Bug#902577: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-4
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-4 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : science It builds those binary packages: libhighwayhash-dev - Fast strong hash functions: SipHash/HighwayHash (development) libhighwayhash0 - Fast strong hash functions: SipHash/HighwayHash (library) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/highwayhash Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/highwayhash/highwayhash_0~20180209-g14dedec-4.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-4/buildlog Changes since the last upload: highwayhash (0~20180209-g14dedec-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Depending on build-essential to really fix autopkgtest failure. * Add watch file to monitor upstream git HEAD. * Don't override debian-watch-file-is-missing, already fixed. * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4 (no change).
Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]
Hi Chris, On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:31:43AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 889854 + pending > thanks > > Hi Nicholas, > > (Shame to spend effort where upstream is so toxic, alas...). Mm, I've read a bit about it... I wonder if he'll really maintain Python 2? > Anyway, > I've uploaded: > > lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes > html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes > > .. to -backports. Thank you very much :-) > Calibre does not install its build-dependencies, even after installing > the results of the above builds: > > dpkg-deb: building package 'calibre-build-deps' in > '../calibre-build-deps_3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb'. > > The package has been created. > Attention, the package has been created in the current directory, > not in ".." as indicated by the message above! > Selecting previously unselected package calibre-build-deps. > (Reading database ... 24786 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to unpack calibre-build-deps_3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking calibre-build-deps (3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1) ... > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Correcting dependencies...Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1 > Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1 > Investigating (0) debhelper:amd64 < 11.3.2~bpo9+1 @ii mK Ib > > Broken debhelper:amd64 Breaks on qt5-qmake:amd64 < none -> 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 > @un uN > (< 5.9.2+dfsg-8) > Considering qt5-qmake:amd64 1 as a solution to debhelper:amd64 7 > Added qt5-qmake:amd64 to the remove list > Fixing debhelper:amd64 via keep of qt5-qmake:amd64 > Investigating (0) qtbase5-dev:amd64 < none -> 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uN Ib > > Broken qtbase5-dev:amd64 Depends on qt5-qmake:amd64 < none | > 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uH > (= 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1) > Considering qt5-qmake:amd64 1 as a solution to qtbase5-dev:amd64 1 > Holding Back qtbase5-dev:amd64 rather than change qt5-qmake:amd64 > Investigating (0) qtbase5-private-dev:amd64 < none -> 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un > uN Ib > > Broken qtbase5-private-dev:amd64 Depends on qtbase5-dev:amd64 < none | > 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uH > (= 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1) > Considering qtbase5-dev:amd64 1 as a solution to > qtbase5-private-dev:amd64 0 > Holding Back qtbase5-private-dev:amd64 rather than change > qtbase5-dev:amd64 > Investigating (0) calibre-build-deps:amd64 < 3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1 @iU mK Nb > Ib > > Broken calibre-build-deps:amd64 Depends on qt5-qmake:amd64 < none | > 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uH > > Considering qt5-qmake:amd64 1 as a solution to calibre-build-deps:amd64 -2 > Removing calibre-build-deps:amd64 rather than change qt5-qmake:amd64 > Done >Done > Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0 > Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0 > Done > The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer > required: > e2fslibs qtchooser > Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them. > The following packages will be REMOVED: > calibre-build-deps > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > 1 not fully installed or removed. > After this operation, 10.2 kB disk space will be freed. > (Reading database ... 24790 files and directories currently installed.) > Removing calibre-build-deps (3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1) ... > mk-build-deps: Unable to install calibre-build-deps at > /usr/bin/mk-build-deps line 402. > mk-build-deps: Unable to install all build-dep packages > > No time to debug, sorry... This issue sounds like "Using backported debhelper considered tricky" ( https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2018/06/msg00037.html ). I believe that the reason I am not able to trigger it in my bpo chroot, is because Calibre Build-Depends on "debhelper (>= 9)" and the debhelper 11 bpo is only installed when a package requires it. My hypothesis is that your backporting chroot has 11~bpo for some other reason. Html5-parser build-deps on dh >=10, which is also fulfilled by stretch's 10.2.5. That said, I have 11.3.2~bpo9+1 installed on my main system. Is it possible that's causing a problem with the generated source package? > > Other URLS: > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/lxml > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/html5-parser > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/calibre > > Not sure why you linked these. Provided purely for convenience. Sincerely, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#889854: Fwd: lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:39:07AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Not sure what I did... Just forwarding here to keep the converation > altogether. > > > - Original message - > From: Debian FTP Masters > To: la...@debian.org, Matthias Klose , Nicholas D Steeves > > Subject: lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes REJECTED > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:35:43 + > > > lxml_4.2.1.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existing in the pool. > > > binary:python-lxml is NEW. > binary:python-lxml-dbg is NEW. > binary:python-lxml-doc is NEW. > binary:python3-lxml is NEW. > binary:python3-lxml-dbg is NEW. > binary:python-lxml-doc is NEW. > binary:python-lxml-dbg is NEW. > binary:python3-lxml is NEW. > binary:python-lxml is NEW. > binary:python3-lxml-dbg is NEW. > source:lxml is NEW. It definitely wasn't your fault. My mentors upload was so long ago that I decided to just reupload with a fresh copy of the orig tarball that I've verified matches the sha256sum of the one that's already in the archive. https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lxml/lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1.dsc If I had to guess what happened, my gbp rebuilt the tarball. Sorry. Cheers, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#902494: RFS: libplist/2.0.0-4 [QA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: sunwea...