Bug#933270: marked as done (RFS: erlang-metrics/2.5.0-1 [ITP] -- generic interface to different metrics systems in Erlang)
Your message dated Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:07:52 +0300 with message-id <20190801050752.ga3...@jupiter.golovan.ru> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #933270, regarding RFS: erlang-metrics/2.5.0-1 [ITP] -- generic interface to different metrics systems in Erlang to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 933270: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933270 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "erlang-metrics" * Package name: erlang-metrics Version : 2.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Benoît Chesneau * URL : https://github.com/benoitc/erlang-metrics * License : BSD-3-clause Section : devel It builds those binary packages: erlang-metrics - generic interface to different metrics systems in Erlang To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/erlang-metrics Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/erlang-metrics/erlang-metrics_2.5.0-1.dsc Regards, James Valleroy signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- The package is uploaded. -- Sergei Golovan--- End Message ---
Bug#933571: RFS: mp3guessenc/0.27.4+dfsg ITP #868235
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:39 AM Peter wrote: > (I had to remove the windows binary from the source package, hence +dfsg) If you haven't already, please ask upstream to remove the Windows binary from their VCS and source tarballs. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Bug#933248: RFS: assaultcube/1.2.0.2-1 [ITA] -- realistic first-person-shooter
Hi Tobias, > I've took a look and I have to say assultcube's license is a nightmere; > for me it is far from clear from me what they mean… However, I cannot > see a change on the licensing, so I guess the situation is unchanged > and that would hint that we are still talking about non-free, at least > for the data. I agree, there was no change in the license, so I left it as it was in the orphaned package. I just organized 'debian/copyright' by adding all licenses presented in the game directories. > For example, what is source in their definition? I can only assume that > they mean the"sources.tar.gz" [1] on the release tab of their github > repo. If that is true, there quite a lots of difference when compared > to (what I guess is supposed to be in their terms) the game package > labeled "AssaultCube for Linux" [2] The game is being mirrored in an 'experimental' branch [1], to be played on Windows and MacOSX with the updated SDL2 library. With that, I just removed the directory containing prebuilt Windows binary sources and some Makefile fixes to create the game binary. > [2] has many MiB more files than [1], so I guess [1] is not sufficient > to play, is it? No, this package is the complete game to play. ;) > If I'm correct, the problem is that [2] is "no modification allowed", > "non commerical" and they are clear that there are bits in it that may > only distributed "unmodified" (in their definition) [3]. So this still > looks non-free for me. > > [1] https://github.com/assaultcube/AC/archive/v1.2.0.2.tar.gz > [2] h > ttps://github.com/assaultcube/AC/releases/download/v1.2.0.2/AssaultCube_v1.2.0 > .2.tar.bz2 > > [3] https://assault.cubers.net/docs/license.html > together with the README.md on https://github.com/assaultcube/AC > > > PS: On [3] they mention ./packages/audio/misc/pickup_armour.ogg -- > as licensed under "Creative Commons Sampling Plus 1.0", which is > unfortunatly a non-free license [4]. This alone makes it non-free. > > [4] > https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Creative_Commons_Sampling_Plus_.28CC-sampling.2B-.29.2C_v1.0 Exactly, in this case would the game have to be 'non-free' rather than 'contrib'? [1] https://github.com/assaultcube/AC/tree/experimental Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#933600: RFS: acmebot/2.4.4-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "acmebot" * Package name: acmebot Version : 2.4.4-1 Upstream Author : Peter Linss * URL : https://github.com/plinss/acmebot * License : GPLv3 Section : web It builds those binary packages: acmebot - Python tool for managing certificates using ACME v1/v2 protocol To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/acmebot Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acmebot/acmebot_2.4.4-1.dsc More information about acmebot can be obtained from https://github.com/plinss/acmebot. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. (Closes: #930094) Best Regards, Hinrikus Wolf
