com/brofield/simpleini
  * License : MIT
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

libsimpleini-dev - Cross-platform C++ library for INI-style
configuration files (dev
 libsimpleini1 - Cross-platform C++ library for INI-style configuration files

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsimpleini


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsimpleini/libsimpleini_4.17+dfsg-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

  [your most recent changelog entry]


  Regards,
   Yangfl

Bug#883751: RFS: deepin-calculator/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

2017-12-13 Thread Yangfl 
Wired, I got lintian clean here...

Anyway, I'll manually check and reupload later.

Bug#882289: marked as done (RFS: terminado/0.7-1)

2017-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:57:24 +0200
with message-id 
and subject line Uploaded to Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #882289,
regarding RFS: terminado/0.7-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882289: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882289
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "terminado"

 * Package name: terminado
   Version : 0.7-1
   Upstream Author : Thomas Kluyver
 * URL : https://github.com/takluyver/terminado
 * License : BSD-2-clause
   Section : python

  It builds those binary packages:

python-terminado - Terminals served to term.js using Tornado
websockets (Python 2)
 python-terminado-doc - Terminals served to term.js using Tornado
websockets (documentation)
 python3-terminado - Terminals served to term.js using Tornado
websockets (Python 3)

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/terminado


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminado/terminado_0.7-1.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:
terminado (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.
  * Update packaging:
- dates in d/copyright
- use https in d/copyright's format
- bump d/watch to version 4
- bump dh compat to 10
- bump standards-version to 4.1.1
- stop using pypi.debian.net in d/watch : use upstream's github
- remove d/upstream as tarballs on github aren't signed
- add an autopkgtest suite
  * Ship the documentation.

 -- Julien Puydt   Mon, 20 Nov 2017 23:18:47 +0100

That means I created the python-terminado-doc package, hence it needs to
get through NEW again.


  Regards,
   Julien Puydt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Uploaded to Debian, closing ticket.--- End Message ---

Bug#882812: marked as done (RFS: quickcal/1.0-1 ITP)

2017-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:56:12 +0530
with message-id 

and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #882812,
regarding RFS: quickcal/1.0-1 ITP
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882812: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882812
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quickcal"

 * Package name: quickcal
   Version : 1.0
   Upstream Author :
 * URL : https://mentors.debian.net/package/quickcal
 * License : GPL
   Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

quickcal   - It is a fast and easy to use calculator.

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/quickcal


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/quickcal/
quickcal_1.0.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

Closes ITP https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882566


  Regards,

  Nathan SR
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

--- End Message ---

Re: How to get debian ci test passed for proxy application

2017-12-13 Thread Roger Shimizu 
Dear Antonio,

Thanks for your informative email!
With the upload last night, I confirm now the issue got solved [0].

[0] 
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/s/shadowsocks-libev/20171212_175154/log.gz

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Antonio Terceiro  wrote:
>
> You do not need anything Restrictions: to be able to start a daemon or
> listen on a local TCP port.

Thanks for your confirmation!
Now I removed the Restrictions for isolation-*.

> | $ ./tests/test.sh
> | running test:  python tests/test.py -c tests/aes.json
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 INFO: UDP relay enabled
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 INFO: initializing ciphers... aes-256-cfb
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 ERROR: bind: Address already in use
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 ERROR: bind() error
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 INFO: initializing ciphers... aes-256-cfb
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 INFO: listening at 127.0.0.1:1081
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 INFO: initializing ciphers... aes-256-cfb
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 INFO: UDP relay enabled
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:02 INFO: listening at 127.0.0.1:1082
>
> 
>
> | *   Trying 127.0.0.1...
> | * TCP_NODELAY set
> |   % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time  
> Current
> |  Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft  
> Speed
> |   0 00 00 0  0  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
>  0* SOCKS5 communication to www.google.com:80
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:04 INFO: connect to www.google.com:80
> | * SOCKS5 request granted.
> | * Connected to 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) port 1081 (#0)
> 
> | > GET / HTTP/1.1
> | > Host: www.google.com
> | > User-Agent: curl/7.57.0
> | > Accept: */*
> | >
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:04 ERROR: remote_recv_cb_recv: Connection reset by peer
> | * Empty reply from server
> |   0 00 00 0  0  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
>  0
> | * Connection #0 to host 127.0.0.1 left intact
> | curl: (52) Empty reply from server
> |  2017-12-04 16:07:04 INFO: closed gracefully
> | test failed:  python tests/test.py -c tests/aes.json
>
> Why this happens? Because on autopkgtest, you assume the package is already
> *installed*. I assume the the daemon provided by the binary package is already
> listening to port 1081, so the test server starts on 1082.

