Bug#897078: RFS: fcitx-qt5/1.2.2-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org a...@debian.org czc...@debian.org Dear mentors and debian-input-method team members, I am looking for a sponsor for team package "fcitx-qt5". This upload fixes the "break" relationship of new fcitx5-module-quickphrase-editor package against the old fcitx-module-quickphrase-editor together with other minor fixes. Besides, I am looking for a DD to grant me the Master Role on Salsa packaging repository (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fcitx-qt5) so that I could push the commits onto Salsa. After that, it would be great if someone could help to delete the old packaging repository (https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-ime/fcitx-qt5.git). * Package name: fcitx-qt5 Version : 1.2.2-2 Upstream Author : Weng Xuetian* URL : https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-qt5 * License : GPL-2+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: fcitx-frontend-qt5 - Free Chinese Input Toy of X - Qt5 IM Module frontend fcitx5-module-quickphrase-editor - Flexible Input Method Framework - Quick Phrase editor module libfcitx-qt5-1 - Free Chinese Input Toy of X - D-Bus client libraries for Qt5 libfcitx-qt5-data - Free Chinese Input Toy of X - data files for Qt5 integration libfcitx-qt5-dev - Free Chinese Input Toy of X - Devel files for libfcitx-qt5 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fcitx-qt5 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fcitx-qt5/fcitx-qt5_1.2.2-2.dsc The new git packaging repo on Salsa (not updated for now): https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fcitx-qt5 The old git packaging repo on Alioth (updated for 1.2.2-2): https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-ime/fcitx-qt5.git Changes since the last upload: fcitx-qt5 (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
Bug#897077: RFS: fcitx/1:4.2.9.6-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org czc...@debian.org debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors and debian-input-method team members, I am looking for a sponsor for team package "fcitx". This upload mainly focuses on the migration of Vcs packaging repo from Alioth to Salsa, together with some other minor fixes. * Package name: fcitx Version : 1:4.2.9.6-2 Upstream Author : Weng Xuetian* URL : https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx * License : GPL-2+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: fcitx - Flexible Input Method Framework fcitx-bin - Flexible Input Method Framework - essential binaries fcitx-data - Flexible Input Method Framework - essential data files fcitx-frontend-all - Flexible Input Method Framework - frontends metapackage fcitx-frontend-gtk2 - Flexible Input Method Framework - GTK+ 2 IM Module frontend fcitx-frontend-gtk3 - Flexible Input Method Framework - GTK+ 3 IM Module frontend fcitx-frontend-qt4 - Flexible Input Method Framework - Qt4 IM Module frontend fcitx-libs - Flexible Input Method Framework - metapackage for libraries fcitx-libs-dev - Flexible Input Method Framework - library development files fcitx-module-dbus - Flexible Input Method Framework - D-Bus module and IPC frontend fcitx-module-kimpanel - Flexible Input Method Framework - KIMPanel protocol module fcitx-module-lua - Flexible Input Method Framework - Lua module fcitx-module-x11 - Flexible Input Method Framework - X11 module and XIM frontend fcitx-modules - Flexible Input Method Framework - core modules fcitx-pinyin - Flexible Input Method Framework - classic Pinyin engine fcitx-qw - Flexible Input Method Framework - QuWei engine fcitx-table - Flexible Input Method Framework - table engine fcitx-table-all - Flexible Input Method Framework - tables metapackage fcitx-table-bingchan - Flexible Input Method Framework - Bingchan table fcitx-table-cangjie - Flexible Input Method Framework - Cangjie table fcitx-table-dianbaoma - Flexible Input Method Framework - Dianbaoma table fcitx-table-erbi - Flexible Input Method Framework - Erbi table fcitx-table-wanfeng - Flexible Input Method Framework - Wanfeng table fcitx-table-wbpy - Flexible Input Method Framework - WubiPinyin table fcitx-table-wubi - Flexible Input Method Framework - Wubi table fcitx-table-ziranma - Flexible Input Method Framework - Ziranma table fcitx-tools - Flexible Input Method Framework - various tools fcitx-ui-classic - Flexible Input Method Framework - Classic user interface gir1.2-fcitx-1.0 - GObject introspection data for fcitx libfcitx-config4 - Flexible Input Method Framework - configuration support library libfcitx-core0 - Flexible Input Method Framework - library of core functions libfcitx-gclient1 - Flexible Input Method Framework - D-Bus client library for Glib libfcitx-qt0 - Flexible Input Method Framework - Meta package for Qt library libfcitx-utils0 - Flexible Input Method Framework - utility support library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fcitx Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fcitx/fcitx_4.2.9.6-2.dsc Salsa packaging repository: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fcitx Changes since the last upload: fcitx (1:4.2.9.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
Bug#897055: RFS: xml2/0.5-2 [QA]
