Bug#887665: marked as done (RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1)

2018-01-22 Thread Tobias Frost 
> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:27:02 +0100
> From: Muri Nicanor 
> To: Adam Borowski , 887665-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#887665: RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>  Thunderbird/52.4.0
> 
> Hi,
> 
> thanks Adam for the review and the input. There was a new usbguard
> release today, so i'll close this RFS and reopen a new one for the new
> release soon. I'll fix the mentioned shortcomings in the new upload.
> 
> cheers,
> muri
> 

Please do not close RFS in this cases, so that the context is maintained.
A RFS should be only be closed when uploaded (or when there is no longer
something to sponsor).

When you have a new version, please recycle the bug, and retitle it
appropiatly.

Thanks!

Bug#887595: RFS: xft/2.3.2-1.1 [NMU]

2018-01-22 Thread Tobias Frost 
Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:58:00AM +, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Hi Julien,
> 
> On Monday, 22 January 2018 7:49 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > IMO this is nothing that warrants a NMU, or an upload on its own.
> 
> Sure, perhaps not in the current RFS form. That said, I'm hoping we can 
> reach some agreement on releasing a new version of xft. Here are some 
> reasons why.
> 
> 1. Cyril Brulebois is listed in Uploaders, but he hasn't been part of 
>Debian XFS for some years now.

Did you ask him if he still is interested in maintaining the package?

> 2. The VCS URL in the Package Tracker no longer functions, due to the 
>recent migration to Debian Salsa.

That is unrelated. alioth is still working. However this is another sign
that the package is no longer in active maintaince.
I suggest to mail kibi and just ask him whether it is and maybe (if you
want) whether you could add yourself as Co-Maintainer.

(You maybe also want to file a bug the the repository is defunc.)

> 3. The package standards version is 3.9.2 ("ancient").
> 4. The lack of Multi-Arch awareness blocks multi-arch support for 
>libpango1.0-dev and libfontforge-dev. These packages, in turn, 
>block Wine.

Thanks for the explanation, but then this should be documented in the bug and
the severity increased (IMHO to important).

> 5. As for fixing other bugs, #843837 should be tagged 'wontfix', 
>since it is an upstream issue (fixed some time ago). I don't know 
>enough about the other three bugs to comment.

How is it fixed upstream? The bug has no info...
Looking for upstream... It seems that there is no newer release
at the site mentioned in d/copyright.

> Marking libxft-dev Multi-Arch: same is particularly important to me,
> so I'm hoping you can update the package with the above points 
> in mind.
> 
> Thanks for your email.

May I recommend to more documentation to the BTS... This not only helps
assessing the situation but also might help later people taking a look
at the same bugs -- to avoid duplicate work.

Without the informatiion in this RFS this bug would be clearly a wontfix,
but when #884176 is severity important, this might be in a scope of a
NMU. But please check with kibi ask asked above...

Remove the moreinfo tag when ready.

Thanks for contributing to Debian!

-- 
tobi


> --
> Hugh McMaster

Bug#867731: RFS: smart-mode-line/2.10.1-1 [ITP]

2018-01-22 Thread Juhani Numminen 
Juhani Numminen kirjoitti 22.01.2018 klo 23:24:
> Nicholas D Steeves kirjoitti 22.01.2018 klo 21:10:
> 
>> I use this package every day and have updated the package several
>> times in the last year.  It's currently at Policy 4.1.3 and dh/compat
>> level 11.  Please consider sponsoring :-)
> 
> The current git repository is hosted on Alioth, which will be shut down and 
> replaced
> by Salsa[1]. You should probably migrate the repository there.
> 
> It seems that there isn't a Salsa team corresponding to pkg-emacsen yet, so I 
> suggest you
> coordinate with the pkg-emacsen folks to create one.

Oh, now I see that there exists such a team. :) (But apparently searching for 
emacsen-team
on the search bar on the top right corner on the Salsa front page won't find 
it. Maybe that
only searches for projects.)