@debian.org Dear Mike and mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "libplist" as a QA upload. Besides, I am looking for a DD to help creating a git repository under Salsa's Debian group and grant me (hosiet-guest) a Master role so that I could push the changes onto the git repo. * Package name: libplist Version : 2.0.0-4 Upstream Author : Nikias Bassen and others * URL : https://github.com/libimobiledevice/libplist/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libplist++-dev - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists libplist++3v5 - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists libplist-dev - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists libplist-doc - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists - docs libplist-utils - Apple property list converter libplist3 - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists python-plist - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libplist Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libplist/libplist_2.0.0-4.dsc Git packaging repository (proposed, not exist yet): https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libplist.git Git packaging repository (temporary, will be removed after upload): https://salsa.debian.org/hosiet-guest/libplist.git Changes since the last upload: libplist (2.0.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Apply "wrap-and-sort -abst". * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4. * Bump debhelper compat to v11. * debian/control: - Drop unnecessary build dependency dh-autoreconf. - Drop -dbg package to achieve -dbgsym migration. + Mark Multi-Arch information according to M-A Hints: + libplist-doc: M-A: foreign + libplist++-dev: M-A: same + libplist-dev: M-A: same + python-plist: M-A: same + Update Vcs fields with git repo under Salsa Debian group. + Use Breaks + Replaces instead of Conflicts + Replaces for package replacement. * debian/compat: Update accordingly. * debian/copyright: Update information accordingly. * debian/patches: Refresh patches. * debian/pycompat: Removed. (lintian tag "debian-pycompat-is-obsolete") * debian/rules: + Enable full hardening. + Use "dh_missing --fail-missing". + Update dh_strip invocation for dbgsym migration. + Force non-parallel build to circumvent failure in tests. * d/p/0003-bplist-Prevent-store-to-misaligned-address-when-writ.patch: Backport upstream patch. Side note: I'm not sure why I often encounter with random test failures caused by parallel build (parallel tests) while others basically cannot reproduce. Might be a problem on my side or some flaws in upstream build system. Anyway, forcing --no-parallel solves FTBFS. -- Regards, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#889854: Fwd: lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Not sure what I did... Just forwarding here to keep the converation altogether. - Original message - From: Debian FTP Masters To: la...@debian.org, Matthias Klose , Nicholas D Steeves Subject: lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes REJECTED Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:35:43 + lxml_4.2.1.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existing in the pool. binary:python-lxml is NEW. binary:python-lxml-dbg is NEW. binary:python-lxml-doc is NEW. binary:python3-lxml is NEW. binary:python3-lxml-dbg is NEW. binary:python-lxml-doc is NEW. binary:python-lxml-dbg is NEW. binary:python3-lxml is NEW. binary:python-lxml is NEW. binary:python3-lxml-dbg is NEW. source:lxml is NEW. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]
tags 889854 + pending thanks Hi Nicholas, (Shame to spend effort where upstream is so toxic, alas...). Anyway, I've uploaded: lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes .. to -backports. Calibre does not install its build-dependencies, even after installing the results of the above builds: dpkg-deb: building package 'calibre-build-deps' in '../calibre-build-deps_3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb'. The package has been created. Attention, the package has been created in the current directory, not in ".." as indicated by the message above! Selecting previously unselected package calibre-build-deps. (Reading database ... 24786 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack calibre-build-deps_3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking calibre-build-deps (3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1) ... Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies...Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1 Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1 Investigating (0) debhelper:amd64 < 11.3.2~bpo9+1 @ii mK Ib > Broken debhelper:amd64 Breaks on qt5-qmake:amd64 < none -> 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uN > (< 5.9.2+dfsg-8) Considering qt5-qmake:amd64 1 as a solution to debhelper:amd64 7 Added qt5-qmake:amd64 to the remove list Fixing debhelper:amd64 via keep of qt5-qmake:amd64 Investigating (0) qtbase5-dev:amd64 < none -> 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uN Ib > Broken qtbase5-dev:amd64 Depends on qt5-qmake:amd64 < none | 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uH > (= 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1) Considering qt5-qmake:amd64 1 as a solution to qtbase5-dev:amd64 1 Holding Back qtbase5-dev:amd64 rather than change qt5-qmake:amd64 Investigating (0) qtbase5-private-dev:amd64 < none -> 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uN Ib > Broken qtbase5-private-dev:amd64 Depends on qtbase5-dev:amd64 < none | 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uH > (= 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1) Considering qtbase5-dev:amd64 1 as a solution to qtbase5-private-dev:amd64 0 Holding Back qtbase5-private-dev:amd64 rather than change qtbase5-dev:amd64 Investigating (0) calibre-build-deps:amd64 < 3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1 @iU mK Nb Ib > Broken calibre-build-deps:amd64 Depends on qt5-qmake:amd64 < none | 5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1 @un uH > Considering qt5-qmake:amd64 1 as a solution to calibre-build-deps:amd64 -2 Removing calibre-build-deps:amd64 rather than change qt5-qmake:amd64 Done Done Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0 Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0 Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: e2fslibs qtchooser Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them. The following packages will be REMOVED: calibre-build-deps 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 10.2 kB disk space will be freed. (Reading database ... 24790 files and directories currently installed.) Removing calibre-build-deps (3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1) ... mk-build-deps: Unable to install calibre-build-deps at /usr/bin/mk-build-deps line 402. mk-build-deps: Unable to install all build-dep packages No time to debug, sorry... > Other URLS: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/lxml > https://mentors.debian.net/package/html5-parser > https://mentors.debian.net/package/calibre Not sure why you linked these. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
