Bug#878268: RFS: streamlink/0.9.0-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.9.0-1.dsc Here is a review: These issues need to be resolved before upload: I think docs/_static/flattr-badge.png is probably non-free. Upstream stopped using a while ago so it should just get removed from their repository and the Debian tarball. These issues would be nice to fix at some point: There has been a new Debian Policy version since your upload. Please add some upstream metadata: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata Personally, I would drop the last paragraph of the description, or possibly just the first sentence of the last paragraph of the description. It would be nice to have a transitional package that also contains a symlink to the new name for the binary (assuming that they are command-line compatible), so that external wrappers for livestreamer still work with streamlink. For use_debian_fonts, please note that Roboto Slab is now available in Debian. Please note that python3-iso3166 is now available in Debian, so you can switch back to the default. Please note that python3-pycryptodome is now available in Debian, so you can switch back to the default. I'd suggest dropping the override_dh_builddeb for Debian. It would be nice if the upstream build system would also install the manual pages and binary in /usr/bin, you might want to send them a patch. Automatic checks: check-all-the-things: $ codespell --quiet-level=3 . $ env PERL5OPT=-m-lib=. duck ... I: debian/copyright:90: URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0: INFORMATION (Certainty:possible) The web page at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 works, but is also available via https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0, please consider switching to HTTPS urls. I: debian/copyright:102: URL: http://scripts.sil.org/OFL: INFORMATION (Certainty:possible) The web page at http://scripts.sil.org/OFL works, but is also available via https://scripts.sil.org/OFL, please consider switching to HTTPS urls. $ find . -type f \( -iname '*.ttf' -o -iname '*.otf' -o -iname '*.sfd' -o -iname '*.pfa' -o -iname '*.pfb' -o -iname '*.bdf' -o -iname '*.pk' -o -iname '*.ttc' -o -iname '*.pcf' \) -exec check-font-embedding-restrictions {} + These fonts in Debian main/contrib have embedding restrictions, which are not DFSG compatible: ./docs/_themes/sphinx_rtd_theme_violet/static/fonts/FontAwesome.otf: 0x0004 ./docs/_themes/sphinx_rtd_theme_violet/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.ttf: 0x0004 https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/os2.htm#fst $ find . -type f \( -iname '*.ttf' -o -iname '*.otf' -o -iname '*.woff' -o -iname '*.sfd' -o -iname '*.pfa' -o -iname '*.pfb' -o -iname '*.bdf' -o -iname '*.pk' -o -iname '*.ttc' -o -iname '*.pcf' \) -exec fontlint {} \; # If you contact the owners of these keys, please point out OpenPGP best practices: # https://help.riseup.net/en/security/message-security/openpgp/best-practices $ find . -type f -iname '*.asc' -exec cat {} + | hot dearmor | hokey lint ... Checking user-ID- and user-attribute-related items: Charlie Drage: Self-sig hash algorithms: [SHA-1] ... Checking subkeys: ... fpr: CDEE D514 4E91 E633 6D0B 59CC 2523 80C9 D3E8 71F7 ... binding sig hash algorithms: [SHA-1] ... cross-cert hash algorithms: [SHA-1] # check if these can be switched to https:// $ grep -nHrF http: . $ find . -type f -iname '*.py' -exec mypy {} + # This command checks style. While a consistent style # is a good idea, people who have different style # preferences will want to ignore some of the output. # Do not bother adding non-upstreamable patches for this. $ proselint . # This command checks style. While a consistent style # is a good idea, people who have different style # preferences will want to ignore some of the output. # Do not bother adding non-upstreamable patches for this. $ find . -type f -iname '*.py' -exec pycodestyle --ignore W191 {} + # This command checks style. While a consistent style # is a good idea, people who have different style # preferences will want to ignore some of the output. # Do not bother adding non-upstreamable patches for this. $ pydocstyle . $ find . -type f -iname '*.py' -exec pyflakes {} + $ find . -type f -iname '*.py' -exec pyflakes3 {} + $ find . -type f -iname '*.py' -exec pylint --rcfile=/dev/null --msg-template='{path}:{line}:{column}: [{category}:{symbol}] {obj}: {msg}' --reports=n {} + $ find . -type f -iname '*.py' -exec pylint3 --rcfile=/dev/null --msg-template='{path}:{line}:{column}: [{category}:{symbol}] {obj}: {msg}' --reports=n {} + $ python2-bandit -r . $ python3-bandit -r . $ vulture . $ find . -type d \( -iname .bzr -o -iname .git -o -iname .hg -o -iname .svn -o -iname CVS -o -iname RCS -o -iname SCCS -o -iname _MTN -o -iname _darcs -o -iname .pc -o -iname .cabal-sandbox -o -iname .cdv -o -iname .metadata -o -iname CMakeFiles -o -iname _build -o
