Bug#896704: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC]

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

On Tuesday, April 24 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:58:30PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> Hi Fabian,
>> 
>> I can help with it, but there are two things I'd like to see first.
>
> Thank you for your review!

My pleasure.  Thanks for the work on the package!

>> 1) There are no Vcs-* fields, and it's unclear to me where the git
>> repository for the package is located (I couldn't find it on
>> salsa.d.o).
>
> I did not maintain the package in a public Git repository so far, so I
> created a fresh repository, imported my changes and put it on Salsa:
>
>   https://salsa.debian.org/wolff-guest/python-picklable-itertools
>
> I have added Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser fields accordingly.

Thanks, much appreciated.  I can also create a repository under the
Debian namespace on salsa if you want.

Or you can also move the package under the Debian Python Modules Team
umbrella, if it makes more sense.  Packaging Python modules with the
DPMT is the preferred way nowadays, but that's really up to you (and
just to be clear, I have no problem if you decide to maintain the
package by yourself).

>> 2) If having the Python 2 version of this package is important for some
>> reason, could you please override the lintian warning
>> ("new-package-should-not-package-python2-module")?
>
> I think that the Python 2 version is not really important; in fact, I
> did not even include it in the original package, but my previous
> sponsor for this package suggested that I should add it (see #841228).

Oh, well.  I don't want to go against Gianfranco here :-).  I understand
his reasoning, and actually there's a very recent thread developing on
debian-devel about this exact topic; see:

  

> I have now simply removed the Python 2 package from debian/control; is
> this sufficient, or do I have to do anything more than that?

I think it's best if we keep the package unchanged for now.  Sorry about
this extra round-trip, but can you please re-add the Python 2 package?

Actually, I've just noticed that the lintian flag in question
("new-package-should-not-package-python2-module") only applies to the
first upload of the package, and will actually be gone once we upload
this next version, so there's really nothing that needs to be done from
your part about it.  I'm sorry about the noise.

Once you reintroduce the Python 2 package, I'll do the upload.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

[Nicholas D Steeves]

Dear Backports Team and Mentors,

I am still pursuing sponsorship of a stretch-backport of calibre and
its dependencies.

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:15:26PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my backport of "lxml".  It is needed
> for a bpo of calibre.  I am collaborating with Norbert Preining for
> the calibre and html5-parser backports, but have not received a reply
> from Matthias Klose wrt lxml.
> 
>   https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2018/01/msg4.html

Package name: lxml
Version : 4.2.1-1~bpo9+1
Upstream Author : Stefan Behnel 
URL : http://lxml.de/
License : PSF, BSD, MIT, and GPL
Section : python

> It builds these binary packages:
> 
>   python-lxml - pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries
>   python-lxml-dbg - pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries 
> (debug ext
>   python-lxml-doc - pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries 
> (documenta
>   python3-lxml - pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries
>   python3-lxml-dbg - pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries 
> (debug ext
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
> URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/lxml

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
 
   dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lxml/lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1.dsc
 
> Finally, one can download it with git using this command.
> 
>   git clone https://salsa.debian.org/sten-guest/lxml.git \
>   && git checkout stretch-backports
> 
> More information about lxml can be obtained from http://lxml.de/.

Changes since the last upload:

lxml (4.2.1-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium

  * Rebuild for stretch-backports.

 -- Nicholas D Steeves   Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:55:28 -0400

lxml (4.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#893919: RFS: yasnippet-snippets/0.2-1

[Nicholas D Steeves]

Hi Chris,

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:38:13AM +0100, Chris Lamb  wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
> 
> > If you have time to sponsor it I'd very much appreciate it :-)
> 
> Link? :)
> 
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> -- 
>   ,''`.
>  : :'  : Chris Lamb, Debian Project Leader
>  `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
>`-

Here are the up-to-date links:

mentors -> https://mentors.debian.net/package/yasnippet-snippets
dget -> 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yasnippet-snippets/yasnippet-snippets_0.2-1.dsc
git -> https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/yasnippet-snippets.git

The order of upload for src:elpy-1.19-1 and
src:yasnippet-snippets-0.2-1 also doesn't matter at this time, because
the changes to elpy's snippets location won't appear until these
projects' next upstream release.

Thank you :-D
Nicholas


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#896704: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC]

[Fabian Wolff]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:58:30PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Hi Fabian,
> 
> I can help with it, but there are two things I'd like to see first.

Thank you for your review!

> 1) There are no Vcs-* fields, and it's unclear to me where the git
> repository for the package is located (I couldn't find it on
> salsa.d.o).

I did not maintain the package in a public Git repository so far, so I
created a fresh repository, imported my changes and put it on Salsa:

  https://salsa.debian.org/wolff-guest/python-picklable-itertools

I have added Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser fields accordingly.

> 2) If having the Python 2 version of this package is important for some
> reason, could you please override the lintian warning
> ("new-package-should-not-package-python2-module")?

I think that the Python 2 version is not really important; in fact, I
did not even include it in the original package, but my previous
sponsor for this package suggested that I should add it (see #841228).

I have now simply removed the Python 2 package from debian/control; is
this sufficient, or do I have to do anything more than that?


I have reuploaded the package to Mentors with the aforementioned
changes.

Best regards,
Fabian

Bug#891182: marked as done (RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:26:12 +0500
with message-id <20180424182612.gj1...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #891182,
regarding RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
891182: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891182
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ssh-tools"

 * Package name: ssh-tools
   Version : 1.4-1
   Upstream Author : Sven Wick 
 * URL : https://github.com/vaporup/ssh-tools/
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

ssh-tools  - ssh-ping, ssh-version, ssh-diff, ssh-facts

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/ssh-tools


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/ssh-tools/ssh-tools_1.4-1.dsc


  Regards,
   Sven
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 10:32:18PM +0200, Sven Wick wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
> 
> still something wrong with the package?
No, I didn't have time to recheck it. I did it now and uploaded the
package, thanks for you contributions and for your patience :)

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#888859: RFS: iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1 [ITP]

[Lumin]

control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 +moreinfo

Hi Yangfl,

As discussed previously, the python script for automatically
generating the files should be added in the package.

-- 
Best,

Bug#883840: RFS: spglib/1.10.3-1 [ITP]

[Andrius Merkys]

On 04/23/2018 10:03 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> I think it is better to wait until it is either accepted or rejected.
> Once it is in unstable you can upload the fixed version much easier.

OK, I will wait for their response, then submit a RFS for -2 version with the 
recent fixes.

Best,
Andrius

-- 
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania

Bug#893919: RFS: yasnippet-snippets/0.2-1

[Chris Lamb]

Hi Nicholas,

> If you have time to sponsor it I'd very much appreciate it :-)

Link? :)


Best wishes,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb, Debian Project Leader
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#895870: closing 895870

[Yanhao Mo]

On Tue 04/24 11:46, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> close 895870 
> thanks
> 
> Sponsored.
> 
> Regards,
> Boyuan Yang

Sorry boyuan, seems that you don't have dm privilege on this package, so
the upload was rejected. I'm still waiting another interested DD to sponsor
it.

-- 
Yanhao Mo


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature