Bug#888859: RFS: iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Control: owner -1 w...@debian.org Hi, I'm releasing the ownership of this bug since I'm not able to deal with it due to work in real life. Sorry for the inconvenience. On 22 February 2018 at 16:05, Yangfl wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:11:18 + Lumin wrote: >> control: owner -1 ! >> control: tags -1 +moreinfo >> >> Hi Yangfl, > > Hi Lumin, > > Confused I haven't received your mail via BTS. Much thanks for your > interest and willing to sponsor. > >> * URL : http://www.iolang.com >> Are you sure this URL is correct? > > Sorry, this RFS header is copied from old ITP. The one in d/control should be > >> Thank you for your work. Here are some comments >> on your package. >> >> * -dfsg: would you please explain what is removed >> from original source in README.source? > > d/copyright should have provided a list of removed files (see Files-Excluded). > > By the way, I have made a PR to upstream to remove ConvertUTF and it > has accepted. The next release will not affected by this. > >> * please fix the following lintian I/W/E: >> (reproduce with debuild -S) >> >> P: iolang source: insane-line-length-in-source-file docs/js/jquery.js >> line length is 517 characters (>512) >> P: iolang source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object >> docs/js/jquery.js line length is 517 characters (>512) >> N: jquery >> O: iolang source: source-is-missing docs/js/jquery.js line length is >> 517 characters (>512) >> P: iolang source: source-contains-prebuilt-doxygen-documentation >> addons/SGML/source/libsgml-1.1.4/docs/html/ >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description >> addons-fix-missing-depends.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description addons-no-rpath.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description >> libs-fix-shlib-with-executable-stack.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description libs-soname.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description >> modules-fix-atk-libname.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description >> modules-fix-clutter-include-dirs.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description >> modules-fix-openssl-wrong-variable-names.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description modules-fix-qdbm-path.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description modules-mariadb.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-sse.patch >> I: iolang source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-static.patch >> E: iolang source: debian-rules-is-dh_make-template >> I: iolang source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing >> >> * the package ships a copy of jquery.js, we should be able to use >> the one provided by libjs-jquery. > > Added deps on libjs-jquery. Source of jquery.js is now provided. > > Also move Flux resource files to /usr/share/ . > >> Your package was successfully built on debomatic-amd64, >> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1/buildlog >> >> I'll check copyright later. >> >> -- >> Best, >> >> -- Best,
Bug#892992: marked as done (RFS: xtables-addons/3.0-0.1 [RC] [NMU])
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2018 20:05:13 +1100 with message-id <3427112.0K99pLzcQC@deblab> and subject line Re: Bug#892992: RFS: xtables-addons/3.0-0.1 [RC] [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #892992, regarding RFS: xtables-addons/3.0-0.1 [RC] [NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 892992: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892992 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xtables-addons" * Package name: xtables-addons Version : 3.0-0.1 Upstream Author : Jan Engelhardt * URL : http://xtables-addons.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: xtables-addons-common - Extensions targets and matches for iptables [tools, libs] xtables-addons-dkms - Extensions targets and matches for iptables xtables-addons-source - Extensions targets and matches for iptables [modules sources] To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xtables-addons Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xtables-addons/xtables-addons_3.0-0.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Non-maintainer upload. [ Dominik George ] * New upstream release + Support for Linux 4.12, 4.13, 4.14 (Closes: #872077) + Fix buffer overflow in xt_DNETMAP (Closes: #877362) * Update Standards-Version and compat level. + Remove explicit dependency on dh-autoreconf. [ Mateusz Łukasik ] * New upstream release 3.0. [ Helmut Grohne ] * Fix FTCBFS: cross.patch (Closes: #866673) Last maintainer upload was 2 years ago, RC exists a few month. Regards, Mateusz Łukasik --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thursday, 15 March 2018 9:05:33 PM AEDT Mateusz Łukasik wrote: >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xtables-addons" > > * Package name: xtables-addons > Version : 3.0-0.1 Uploaded. :) Thank you very much, Mateusz. Please consider becoming maintainer of this package. Pierre is OK to orphan xtables-addons and lately I couldn't take a proper care of it either... Best wishes, Dmitry Smirnov. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message ---
Bug#893052: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-1 [I maintain the package]
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:38:37PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 08:06:13PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Hi, > > uploaded the package. I've to make up my mind about the kind of linux > > specific > > arch all packaging stuff. > > > > Sven > > Thank you for sponsoring this upload :-) > > Should I leave filing a wishlist bug against dpkg-dev, for the > creation of an arch: linux-all to you, or go ahead and do it myself? I would be surprised if that's the first time we've this issue. So I wanted to search for prior discussions first. Sven
Re: .dput.cf: File contains no section headers.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:54:47PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 06:48:47PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > Read 'How to upload packages to mentors.debian.net?' at [0].