I still think you should update your Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser for the new 
repository.
https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/smart-mode-line

Juhani

Bug#888005: marked as done (RFS: ncurses-hexedit/0.9.7+orig-1 [ITA])

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:02:24 +0100
with message-id <20180123020224.2papzno5nhhaa...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#888005: RFS: ncurses-hexedit/0.9.7+orig-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #888005,
regarding RFS: ncurses-hexedit/0.9.7+orig-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
888005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888005
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ncurses-hexedit"

 * Package name: ncurses-hexedit
   Version : 0.9.7+orig-1
   Upstream Author : Adam Rogoyski 
 * URL : http://www.rogoyski.com/adam/programs/hexedit/
 * License : GPL-2.0+
   Section : editors

  It builds this binary package:

ncurses-hexedit - Edit files/disks in hex, ASCII and EBCDIC

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/ncurses-hexedit


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ncurses-hexedit/ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7+orig-1.dsc

  Changes have also been pushed to 
https://salsa.debian.org/e7appew-guest/ncurses-hexedit.git.

  Changes since the last upload:

  * New maintainer. (Closes: #873553)
  * Convert source to '3.0 (quilt)' format.
  * Build with Debhelper compat level 11. (Closes: #595051) (LP: #881825)
  * debian/control:
- Add homepage details.
- Indicate compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.3.
- Add VCS details.
  * debian/rules:
- Build with all hardening flags set.
  * debian/patches:
- Update autoconf files for version 2.69.
- Fix conflicting definitions of ncurses' WINDOW. (Closes: #701670)
- Generate an INFO-DIR-SECTION without ".info" for info file.
  (Closes: #551671)
- Fix compilation warnings.
- Don't prompt about quitting without saving if file is unmodified.
  (Closes: #652947)
- If started in read-only mode, keep this mode for subsequent
  files too.
  * Remove trailing white spaces from changelog.
  * Add watch file.
  * Revert to using unrepacked upstream tarball, since renaming the
project's top-level directory is no longer necessary with current
standards.
  * Convert debian/copyright to DEP-5 format and update.
  * Add debian/gbp.conf.


  Regards,
   Carlos Maddela
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:39:28AM +1100, Carlos Maddela wrote:
>  * Package name: ncurses-hexedit
>Version : 0.9.7+orig-1

>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>   * New maintainer. (Closes: #873553)
>   * Convert source to '3.0 (quilt)' format.
>   * Build with Debhelper compat level 11. (Closes: #595051) (LP: #881825)
>   * debian/control:
> - Add homepage details.
> - Indicate compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.3.
> - Add VCS details.
>   * debian/rules:
> - Build with all hardening flags set.
>   * debian/patches:
> - Update autoconf files for version 2.69.
> - Fix conflicting definitions of ncurses' WINDOW. (Closes: #701670)
> - Generate an INFO-DIR-SECTION without ".info" for info file.
>   (Closes: #551671)
> - Fix compilation warnings.
> - Don't prompt about quitting without saving if file is unmodified.
>   (Closes: #652947)
> - If started in read-only mode, keep this mode for subsequent
>   files too.
>   * Remove trailing white spaces from changelog.
>   * Add watch file.
>   * Revert to using unrepacked upstream tarball, since renaming the
> project's top-level directory is no longer necessary with current
> standards.
>   * Convert debian/copyright to DEP-5 format and update.
>   * Add debian/gbp.conf.

✓

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out,
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the
⠈⠳⣄ sky.  Your cat demands food.  The priority should be obvious...--- End Message ---

Bug#887907: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-back/0.26.2-1)

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:30:19 +0100
with message-id <20180123003019.4ip6ujm3o4jbx...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#887907: RFS: gnustep-back/0.26.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #887907,
regarding RFS: gnustep-back/0.26.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
887907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-back".  This version
requires gnustep-gui/0.26.2-1 which is in the NEW queue.  I have
included an additional link to the .dsc for convenience.

