Bug#931377: RFS: gcc-8-doc/8.3.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:43:08PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > > I can also backport gcc-doc-defaults afterwards. > > > > Good idea, yeah. > > Uploaded to mentors.d.o In bpo-NEW, thanks! These packages were sorely missing from Buster. About that VLOCAL part: I think it'd be nice to have it in unstable as well, to ease future backports, and to reduce their diffs. The variable would be empty in regular versions. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family. Including that weird uncle ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws. ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#933493: marked as done (RFS: gcc-9-doc/9.1.0-1)
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2019 05:02:08 +0200 with message-id <20190731030208.ga7...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#933493: RFS: gcc-9-doc/9.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #933493, regarding RFS: gcc-9-doc/9.1.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 933493: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933493 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-9-doc" * Package name: gcc-9-doc Version : 9.1.0-1 Upstream Author : FSF * URL : https://gcc.gnu.org/ * License : GFDL-1.2+, GFDL-1.3+, GPL-2+, GPL-3+ Section : doc It builds those binary packages: cpp-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional gcc-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional gcc-9-doc_9.1.0-1_amd64.buildinfo non-free/doc optional gccgo-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional gfortran-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional gnat-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-9-doc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/gcc-9-doc/gcc-9-doc_9.1.0-1.dsc More information about gcc-9-doc can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: gcc-9-doc (9.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream branch. * Synced patches with gcc-9, 9.1.0-10 * New upstream version 9.1.0 * d/patches: refresh patches * d/control: bump Standards-Version to 4.4.0, no changes needed. -- Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:28:18 +0300 Regards, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:41:02PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > * Package name: gcc-9-doc >Version : 9.1.0-1 > gcc-9-doc (9.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New upstream branch. > * Synced patches with gcc-9, 9.1.0-10 > * New upstream version 9.1.0 > * d/patches: refresh patches > * d/control: bump Standards-Version to 4.4.0, no changes needed. In NEW since a while ago. Big thanks for your work here! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family. Including that weird uncle ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws. ⠈⠳⣄--- End Message ---
Bug#933248: RFS: assaultcube/1.2.0.2-1 [ITA] -- realistic first-person-shooter
Hi Boyuan Yang, > While I haven't looked into your package (yet), I do have some questions: Yes, OK! :) > how will you handle the situation that source package assaultcube-data also > provides the binary package assaultcube-data? I mirrored the upstream game where 'assaultcube-data' would have a directory containing prebuilt binary Windows fonts that were deleted. Leaving only the game source files. > What's the reason of moving it from non-free to main area? If > assaultcube-data > is already free, why would it still be in the contrib section? This was also my question, because each directory and file contained in the game has different licenses for each author. I need to know with the sponsor who will see my package. Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#933507: RFS: openldap/2.4.48+dfsg-1~bpo10+1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors and backporters, I am looking for a sponsor to perform the initial upload of openldap to buster-backports, since it will be NEW. I am DM for the package and can take care of future uploads myself. Rationale for backporting: while the client library (libldap) is mature and stable, the OpenLDAP server (slapd) is more actively developed, so advanced slapd users often prefer to run the latest upstream version. The backport is a simple rebuild; no changes are needed to build in buster at this time. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: https://mentors.debian.net/package/openldap https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.48+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.dsc The changes since stable are: openldap (2.4.48+dfsg-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for buster-backports. . openldap (2.4.48+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. - fixed slapd to restrict rootDN proxyauthz to its own databases (CVE-2019-13057) (ITS#9038) (Closes: #932997) - fixed slapd to enforce sasl_ssf ACL statement on every connection (CVE-2019-13565) (ITS#9052) (Closes: #932998) - added new openldap.h header with OpenLDAP specific libldap interfaces (ITS#8671) - updated lastbind overlay to support forwarding authTimestamp updates (ITS#7721) (Closes: #880656) * Update Standards-Version to 4.4.0. * Add a systemd drop-in to set RemainAfterExit=no on the slapd service, so that systemd marks the service as dead after it crashes or is killed. Thanks to Heitor Alves de Siqueira. (Closes: #926657, LP: #1821343) * Use more entropy for generating a random admin password, if none was set during initial configuration. Thanks to Judicael Courant. (Closes: #932270) * Replace debian/rules calls to dpkg-architecture and dpkg-parsechangelog with variables provided by dpkg-dev includes. * Declare R³: no. * Create a simple autopkgtest that tests installing slapd and connecting to it with an ldap tool. * Install the new openldap.h header in libldap2-dev. Thank you, Ryan
