Bug#887921: marked as done (RFS: bluefish/2.2.10-1 [ITA])
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 04:48:45 +0100 with message-id <20180122034845.mdh6cw4vlx5sh...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#887921: RFS: bluefish/2.2.10-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #887921, regarding RFS: bluefish/2.2.10-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 887921: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887921 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bluefish" * Package name: bluefish Version : 2.2.10-1 Upstream Author : Olivier Sessink* URL : http://bluefish.openoffice.nl * License : GPL-3+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: bluefish - advanced Gtk+ text editor for web and software development bluefish-data - advanced Gtk+ text editor (data) bluefish-plugins - advanced Gtk+ text editor (plugins) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/bluefish Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bluefish/bluefish_2.2.10-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release (Closes: #591965, #771394 ; LP:#1551298). - Removed unnecessary 827747_fix_z-index_description.patch. * New maintainer (Closes: #887145). * Bumped to Standards-Version 4.1.3. + debian/compat: Raised to level 10. + Added Multi-Arch: same to bluefish-plugins. - Removed dh-autoreconf Build-Depends. * Changed the installation directory of the bluefish.appdata.xml file (added changed-install-dir-appdata.patch). + Changed to usr/share/metainfo on bluefish.install. * Added hardering flags on debian/rules. * Changed desktop-data/bluefish.appdata.xml.in to legacyformat (added patch file). Regards, Innocent De Marchi --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 07:08:48PM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: > * Package name: bluefish >Version : 2.2.10-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > * New upstream release (Closes: #591965, #771394 ; LP:#1551298). > - Removed unnecessary 827747_fix_z-index_description.patch. > * New maintainer (Closes: #887145). > * Bumped to Standards-Version 4.1.3. > + debian/compat: Raised to level 10. > + Added Multi-Arch: same to bluefish-plugins. > - Removed dh-autoreconf Build-Depends. > * Changed the installation directory of the > bluefish.appdata.xml file (added changed-install-dir-appdata.patch). > + Changed to usr/share/metainfo on bluefish.install. > * Added hardering flags on debian/rules. > * Changed desktop-data/bluefish.appdata.xml.in to legacyformat > (added patch file). ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out, ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the ⠈⠳⣄ sky. Your cat demands food. The priority should be obvious...--- End Message ---
Bug#887954: marked as done (RFS: jag/0.3.4-1 -- arcade and puzzle 2D game)
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:25:18 +0100 with message-id <20180122022518.tzvvu7hcylo3r...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#887954: RFS: jag/0.3.4-1 -- arcade and puzzle 2D game has caused the Debian Bug report #887954, regarding RFS: jag/0.3.4-1 -- arcade and puzzle 2D game to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 887954: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887954 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jag" * Package name: jag Version : 0.3.4-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes* URL : https://github.com/coringao/jag * License : GPL-3+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: jag - arcade and puzzle 2D game jag-data - arcade and puzzle 2D game (data file) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/jag Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jag/jag_0.3.4-1.dsc More information about JAG can be obtained from https://github.com/coringao/jag/wiki. Changes since the last upload: **changelog version: 0.3.4** * Fix unix install in 'game.pro' (Thanks for the contribution of yuryfdr) * Fix editor build with Qt5 (Thanks for the contribution of yuryfdr) * Added the GPLv3 license to the files in the 'editor' directory * Files removed in 'data/help' directory indexed language: Russian and Dutch * Added language in Portuguese (Thanks for the contribution of Ricky R. Froes) * Updated language files **debian/changelog version: 0.3.4-1** * New upstream release * debian/control: + Changed Vcs-* URLs to salsa.d.o + Declare compliance with Debian Policy: 4.1.3 * Updated d/copyright years * Added Debian Games Team in d/copyright * Updated d/upstream/metadata years Regards, Carlos Donizete Froes --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 11:46:18PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > * Package name: jag >Version : 0.3.4-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > **changelog version: 0.3.4** > * Fix unix install in 'game.pro' (Thanks for the contribution of yuryfdr) > * Fix editor build with Qt5 (Thanks for the contribution of yuryfdr) > * Added the GPLv3 license to the files in the 'editor' directory > * Files removed in 'data/help' directory indexed language: Russian and > Dutch > * Added language in Portuguese (Thanks for the contribution of Ricky R. > Froes) > * Updated language files > > **debian/changelog version: 0.3.4-1** > * New upstream release > * debian/control: > + Changed Vcs-* URLs to salsa.d.o > + Declare compliance with Debian Policy: 4.1.3 > * Updated d/copyright years > * Added Debian Games Team in d/copyright > * Updated d/upstream/metadata years ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out, ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the ⠈⠳⣄ sky. Your cat demands food. The priority should be obvious...--- End Message ---