> >
> > [0] https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
> >
>
> Euh ... that is also '.ini' format.
> Over here I have dput-ng with documention saying I should
> provide JSON, so I did.
>
> Got parse error ".dput.cf: File contains no section headers."
>
> | stappers@bob:~/src/foo-pkg/foobarbaz$ dput ../foobarbaz.4.0-1_armhf.changes
> | Error parsing file /home/stappers/.dput.cf: File contains no section
> headers.
> | file: /home/stappers/.dput.cf, line: 1
> | '{\n'
> | stappers@bob:~/src/foo-pkg/foobarbaz$ which dput
> | /usr/bin/dput
> | stappers@bob:~/src/foo-pkg/foobarbaz$ dpkg -S $( which dput )
> | dput-ng: /usr/bin/dput
> | stappers@bob:~/src/foo-pkg/foobarbaz$
>
>
> Using '.ini' format got it working.
>
> Content is as at [0]
Please don't ignore my emails.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2018/03/msg00270.html
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: .dput.cf WAS: Upload failed: 301 Moved Permanently
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:31:39AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > I've to admit: I'm not really getting your point, Mattia. Like I said in my first post¹, just to fulfil my curiosity. As an admin of mentors.d.n (and as a chronically lazy person) I'm curious as to why anybody would go to the extra length of using a local configuration when both dput and dput-ng ship with good enough default one. Nothing more, really. ¹ https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2018/03/msg00268.html -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: .dput.cf WAS: Upload failed: 301 Moved Permanently
On 18-03-21 12:58:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:31:39AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > I've to admit: I'm not really getting your point, Mattia. > > Like I said in my first post¹, just to fulfil my curiosity. > As an admin of mentors.d.n (and as a chronically lazy person) I'm > curious as to why anybody would go to the extra length of using a local > configuration when both dput and dput-ng ship with good enough default > one. > Nothing more, really. Alright - we're on the same page, because I'm using the default config now, again. :) Thanks for your work on m.d.n! Cheers, Georg signature.asc Description: Digital signature
How can i make my innovative software a part of debian project ?
I have developed a new software as a result of a scientific research and a want to share my study as an open-source software. This software offers a new and useful method for C/C++ multi-thread computing. More specificity, it acts as an autonomous management system for the thread synchronization tasks. Not surprisingly, application development with the this software is much more easy than classical C/C++ threading libraries thanks to the its autonomous management system. This software also includes a nice and useful GUI (Graphical User Interface ) and therefore, it is easy to use. The copyright application for the software has been performed in 12 March 2018 to US copyright office and the software is ready to use. I have developed this software in order to prove my coding skills and I want to ask you that how can i make my own software a part of the debian project. Finally, I want to publish my software with BCD -3 clause license. Is this license proper for the debian system ? Thank you for your interest and best regards. Erkam Murat Bozkurt M.Sc in Control Systems Engineering
Re: How can i make my innovative software a part of debian project ?
This can be helpful for you: https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers El 21/03/18 a les 13:15, Erkam Murat Bozkurt ha escrit: > I have developed a new software as a result of a scientific research and > a want to share my study as an open-source software. This software > offers a new and useful method for C/C++ multi-thread computing. More > specificity, it acts as an autonomous management system for the thread > synchronization tasks. Not surprisingly, application development with > the this software is much more easy than classical C/C++ threading > libraries thanks to the its autonomous management system. This software > also includes a nice and useful GUI (Graphical User Interface ) and > therefore, it is easy to use. > > > The copyright application for the software has been performed in 12 > March 2018 to US copyright office and the software is ready to use. I > have developed this software in order to prove my coding skills and I > want to ask you that how can i make my own software a part of the debian > project. Finally, I want to publish my software with BCD -3 clause > license. Is this license proper for the debian system ? > > > Thank you for your interest and best regards. > > Erkam Murat Bozkurt > > M.Sc in Control Systems Engineering > >
Re: How can i make my innovative software a part of debian project ?
The most important question is whether you want to maintain the software yourself or expect someone else to do that. As a software author please also read https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How can i make my innovative software a part of debian project ?
