Bug#885691: RFS: groonga/7.1.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" * Package name: groonga Version : 7.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Groonga Project * Url : http://groonga.org/ * Licenses: LGPL-2.1 Section : database It builds those binary packages: * groonga * groonga-server-common * groonga-server-gqtp * libgroonga-dev * libgroonga0 * groonga-tokenizer-mecab * groonga-token-filter-stem * groonga-plugin-suggest * groonga-bin * groonga-httpd * groonga-doc * groonga-examples * groonga-munin-plugins To access further information about this package, visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/groonga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga/groonga_7.1.0-1.dsc More information about groonga can be obtained from http://groonga.org/ Changes since last upload: * New upstream release. * debian/patches/fix-nginx-FTBFS-on-kfreebsd.patch - Refresh patch to fix FTBFS on kFreeBSD. * debian/control - Bump Standards-Version, no other changes are required. Regards, pgpowQnSVmhzu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#878268: RFS: streamlink/0.9.0-1 [ITP]
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.9.0+dfsg.2-1.dsc Uploaded to NEW. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html For future uploads, please file an RFS bug as usual. Please consider working through the other issues I mentioned as you find time. Most of what I mentioned can just be forwarded to upstream issues, I guess they would welcome patches if you have the time though. > In uploaded version, I've added a transitional package for livestreamer > as they are compatible. You have not included a livestreamer symlink in /usr/bin, please address that in your next upload. > You mean, so that `debian/streamlink.links` and > `debian/streamlink.manpages` can be removed ? Right. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Bug#880729: marked as done (RFS: python-parameterized/0.6.1-2)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:29:49 +0100 with message-id <20171229022949.kn4dtpgnu6ygd...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#880729: RFS: python-parameterized/0.6.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #880729, regarding RFS: python-parameterized/0.6.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 880729: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880729 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: python-parameterized Version : 0.6.1-2 Upstream Author : David Wolever * URL : https://github.com/wolever/parameterized * License : BSD Section : python Please check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/python-parameterized.git Changes since the last upload: * Fix debci failures due to a buggy test - New patch Remove-unicode-docstring-test.patch * Fixup the Vcs-Browser URI * Remove superfluous nocheck guards * Add recommended get-orig-source target * Bump the standards version to 4.1.1 Best regards, Ghis --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 02:38:27PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > * Package name: python-parameterized > Version : 0.6.1-2 > Changes since the last upload: > > * Fix debci failures due to a buggy test > - New patch Remove-unicode-docstring-test.patch > * Fixup the Vcs-Browser URI > * Remove superfluous nocheck guards > * Add recommended get-orig-source target > * Bump the standards version to 4.1.1 ✓ -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---
Bug#885559: marked as done (RFS: librime/1.2.9+dfsg2-1)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:16:12 +0100 with message-id <20171229021612.y7o7ewc3xficx...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#885559: RFS: librime/1.2.9+dfsg2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #885559, regarding RFS: librime/1.2.9+dfsg2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 885559: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885559 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "librime" in pkg-ime team: * Package name: librime Version : 1.2.9+dfsg2-1 Upstream Author : GONG Chen * URL : https://github.com/lotem/librime * License : GPL-3 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: librime-bin - Rime Input Method Engine - utilities librime-dev - Rime Input Method Engine, the core library - development files librime1- Rime Input Method Engine - core library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/librime Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libr/librime/ librime_1.2.9+dfsg2-1.dsc Git packaging repository: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-ime/librime.git Changes since the last upload: librime (1.2.9+dfsg2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. * Rebuild the package and closes: #883373. * Remove zlib1.dll from source code and generate +dfsg2 tarball. * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.3. * Use automatic debug packages, drop librime1-dbg. * Bump debhelper compat to v10. * d/rules: replace dh_install with the newer dh_missing. * d/rules: drop --parallel