Bug#887954: RFS: jag/0.3.4-1 -- arcade and puzzle 2D game
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jag" * Package name: jag Version : 0.3.4-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes* URL : https://github.com/coringao/jag * License : GPL-3+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: jag - arcade and puzzle 2D game jag-data - arcade and puzzle 2D game (data file) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/jag Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jag/jag_0.3.4-1.dsc More information about JAG can be obtained from https://github.com/coringao/jag/wiki. Changes since the last upload: **changelog version: 0.3.4** * Fix unix install in 'game.pro' (Thanks for the contribution of yuryfdr) * Fix editor build with Qt5 (Thanks for the contribution of yuryfdr) * Added the GPLv3 license to the files in the 'editor' directory * Files removed in 'data/help' directory indexed language: Russian and Dutch * Added language in Portuguese (Thanks for the contribution of Ricky R. Froes) * Updated language files **debian/changelog version: 0.3.4-1** * New upstream release * debian/control: + Changed Vcs-* URLs to salsa.d.o + Declare compliance with Debian Policy: 4.1.3 * Updated d/copyright years * Added Debian Games Team in d/copyright * Updated d/upstream/metadata years Regards, Carlos Donizete Froes
Bug#883627: RFS: network-manager-fortisslvpn/1.2.6-1 [ITP] -- NetworkManager Fortinet SSLVPN plugin
Hi! On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:31:24 +0100 Lubomir Rintelwrote: > At 1.2.8 now. > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/network-manager-fortisslvpn/network-manager-fortisslvpn_1.2.8-1.dsc I think the package is already in a pretty good shape. Only a few minor nits. The other day, I've uploaded gnome-shell 3.26.2-4 to unstable where I pulled your patches for the libnm port. I would thus prefer, if network-manager-fortisslvpn does not build the libnm-glib compat support, as I'm actually in the process of getting all affected packages updated to drop those dependencies. Would be great if you apply the attached patch and re-upload 1.2.8-1. I'm happy to sponsor the package then. Regards, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 0993a2e..eff1d16 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -4,15 +4,9 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Lubomir Rintel Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11), intltool, - network-manager-dev (>= 1.2.0), - libnm-util-dev (>= 1.2.0), - libnm-glib-dev (>= 1.2.0), - libnm-glib-vpn-dev (>= 1.2.0), - libnm-gtk-dev (>= 1.2.0), libnm-dev (>= 1.2.0), libnma-dev (>= 1.2.0), ppp-dev (>= 2.4.7-1+1), - libdbus-glib-1-dev (>= 0.74), libsecret-1-dev (>= 0.18), libgtk-3-dev (>= 3.4), libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.32) @@ -27,8 +21,6 @@ Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, network-manager (>= 1.2.0), openfortivpn -Breaks: network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome (<< 1.2.4-2) -Replaces: network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome (<< 1.2.4-2) Description: network management framework (Fortinet SSLVPN plugin core) NetworkManager is a system network service that manages your network devices and connections, attempting to keep active network connectivity when diff --git a/debian/network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome.install b/debian/network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome.install index 8cbcbe5..c0c7cc6 100644 --- a/debian/network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome.install +++ b/debian/network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome.install @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -usr/lib/*/NetworkManager/libnm-fortisslvpn-properties.so usr/lib/*/NetworkManager/libnm-vpn-plugin-fortisslvpn-editor.so usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-fortisslvpn-auth-dialog usr/share/appdata/network-manager-fortisslvpn.metainfo.xml diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index b04953f..91a1423 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- \ --libexecdir=/usr/lib/NetworkManager \ --disable-static \ + --without-libnm-glib \ --with-pppd-plugin-dir=$(PPPD_PLUGIN_DIR) override_dh_makeshlibs: signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#849754: Review