Hello, I suggest maintaining your package. I've free time and wide involved in Open source software. Regards, 2018-03-21 13:43 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : > The most important question is whether you want to maintain the software > yourself or expect someone else to do that. > As a software author please also read https://wiki.debian.org/ > UpstreamGuide > > -- > WBR, wRAR >
Bug#893716: RFS: deepin-screen-recorder/2.7.3-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deepin-screen-recorder" * Package name: deepin-screen-recorder Version : 2.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co., Ltd. * URL : https://www.deepin.org/ * License : GPLv3 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: deepin-screen-recorder - Simple recorder tools for deepin To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/deepin-screen-recorder Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/deepin-screen-recorder/deepin-screen-recorder_2.7.3-1.dsc Regards, Yangfl
Bug#887699: marked as done (RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:23:02 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #887699, regarding RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 887699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887699 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Note: The first time upload was rejected by ftpmaster due to license issues. I have fixed them in this version. This ITP package will fix an RC bug of another package lua-torch-nn, because lua-moses was added as a new dependency by upstream. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses" * Package name: lua-moses Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-1 Upstream Author : https://github.com/Yonaba * URL : https://github.com/Yonaba/Moses * License : MIT Section : interpreters It builds those binary packages: lua-moses - Utility library for functional programming in Lua To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-moses Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-moses/lua-moses_1.6.1+git20170613-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-1/buildlog Changes since the last upload: lua-moses (1.6.1+git20170613-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release. (Closes: #870124) -- Best, --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package lua-moses version 1.6.1+git20170613-1 is in NEW now, and the package at mentors is not newer (2018-01-19) than the package in NEW (2018-01-19), so there is currently no package to sponsor. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/lua-moses_1.6.1+git20170613-1.html https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-moses Please remove the package from mentors or mark it "needs sponsor = no". If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW, then you can upload an updated package to mentors and feel free to reopen this RFS 887699 or open a new RFS.--- End Message ---
Bug#887562: marked as done (RFS: ries/2017.02.12-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:23:02 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: ries/2017.02.12-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #887562, regarding RFS: ries/2017.02.12-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 887562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887562 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 887561 by -1 X-Debbugs-CC: j...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ries" * Package name: ries Version : 2017.02.12 Upstream Author : Robert P. Munafo * URL : https://mrob.com/pub/ries/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: C Description : find algebraic equations, given their solution Given a number, ries searches for algebraic equations in one variable that have a solution (root) near that number. It avoids trivial or reducible solutions like ``x/x = 1''. If rhe input is an integer, ries can find an exact solution expressed in terms of single-digit integers. The output gives progressively ``more complex'' equations that come progressively closer to matching the input number. It builds a single binary package: ries. The packaging repository is available on alioth.d.o: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/ries.git Best, nicoo signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package ries version 2017.02.12-1 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/ries--- End Message ---
Bug#893491: marked as done (RFS: libexif-gtk/0.4.0-1)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:32:17 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libexif-gtk/0.4.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #893491, regarding RFS: libexif-gtk/0.4.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 893491: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893491 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors and Debian PhotoTools Team, I am looking for a sponsor for a Team Upload of the package "libexif-gtk". * Package name: libexif-gtk Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Dan Fandrich * URL : https://libexif.github.io * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : libs The source builds the following binary packages: * libexif-gtk-dev - Library providing GTK+ widgets to display/edit EXIF tags (develop * libexif-gtk5 - Library providing GTK+ widgets to display/edit EXIF tags To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libexif-gtk Alternatively, you can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libe/libexif-gtk/libexif-gtk_0.4.0-1.dsc More information about libexif-gtk can be obtained from https://libexif.github.io Changes since the last upload: * Team upload. [ Emmanuel Bouthenot ] * Remove the DM-Upload-Allowed field from debian/control. [ Hugh McMaster ] * New upstream release. * debhelper update: - Update package compatibility to level 11. * Package libexif-gtk5 symbols. * debian/*.docs: - Package the NEWS file. * debian/*.install: - Use multi-arch directories. * debian/control: - Build-Depend on debhelper version 11. - Build-Depend on libexif-dev 0.6.21. - Remove dh-autoreconf from the Build-Depends list. - Raise Standards-Version from 3.9.2 to 4.1.3. - Update the Homepage field to point to https://salsa.debian.org. - Update the Vcs-fields to point to https://salsa.debian.org. - Update the package order. - Mark libexif-gtk5 and libexif-gtk-dev Multi-Arch: same. * debian/copyright: - Update the Format specification URI. - Update the Source URL field to point to https://libexif.github.io. - Update copyright information for libexif-gtk 0.4.0. - Switch to LGPL-2.1+ for libexif-gtk 0.4.0. * debian/patches: - Drop patches superseded upstream: use_autoreconf, use_deprecated_gtk, french_translation and german_translation. - Rebase pkgconfig_require_gtk2.patch for libexif-gtk 0.4.0. - add-am_prog_ar.patch: Add the AM_PROG_AR macro to configure.ac to avoid some automake warnings. * debian/rules: - Remove excess whitespace. - Remove '--with autoreconf' (now handled by debhelper >= level 10). - Remove dh_auto_build overrides. - Override dh_auto_clean to remove left-over build files. - Add 'hardening=+all' to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS. * debian/source/options: - Remove from package. Debhelper handles the specified options by default. * debian/watch: - Update to version 4 and switch to upstream's github repository. Regards, Hugh McMaster--- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package libexif-gtk version 0.4.0-1 is in experimental now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/libexif-gtk--- End Message ---