argument, no longer needed. * d/copyright: use secure url for copyright format, minor updates. * d/patches: add patch to turn on multiarch support for librime. Thus librime-dev is converted to arch:any. * d/control: mark librime1 as M-A: same. The core problem this upload is trying to solve is #883373. Don't know why, but a rebuild of librime would fix the bug so here we are. I will investigate into librime status in Debian Stretch after this version gets uploaded into the archive. Regards, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:50:55AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > * Package name: librime >Version : 1.2.9+dfsg2-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > librime (1.2.9+dfsg2-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Team upload. >* Rebuild the package and closes: #883373. >* Remove zlib1.dll from source code and generate +dfsg2 tarball. >* Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.3. >* Use automatic debug packages, drop librime1-dbg. >* Bump debhelper compat to v10. >* d/rules: replace dh_install with the newer dh_missing. >* d/rules: drop --parallel argument, no longer needed. >* d/copyright: use secure url for copyright format, minor updates. >* d/patches: add patch to turn on multiarch support for librime. > Thus librime-dev is converted to arch:any. >* d/control: mark librime1 as M-A: same. > > The core problem this upload is trying to solve is #883373. Don't know why, > but a rebuild of librime would fix the bug so here we are. So there was some kind of incompatibility. Not surprising, especially in C++ it's a hard thing to do. > I will investigate into librime status in Debian Stretch after this version > gets uploaded into the archive. Does it work correctly in Stretch? The report is from unstable, it's likely the breakage in a dependency happened after Stretch's release. If that's the case, a versioned Depends: or Breaks: relationship would be all that's needed. Uploaded. 喵! -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---
Bug#878268: RFS: streamlink/0.9.0-1 [ITP]
Hi,
Le 18/12/2017 à 07:26, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
>
>> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.9.0-1.dsc
>
> Here is a review:
>
> These issues need to be resolved before upload:
>
> I think docs/_static/flattr-badge.png is probably non-free. Upstream
> stopped using a while ago so it should just get removed from their
> repository and the Debian tarball.>
> These issues would be nice to fix at some point:
>
> There has been a new Debian Policy version since your upload.
Thanks for your review.
I have uploaded a new version of the streamlink package, available with:
dget
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.9.0+dfsg.2-1.dsc
I removed the flattr image and font-awesome fonts using Files-Excluded
in the copyright file.
I've also asked upstream to remove the flattr image
(https://github.com/streamlink/streamlink/pull/1395)
Here are the changes since 0.9.0-1:
* Exlude flattr-badge and font-awesome which might not be dfsg-compatible
* Bump standard version, no change required
* Remove streaming platform references in description
* Add fonts-roboto-slab to recommends
* Add transitional package livestreamer
>
> Please add some upstream metadata:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata
>
> Personally, I would drop the last paragraph of the description, or
> possibly just the first sentence of the last paragraph of the
> description.
Done in uploaded version. I've only removed the reference to twitch and
kept the general notice.
>
> It would be nice to have a transitional package that also contains a
> symlink to the new name for the binary (assuming that they are
> command-line compatible), so that external wrappers for livestreamer
> still work with streamlink.
In uploaded version, I've added a transitional package for livestreamer
as they are compatible.
>
> For use_debian_fonts, please note that Roboto Slab is now available in Debian.
I updated the patch comment and added a recommends dependency on
fonts-roboto-slab.
>
> Please note that python3-iso3166 is now available in Debian, so you
> can switch back to the default.
>
> Please note that python3-pycryptodome is now available in Debian, so
> you can switch back to the default.>
> I'd suggest dropping the override_dh_builddeb for Debian.
>
> It would be nice if the upstream build system would also install the
> manual pages and binary in /usr/bin, you might want to send them a
> patch.
You mean, so that `debian/streamlink.links` and
`debian/streamlink.manpages` can be removed ?
>
> Automatic checks:
>
> check-all-the-things:
>
> $ codespell --quiet-level=3 .
>
>
> $ env PERL5OPT=-m-lib=. duck
> ...
> I: debian/copyright:90: URL:
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0: INFORMATION
> (Certainty:possible)
>The web page at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 works,
> but is also available via https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0,
> please consider switching to HTTPS urls.