I reviewed this packaging and came up with some issues: - The description does nothing to explain what makes this solution unique. + Why is this special? + How does it even work? + This should be easily gleaned from the package description. - There is a lintian override for a legitimate mistake (unindented list). - d/patches is scary... + Do not create lintian overrides using d/patches. + Keep patches to essential changes (not syntax and language changes). + Do not perform such a massive application rewrite using d/patches. + That change should be sent upstream... not held local. - Absolutely DO NOT generate lintian-override files from d/patches. - d/control should wrap long lines. - d/rules could use some more whitespace. - The py2 dependency is bad (very bad, especially at this point). + There are only two years left until py2 EoL. - d/links suggests binaries are not being installed into standard locations. - d/NEWS is not needed here and will be needlessly noisy for users. - d/install should use wildcards to grab docs, instead of a file list - d/install does not need the leading "./" - d/compat should probably get a bump to 11 + in d/control as well - This is a python package, but raw source is being installed to /usr/lib. + The python scripts should be compiled. + There should be no "src/*" inclusion in d/install. - Using d/install is not the correct way to include init script. - The debhelper scripts have already been commented on. - The interaction with the init system was also already commented on. - This packaging doesn't follow any sort of standard. + There is no way to simply grab the source and build a package. + I would suggest creating a debian packaging repo (on alioth or salsa). + Using gbp will make it substantially easier for others to review. + Following a standard also means others can easily hop in and help. - Tests are included, but nothing is done with them. + If you built them, use them! Not Debian-centric: - Why is there no Makefile? + What Install.txt provides should be available via make. + It's also where you would stick bits of code to generate documentation. - The "release" version v0.0.0 suggests incomplete work. + There has been no release since v0.0.0 (in 2016), despite code changes. - Why are man pages under debian/? + Make them a part of the software, not the package. + Generate the file man page during build (using make). Personally, I don't understand what this backup solution offers over others. Even after discussing this on IRC, I still really don't have any idea what it offers over other solutions. I feel like a lot of buzz words are being arbitrarily assigned to the description. This makes it hard to follow what is fact and what is opinion. Perhaps: Guerilla Backup is a backup solution for small and unstable networks. It can use your choice of transports (ssh, telnet, xmpp, etc.) to push backups to a distributed cluster. Guerilla Backup ensures security by pre-encrypting data before upload and only this key can be used to decrypt the data. There's no real distinction between opinions, technical info, or general user info. It makes it pretty much impossible to know what someone is getting with this software. Feel free to reach out via IRC if you need help! -- Michael Lustfield
Bug#887758: closed by Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> (Re: Bug#887758: RFS: memleax/1.1.1-1)
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 02:51:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: > > #887758: RFS: memleax/1.1.1-1 > > It has been closed by Adam Borowski. > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Adam Borowski > by > replying to this email. Thank you Adam! :-) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#887595: RFS: xft/2.3.2-1.1 [NMU]
Hi Hugh, On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:43:01 +, Hugh McMaster wrote: > Changes since the last upload: > * Non-maintainer upload. > * debian/control: > - Mark libxft-dev Multi-Arch: same (Closes: #884176). > IMO this is nothing that warrants a NMU, or an upload on its own. Cheers, Julien
Bug#887040: RFS: reptyr/0.6.2-1.1 [RC] [NMU]
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > The version currently in mentors.d.n looks good to me. Actually, I missed a minor wart: there is still no DEP3 metadata in the patches. You can easily add that with `patchedit`. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#887040: RFS: reptyr/0.6.2-1.1 [RC] [NMU]