 * Package name: gnustep-back
   Version : 0.26.2-1
   Upstream Author : Fred Kiefer ,
 Adam Fedor ,
 Alexander Malmberg ,
 Banlu Kemiyatorn  and many others
 * URL : http://gnustep.org
 * License : LGPL-2+ (bundles), GPL-3+ (tools)
   Section : gnustep

It builds these binary packages:

gnustep-back-common - GNUstep GUI Backend - common files
gnustep-back0.26 - GNUstep GUI Backend
gnustep-back0.26-art - GNUstep GUI Backend (art)
gnustep-back0.26-cairo - GNUstep GUI Backend (cairo)
gnustep-back0.26-xlib - GNUstep GUI Backend (xlib)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-back

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-back/gnustep-back_0.26.2-1.dsc
  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui_0.26.2-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  [ Eric Heintzmann ]
  * debian/rules:
+ Remove -shared-libgcc LDFLAG, now useless.
+ Append --as-needed LDFLAG.
+ Hardening: remove -pie option.
+ Now build depends on latest gnustep-gui package.
  * debian/control:
+ Bump Standards Versions to 4.1.0.
+ As requested by Gürkan, change his name.
  * New fix-spelling-error.patch.
  * Add a testsuite.

  [ Yavor Doganov ]
  * New upstream release 0.26.2:
+ Rename packages following the SONAME change:
  - gnustep-back0.25 -> gnustep-back0.26
  - gnustep-back0.25-art -> gnustep-back0.26-art
  - gnustep-back0.25-cairo -> gnustep-back0.26-cairo
+ New package gnustep-back0.26-xlib: prepare for removal of the art
  backend due to removal of src:libart-lgpl (Addresses: #885786).
  * debian/watch: Switch to ftp.gnustep.org; much more reliable.
  * debian/compat: Bump compat level to 11.
  * debian/rules: Replace shell comments with makefile comments; M-x
wh-cl.  Use convenience variables where possible.
(DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND): Add -Wl,--no-undefined.
(override_dh_testdir): New target to regenerate debian/control.
(override_dh_auto_configure): Substitute GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_DOC as well
when generating gnustep-back-common.install.  Configure the xlib
backend in a separate builddir; handle the generation of maintainer
scripts and .install/.links files.
(override_dh_auto_build): Pass dpkg-buildflags explicitly as OBJCFLAGS
and CFLAGS are being reset by gnustep-make.  Build documentation.
Pass $(optim) for proper noopt support.  Pass tools=no and fonts=no to
the cairo build.  Remove unnecessary tools recipe; add one for xlib.
(override_dh_auto_install): Install documentation and the xlib
backend.
(override_dh_auto_clean): Clean documentation; ignoring errors.
Simplify the recipe.
(override_dh_strip): Remove in favor of automatic -dbgsym packages.
(override_dh_shlibdeps): Add override to fix circular dependencies;
regression introduced in 0.25.0-1 (Closes: #882078).  Thanks to Bill
Allombert for the report.
  * debian/templates/control.m4: Remove -dbg, add new package -xlib.
(Build-Depends): Require debhelper >= 11 and gnustep-make >= 2.7.0-3
for the optim variable definition.
(Section): Remove section "libs" for all packages as it is wrong
according to lintian (and to me).
(Depends): Relax dependencies on -common to ease transitions with the
ultimate goal to support partial upgrades.
(Breaks, Replaces): Remove; obsolete.
(Standards-Version): Declare compliance with 4.1.3.
  * debian/control: Regenerate.
  * debian/templates/gnustep-back-common.install.in: Add
@GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_DOC@/*.
  *

Bug#849754: guerillabackup review

2018-01-22 Thread halfdog 
Hello Michael,

Thanks for you detailed review.

Michael Lustfield wrote:
> I reviewed this packaging and came up with some issues:
> 
> - The description does nothing to explain what makes this solution unique.
>   + Why is this special?
>   + How does it even work?
>   + This should be easily gleaned from the package description.

This is the current description for reference. There is similar
topic at the end of the mail, where improvements are discussed
in detail.