>
> I: debian/copyright:102: URL: http://scripts.sil.org/OFL: INFORMATION
> (Certainty:possible)
>The web page at http://scripts.sil.org/OFL works, but is also
> available via https://scripts.sil.org/OFL, please consider switching
> to HTTPS urls.
>
> $ find . -type f \( -iname '*.ttf' -o -iname '*.otf' -o -iname '*.sfd'
> -o -iname '*.pfa' -o -iname '*.pfb' -o -iname '*.bdf' -o -iname '*.pk'
> -o -iname '*.ttc' -o -iname '*.pcf' \) -exec
> check-font-embedding-restrictions {} +
> These fonts in Debian main/contrib have embedding
> restrictions, which are not DFSG compatible:
>
> ./docs/_themes/sphinx_rtd_theme_violet/static/fonts/FontAwesome.otf: 0x0004
> ./docs/_themes/sphinx_rtd_theme_violet/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.ttf:
> 0x0004
>
> https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/os2.htm#fst
>
> $ find . -type f \( -iname '*.ttf' -o -iname '*.otf' -o -iname
> '*.woff' -o -iname '*.sfd' -o -iname '*.pfa' -o -iname '*.pfb' -o
> -iname '*.bdf' -o -iname '*.pk' -o -iname '*.ttc' -o -iname '*.pcf' \)
> -exec fontlint {} \;
>
>
> # If you contact the owners of these keys, please point out OpenPGP
> best practices:
> # https://help.riseup.net/en/security/message-security/openpgp/best-practices
> $ find . -type f -iname '*.asc' -exec cat {} + | hot dearmor | hokey lint
> ...
> Checking user-ID- and user-attribute-related items:
> Charlie Drage :
> Self-sig hash algorithms: [SHA-1]
> ...
> Checking subkeys:
> ...
> fpr: CDEE D514 4E91 E633 6D0B 59CC 2523 80C9 D3E8 71F7
> ...
> binding sig hash algorithms: [SHA-1]
> ...
> cross-cert hash algorithms: [SHA-1]
>
> # check if these can be switched to https://
> $ grep -nHrF http: .
>
>
> $ find . -type f -iname '*.py' -exec mypy {} +
>
>
> # This command checks style. While a consistent style
> # is a good idea, people who have different style
> # preferences will want to ignore some of the output.
> # Do not bother adding non-upstrea
Bug#885625: marked as done (RFS: jag/0.3.3-2 [RC] -- arcade and puzzle 2D game)
Hi Adam, Em qui, 2017-12-28 às 23:18 +, Debian Bug Tracking System escreveu: > There's nothing RC here. Sorry, but I did not know which entry was RC, QA, or NMC for a simple upgrade in the package. > Uploaded. Thanks! :D -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#885625: marked as done (RFS: jag/0.3.3-2 [RC] -- arcade and puzzle 2D game)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:15:34 +0100 with message-id <20171228231534.o27rp2ne7b7oj...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#885625: RFS: jag/0.3.3-2 [RC] -- arcade and puzzle 2D game has caused the Debian Bug report #885625, regarding RFS: jag/0.3.3-2 [RC] -- arcade and puzzle 2D game to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 885625: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885625 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jag" * Package name: jag Version : 0.3.3-2 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL : https://github.com/coringao/jag * License : GPL-3+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: jag - arcade and puzzle 2D game jag-data - arcade and puzzle 2D game (data file) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/jag Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jag/jag_0.3.3-2.dsc More information about JAG can be obtained from https://github.com/coringao/jag/wiki. Changes since the last upload: * Mark arch: all packages as 'Multi-Arch: foreign' * Bump compat level to 11 and require debhelper >= 11 Regards, Carlos Donizete Froes --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 03:42:07PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > * Package name: jag >Version : 0.3.3-2 > Changes since the last upload: > > * Mark arch: all packages as 'Multi-Arch: foreign' > * Bump compat level to 11 and require debhelper >= 11 There's nothing RC here. Uploaded. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---
Bug#884780: RFS: piu-piu/1.0-1 [ITP]
Looks good so far.