Hi Mateusz, On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:36:40PM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > > Thanks for review. I pushed all suggested changes to mentors. You are very welcome. The version currently in mentors.d.n looks good to me. Now we only need an actual DD to sponsor the upload; Jonathan (in copy) might do it, but he is not very available since a few days. Best, nicoo signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#887921: RFS: bluefish/2.2.10-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bluefish" * Package name: bluefish Version : 2.2.10-1 Upstream Author : Olivier Sessink* URL : http://bluefish.openoffice.nl * License : GPL-3+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: bluefish - advanced Gtk+ text editor for web and software development bluefish-data - advanced Gtk+ text editor (data) bluefish-plugins - advanced Gtk+ text editor (plugins) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/bluefish Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bluefish/bluefish_2.2.10-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release (Closes: #591965, #771394 ; LP:#1551298). - Removed unnecessary 827747_fix_z-index_description.patch. * New maintainer (Closes: #887145). * Bumped to Standards-Version 4.1.3. + debian/compat: Raised to level 10. + Added Multi-Arch: same to bluefish-plugins. - Removed dh-autoreconf Build-Depends. * Changed the installation directory of the bluefish.appdata.xml file (added changed-install-dir-appdata.patch). + Changed to usr/share/metainfo on bluefish.install. * Added hardering flags on debian/rules. * Changed desktop-data/bluefish.appdata.xml.in to legacyformat (added patch file). Regards, Innocent De Marchi
Bug#887665: RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:34:37PM +0100, Muri Nicanor wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" > > * Package name : usbguard > Version : 0.7.1+ds-1 > Changes since last upload: > > * New upstream version 0.7.1 (Closes: #868160) The bug you're closing is not "please package new upstream". Thus, this part should be: * New upstream version 0.7.1 + Fix failure with read-only /etc (Closes: #868160) > * remove dh-systemd due to being part of debhelper (>= 9.20160709) > * bump standards version > * add correct section to libusbguard0 > * remove parsing of dpkg-genchangelog > * updated the watch file for the new github url, modified the archive name > so the correct version will be used and removed the signature line, as > that version is not signed > * remove patches that have been upstreamed > * add asciidoctor to build depends Please run lintian before requesting sponsoring; it automates checking for most of likely problems, saving time for both you and me: E: usbguard changes: unreleased-changes The package is explicitely marked as "not for uploading" (ie, is meant for testing, review and further work). As you filed the RFS, I guess it's not what you wanted... W: usbguard source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/usbguard.postinst Debhelper wants to add further things to the postinst, but doesn't know where. W: usbguard source: debian-watch-could-verify-download debian/upstream/signing-key.asc The new version is not signed; you should then delete (or rename away) this key to mark the lack of signature as intentional. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out, ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the ⠈⠳⣄ sky. Your cat demands food. The priority should be obvious...
Bug#887907: RFS: gnustep-back/0.26.2-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-back". This version requires gnustep-gui/0.26.2-1 which is in the NEW queue. I have included an additional link to the .dsc for convenience. * Package name: gnustep-back Version : 0.26.2-1 Upstream Author : Fred Kiefer, Adam Fedor , Alexander Malmberg , Banlu Kemiyatorn and many others * URL : http://gnustep.org * License : LGPL-2+ (bundles), GPL-3+ (tools) Section : gnustep It builds these binary packages: gnustep-back-common - GNUstep GUI Backend - common files gnustep-back0.26 - GNUstep GUI Backend gnustep-back0.26-art - GNUstep GUI Backend (art) gnustep-back0.26-cairo - GNUstep GUI Backend (cairo) gnustep-back0.26-xlib - GNUstep GUI Backend (xlib) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-back Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-back/gnustep-back_0.26.2-1.dsc dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui_0.26.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: [ Eric Heintzmann ] * debian/rules: + Remove -shared-libgcc LDFLAG, now useless. + Append --as-needed LDFLAG. + Hardening: remove -pie option. + Now build depends on latest gnustep-gui package. * debian/control: + Bump Standards Versions to 4.1.0. + As requested by Gürkan, change his name. * New fix-spelling-error.patch. * Add a testsuite. [ Yavor Doganov ] * New upstream release 0.26.2: + Rename packages following the SONAME change: - gnustep-back0.25 -> gnustep-back0.26 - gnustep-back0.25-art -> gnustep-back0.26-art - gnustep-back0.25-cairo -> gnustep-back0.26-cairo + New package gnustep-back0.26-xlib: prepare for removal of the art backend due to removal of src:libart-lgpl (Addresses: #885786). * debian/watch: Switch to ftp.gnustep.org; much more reliable. * debian/compat: Bump compat level to 11. * debian/rules: Replace shell comments with makefile comments; M-x wh-cl. Use convenience variables where possible. (DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND): Add -Wl,--no-undefined. (override_dh_testdir): New target to regenerate debian/control. (override_dh_auto_configure): Substitute GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_DOC as well when generating gnustep-back-common.install. Configure the xlib