===
 The tool supports asynchronous, local-coordinated, distributed
 secure backup generation, forwarding, verification, storage
 and deletion even in rugged environments. The system is open
 to integration of own code. The codebase is very small and
 kept simple to ease auditing.
 .
 Unlike business backup solutions, guerillabackup also considers
 following conditions that might be encountered with private use:
 * infrastructure uptime below 99%, e.g. machines not always powered
 * poor network connectivity, e.g. mobile access, parallel video
   streaming
 * poor physical access and anti-theft protection of machines
 * no security monitoring of machines
 .
 See /usr/share/doc/guerillabackup/Design.txt.gz section "Requirements"
 for more information.
===

> - There is a lintian override for a legitimate mistake (unindented list)

Bug#867731: RFS: smart-mode-line/2.10.1-1 [ITP]

2018-01-22 Thread Juhani Numminen 
Nicholas D Steeves kirjoitti 22.01.2018 klo 21:10:

> I use this package every day and have updated the package several
> times in the last year.  It's currently at Policy 4.1.3 and dh/compat
> level 11.  Please consider sponsoring :-)

The current git repository is hosted on Alioth, which will be shut down and 
replaced
by Salsa[1]. You should probably migrate the repository there.

It seems that there isn't a Salsa team corresponding to pkg-emacsen yet, so I 
suggest you
coordinate with the pkg-emacsen folks to create one.

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/12/msg3.html

Regards,
Juhani

Bug#868435: marked as done (RFS: parsington/1.0.1-1 [ITP])

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:43:41 +0200
with message-id 
and subject line Closing RFS: parsington/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #868435,
regarding RFS: parsington/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
868435: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: parsington
  Version : 1.0.1-1
  Upstream Author : Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin-Madison
* URL : https://github.com/scijava/parsington
* License : BSD
  Section : java

Please check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/parsington.git

Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #868432)

Regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:12:47 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant  wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 13:19:24 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant 
>  wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:
> > * Package name: parsington
> This RFS is placed on hold, whilst the maintenance of this package is 
> transferred to the Debian Java Team.

I think this RFS was fulfilled, under the name libparsington-java.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libparsington-java

Juhani--- End Message ---

Bug#868430: marked as done (RFS: imglib2/4.3.0-1 [ITP])

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:38:31 +0200
with message-id 
and subject line Closing RFS: imglib2/4.3.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #868430,
regarding RFS: imglib2/4.3.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
868430: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868430
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name: pyzo
  Version : 4.3.0-1
  Upstream Author : Tobias Pietzsch, Curtis Rueden et al.
* URL : http://imglib2.net/
* License : BSD
  Section : java

Please check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/imglib2.git

Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #868381)

Regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:13:51 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant  wrote:

> This RFS is placed on hold, whilst the maintenance of this package is 
> transferred to the Debian Java Team.

It seems to me that this RFS is not needed any more, and that the package is now
called libimglib2-java.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libimglib2-java


Juhani--- End Message ---

Bug#850648: marked as done (RFS: cohomcalg/0.31b+ds-1 [ITP])

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:23:03 +0200
with message-id <28eaae46-71c7-62c4-52ef-4b4f791e6...@gmail.com>
and subject line Closing RFS: cohomcalg/0.31b+ds-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #850648,
regarding RFS: cohomcalg/0.31b+ds-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
850648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cohomcalg":

 * Package name: cohomcalg
   Version : 0.31b+ds-1
   Upstream Author : Ralph Blumenhagen, Benjamin Jurke, Thorsten Rahn,
 Helmut Roschy
 * URL : http://wwwth.mpp.mpg.de/members/bjurke/cohomcalg/
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : math

It builds those binary packages:

  cohomcalg - sheaf cohomology of line bundles on toric varieties

It is available in the Debian Science git repository:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/cohomcalg.git

I have also attached a patch to add cohomcalg to the Debian Science blends
mathematics task.

Thanks!
Doug Torrance
>From f9fc2e63b802f289e8d045fa4c416fb441201716 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Torrance 
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:48:31 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Add cohomcalg to mathematics task.