2018-04-28 1:05 GMT+08:00 Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com>: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "xml2" as a QA upload. The > main point is the migration of Vcs fields from Alioth to Salsa: > > * Package name: xml2 >Version : 0.5-2 > * URL : [defunct] > * License : GPLv2 >Section : utils Besides, it would be great if someone could help to delete the git repository on Alioth platform ( scm.alioth.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/xml2.git ) together with this upload. -- Thanks, Boyuan Yang
Bug#897072: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.15.1-2~bpo9+1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my continued support of backported "btrfs-progs". There was an RC bug against btrfs-progs for some time, which is why it didn't migrate to testing, and why I was unable to provide an updated backport. Hi Gianfranco! I've CCed you as usual, because you usually take care of sponsoring this package. Thank you very much for your continued support :-) Package name: btrfs-progs Version : 4.15.1-2~bpo9+1 Upstream Author : linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org URL : http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ License : GPL-2 Section : admin It builds these binary packages: btrfs-progs - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities btrfs-progs-udeb - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (udeb) (udeb) btrfs-tools - transitional dummy package To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfs-progs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.15.1-2~bpo9+1.dsc More information about btrfs-progs can be obtained from http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ Changes since the last upload: btrfs-progs (4.15.1-2~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium * Rebuild for stretch-backports. -- Nicholas D SteevesFri, 27 Apr 2018 20:48:43 -0400 btrfs-progs (4.15.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * If libzstd is provided in both deb & udeb variants (such as Ubuntu bionic) enable zstd support. If libzstd is not provided with both deb & udeb variants (such as current Debian unstable) disable zstd support. If and when libzstd is provided in both deb & udeb variants, a binNMU of this package is sufficient to enable zstd support. Closes: #886968 * Drop obsolete lintian overrides. * Add alternative email address as uploader. -- Dimitri John Ledkov Sat, 21 Apr 2018 11:59:50 +0100 btrfs-progs (4.15.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release -- Dimitri John Ledkov Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:50:12 + btrfs-progs (4.14.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. * Add libzstd-dev build dependency. -- Dimitri John Ledkov Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:43:20 + btrfs-progs (4.13.3-1~bpo9+1) unstable; urgency=medium Regards, Nicholas D Steeves
Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]
[ Adding debian-legal to the Cc list. ] On Friday, April 27 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the link-grammar > package. [...] > The package is available on Mentors: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/link-grammar So, here's the other thing I noticed. d/copyright doesn't seem to be up-to-date. Also, I don't see any mention about the "debian/" directory on d/copyright, which might be a problem. I understand the package is already at this state, but I think it may be a good idea to fix it. First, I'd recommend re-checking d/copyright and making sure new copyrights are properly listed. I've found a few notices mentioning 2017/2018, so it's a good idea to list them. I understand this is a very boring task, but it's something we take seriously at Debian. As for the "debian/" directory, I *think* it should be enough to list everybody who has ever touched the debian/ directory. I used the following one-liner to get a formatted list: $ git log --date="format:%Y" --format="Copyright %ad %an <%ae>" debian/ | sort -u Copyright 2009 Ken BloomCopyright 2010 Ken Bloom Copyright 2011 Ken Bloom Copyright 2015 Wookey Copyright 2016 Gianfranco Costamagna Copyright 2016 Gianfranco Costamagna Copyright 2016 Jeremy Bicha Copyright 2016 Jeremy Bicha Copyright 2017 Adrian Bunk Copyright 2017 Jeremy Bicha Copyright 2017 Steve Langasek Copyright 2018 Fabian Wolff After massaging a bit: Copyright 2009-2011 Ken Bloom Copyright 2015 Wookey Copyright 2016 Gianfranco Costamagna Copyright 2016-2017 Jeremy Bicha Copyright 2017 Adrian Bunk Copyright 2017 Steve Langasek Copyright 2018 Fabian Wolff So I think it should be enough to put these lines there. As for the licence... Well, I'd choose the same licence as the package, although if we are to be pedantic here, the right thing would be to get in touch with everyone above and getting their confirmation. I don't know... Anyway, I am copying debian-legal here, hoping that someone more knowledgeable can shed some light. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]