backend in a separate builddir; handle the generation of maintainer scripts and .install/.links files. (override_dh_auto_build): Pass dpkg-buildflags explicitly as OBJCFLAGS and CFLAGS are being reset by gnustep-make. Build documentation. Pass $(optim) for proper noopt support. Pass tools=no and fonts=no to the cairo build. Remove unnecessary tools recipe; add one for xlib. (override_dh_auto_install): Install documentation and the xlib backend. (override_dh_auto_clean): Clean documentation; ignoring errors. Simplify the recipe. (override_dh_strip): Remove in favor of automatic -dbgsym packages. (override_dh_shlibdeps): Add override to fix circular dependencies; regression introduced in 0.25.0-1 (Closes: #882078). Thanks to Bill Allombert for the report. * debian/templates/control.m4: Remove -dbg, add new package -xlib. (Build-Depends): Require debhelper >= 11 and gnustep-make >= 2.7.0-3 for the optim variable definition. (Section): Remove section "libs" for all packages as it is wrong according to lintian (and to me). (Depends): Relax dependencies on -common to ease transitions with the ultimate goal to support partial upgrades. (Breaks, Replaces): Remove; obsolete. (Standards-Version): Declare compliance with 4.1.3. * debian/control: Regenerate. * debian/templates/gnustep-back-common.install.in: Add @GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_DOC@/*. * debian/templates/gnustep-back-common.prerm.in: Also delete /var/lib/GNUstep, another regession in 0.25.0-1 (Closes: #832349). Thanks Andreas Beckmann. * debian/patches/autoreconf.patch: New; fix autoreconf failure. * debian/patches/no-freetype-config.patch: New; use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to detect freetype as freetype-config is being removed (Closes: #887719). * debian/patches/link-libs.patch: New; fix FTBFS with ld --no-undefined. * debian/patches/fix-spelling-error.patch: Fix another spelling error. * debian/patches/series: Update. * debian/clean: Simplify; add Documentation/version.texi. * debian/font_cacher.1: New file. * debian/gnustep-back-common.manpages: Install it. * debian/changelog: Whitespace cleanup. * debian/copyright: Update copyright years, add debian packaging copyright/license information, add configure
Bug#849754: Update from IRC discussion
In response to discussion, packaging was adjusted: * Added lintian override to ignore non-standard directory perms explaining the read restrictions * Ignore possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description (false positive) * Added docstrings to systemd service files, reported when using lintian -EviIL +pedantic
Bug#887758: marked as done (RFS: memleax/1.1.1-1)
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:49:06 +0100 with message-id <20180121144906.hb2lbtwi3diz4...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#887758: RFS: memleax/1.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #887758, regarding RFS: memleax/1.1.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 887758: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "memleax". Hi Jonathan, I've CCed you because you sponsored my last upload. Please consider granting DM privileges for this package if you're satisfied with the quality of my work :-) -- P.S, I retagged debian/1.1.0-1 to incorporate your fixes. Btw, I take it the bits I copied from the Valgrind package and then commented out will never be potentially useful? Package name: memleax Version : 1.1.1-1 Upstream Author : WuBingzhengURL : https://github.com/WuBingzheng/memleax License : GPL-2 Section : devel It builds this binary package: memleax- debug a running process for memory leaks To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/memleax Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/memleax/memleax_1.1.1-1.dsc Alternatively, one can clone its repository with this command: git clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/memleax.git More information about memleax can be obtained from https://github.com/WuBingzheng/memleax. Changes since the last upload: memleax (1.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version. * Only build for supported architectures: amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, and i386. (Closes: #886971) * Switch to debhelper 11. * Declare compat level 11. * Fix Vcs-Git link. -- Nicholas D Steeves Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:14:10 -0500 memleax (1.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:38:34PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Version : 1.1.1-1 > Upstream Author : WuBingzheng > Changes since the last upload: > > memleax (1.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New upstream version. > * Only build for supported architectures: amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, > and i386. (Closes: #886971) > * Switch to debhelper 11. > * Declare compat level 11. > * Fix Vcs-Git link. ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out, ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the ⠈⠳⣄ sky. Your cat demands food. The priority should be obvious...--- End Message ---