---
 tasks/mathematics | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tasks/mathematics b/tasks/mathematics
index 726074b..d363c25 100644
--- a/tasks/mathematics
+++ b/tasks/mathematics
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ Depends: planarity, flintqs
 
 Depends: rubiks
 
+Depends: cohomcalg
+
 X-Removed: Packages removed from Debian
 
 Depends: octaviz
-- 
2.7.4

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing this bug report since Doug's cohomcalg/0.32+ds-1 was indeed sponsored 
by Andreas.
It's in the NEW queue now.
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/cohomcalg_0.32+ds-1.html

Juhani--- End Message ---

Bug#867731: RFS: smart-mode-line/2.10.1-1 [ITP]

2018-01-22 Thread Nicholas D Steeves 
Hi,

I use this package every day and have updated the package several
times in the last year.  It's currently at Policy 4.1.3 and dh/compat
level 11.  Please consider sponsoring :-)

Cheers,
Nicholas


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#887595: RFS: xft/2.3.2-1.1 [NMU]

2018-01-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo 
Control: tag -1 moreinfo

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:43:01AM +, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
>   * Non-maintainer upload.
>   * debian/control:
> - Mark libxft-dev Multi-Arch: same (Closes: #884176).

So, in #884176 you attacted a debdiff also fixing #843837 - where did it
end?
Anyway, if you want to fix that but by that patch, please first forward
it upstream and put valid DEP-3 headers on it.


(and I'm a fan of the multiarch/bootstrap efforts, so I'm up for
sponsoring NMUs accomplishing that, but not that I haven't marked myself
as "owner" of this RFS, I'm more than happy if anybody picks it up
instead of me)

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#873094: RFS: granite/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

2018-01-22 Thread Jeremy Bicha 
Yangfl,

Maybe you didn't see the recent comments Tobias posted on
https://bugs.debian.org/873094

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

Bug#887665: marked as done (RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1)

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:27:02 +0100
with message-id <9a949305-eb64-d90a-4c6d-76c190a43...@immerda.ch>
and subject line Re: Bug#887665: RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #887665,
regarding RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
887665: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887665
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard"

* Package name : usbguard
  Version  : 0.7.1+ds-1
  Upstream Author  : Muri Nicanor 
* Url  : https://dkopecek.github.io/usbguard/
* Licenses : GPL-2+,GPL-3+,CC-BY-SA-3.0,FSFULLR,public-domain
  Programming Lang : C
  Section  : utils

 The USBGuard software framework helps to protect your computer against
 rogue USB devices (a.k.a. BadUSB) by implementing basic whitelisting
 and blacklisting capabilities based on device attributes.

It builds those binary packages:

  * libusbguard0
  * usbguard
  * usbguard-applet-qt

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/usbguard

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/usbguard/usbguard_0.7.1+ds-1.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://salsa.debian.org/muri-guest/usbguard

More information about usbguard can be obtained from
https://dkopecek.github.io/usbguard/


Changes since last upload:

  * New upstream version 0.7.1 (Closes: #868160)
  * remove dh-systemd due to being part of debhelper (>= 9.20160709)
  * bump standards version
  * add correct section to libusbguard0
  * remove parsing of dpkg-genchangelog
  * updated the watch file for the new github url, modified the archive name
so the correct version will be used and removed the signature line, as
that version is not signed
  * remove patches that have been upstreamed
  * add asciidoctor to build depends

Regards,
  Muri Nicanor





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

thanks Adam for the review and the input. There was a new usbguard
release today, so i'll close this RFS and reopen a new one for the new
release soon. I'll fix the mentioned shortcomings in the new upload.

cheers,
muri



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#878268: marked as done (RFS: streamlink/0.9.0+dfsg.2-3 [ITP])

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:20:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: streamlink/0.9.0+dfsg.2-3 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #878268,
regarding RFS: streamlink/0.9.0+dfsg.2-3 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
878268: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878268
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink"

 * Package name: streamlink
   Version : 0.8.1-2
   Upstream Author : Streamlink Team
 * URL : https://streamlink.github.io/
 * License : BSD-2-clause, Apache-2.0, MIT/Expat, SIL-OFL-1.1
   Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python3-streamlink - Python module for extracting video streams from
various websites
  python3-streamlink-doc - CLI for extracting video streams from various
websites (documentation)
  streamlink - CLI for extracting video streams from various websites to
a video

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
  https://mentors.debian.net/package/streamlink


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.8.1-2.dsc

This package is a fork of livestreamer package which is going to be removed
(See #877485).

I have already working packaging here (which is why the version is not -1):
  https://github.com/amurzeau/streamlink-debian.