On Friday, April 27 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the link-grammar > package. > > My changes are summarized in the latest changelog entry: > > link-grammar (5.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * QA upload. > * New upstream release. > * Update symbols file. > * Remove trailing whitespace from debian/changelog in order to > silence the file-contains-trailing-whitespace Lintian tag. > * Upgrade to debhelper compat version 11. > * Remove the empty file debian/patches/series. > * Use HTTPS URI in debian/watch. > * Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.1.4 (no changes). > * Add debian/python3-link-grammar.lintian-overrides to override the > python-package-depends-on-package-from-other-python-variant > Lintian tag. > * Update Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git fields in debian/control. > * Update Homepage field in debian/control and Source field in > debian/copyright to use HTTPS. > * Remove incorrect Multi-Arch fields in debian/control. > >-- Fabian WolffFri, 27 Apr 2018 15:35:36 +0200 Hey Fabian, Thanks for taking care of this package. > I have to admit that I'm not entirely sure about the Multi-Arch fields > that I removed. The link-grammar binary package installs an > architecture-dependent binary into /usr/bin, but it was marked > Multi-Arch: foreign, which looked suspect to me. Also, the > liblink-grammar-java package seems to have an incorrect Multi-Arch > field according to the Multiarch hinter: > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/link-grammar Yeah, the link-grammar package shouldn't be "Multi-Arch: foreign" indeed. As for the "Multi-Arch: same" issue, I also agree with your solution; it seems that removing the field is the most sensible approach here. > Other than that, I made sure that the autopkgtests pass and that the > package is mostly Lintian-clean, save for several > package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger warnings > (which, according to the Lintian tag documentation, might be due to a > debhelper bug) and an orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature warning > (which I would blame on git-buildpackage, see #872864). Agreed about both warnings. I have a few more things to say, but I'll send another e-mail soon. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#890878: RFS: company-irony
Oops, that last link was supposed to be https://github.com/Sarcasm/irony-mode/issues/172 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#890878: RFS: company-irony
Hi Alberto, On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:39:44PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Alberto, > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:34:07AM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > > > > Because for now the most pressing issue is that it doesn't initialise > > > properly... > > > > > > Company backend 'company-clang' could not be initialized: > > > Company found no clang executable > > > > > > This was both with no configuration (and M-x company-mode), and with > > > following upstream's README in a clean sid chroot. I opened a random > > > cpp from kdeconnect to test. I suspect a documentation of > > > configuration issue because I would have expected company-irony to > > > load rather than company-clang...but it's possibly a bug. > > > > > > Please let me know how you made company-irony work. > > > > Oh, yes, I think this is expected. From the documentation at > > > > /usr/share/doc/elpa-company-irony/README.md > > > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > > > > ## Configuration > > > > Add `company-irony` to your company backends. > > > > ~~~el > > (eval-after-load 'company > > '(add-to-list 'company-backends 'company-irony)) > > ~~~ > > > > --8<---cut here---end--->8--- > > This is exactly one of the two things that I tried. To be fair, > company-irony's autocomplete seems to function properly despite this > :-) > > Could you patch README.md to show how to remove company-clang from > company-backends, and also document that this warning is harmless (if > it's harmless). Any progress on this? In pseudo code: eval company-backends to check if company-clang is an element if non nil (eg: if the company-clang element exists) remove company-clang from company-backends (add-to-list 'company-backends 'company-irony) Justification: company-clang and company-irony should not be used at the same time, and company-irony replaces company-clang. Also, here are some resources for patching the upstream description and for improving the Debian description: https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/26cxgl/fastest_c_completion_system/ https://github.com/Sarcasm/company-irony/issues/33 https://github.com/Sarcasm/company-irony/issues/33 Happy hacking, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#896704: marked as done (RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC])
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:47:12 -0400 with message-id <8736zgy4tr@sergiodj.net> and subject line Re: Bug#896704: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #896704, regarding RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 896704: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896704 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-picklable-itertools". The current version of this package is missing a dependency, which is why it fails to import on systems where that dependency is not installed (see #896213, #896214). dh-python did not find this dependency, and I apparently only tested the package on systems that happened to have the missing dependency installed, which is why importing worked fine for me. I have now manually added the missing dependency in debian/control. In order to (hopefully) avoid this problem in the future, I have also added a Testsuite field in debian/control. My changes are summarized in the latest changelog entry: python-picklable-itertools (0.