Description: s/horisontal/horizontal/
debian/changelog:
* you need to file an ITP bug ("reportbug wnpp") and put its number here.
ITPs are there so people are notified about what you're going to package.
In this case, it's pretty unlikely anyone will object, and we already did
the review, but it's a formality that costs us little.
* as the package is meant for upload, please s/UNRELEASED/unstable/
I also couldn't get network play to work: it just hangs on both client and
server. But single player mode appears to be fine.
Other comments I have are for upstream code, I guess you'd prefer them to be
filed as issues on github.
Meow!
--
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.
Bug#885641: RFS: xml-core/0.18-1 [ITA]
Xml-core itself needs a rewrite especially to separate the catalogs per apps, add tests etc. There was a RFH about it a few years back FYI.
Bug#885641: RFS: xml-core/0.18-1 [ITA]
Hi, thanks for your questions. :) I will reply your questions, in the reverse order. > This is a native package, so really "Adopting" it also means taking care > of the (little) code there is inside. Therefore, turning it into a 3.0 > (quilt) package is most probably not an appropriate action. Change native to quilt probably was a mistake due to my lack of experience. Thanks for pointing it out, I will read more for better understand the difference between quilt and native. > You wrote to the O bug, but without turning it into an ITA [...] hummm... Another mistake due to the lack of experience. I thought that reply with the ITA in the subject changes it, sorry. My mistake. Could you give me some hints here? > [...] importantly without writing *why* you'd like to adopt such odd package. > I'm honestly curious: I'm kind of biased here as I was the one massaging > it into shape when it needed it last year. I will try to be brief with my 'why'. First of all, I am interested in software distribution and I really like to understand about Debian package structure. My first contact with xml-core came from my attempt to adopt dia package, wherein the field "Depends on packages which need a new maintainer" pointed out some packages, one of them is xml-core. I decided to better understand xml-core. In the end, it sounds to me a good opportunity to learn more about a native package and at the same time reduce one of the dependencies without a maintainer (I am totally aware about the responsibility to maintain a package). > And all in all, I personally doubt the usefulness of doing an upload > only bumping std-ver (to a version that is not even the last) and just > tweaking a couple of other fields. I did what my current knowledge in Debian package enabled me to do. When I looked at the xml-core files, I did not find anything that I can improve, however, if there is any problem with it I will be glad to put effort to improve it.
Bug#885571: marked as done (RFS: wordplay/7.22-19 [ITA])
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:31:34 +0100 with message-id <20171228213134.u2u33yubv6trl...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#885571: RFS: wordplay/7.22-19 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #885571, regarding RFS: wordplay/7.22-19 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 885571: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885571 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wordplay" * Package name: wordplay Version : 7.22-19 Upstream Author : Evans A Criswell * URL : http://hsvmovies.com/static_subpages/personal_orig/wordplay/index.html * License : Custom Section : games It builds those binary packages: wordplay - anagram generator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/wordplay Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wordplay/wordplay_7.22-19.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New Maintainer (Closes: #840055). * Added fix-superfluous-letters.patch (Closes: #614349). * Added hardering on debian/rules. * Added debian/watch file. * Bumped Standards-Version to 4.1.3. * Updated Description field on debian/control. Regards, Innocent De Marchi --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 05:08:06PM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:04:19AM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: > > > * Package name: wordplay > > >Version : 7.22-19 > > > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > > > * New Maintainer (Closes: #840055). > > > * Added fix-superfluous-letters.patch (Closes: #614349). > > > * Added hardering on debian/rules. > > > * Added debian/watch file. > > > * Bumped Standards-Version to 4.1.3. > > > * Updated Description field on debian/control. > > > > The watch file thinks the new version is 722 rather than 7.22. > > > Yes, I know this. The upstream files have a version number 721 instead > of 7.21 and 722 instead of 7.22. But versions of the package in Debian > have used format 7.22-18 and I have followed the same format. The > previous version of the package did not have a watch file and Lintian > complained that there was no file watch. At