Thanks for your hint!
Yes, previous failure on debci was because of installation of the
package, with the default config, so with the default port to open.

However the test opens both 1081 and 1082, which is expected.
The root cause is the application opens more than 1 port, and 8388 is
both listed in default config [1] and test config.
So here's the conflict.
After I add a patch [2] to change the port for the test from 8388 to
8389, now the test can be passed on debci [0].

[1] 
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/shadowsocks-libev.git/tree/debian/config.json
[2] 
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/shadowsocks-libev.git/tree/debian/patches/0001-Change-the-port-to-listen-from-8388-to-8389.patch

I'm happy that one more package is starting to enjoy the benefit of
continuous integration practice in debian.
It's really appreciated there's debci framework in debian.
Thanks for your work!

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1

Bug#876483: marked as done (RFS: xtensor/0.11.2-1 [experimental])

2017-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:36:59 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: xtensor/0.11.2-1 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #876483,
regarding RFS: xtensor/0.11.2-1 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
876483: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876483
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: xtensor
  Version : 0.11.2-1
  Upstream Author : Johan Mabille, Sylvain Corlay and Wolf Vollprecht
* URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor
* License : BSD
  Section : libs

Please check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor.git

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream version 0.11.2
  * Refresh the patch queue
  * Fixup whitespacing in rules file
  * Replace occurrences of findstring with filter
  * Use DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS for the nocheck and nodoc guards

Regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package xtensor version 0.11.2-1 is in experimental now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/xtensor--- End Message ---

Bug#882303: marked as done (RFS: sphinxcontrib-bibtex/0.3.6-2)

2017-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:36:59 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: sphinxcontrib-bibtex/0.3.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #882303,
regarding RFS: sphinxcontrib-bibtex/0.3.6-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882303
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: sphinxcontrib-bibtex
  Version : 0.3.6-2
  Upstream Author : Matthias C. M. Troffaes
* URL : https://github.com/mcmtroffaes/sphinxcontrib-bibtex
* License : BSD
  Section : python

Please check out the package by visiting the following URL:


https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/sphinxcontrib-bibtex.git

Changes since last upload:

  * Enable testing during build
  * Ignore tests requiring Tinkerer
  * Add missing B-D on sphinx-common
  * Bump the standards version to 4.1.1

Regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package sphinxcontrib-bibtex version 0.3.6-2 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/sphinxcontrib-bibtex--- End Message ---

Bug#882302: marked as done (RFS: python-meshio/1.9.3-1)

2017-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:36:59 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: python-meshio/1.9.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #882302,
regarding RFS: python-meshio/1.9.3-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882302: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882302
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: python-meshio
  Version : 1.9.3-1
  Upstream Author : Nico Schlömer
* URL : https://github.com/nschloe/meshio
* License : Expat
  Section : python

Please check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/python-meshio.git

Changes since last upload:

  * New upstream version 1.9.3
  * Refresh the patch queue
  * Add new dependency on netCDF4
  * Add support for nocheck builds

Regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package python-meshio version 1.9.3-1 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/python-meshio--- End Message ---

Bug#878516: marked as done (RFS: ansi/0.1.3-1 [ITP])

2017-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:36:59 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: ansi/0.1.3-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #878516,
regarding RFS: ansi/0.1.3-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
878516: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878516
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ansi". (i've already sent an
RFS to debian-python a month ago:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2017/09/msg00038.html)

* Package name : ansi
  Version  : 0.1.3-1
  Upstream Author  : Wijnand Modderman-Lenstra 
* Url  : https://github.com/tehmaze/ansi/
* Licenses : Expat
  Programming Lang : Python
  Section  : python

 Various ANSI escape codes, used in moving the cursor in a text console or
 rendering coloured text.