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Depend on python[3]-pkg-resources (Closes: #896213, #896214). * Add Testsuite field to debian/control. * Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.1.4 (no changes). * Upgrade to debhelper compat level 11 (no changes). -- Fabian WolffMon, 23 Apr 2018 18:30:09 +0200 The package is available on Mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-picklable-itertools https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-picklable-itertools/python-picklable-itertools_0.1.1-2.dsc Thank you! Best regards, Fabian --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Friday, April 27 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:55:00PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Or you can also move the package under the Debian Python Modules Team >> umbrella, if it makes more sense. Packaging Python modules with the >> DPMT is the preferred way nowadays, but that's really up to you (and >> just to be clear, I have no problem if you decide to maintain the >> package by yourself). > > I have joined the DPMT and created a repository there: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-picklable-itertools > > I have also set the DPMT as Maintainer in debian/control. Awesome. >> I think it's best if we keep the package unchanged for now. Sorry about >> this extra round-trip, but can you please re-add the Python 2 package? >> >> Actually, I've just noticed that the lintian flag in question >> ("new-package-should-not-package-python2-module") only applies to the >> first upload of the package, and will actually be gone once we upload >> this next version, so there's really nothing that needs to be done from >> your part about it. I'm sorry about the noise. >> >> Once you reintroduce the Python 2 package, I'll do the upload. > > I have reuploaded the package to Mentors: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-picklable-itertools I've uploaded the package now. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#897055: RFS: xml2/0.5-2 [QA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "xml2" as a QA upload. The main point is the migration of Vcs fields from Alioth to Salsa: * Package name: xml2 Version : 0.5-2 * URL : [defunct] * License : GPLv2 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: xml2 - Convert between XML, HTML, CSV and a line-oriented format To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xml2 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xml2/xml2_0.5-2.dsc Salsa packaging repository: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xml2.git Changes since the last upload: xml2 (0.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * d/control: Use Salsa repo for Vcs fields. * d/rules: Use "dh_missing --fail-missing". * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4 (no changes needed). * Bump debhelper compat to v11. Regards, Boyuan Yang
Bug#896704: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC]
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:47:12PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > I've uploaded the package now. Great, thank you!
Bug#884338: marked as done (RFS: plasma-gmailfeed/1.1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:20:29 + with message-idand subject line closing RFS: plasma-gmailfeed/1.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #884338, regarding RFS: plasma-gmailfeed/1.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 884338: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884338 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plasma-gmailfeed" Package name: plasma-gmailfeed Version : 1.1-1 Upstream Author : Anthony Vital URL : https://github.com/anthon38/gmailfeed License : GPL-3+ Section : kde It builds this binary package: plasma-gmailfeed - plasmoid that shows your Gmail feed with notifications To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/plasma-gmailfeed Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plasma-gmailfeed/plasma-gmailfeed_1.1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/anthon38/gmailfeed Regards, Nicholas D Steeves --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package plasma-gmailfeed has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#896704: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC]
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:55:00PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Or you can also move the package under the Debian Python Modules Team > umbrella, if it makes more sense. Packaging Python modules with the > DPMT is the preferred way nowadays, but that's really up to you (and > just to be clear, I have no problem if you decide to maintain the > package by yourself). I have joined the DPMT and created a repository there: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-picklable-itertools I have also set the DPMT as Maintainer in debian/control. > I think it's best if we keep the package unchanged for now. Sorry about > this extra round-trip, but can you please re-add the Python 2 package? > > Actually, I've just noticed that the lintian flag in question > ("new-package-should-not-package-python2-module") only applies to the > first upload of the package, and will actually be gone once we upload > this next version, so there's really nothing that needs to be done from > your part about it. I'm sorry about the noise. > > Once you reintroduce the Python 2 package, I'll do the upload. I have reuploaded the package to Mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-picklable-itertools Best regards, Fabian
Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the link-grammar package. My changes are summarized in the latest changelog entry: link-grammar (5.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium * QA upload. * New upstream release. * Update symbols file. * Remove trailing whitespace from debian/changelog in order to silence the file-contains-trailing-whitespace Lintian tag. * Upgrade to debhelper compat version 11. * Remove the empty file debian/patches/series. * Use HTTPS URI in debian/watch. * Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.1.4 (no changes). * Add debian/python3-link-grammar.lintian-overrides to override the python-package-depends-on-package-from-other-python-variant Lintian tag. * Update Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git fields in debian/control. * Update Homepage field in debian/control and Source field in debian/copyright to use HTTPS. * Remove incorrect Multi-Arch fields in debian/control. -- Fabian WolffFri, 27 Apr 2018 15:35:36 +0200 I have to admit that I'm not entirely sure about the Multi-Arch fields that I removed. The link-grammar binary package installs an architecture-dependent binary into /usr/bin, but it was marked Multi-Arch: foreign, which looked suspect to me. Also, the liblink-grammar-java package seems to have an incorrect Multi-Arch field according to the Multiarch hinter: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/link-grammar Other than that, I made sure that the autopkgtests pass and that the package is mostly Lintian-clean, save for several package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger warnings (which, according to the Lintian tag documentation, might be due to a debhelper bug) and an orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature warning (which I would blame on git-buildpackage, see #872864). The package is available on Mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/link-grammar Thank you! Best regards, Fabian
Bug#897045: RFS: libgpg-error/1.29-4~bpo9+1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgpg-error" * Package name: libgpg-error Version : 1.29-4~bpo9+1 Upstream Author : GnuPG developers* URL : https://www.gnupg.org/software/libgpg-error/index.html * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: gpgrt-tools - GnuPG development runtime library (executable tools) libgpg-error-dev - GnuPG development runtime library (developer tools) libgpg-error-mingw-w64-dev - library of error values and messages in GnuPG (Windows developmen libgpg-error0 - GnuPG development runtime library libgpg-error0-udeb - library for common error values and messages in GnuPG components (udeb) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgpg-error Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgpg-error/libgpg-error_1.29-4~bpo9+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: libgpg-error (1.29-4~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium * Rebuild for stretch-backports. -- Jacob Adams Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:47:15 -0400 This package is a dependency for libgpgme which I would like to backport for my GSoC 2018 project. I will file an RFS for libgpgme once the latest version migrates to testing. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#897038: RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-4 [ITA] - Ethernet bridge frame table administration
On 27 April 2018 at 13:36, Alberto Molina Coballeswrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I'm intending to adopt ebtables and integrating it into the pkg-netfilter > packaging team [0], Arturo Borrero González will sponsor > it, > but any comment will be appreciated. > > * Package name: ebtables > Version : 2.0.10.4-4 > Upstream Author : Bart De Schuymer > * URL : http://www.netfilter.org > * License : GPL-2 > > It builds those binary packages: > > ebtables - Ethernet bridge frame table administration > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/ebtables > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ebtables/ebtables_2.0.10.4-4.dsc built, checked, signed and uploaded. Please follow up with any problems reported by our Debian online services: buildd, piuparts, etc. Also, some lintian warnings to address in next iterations: W: ebtables: binary-without-manpage sbin/ebtables-restore W: ebtables: binary-without-manpage sbin/ebtables-save W: ebtables: systemd-service-file-wraps-init-script lib/systemd/system/ebtables.service ExecStart W: ebtables: systemd-service-file-wraps-init-script lib/systemd/system/ebtables.service ExecReload W: ebtables: systemd-service-file-wraps-init-script lib/systemd/system/ebtables.service ExecStop If you have the time, please refresh our wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks Thanks for your contribution to Debian :-)
Bug#897038: marked as done (RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-4 [ITA] - Ethernet bridge frame table administration)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:32:58 +0200 with message-id