Bug#931934: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-4~experimental1
Hello, I close this bug. I'm working on the today released 1.0.28. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser git: https://jff.email/cgit/ Threema: SYR8SJXB Wire: @joergfringsfuerst Skype:joergpenguin Ring: jff Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#931934: marked as done (RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-4~experimental1)
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:54:22 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#931934: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-4~experimental1
has caused the Debian Bug report #931934,
regarding RFS: sane-backends/1.0.27-4~experimental1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
931934: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931934
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sane-backends"
Package name: sane-backends
Version : 1.0.27-4~experimental1
Upstream Author : sane-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
URL : http://www.sane-project.org
License : GPL-2+ with sane exception, GPL-2+, Artistic,
LGPL-2.1+
Section : graphics
It builds those binary packages:
sane-utils - API library for scanners -- utilities
libsane-common - API library for scanners -- documentation and support files
libsane1 - API library for scanners
libsane-dev- API development library for scanners [development files]
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/sane-backends
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sane-backends/sane-backends_1.0.27-4~experimental1.dsc
or
https://jff.email/cgit/sane-backends.git/?h=release%2F1.0.27-4_experimental1
Changes since the last upload:
* debian/rules:
- Add --exclude=/sane/ to override_dh_makeshlibs-arch to generate
only public symbols (Closes: #911597).
- Don't install obsolete hal fdi file (Closes: #913282).
* Remove architecture dependent symbols files.
* Merge release 1.0.27-3.2 into source tree.
- I disagree the changes from 1.0.27-3.1.
- Thanks to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz for the bug fix.
* New debian/patches/0725-fix_link_60-libsane_rule.patch:
- Fix directory for 20-sane.hwdb (Closes: #916239).
* New debian/patches/0155-genesys_gl847.patch:
- Fix discolored bar on GL847 chip based scanners (Closes: #912603).
* Fix missing set device to group scanner (Closes: #918358);
- New debian/99-libsane.rules.
- debian/libsane.install: Install File into /etc/udev/rules.d/
- Change debian/TROUBLESHOOTING.Debian
* debian/sane-utils.config: Remove the RUN parameter in compliance with
Debian Policy Manual section 9.3.3.1 (Closes: #915197).
* debian/copyright:
- Add year 2019 for debian/*.
- Add missing Uploaders to debian/*.
* Fix the lintian warning "libsane: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
libsane1":
- debian/control: rename package libsane to libsane1.
- debian/rules: Change filenames and directories from libsane to libsane1.
- Rename debian/99-libsane.rules to debian/99-libsane1.rules.
* Refresh debian/patches/0100-source_spelling.patch.
* New debian/libsane-common.lintian-overrides and
debian/libsane1.lintian-overrides to override false positive spelling-error.
* Fix autopkgtest.
* Migrate to debhelper 12:
- Change debian/compat to 12.
- Bump minimum debhelper version in debian/control to >= 12.
* Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.4.0 (No changes needed).
* New debian/sane-utils.lintian-overrides to override false positve missing
init.d script.
* debian/control: Add Pre-Depends ${misc:Pre-Depends} to install invoke-rc.d.