It builds those binary packages:

  * python3-ansi

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/ansi

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/ansi/ansi_0.1.3-1.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/ansi.git

More information about ansi can be obtained from
https://github.com/tehmaze/ansi/


cheers,
  muri



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package ansi version 0.1.3-1 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/ansi--- End Message ---

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-12-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin 
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:35:50PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> wRAR, because I filed the bug (866635) that ended up pushing
> cyclograph out of Testing months ago, I feel some responsibility to
> help it get back into Testing.
> 
> Is there anything else that you are waiting on in order to sponsor cyclograph?
> 
> For reference, the repo is at
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-running/cyclograph.git
I've reviewed the current version and I'm fine with sponsoring it.
Federico, please update the changelog entry date (and distribution) and
I'll upload it.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#883751: RFS: deepin-calculator/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

2017-12-13 Thread Adam Borowski 
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 08:25:20AM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> 2017-12-11 7:26 GMT+08:00 Adam Borowski :
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 04:04:41PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> >>  * Package name: deepin-calculator
> >>Version : 1.0.1-1
> >
> >>   It builds those binary packages:
> >> deepin-calculator - Calculator for deepin
> >
> > Lintian sez:
> > W: deepin-calculator: desktop-entry-lacks-main-category 
> > usr/share/applications/deepin-calculator.desktop
> > and indeed, it shows in the menu as "Other".
> >
> > Otherwise, everything seems fine.

> added patches from upstream branch.

The new version has:
missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2+

And indeed -- you only have a section for gpl-3+, but not gpl-2+.


It'd be nice if you could run lintian before requesting an upload -- both of
these issues wouldn't require a round-trip.  Automated tools save human
time...

Obviously, there's no requirement to be entirely lintian clean: it's a
mindless tool that makes errors, but in the vast majority of times it's
worth to at least consider what it says.


喵!
-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.

Bug#883915: marked as done (RFS: k2pdfopt/2.42+ds-1 [ITP])

2017-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:53:28 +0100
with message-id <20171213095328.ehyalqmauewet...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#883915: RFS: k2pdfopt/2.42+ds-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #883915,
regarding RFS: k2pdfopt/2.42+ds-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
883915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "k2pdfopt"

 * Package name: k2pdfopt
   Version : 2.42+ds-1
   Upstream Author : willus
 * URL : http://www.willus.com/k2pdfopt/
 * License : AGPL3+
   Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

k2pdfopt   - PDF Reflow tool

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/k2pdfopt


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/k2pdfopt/k2pdfopt_2.42+ds-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

  [your most recent changelog entry]


  Regards,
   Yangfl
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 06:07:04PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
>  * Package name: k2pdfopt
>Version : 2.42+ds-1
> 
>   It builds those binary packages:
> 
> k2pdfopt   - PDF Reflow tool

Uploaded, in NEW.

I'm not quite happy with the man page, though.  This program has an
extensive amount of command-line functionality, that's somewhat documented
inside the curses-like interface -- yet a typical Unix user wouldn't even
think about looking there.  It'd be nice if you could somehow reproduce the
arguments in the man page.

That's an improvement to the package, though -- the current state is
functional enough for unstable (the usual definition: a package is fit for
unstable if, in case you land in hospital tomorrow or otherwise are
temporarily unable to work on it, you'd be ok with the package to become a
part of the next stable release).


喵!
-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---