Some notes about it:
 - I use git-buildpackage with pristine-tar to keep the exact original
   tar.
 - I have additional files .travis.yml and travis-build/ used to build
   packages on travis-ci.
 - The generated changes file after build does not include the upstream
   signature (orig.tar.gz.asc) as git-buildpackage does not handle it
   yet. Because of that, I have the lintian warning
   orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature on the changes file.
   (See #872864).

Regards,
--
 Alexis Murzeau
 PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC  2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package streamlink version 0.9.0+dfsg.2-3 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/streamlink--- End Message ---

Bug#884456: marked as done (RFS: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin/1.1.6+ds+git20180111-1 [ITP])

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:20:24 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin/1.1.6+ds+git20180111-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #884456,
regarding RFS: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin/1.1.6+ds+git20180111-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
884456: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-deepin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin"

 * Package name: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin
   Version : 1.1.5+ds2-1
   Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co., Ltd.
 * URL : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/qt5dxcb-plugin
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

qt5dxcb-plugin - Qt platform theme integration plugin for DDE

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin_1.1.5+ds2-1.dsc

  Git packaging repository:

https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-deepin/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin.git

  Changes since the last upload:

 deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin (1.1.5+ds2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial release. (Closes: #884274)

Regards,
Boyuan Yang

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin version 1.1.6+ds+git20180111-1 is in NEW now,
and the package at mentors is not newer (2018-01-11) than the package in NEW 
(2018-01-11),
so there is currently no package to sponsor.

https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin_1.1.6+ds+git20180111-1.html
https://mentors.debian.net/package/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin

If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW,
then you can upload an updated package to mentors
and feel free to reopen this RFS 884456 or open a new RFS.--- End Message ---

Bug#888005: RFS: ncurses-hexedit/0.9.7+orig-1 [ITA]

2018-01-22 Thread Carlos Maddela 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ncurses-hexedit"

 * Package name: ncurses-hexedit
   Version : 0.9.7+orig-1
   Upstream Author : Adam Rogoyski 
 * URL : http://www.rogoyski.com/adam/programs/hexedit/
 * License : GPL-2.0+
   Section : editors

  It builds this binary package:

ncurses-hexedit - Edit files/disks in hex, ASCII and EBCDIC

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/ncurses-hexedit


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ncurses-hexedit/ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7+orig-1.dsc

  Changes have also been pushed to 
https://salsa.debian.org/e7appew-guest/ncurses-hexedit.git.

  Changes since the last upload:

  * New maintainer. (Closes: #873553)
  * Convert source to '3.0 (quilt)' format.
  * Build with Debhelper compat level 11. (Closes: #595051) (LP: #881825)
  * debian/control:
- Add homepage details.
- Indicate compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.3.
- Add VCS details.
  * debian/rules:
- Build with all hardening flags set.
  * debian/patches:
- Update autoconf files for version 2.69.
- Fix conflicting definitions of ncurses' WINDOW. (Closes: #701670)
- Generate an INFO-DIR-SECTION without ".info" for info file.
  (Closes: #551671)
- Fix compilation warnings.
- Don't prompt about quitting without saving if file is unmodified.
  (Closes: #652947)
- If started in read-only mode, keep this mode for subsequent
  files too.
  * Remove trailing white spaces from changelog.
  * Add watch file.
  * Revert to using unrepacked upstream tarball, since renaming the
project's top-level directory is no longer necessary with current
standards.
  * Convert debian/copyright to DEP-5 format and update.
  * Add debian/gbp.conf.


  Regards,
   Carlos Maddela

Bug#883627: marked as done (RFS: network-manager-fortisslvpn/1.2.8-1 [ITP] -- NetworkManager Fortinet SSLVPN plugin)

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:19:08 +0100
with message-id <81fd4784-ff66-4843-29f5-79acb1870...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: network-manager-fortisslvpn/1.2.6-1 [ITP] -- 
NetworkManager Fortinet SSLVPN plugin
has caused the Debian Bug report #883627,
regarding RFS: network-manager-fortisslvpn/1.2.8-1 [ITP] -- NetworkManager 
Fortinet SSLVPN plugin
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
883627: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883627
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hello":