Build with sbuild and pdebuild and the tests with Lintain and Piuparts
are ok:
+--+
| Summary |
+--+
Build Architecture: amd64
Build Type: full
Build-Space: 405228
Build-Time: 467
Distribution: sid
Host Architecture: amd64
Install-Time: 84
Job:
/data/entwicklung/linux/debian/sane-backends/sane-backends_1.0.27-4~experimental1.dsc
Lintian: info
Machine Architecture: amd64
Package: sane-backends
Package-Time: 566
Piuparts: pass
Source-Version: 1.0.27-4~experimental1
Space: 405228
Status: successful
Version: 1.0.27-4~experimental1
Finished at 2019-07-12T13:02:53Z
Build needed 00:09:26, 405228k disk space
Regards,
Jörg Frings-Fürst
--
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F
Bug#933571: RFS: mp3guessenc/0.27.4+dfsg ITP #868235
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for "mp3guessenc". Package name: mp3guessenc Version : 0.27.4+dfsg Upstream Author : Elio Blanca URL : http://mp3guessenc.sourceforge.net/ License : LGPL-2.1 Programming Lang: C Section : sound Description : Utility for analysis of audio mpeg files It builds binary package: mp3guessenc -- Utility for analysis of audio mpeg files Package is free of lintian & build-log warnings. (I had to remove the windows binary from the source package, hence +dfsg) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/mp3guessenc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mp3guessenc/mp3guessenc_0.27.4+dfsg.1-02.dsc More information about mp3guessenc can be obtained from http://mp3guessenc.sourceforge.net/ Regards, Peter B
Bug#933248: RFS: assaultcube/1.2.0.2-1 [ITA] -- realistic first-person-shooter
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Carlos, On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 22:37:36 -0300 Carlos Donizete Froes < corin...@riseup.net> wrote: > Hi Boyuan Yang, > > > While I haven't looked into your package (yet), I do have some questions: > > Yes, OK! :) > > > how will you handle the situation that source package assaultcube- data also > > provides the binary package assaultcube-data? > > I mirrored the upstream game where 'assaultcube-data' would have a directory > containing prebuilt binary Windows fonts that were deleted. Leaving only the > game source files. > > > What's the reason of moving it from non-free to main area? If assaultcube-data > > is already free, why would it still be in the contrib section? > > This was also my question, because each directory and file contained in the game > has different licenses for each author. I need to know with the sponsor who will > see my package. I've took a look and I have to say assultcube's license is a nightmere; for me it is far from clear from me what they mean… However, I cannot see a change on the licensing, so I guess the situation is unchanged and that would hint that we are still talking about non-free, at least for the data. For example, what is source in their definition? I can only assume that they mean the"sources.tar.gz" [1] on the release tab of their github repo. If that is true, there quite a lots of difference when compared to (what I guess is supposed to be in their terms) the game package labeled "AssaultCube for Linux" [2] [2] has many MiB more files than [1], so I guess [1] is not sufficient to play, is it? If I'm correct, the problem is that [2] is "no modification allowed", "non commerical" and they are clear that there are bits in it that may only distributed "unmodified" (in their definition) [3]. So this still looks non-free for me. [1] https://github.com/assaultcube/AC/archive/v1.2.0.2.tar.gz [2] h ttps://github.com/assaultcube/AC/releases/download/v1.2.0.2/AssaultCube_v1.2.0.2.tar.bz2 [3] https://assault.cubers.net/docs/license.html together with the README.md on https://github.com/assaultcube/AC PS: On [3] they mention ./packages/audio/misc/pickup_armour.ogg -- as licensed under "Creative Commons Sampling Plus 1.0", which is unfortunatly a non-free license [4]. This alone makes it non-free. [4] https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Creative_Commons_Sampling_Plus_.28CC-sampling.2B-.29.2C_v1.0 -- tobi
Bug#931377: RFS: gcc-8-doc/8.3.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
ср, 31 июл. 2019 г. в 06:25, Adam Borowski : > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:43:08PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > > > I can also backport gcc-doc-defaults afterwards. > > > > > > Good idea, yeah. > > > > Uploaded to mentors.d.o > > In bpo-NEW, thanks! These packages were sorely missing from Buster. Thank you! > About that VLOCAL part: I think it'd be nice to have it in unstable as well, > to ease future backports, and to reduce their diffs. The variable would be > empty in regular versions. Yes, it will be a part of 5:19 upload defaulting to gcc-9 (once it hits unstable). -- With best wishes Dmitry
Re: Gathering debug data from buildd's?
Hi Hilmar, > I sent a request 3 days ago, still no response. Do I have to sign my > E-Mail to get the request processed? No. It just takes a bit of time sometimes for people of the team that do this manually but they usually answer, so you'll be informed when it's done. F. pgp5yTbAlpDJ2.pgp Description: PGP signature
