Bug#921408: RFS: python-bacpypes/0.17.5-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-bacpypes" * Package name: python-bacpypes Version : 0.17.5-1 Upstream Author : Joel Bender * URL : https://github.com/JoelBender/bacpypes * License : Expat Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-bacpypes - BACnet application and network layer in Python python3-bacpypes - BACnet application and network layer in Python To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-bacpypes Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-bacpypes/python-bacpypes_0.17.5-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #921395) Regards, Rob Wiesler
Bug#921403: RFS: pyfltk/1.3.4.1-1 [ITP]
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:27 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote: > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyfltk/pyfltk_1.3.4.1-1.dsc Here is a review: > More information about pyfltk can be obtained from https://www.example.com. This appears to be incorrect :) I'm not sure but I don't think Python documentation packages are meant to be renamed when moving to Python 3. If you prefer to do so then you'll need to rename the debian/python-fltk-doc.* files. You have dropped debian/install, does the package still build correctly without this? You have changed the author in debian/patches/no_docs, which is meant to indicate the author of the patch, not the current maintainer of the package. You have dropped debian/patches/platform_startswith, but I think that should have been updated to apply to the new version instead. The debian/changelog file has UNRELEASED at the top but it should have unstable. debian/changelog is missing other changes that have been made to the package. I suggest using the debhelper-compat mechanism instead of debian/compat, and using debhelper compat level 12 instead of 10. I chose 12 because that is the latest version of debhelper in Debian backports. You also have a different version in debian/compat and the debian/control Build-Depends, they should be the same (or just switch to using debhelper-compat to avoid the version duplication). https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/debhelper/debhelper.7.en.html#COMPATIBILITY_LEVELS You have opted to bump the Python dependency versions to 3.7, does pyfltk really need such a high version of Python? Using inflated dependency versions limits backportability of the package. You will need to unarchive and re-open the bugs closed in a +rm version here, and then close them in debian/changelog if the version you are uploading fixes those bugs. Seems like #866915 has been fixed and #849973 would be easy to fix. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=both;src=pyfltk I'm guessing python3-fltk-dbg can be dropped in favour of the automatic debug symbols packages. https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages You have removed the Standards-Version from debian/control, please restore it, read the upgrading checklist, make any changes needed and then update Standards-Version to the version of Debian Policy that the package complies with. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist I think override_dh_strip can be removed from debian/control if it isn't going to be used. I suggest running this command to make diffs of the Debian packaging easier to read: wrap-and-sort --short-indent --wrap-always --sort-binary-packages --trailing-comma --dry-run The debian/watch file doesn't work: https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/pyfltk/ $ uscan --verbose scan info: Newest version of pyfltk on remote site is 1.3.0, local version is 1.3.4.1 uscan info:=> Only older package available from https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/pyfltk/pyFltk-1.3.0.tar.gz Automated checks: lintian: lots of warnings/errors -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Bug#921405: RFS: pyfltk/1.3.4.1-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyfltk". Sorry this is my second post. I failed to set it as ITA. This package use to be in Debian but was orphaned. I am looking to pick it up as the new maintainer but need a sponsor. I am a high school CS teacher who needs the package for my students. * Package name: pyfltk Version : 1.3.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Andreas Held * URL : http://pyfltk.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Section : python It builds those binary packages: python3-fltk - Python wrapper for the Fast Light Toolkit python3-fltk-doc - Documentation for pyFltk python3-fltk-dbg - Python wrapper for the Fast Light Toolkit - Debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyfltk Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyfltk/pyfltk_1.3.4.1-1.dsc More information about pyfltk can be obtained from http://pyfltk.sourceforge.net/ Regards, Robert Arkiletian
Re: my first debian package
Looking for a sponsor. https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyfltk
Re: my first debian package
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:13 PM Paul Wise wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:58 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > > Hurray! I built it. > > Congrats! Please also check the package with lintian. > Will do.