Re: CMake and NDEBUG
Dear all, For reference, I paste here the solution proposed by Gert Wollny [6], and that is now getting implemented in the packages of the Orthanc ecosystem: "Add this at the top of d/rules: export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-DNDEBUG export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-DNDEBUG" Regards, Sébastien- [6] https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2018/04/msg00132.html On 25/04/18 13:36, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: Dear Debian mentors, I write this message as the maintainer of the Debian packages of the Orthanc project [1]. The Debian packages for Orthanc and its associated plugins pay attention to the fact of *not* setting "-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release", as requested by the Debian policy [2]. However, the source code of the upstream Orthanc project makes many calls to the "assert()" function of the standard library [3], in order to help with the early tracking of bugs. Because those assertions are extremely time-consuming, they should only be enabled in debug builds. The assertions can be disabled by defining the macro "NDEBUG" while compiling the software. Invoking CMake with "-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release" would make "NDEBUG" defined, at least for gcc and clang [4]. However, because packages of the Orthanc family are built using "-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None", "NDEBUG" is left undefined, and the Orthanc log warns about bad performance: $ sudo apt-get install orthanc $ head /var/log/orthanc/Orthanc.log W0424 13:01:40.158634 main.cpp:1298] Orthanc version: 1.3.2 W0424 13:01:40.158696 main.cpp:1146] Performance warning: Non-release build, runtime debug assertions are turned on I have not been able to find a definite answer about how "NDEBUG" should be properly handled. I am considering to add the following arguments wile invoking CMake in debian/rules in order to have "NDEBUG" manually defined: cmake -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=-DNDEBUG -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-DNDEBUG [...] Please someone could validate this approach wrt. Debian policy? TIA! Regards, Sébastien- PS: For sake of completeness, this question was first asked on the Debian Med mailing list, and Andreas Tille recommended me to forward it to the Debian mentors [5]. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/orthanc [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711515#51 [3] http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cassert/assert/ [4] https://stackoverflow.com/a/34314956/881731 [5] https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2018/04/msg00125.html -- Sébastien Jodogne Mail: s.jodo...@gmail.com Web: http://www.sjodogne.be/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/sjodogne
Bug#897038: RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-4 [ITA] - Ethernet bridge frame table administration
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I'm intending to adopt ebtables and integrating it into the pkg-netfilter packaging team [0], Arturo Borrero Gonzálezwill sponsor it, but any comment will be appreciated. * Package name: ebtables Version : 2.0.10.4-4 Upstream Author : Bart De Schuymer * URL : http://www.netfilter.org * License : GPL-2 It builds those binary packages: ebtables - Ethernet bridge frame table administration To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ebtables Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ebtables/ebtables_2.0.10.4-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: [ Alberto Molina Coballes ] * [bf201c6] d/control: Updating maintainers and adding uploaders (Closes: #891769) * [0f4ede2] d/control: Updating Standards-Version to 4.1.3 * [3ce5061] d/control: Adding VCS-* headers * [481b022] d/control: Updating homepage * [16740e9] d/watch: Updating url * [6d94fde] d/control: Updating debhelper to 11 * [ea71db8] d/compat: Updating to 11 * [a80dc56] d/copyright: Updating according to DEP-5 [ Arturo Borrero Gonzalez ] * [1b1ac15] d/rules: use debhelper rather than cdbs * [dd20bc3] d/patches: add compilation_warning.patch [ Alberto Molina Coballes ] * [1aa6f5d] d/patches: set LIBDIR to /lib/ebtables * [01096e7] d/control: delete dh-systemd (>= 1.5) as build-dependence * [9232eca] d/patches: add -g to produce debugging information Regards, Alberto Molina Coballes
Bug#897016: RFS: ncurses-hexedit/0.9.7+orig-4
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ncurses-hexedit" * Package name: ncurses-hexedit Version : 0.9.7+orig-4 Upstream Author : Adam Rogoyski* URL : http://www.rogoyski.com/adam/programs/hexedit/ * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : editors It builds this binary package: ncurses-hexedit - Edit files/disks in hex, ASCII and EBCDIC To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ncurses-hexedit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ncurses-hexedit/ncurses-hexedit_0.9.7+orig-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Update build dependency to libncurses-dev [ncurses6]. * Add machine-readable upstream metadata. * Indicate compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.4. Regards, Carlos Maddela