Bug#884651: RFS: stlcmd/1.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stlcmd" * Package name: stlcmd Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : John Allwine* URL : https://www.github.com/AllwineDesigns/stl_cmd * License : GPL Section : misc It builds those binary packages: stlcmd - Suite of commands for generating, inspecting and manipulating STL files. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/stlcmd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stlcmd/stlcmd_1.0-1.dsc More information about stl_cmd can be obtained from https://www.allwinedesigns.com/blog/stlcmd. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. (Closes: #884310) Regards, John Allwine
Re: Broken pbuilder process
Hello The Wanderer, Am Samstag, den 16.12.2017, 08:10 -0500 schrieb The Wanderer: > This looks like the same error as in bugs 576425, 725434, and 823651. Thanks for the bug numbers. I've done now: * Install gdebi and gdebi-core (libpam-tmpdir already installed) * Added BUILDERSATISFYDEPENDSCMD="/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder- satisfydepends-gdebi" * And finally added as /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/D10tmp: #!/bin/bash # Work around #725434 # example file to be used with --hookdir # #create $TMP and $TMPDIR echo "***" echo "* Use workaroud for bug #725434 and create*" echo "*TMP=$TMP *" echo "*TMPDIR=$TMPDIR *" echo "***" [ -n "$TMP" -a ! -d "$TMP" ] && mkdir -p "$TMP" || true [ -n "$TMPDIR" -a ! -d "$TMPDIR" ] && mkdir -p "$TMPDIR" || true Now that issue is gone. TMP and TMPDIR is now set to /tmp/user/0 I checked /tmp and found out, that /tmp/user/0 and /tmp/user/1000 are created successfully. Now pbuilder stops at that point: dh build --with python3 --with autoreconf dh_testdir dh_update_autotools_config dh_autoreconf autoreconf: cannot create /tmp/user/0/ar9833.19830: Permission denied at /usr/bin/autoreconf line 691. dh_autoreconf: autoreconf -f -i returned exit code 13 It looks like, that "ar9833.19830" is a temporary given directory name. But why i have no permission to create that subdirectory? Greetings Sascha -- Sascha Manns Email: sascha.ma...@mailbox.org | Blog: http://saigkill.tuxfamily.org GPG: 0x168428cdb1f20ab1
Bug#884522: marked as done (RFS: bitz-server/1.0.2-1)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Dec 2017 12:47:29 +0100 with message-id <20171217114729.soadlfbpc62c3...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#884522: RFS: bitz-server/1.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #884522, regarding RFS: bitz-server/1.0.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 884522: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884522 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bitz-server" Package name: bitz-server Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Uditha AtukoralaURL : https://github.com/uditha-atukorala/bitz-server License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: bitz-server - ICAP server (RFC 3507) implementation in C++ bitz-server-doc - ICAP server (RFC 3507) implementation in C++ (Documentation) libicap-dev - ICAP server (RFC 3507) implementation in C++ (development files) libicap1 - ICAP server (RFC 3507) implementation in C++ (library files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/bitz-server Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitz-server/bitz-server_1.0.2-1.dsc or from alioth: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/bitz-server.git?h=release%2F1.0.2-1 Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release: - Make builds reproducible (Closes: #882112). * Change to my new mail address: - debian/control, - debian/copyright * debian/copyright: Bump years to 2017. * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.2.0. (No changes needed). * debian/libicap1.symbols.ppc64el (Closes: #878847, #878844): - Mark symbols optional not emitted when building with -O3. Thanks to Matthias Klose . Build with sbuild and pdebuild and the tests with lintian and piuparts are ok. Regards, Jörg Frings-Fürst - -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser Threema: SYR8SJXB Wire: @joergfringsfuerst Skype: joergpenguin Ring: jff IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEY+AHX8jUOrs1qzDuCfifPIyh0l0FAlo08qoACgkQCfifPIyh 0l0opA//Vai+XoIIwLsSKeQzxsP04Bi07V6u1oRFhTL+VrVhmprd9HGIQLsCKwBw ckwENN4NBTwgR2UB54CK4+Pr2ug6o1CkVOSlYPAL+oPELwOAIfpE9B12xcJHGZgd 4Zu9ZQ4VAKVg580BC7ro/4U7Y5UygkRbaaSygW+hEW/Y/8USxK42mOmNICBlcEXt mGivSPcVE/vxdsXsRNAL7cN46jh1JeY3mB5arYSywX3uYSNnZI0YZvUtQlgeIYP+ maFv9eGQfNHX6d6TMmHfZpI/Xo3XyT5m8iwFFx38aYftgR7MzxZykRfR8HVq4k+q kHViUVY/XA1FCzlVZkFnPkLIwLfcSy8pH7S0sZy9dhngdL1b7njmuPE0tlc+FzP0 EvNJWUtzS2ajJwiIxsmiq82AQ91RPVQYp41gz/Py0NOq1joFyViAYMkZD9kk5tkb Ji5Qe8j7aOHCCYt/0nSyseeXHMDFN9mqj4vNwNoo6TLlOgdPlwSDqD+GepjinzgI UpobLMXcLSBNw9upckWXB87HwwHa1H7o4kSSewavVHdaKnkpPkJaAmHP0tRy09+P As/2HLE2Kn7xbhnNOiLOS2FCrdqiJy+l3LO84dxelIxrk+Qk3pRmOg7p82kcgZGP 1wo9pi1buhXzuDcI9pIc0fJ4dm1Rgvv4WYegYn0MoPV7UPq7L/c= =79PJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:17:14AM +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: >Package name: bitz-server >Version : 1.0.2-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > * New upstream release: > - Make builds reproducible (Closes: #882112). > * Change to my new mail address: > - debian/control, > - debian/copyright > * debian/copyright: Bump years to 2017. > * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.2.0. (No changes needed). > * debian/libicap1.symbols.ppc64el (Closes: #878847, #878844): > - Mark symbols optional not emitted when building with -O3. > Thanks to Matthias Klose . ✓ -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---
Bug#867009: marked as done (RFS: fzf/0.16.8-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:22:50 + with message-idand subject line closing RFS: fzf/0.16.8-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #867009, regarding RFS: fzf/0.16.8-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 867009: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867009 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fzf" * Package name: fzf Version : 0.16.8-2 Upstream Author : junegun...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/junegunn/fzf * License : Expat Section : shells It builds those binary packages: fzf - command-line fuzzy finder To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fzf Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fzf/fzf_0.16.8-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. (Closes: #783307) Regards, Tom Fitzhenry --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package fzf has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Re: Package 'rednotebook' dropped off main mentors page
On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 10:16 +, Phil Wyett wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that a package submitted by myself: > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rednotebook > > has vanished off the main page on https://mentors.debian.net/ > > Is there a site issue or is something else afoot? > > Regards > > Phil > Individual mentors page for package: https://mentors.debian.net/package/rednotebook Regards Phil -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. Web: https://kathenas.org GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Instagram: kathenasorg GPG: 1B97 6556 913F 73F3 9C9B 25C4 2961 D9B6 2017 A57A signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package 'rednotebook' dropped off main mentors page
Hi all, It seems that a package submitted by myself: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rednotebook has vanished off the main page on https://mentors.debian.net/ Is there a site issue or is something else afoot? Regards Phil -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. Web: https://kathenas.org GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Instagram: kathenasorg GPG: 1B97 6556 913F 73F3 9C9B 25C4 2961 D9B6 2017 A57A signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Upload rejected
Hello Andrey, Am Sonntag, den 17.12.2017, 14:09 +0500 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > This keyserver has nothing to do with mentors. You need to upload > your key > on the mentors profile settings page. Ah ok. Thanks for the hint. Now it works. Greetings Sascha