Bug#921403: RFS: pyfltk/1.3.4.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyfltk". I am a high school Computer Science teacher. I teach gui programming with pyfltk so I want to get the package back into Debian. * Package name: pyfltk Version : 1.3.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Andreas Held * URL : http://pyfltk.sourceforge.net/ * License : GNU Library General Public License Section : python It builds those binary packages: python3-fltk - Python wrapper for the Fast Light Toolkit python3-fltk-doc - Documentation for pyFltk python3-fltk-dbg - Python wrapper for the Fast Light Toolkit - Debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyfltk Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyfltk/pyfltk_1.3.4.1-1.dsc More information about pyfltk can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Regards, Robert Arkiletian
Re: my first debian package
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:58 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote: > Hurray! I built it. Congrats! Please also check the package with lintian. > How do I sign the dsc and changes files with gpg before uploading to > mentors site with dput. The intro guide should document that, but it should be enough to run debsign and debrelease (both from devscripts) . https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Bug#910004: RFS: apache-opennlp/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- machine learning based toolkit for the processing of natural language text
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:33:56PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Updated. Could you please try building the package once more? It compiles now: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/apache-opennlp/1.9.1-1/buildlog However I guess you didn't install all the opennlp components: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/apache-opennlp/1.9.1-1/contents -rw-r--r-- root/root 1236603 2019-02-04 14:04 ./usr/share/java/opennlp-tools.jar -rw-r--r-- root/root 66535 2019-02-04 14:04 ./usr/share/java/opennlp-uima.jar I think the expected package content list should contain .jar files for all these modules: opennlp-brat-annotator opennlp-distr opennlp-docs opennlp-morfologik-addon opennlp-tools opennlp-uima Besides, there are also some wrapper scripts under several directories. Are they omitted intentionally? ❯❯❯ find . -type d -name bin ./opennlp-tools/bin ./opennlp-brat-annotator/src/main/bin ./opennlp-morfologik-addon/bin ./opennlp-morfologik-addon/src/main/bin ./opennlp-distr/src/main/bin
Re: my first debian package
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:15 PM Paul Wise wrote: ... > Once the package is ready, you can upload it to the mentors site and > ask for a sponsor. If you have any questions while creating the > package, you can ask them on this list or on the #debian-mentors IRC > channel. > > https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers > https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto > Hurray! I built it. Everything is now updated in the git repo here https://bitbucket.org/robark/python3-fltk/src/master How do I sign the dsc and changes files with gpg before uploading to mentors site with dput.
Bug#921373: RFS: codelite [QA] -- Powerful and lightweight IDE
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 05:11:40PM +, David Hart wrote: > * Package name: codelite > Version : 12.0+dfsg-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > codelite (12.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * QA upload. > > * New upstream release. > > * debian/codelite-plugins.install: > - Install new plugins. > * debian/copyright: > - Add copyright for new plugin. > - Update copyright dates. > * debian/patches: > - Refresh patches. > - Backport a fix for LLDB terminal crashes. > - Fix 3 more spelling mistakes. > * debian/control: > - Bump standards to 4.3.0. > * debian/compat: > - Use debhelper 11. > * debian/watch: > - Add oversionmangle for +dfsg Your upload would remove the last changelog entry, could you please fix that? Otherwise, I see no problems so far. The issue with VCS would be nice to solve but is not a showstopper. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Remember, the S in "IoT" stands for Security, while P stands ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ for Privacy. ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#921226: RFS: austin/0.6.1~beta-1 [ITP]
Hi Sorry for not including the bug address in the CC. I have simplified the debian/rules file (https://github.com/P403n1x87/austin/commit/655c3beb09199bb9dbe6c9dbdb8395c25e9213c9) and verified with gbp buildpackage. I have excluded the custom Makefile from the sources and seems fine to me now. Please let me know if you want me to re-upload the package with the latest changes. Regarding python2, the package doesn't include any python2 code. Even the python project inside austin/ is compatible with python3. However, the main C application shipped with the package (which is just the single binary src/austin) supports both python2 (2.3 - 2.7) and python3 (3.3 - 3.7). Thanks, Gabriele On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 at 23:31, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 10:39:09PM +, Gabriele wrote: > > Hey > > > > Many thanks for getting back to me! > > Could you please re-add 921...@bugs.debian.org to CC? (I'm 99.9% sure > you'll be ok with that but the rule is to never make anything public without > an explicit permission). Any such package reviews are supposed to be done > in public, for a number of reasons: > * there's a record of the review > * anyone else can chime in > * anyone else can continue the review -- I might need to pass if there'll >be any complex python-specific questions > * others can learn > > > I have sent the public key to the keyserver as you have suggested. > > Great, thanks! It'll probably take a bit of time for it to propagate. > > > Regarding the dependencies you have mentioned, they shouldn't really > > be such. The tarball includes snapcraft sources for creating artifacts > > for the snap store (think of this as the analogue of the debian/ > > folder but for another type of repository, https://snapcraft.io/). > > This tool is then not required for the application to run and to even > > build. > > Yeah, but the build system still calls it. After your changes