least with this file, if > version 723 is released the system will detect it. There is also the > option of not putting the watch file...In any case, the latest > upstream version of the program is 1996: The watch file does not seem > to be very useful (and this can not be appreciated by Lintian! :-) ). Well, lintian is a tool rather than a god to appease, especially for tags that are even off by default. I don't like reporting a wrong version number: it confuses QA tools (making them think a new version is available), and makes uscan -d name the tarball wrong. Options would include having a dversionmangle that takes the last two digits and produces 7.23 or 19.96 -- not sure how useful that would be. Or, dropping the watch file altogether. But, this is your package, and I'm not going to impose a strict observance of my preferences here. Uploaded -- can always do further improvements in -20. Meow! -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---
Bug#885641: RFS: xml-core/0.18-1 [ITA]
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 05:09:29PM -0200, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xml-core" Hi. I'm here mostly to ask some questions: > Changes since the last upload: > > * New maintainer (Closes: #660687) > * debian/control: bumped Standards-Version to 4.1.2 > * debian/control: bumped debhelper to 10 > * debian/control: Added homepage > * debian/source/format: update to use quilt This is a native package, so really "Adopting" it also means taking care of the (little) code there is inside. Therefore, turning it into a 3.0 (quilt) package is most probably not an appropriate action. You wrote to the O bug, but without turning it into an ITA, and most importantly without writing *why* you'd like to adopt such odd package. I'm honestly curious: I'm kind of biased here as I was the one massaging it into shape when it needed it last year. And all in all, I personally doubt the usefulness of doing an upload only bumping std-ver (to a version that is not even the last) and just tweaking a couple of other fields. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#885641: RFS: xml-core/0.18-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xml-core" Package name: xml-core Version : 0.18-1 Upstream Author : Debian XML/SGML Group maintains URL : https://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ License : GPL-2+ Section : text It builds those binary packages: xml-core - XML infrastructure and XML catalog file support To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xml-core Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xml-core/xml-core_0.18-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #660687) * debian/control: bumped Standards-Version to 4.1.2 * debian/control: bumped debhelper to 10 * debian/control: Added homepage * debian/source/format: update to use quilt Regards, Rodrigo Siqueira
Bug#885625: RFS: jag/0.3.3-2 [RC] -- arcade and puzzle 2D game
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jag" * Package name: jag Version : 0.3.3-2 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL : https://github.com/coringao/jag * License : GPL-3+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: jag - arcade and puzzle 2D game jag-data - arcade and puzzle 2D game (data file) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/jag Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jag/jag_0.3.3-2.dsc More information about JAG can be obtained from https://github.com/coringao/jag/wiki. Changes since the last upload: * Mark arch: all packages as 'Multi-Arch: foreign' * Bump compat level to 11 and require debhelper >= 11 Regards, Carlos Donizete Froes
Bug#885571: RFS: wordplay/7.22-19 [ITA]
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:04:19AM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: > * Package name: wordplay >Version : 7.22-19 > Changes since the last upload: > > * New Maintainer (Closes: #840055). > * Added fix-superfluous-letters.patch (Closes: #614349). > * Added hardering on debian/rules. > * Added debian/watch file. > * Bumped Standards-Version to 4.1.3. > * Updated Description field on debian/control. The watch file thinks the new version is 722 rather than 7.22. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.
Bug#885571: RFS: wordplay/7.22-19 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wordplay" * Package name: wordplay Version : 7.22-19 Upstream Author : Evans A Criswell * URL : http://hsvmovies.com/static_subpages/personal_orig/wordplay/index.html * License : Custom Section : games It builds those binary packages: wordplay - anagram generator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/wordplay Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wordplay/wordplay_7.22-19.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New Maintainer (Closes: #840055). * Added fix-superfluous-letters.patch (Closes: #614349). * Added hardering on debian/rules. * Added debian/watch file. * Bumped Standards-Version to 4.1.3. * Updated Description field on debian/control. Regards, Innocent De Marchi