Bug#884584: RFS: ignore-me/0.1.2-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ignore-me" * Package name: ignore-me Version : 0.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Sascha Manns* URL : https://launchpad.net/ignore-me * License : GPL-3.0 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: ignore-me - Generator for ignore files for autotools based projects To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ignore-me Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ignore-me/ignore- me_0.1.2-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * Added translation pt_BR * Initial release. (Closes: #877782) * Fixed LP#1732229: Fix copyright * Fixed LP#1732230: Upgrade packaging base * Fixed LP#1732232: Use new git location for update src files Regards, Sascha Manns - -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers artful-updates APT policy: (500, 'artful-updates'), (500, 'artful-security'), (500, 'artful'), (100, 'artful-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-19-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJaNjkrAAoJEHUnY+i/qDosabYP/3tRp7BVX49G0ssrT9l7uZan XrvdE1CPgHbG3IsfSn+KxHMSkSr8l40C9KPj5Hss+weyDOUSfXn5Jm/oESkQ1yy6 6/Swp1YUZEw81n0nsxCOIcXiDnGQb13cIqTVZ3aqgwGgRf8Bx319Kh+B9OeY4RLj MOJS62TT1tm6v57TFGrauW0mj4aI3V+FQlR3xiN5ywF4QHkXhtBGlo4dTJgiJhGZ EAxuHAV1pc6nrF3vj2Mur4iRHk+6O63qtHSNFB7VgQmTw/tRuP4//Rl/fI3aPADd R2OgPvDh0J4AXHUN8xEpPks4iv7yBBoLT2HivnLQBpvv/oqvTC6XjN/7KiC7kYHY hbBeK0YVFpLso1cFNfYPgPJ7yQRVi8niE3mOcQNci+X/GUIqTWMtXObVsnKO3khg xRb77Tk0xsnS0dxJALbt5K95jQN5TFeG7UeYzfecSe3kEAZnzCAX2A6Ol0Ij8wUd Ima44rjpbS+st3+HYyF82U4Y442nypWqof9xCnOoY7l40VYggR/bC7Wx6MXm39+0 pbdaDLl7FPCl4jZB9zxS2S8/V1AVwFjNjSNVf7HSBy7ndXZef5uEcGIY30ocE4B0 swN1aBhXVL3wUTZl29O7wlOxQ0P7c0pMAG9Fno+qvtSSEbrvcAyfPN3a/GUd+a0U 7H/tbdoS08hm5HbSHZ3V =DzUR -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Upload rejected
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:06:37AM +0100, Sascha Manns wrote: > Hello list, > > today i tried to upload a package to mentors, but sadly it was > rejected: > > Your upload does not contain a valid signature. Output was: > > gpg: Signature made So 17 Dez 2017 08:27:40 UTC using RSA key ID > 3EF12E85 > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > > Before uploading i added that mentioned key: > > gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-keys > 3F25F4D2A4F30A9DBAE2191DC70ECCE03EF12E85 > gpg: sending key C70ECCE03EF12E85 to hkp://keyring.debian.org This keyserver has nothing to do with mentors. You need to upload your key on the mentors profile settings page. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Upload rejected
Hello list, today i tried to upload a package to mentors, but sadly it was rejected: Your upload does not contain a valid signature. Output was: gpg: Signature made So 17 Dez 2017 08:27:40 UTC using RSA key ID 3EF12E85 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Before uploading i added that mentioned key: gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-keys 3F25F4D2A4F30A9DBAE2191DC70ECCE03EF12E85 gpg: sending key C70ECCE03EF12E85 to hkp://keyring.debian.org dput says by uploading: LANG=C dput mentors ignore-me_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes Checking signature on .changes gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 17 09:27:40 2017 CET gpg:using RSA key C70ECCE03EF12E85 gpg: Good signature from "Sascha Manns" [ultimate] Good signature on /home/sascha/pbuilder/ignore-me_0.1.2- 1_amd64.changes. Checking signature on .dsc gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 17 09:27:07 2017 CET gpg:using RSA key C70ECCE03EF12E85 gpg: Good signature from "Sascha Manns " [ultimate] Good signature on /home/sascha/pbuilder/ignore-me_0.1.2-1.dsc. Uploading to mentors (via http to mentors.debian.net): Uploading ignore-me_0.1.2-1.dsc: done. Uploading ignore-me_0.1.2.orig.tar.xz: done. Uploading ignore-me_0.1.2-1.debian.tar.xz: done. Uploading ignore-me_0.1.2-1_all.deb: done. Uploading ignore-me_0.1.2-1_amd64.buildinfo: done. Uploading ignore-me_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes: done. Successfully uploaded packages. But why the upload fails? Greetings Sascha -- Sascha Manns Email: sascha.ma...@mailbox.org | Blog: http://saigkill.tuxfamily.org GPG: 0x168428cdb1f20ab1
Bug#884580: RFS: pokemmo/1.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Multiplayer online game based on the Pokemon universe
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pokemmo" * Package name: pokemmo Version : 1.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes* URL : https://github.com/coringao/pokemmo * License : GPL-3.0+ Section : contrib/games It builds those binary packages: pokemmo - Online game based on the Pokemon universe To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pokemmo Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pokemmo/pokemmo_1.4.1-1.dsc More information about PokeMMO can be obtained from https://pokemmo.eu Regards, Carlos Donizete Froes