Bug#887870: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 [ITP]
2018-01-21 20:54 GMT+08:00 Mathieu Malaterre: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Yangfl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for including wrong deps. I've fixed them all and reuploaded the >> package into mentors.d.o. >> >> I'd like to mention that pcc alone *won't* work without the pcc-libs >> (which I've already packaged and tested). But I'd want pcc-libs to be >> built with pcc, so pcc must be uploaded prior to pcc-libs. > > Are you saying that #638309 is still there then ? > > $ pcc --version > Portable C Compiler 1.2.0.DEVEL 20171212 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > $ echo 'main() {}' > junk.c > $ pcc junk.c > /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find crtbegin.o: No such file or > directory > /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find -lpcc > error: /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld terminated with status 1 You can install https://mentors.debian.net/package/pcc-libs (newer version), hope it can work.
Bug#887870: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 [ITP]
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Yangflwrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for including wrong deps. I've fixed them all and reuploaded the > package into mentors.d.o. > > I'd like to mention that pcc alone *won't* work without the pcc-libs > (which I've already packaged and tested). But I'd want pcc-libs to be > built with pcc, so pcc must be uploaded prior to pcc-libs. Are you saying that #638309 is still there then ? $ pcc --version Portable C Compiler 1.2.0.DEVEL 20171212 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu $ echo 'main() {}' > junk.c $ pcc junk.c /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find crtbegin.o: No such file or directory /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find -lpcc error: /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld terminated with status 1
Bug#887870: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 [ITP]
Hi, Sorry for including wrong deps. I've fixed them all and reuploaded the package into mentors.d.o. I'd like to mention that pcc alone *won't* work without the pcc-libs (which I've already packaged and tested). But I'd want pcc-libs to be built with pcc, so pcc must be uploaded prior to pcc-libs. Sincerely,
Bug#887870: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 [ITP]
Are you using the package ? I cannot even install it. $ dget -u https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pcc/pcc_1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1.dsc $ cd pcc-1.2.0\~DEVEL+20180120 $ debuild $ sudo dpkg -i ../pcc_1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1_amd64.deb Selecting previously unselected package pcc. (Reading database ... 483634 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../pcc_1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking pcc (1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of pcc: pcc depends on pcc-for-x86-64-linux-gnu; however: Package pcc-for-x86-64-linux-gnu is not installed. dpkg: error processing package pcc (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.6.1-2) ... Errors were encountered while processing: pcc
Bug#887870: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 [ITP]
Disclaimer: I am not a DD and cannot sponsor your package. On 2018-01-21 15:01 +0800, Yangfl wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pcc" > > * Package name: pcc >Version : 1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 >Upstream Author : Anders Magnusson> * URL : http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/ > * License : BSD >Section : devel > > It builds those binary packages: > > pcc - Portable C Compiler > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/pcc > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pcc/pcc_1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1.dsc Haven't tried to build it yet, but I see the following rather serious problem: pcc depends on unavailable packages on amd64 and i386, apparently a remnant from the previous version which used to be in experimental. This makes me wonder how you have tested your package, when it is not installable. In particular, has bug #638309 been fixed? The debian/links file should probably be removed, it only works on amd64 and seems to be redundant with the override_dh_link rule in debian/rules. > More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Information about pcc, however, can be found at http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/. ;-) Sadly they don't do https. :-( > Changes since the last upload: > > [your most recent changelog entry] * Initial release (Closes: #442913) Which is not completely true, since version 1.1.0~DEVEL+20110422-1 used to be in experimental: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pcc. Whether it's worth to keep the old changelog entry for that version is debatable. Cheers, Sven