Bug#933493: RFS: gcc-9-doc/9.1.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-9-doc" * Package name: gcc-9-doc Version : 9.1.0-1 Upstream Author : FSF * URL : https://gcc.gnu.org/ * License : GFDL-1.2+, GFDL-1.3+, GPL-2+, GPL-3+ Section : doc It builds those binary packages: cpp-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional gcc-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional gcc-9-doc_9.1.0-1_amd64.buildinfo non-free/doc optional gccgo-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional gfortran-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional gnat-9-doc_9.1.0-1_all.deb non-free/doc optional To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-9-doc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/gcc-9-doc/gcc-9-doc_9.1.0-1.dsc More information about gcc-9-doc can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: gcc-9-doc (9.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream branch. * Synced patches with gcc-9, 9.1.0-10 * New upstream version 9.1.0 * d/patches: refresh patches * d/control: bump Standards-Version to 4.4.0, no changes needed. -- Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:28:18 +0300 Regards, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Bug#931377: RFS: gcc-8-doc/8.3.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
вт, 30 июл. 2019 г. в 18:23, Adam Borowski : > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 05:12:33PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > I have uploaded gcc-8-doc targeted buster-backports. Would you agree > > to sponsor it? > > Looks good, in bpo-NEW. Thank you! > > I can also backport gcc-doc-defaults afterwards. > > Good idea, yeah. Uploaded to mentors.d.o -- With best wishes Dmitry
Bug#933248: RFS: assaultcube/1.2.0.2-1 [ITA] -- realistic first-person-shooter
While I haven't looked into your package (yet), I do have some questions: how will you handle the situation that source package assaultcube-data also provides the binary package assaultcube-data? What's the reason of moving it from non-free to main area? If assaultcube-data is already free, why would it still be in the contrib section? Thanks, Boyuan Yang On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 03:43:58 -0300 Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "assaultcube" > > * Package name: assaultcube >Version : 1.2.0.2-1 >Upstream Author : Rabid Viper Productions > * URL : http://assault.cubers.net > * License : GPL-2+ or Zlib >Section : contrib/games > > It builds those binary packages: > > assaultcube - realistic first-person-shooter > assaultcube-data - realistic first-person-shooter (data file) > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/assaultcube > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/assaultcube/assaultcube_1.2.0.2-1.dsc > > More information about assaultcube can be obtained from https://gitlab.com/coringao/assaultcube. > > Changes since the last upload: > > assaultcube (1.2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New upstream release (Closes: #726355, #727026, #779617) > * Added files: > + d/assaultcube.6 - Manpages used from previous version. > + d/assaultcube.docs. > + d/assaultcube-data.install. > + d/assaultcube-data.links. > + d/assaultcube-server.6 - Manpages used from previous version. > + d/clean - Removing the bin_unix directory. > + d/manpages. > * Removed files (outdated): > - d/assaultcube.dirs. > - d/assaultcube.lintian-overrides. > - d/assautcube.xpm. > - d/autoreconf. > - d/compat. > - d/patches. > - d/README.Debian. > - d/README.source. > * debian/assaultcube.desktop: Updated '.desktop' application shortcut file. > * debian/assaultcube.install: Updated directory paths. > * debian/changelog: Corrected file containing white space. > * debian/control: > + Added package assaultcube-data. > + Build-Depends: Libraries updated for SDL2. > + Bumped Standards-Version to 4.4.0. > - Changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in > Build-Depends field and bumped level to 12. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#931377: RFS: gcc-8-doc/8.3.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 05:12:33PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > I have uploaded gcc-8-doc targeted buster-backports. Would you agree > to sponsor it? Looks good, in bpo-NEW. > I can also backport gcc-doc-defaults afterwards. Good idea, yeah. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family. Including that weird uncle ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws. ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#931377: RFS: gcc-8-doc/8.3.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
ср, 3 июл. 2019 г. в 20:14, Adam Borowski : > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:00:27PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > ср, 3 июл. 2019 г. в 18:52, Adam Borowski : > > > It's a pity neither Guo nor you managed to update the docs before Buster, > > > but 1. we can upload this to buster-backports soon, > > > > Should I do anything manually to do this upload? > > There's nothing we can do before this package passes NEW and migrates to > testing. I have uploaded gcc-8-doc targeted buster-backports. Would you agree to sponsor it? I can also backport gcc-doc-defaults afterwards. -- With best wishes Dmitry
Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6
Hi Adam Thanks for the work you have put into qcoan. I hope that we will get someone else to have a look at the program soon. I have now added the missing dependency for qcoan. Regards, Elmar Am 30.07.19 um 06:16 schrieb Adam Borowski: On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 02:02:58PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: I have now changed something in the dependencies and hope that this will work better for you. Alas: qmake -qt=qt5 qcoan.pro Project ERROR: Unknown module(s) in QT: core gui widgets After adding qtbase5-dev, it builds. But unfortunately, due to hardware problems, I cannot really continue. All my machines that both 1. work and 2. are adequate for mucking with gui stuff, are on a different continent; unless situation improves I won't be able to review this in quite a while. Thus, I'm afraid it'd be best to ask someone else for now. Meow!