 * Package name: network-manager-fortisslvpn
   Version : 1.2.6-1
   Upstream Author : Lubomir Rintel 
 * URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/NetworkManager/
 * License : GPLv2+
   Section : net

It builds those binary packages:

  network-manager-fortisslvpn   - network management framework (Fortinet 
SSLVPN plugin core)
  network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome - network management framework (Fortinet 
SSLVPN plugin GNOME GUI)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://people.freedesktop.org/~lkundrak/network-manager-fortisslvpn/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://people.freedesktop.org/~lkundrak/network-manager-fortisslvpn/network-manager-fortisslvpn_1.2.6-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 network-manager-fortisslvpn (1.2.6-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium

* Initial release. (Closes: #835938)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:25:20 +0100 Lubomir Rintel  wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 01:59:39 +0100 Michael Biebl  wrote:
> 
> > Would be great if you apply the attached patch and re-upload 1.2.8-1.
> > I'm happy to sponsor the package then.
> 
> Thanks, applied:
> 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/network-manager-fortisslvpn/network-manager-fortisslvpn_1.2.8-1.dsc


Package looks fine, I've uploaded it, thus closing this RFS bug.

Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Default permissions for possible sensitive information places

2018-01-22 Thread Frédéric Bonnard 
Hi,
upstream of rear software installs /etc/rear/ /etc/rear/cert/ and
/etc/rear/local.conf with no permissions to group and others, because
those may contain sensitive information (I guess encryption key for
example) ; details here : https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/1666
I'm wondering about this being the good thing to do, by default, given
that there's nothing confidential by default and that it diverges by
what is suggested by the policy :
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#permissions-and-owners
- /etc/rear/ and /etc/rear/cert/ : I guess maybe it would make sense for
a directory targeted to store keys for example and even in that case,
only setting correct permission for the key files themselves would be
enough.
- local.conf : for configuration file that may contain sensitive
information but which default version (from the package) doesn't include
anything, does that make sense ? the admin putting sensible information
should then change the configuration file permission to reflect that.

Also rear/backups in general is a sysadmin activity and hiding all
/etc/rear to non-root won't be an issue.
And I agree that setting by default restrictive permission may be good as
the admin backuping won't even need to take care of that.
But this does more than just what's needed (atomic, necessary and
sufficient based on the actual content) and deviates from Debian
defaults. So I'm a bit confused.

Do you know of some Debian usage in that case or if I missed some policy
point ?

F.


pgpYf0RurusWS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#887595: RFS: xft/2.3.2-1.1 [NMU]

2018-01-22 Thread Hugh McMaster 
Hi Julien,

On Monday, 22 January 2018 7:49 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> IMO this is nothing that warrants a NMU, or an upload on its own.

Sure, perhaps not in the current RFS form. That said, I'm hoping we can 
reach some agreement on releasing a new version of xft. Here are some 
reasons why.

1. Cyril Brulebois is listed in Uploaders, but he hasn't been part of 
   Debian XFS for some years now.
2. The VCS URL in the Package Tracker no longer functions, due to the 
   recent migration to Debian Salsa.
3. The package standards version is 3.9.2 ("ancient").
4. The lack of Multi-Arch awareness blocks multi-arch support for 
   libpango1.0-dev and libfontforge-dev. These packages, in turn, 
   block Wine.
5. As for fixing other bugs, #843837 should be tagged 'wontfix', 
   since it is an upstream issue (fixed some time ago). I don't know 
   enough about the other three bugs to comment.

Marking libxft-dev Multi-Arch: same is particularly important to me,
so I'm hoping you can update the package with the above points 
in mind.

Thanks for your email.

--
Hugh McMaster

Bug#883627: RFS: network-manager-fortisslvpn/1.2.6-1 [ITP] -- NetworkManager Fortinet SSLVPN plugin

2018-01-22 Thread Lubomir Rintel 
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 01:59:39 +0100 Michael Biebl  wrote:

> Would be great if you apply the attached patch and re-upload 1.2.8-1.
> I'm happy to sponsor the package then.

Thanks, applied:

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/network-manager-fortisslvpn/network-manager-fortisslvpn_1.2.8-1.dsc