at least > repacking the sources succeeds, but the actual build still fails: > > > Command: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b -rfakeroot > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package austin > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 0.6.1~beta-1 > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Gabriele N. Tornetta > > dpkg-source --before-build . > dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64 > fakeroot debian/rules clean > dh clean >dh_auto_clean > make -j6 clean > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > snapcraft clean > make[1]: snapcraft: Command not found > make[1]: *** [Makefile:23: clean] Error 127 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>' > dh_auto_clean: make -j6 clean returned exit code 2 > > > In fact, all that austin requires is a C compiler. Python is > > only a test dependency as it is invoked during tests. The Makefile > > included in the tarball is not intended for autogeneration, but just > > to simplify the testing during development. The package should be > > built with the standard autoreconf process instead, as I think is > > currently happening. > > Seems like this is the problem: > > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package austin > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 0.6.1~beta-1 > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Gabriele N. Tornetta > > dpkg-source --before-build . > fakeroot debian/rules clean > dh clean >dh_clean > dpkg-source -b . > dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)' > dpkg-source: info: building austin using existing > ./austin_0.6.1~beta.orig.tar.gz > dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series > dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file Makefile, use > --include-removal to override > dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file src/Makefile.in, use > --include-removal to override > dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file src/austin, use > --include-removal to override > dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file test/test_process_iter.py, > use --include-removal to override > dpkg-source: info: building austin in austin_0.6.1~beta-1.debian.tar.xz > dpkg-source: info: building austin in austin_0.6.1~beta-1.dsc > dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=source > dpkg-genchanges --build=source >../austin_0.6.1~beta-1_source.changes > dpkg-genchanges: info: including full source code in upload > dpkg-source --after-build . > dpkg-buildpackage: info: full upload (original source is included) > > The patch system ignores deletions unless specifically told so (there are > usually nicer ways to get this effect), which apparently results in some old > version of the Makefile being used. Normally, dh_autoreconf would generate > a proper version, but you specifically disable it in debian/rules. That's > bad for other reasons as well -- the package won't see improvements from new > versions of autotools (bug fixes, support for new architectures, etc). > > > Please note that I have some local changes that fix some
Bug#921373: RFS: codelite [QA] -- Powerful and lightweight IDE
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an update of the orphaned package "codelite" * Package name: codelite Version : 12.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : eranif * URL : https://codelite.org * License : GPL2+ Section : devel It builds these binary packages: codelite -- Powerful and lightweight IDE codelite-plugins -- Powerful and lightweight IDE - plugins To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/codelite Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/codelite/codelite_12.0+dfsg-1.dsc There is also a git repo: https://github.com/dghart/debian-salsa-codelite-clone which is a clone of https://salsa.debian.org/debian/codelite to which afaict I can't upload. After being RFA for some time, codelite is now orphaned: see #852312. It still provides version 10.0, while the upstream version is 12.0. I've updated the package to 12.0 and made other minor fixes. This is a request for a review and upload of the update. The amended package builds and works, and is lintian-clean apart from the warning: orphaned-package-not-maintained-in-debian-infrastructure. Changes since the last upload: codelite (12.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * QA upload. * New upstream release. * debian/codelite-plugins.install: - Install new plugins. * debian/copyright: - Add copyright for new plugin. - Update copyright dates. * debian/patches: - Refresh patches. - Backport a fix for LLDB terminal crashes. - Fix 3 more spelling mistakes. * debian/control: - Bump standards to 4.3.0. * debian/compat: - Use debhelper 11. * debian/watch: - Add oversionmangle for +dfsg Regards, David Hart
Bug#919614: RFS: note/1.3.26-2 [ITA]
Hi, There is proposal (DEP-14) to create tags, like debian/2.1.2-5 > in git repository, that mark state of source package, uploaded in > archives. > I pretend use gbp, I That create the tags and branch that you mention. I have a new version 1.3.26-3 applied the fix. I need to create start an mentors.d.n process or just I let it know when I ready? Thanks! Regards -- Arias Emmanuel http://eamanu.com Github/Gitlab; @eamanu Debian: @eamanu-guest
Bug#910004: RFS: apache-opennlp/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- machine learning based toolkit for the processing of natural language text
Hi Mo Zhou, On 2019-02-02 10:26, Mo Zhou wrote: > Thank you for the effort on apache-opennlp packaging. However it failed > to build (I cannot help you diagnose the failure because I know nothing > about Java): I have just fixed the issue. > BTW, 1.9.1 release is available. Updated. Could you please try building the package once more? Best wishes, Andrius -- Andrius Merkys Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325 LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
Bug#919413: RFS: doxygen/1.8.15-1 [ITA]
Control: severity 921295 important Control: severity -1 normal (setting severity of RFS back to normal) https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html > Transition Freeze > Starting 2019-01-12, new transitions and large/disruptive changes are no > longer acceptable for buster. I am wondering whether this applies here, given the large number of packages which don't compile. Best Ole
