Bug#972402: RFS: libphp-swiftmailer/6.2.3-1 [ITA] -- Swiftmailer, free feature-rich PHP mailer

2020-10-17 Thread Robin Gustafsson
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libphp-swiftmailer":

 * Package name: libphp-swiftmailer
   Version : 6.2.3-1
   Upstream Author :
 * URL : http://swiftmailer.org/
 * License : Expat
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/pear/php-swiftmailer
   Section : php

It builds those binary packages:

  php-swiftmailer - Swiftmailer, free feature-rich PHP mailer

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libphp-swiftmailer/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libphp-swiftmailer/libphp-swiftmailer_6.2.3-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 libphp-swiftmailer (6.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Nicolas Roudaire ]
   * Imported upstream version 6.2.3 (Closes: #951591)
   * Upgrade Standards-Version to 4.5.0
   * debian/control: Update debhelper-compat to 12
   * debian/compat: Remove because of debhelper-compat in debian/control
   * Update debian/copyright
   * Add debian/upstream/metadata
 .
   [ Robin Gustafsson ]
   * Add pkg-php-tools dependency overrides
   * Change name of license from MIT to Expat
   * Remove unnecessary debian/dirs
   * Install docs instead of tests as documentation
   * Reformat files
   * Update maintainer info due to team adoption
   * Remove transitional package (Closes: #878656)
   * Clean up dependencies
   * Fix VCS URLs
   * Install an autoload.php file (Closes: #951605)
   * Bump debhelper-compat to 13
   * Tweak gbp.conf
   * Run tests during build
   * Add autopkgtest tests

--

Adoption into the PHP PEAR team was discussed with the current
maintainer on the team's mailing list [1].

Please feel free to review and/or sponsor this even if you're not
active within the team. All help is appreciated.


[1]: 
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-php-pear/2020-September/014730.html


Regards,
--
  Robin Gustafsson



Bug#972407: RFS: mini-httpd/1.30-3 [QA] -- Small HTTP server

2020-10-17 Thread Lorenzo Puliti
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mini-httpd":

 * Package name: mini-httpd
   Version : 1.30-3
   Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
 * URL : https://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd
 * License : BSD-2-clause
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mini-httpd
   Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  mini-httpd - Small HTTP server

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/mini-httpd/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mini-httpd/mini-httpd_1.30-3.dsc

Updated git repo:

  https://salsa.debian.org/Lorenzo.ru.g-guest/mini-httpd/-/tree/qa-1.30-3

Changes since the last upload:

 mini-httpd (1.30-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Lorenzo Puliti ]
   * QA upload.
   * Fix lintian error 'init-d script not starting the service':
 the service is now shipped as disabled with Sysv
   * Warn users of changes in /etc/default/mini-httpd with a
 NEWS file
   * Set rules-requires-root to 'binary-targets'
   * Add an experimental systemd native service:
  - do not start the service after install
  - run in foreground
  - use the conf file in /etc/ for other options
  - Same start sequence of other httpds (Apache2, Nginx..)
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5, no chages required
   * Bump dh-compat version to 13
   * Merge the runscript from 'mini-httpd-run' package:
 - Add a Build-Dep on dh-runit>=2.9.0
 - ship the runit service as disabled
 - Breaks and Replaces with 'mini-httpd-run'
 - ship a presubj file to easy work of QA
   * Update runit runscript:
 - use the 'invoke-run' interpreter
 - ship a default finish file
 - use the conf file in /etc instead of command line options
   (note that this way the server no longer run inside a chroot)
   * Sysv: add the syslog facility to LSB header: this is
 needed because the Sysv script logs to syslog by default
 .
   [ Jean ]
   * Update init.d script LSB Header with $network: otherwise
 mini-httpd starts too early during the boot sequence

Regards,
--
  Lorenzo Puliti



Fortran issue solved but symbols issues (Was: Bug#957665: Fortran issue in paw (Was: paw: ftbfs with GCC-10))

2020-10-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andrius

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 03:34:15PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> 
> FFLAGS += -fallow-argument-mismatch

Thanks a lot for the helpful hint which enabled me to do one
step forward[1].  Unfortunately there are further errors:

...
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/cdf/shared/mlpdef.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/build/pawlib/paw/cdf/mlpdef.c:155:
 multiple definition of `klnkaddr'; 
paw/cdf/shared/pawcdf.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/build/pawlib/paw/cdf/pawcdf.c:155:
 first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: warning: alignment 4 of symbol `pawch3_' in 
paw/ntuple/shared/c_decl.o is smaller than 16 in paw/code/shared/pawint3.o
/usr/bin/ld: warning: size of symbol `hcfile_' changed from 12800 in 
paw/code/shared/hgetid.o to 4000 in paw/ntuple/shared/c_decl.o
/usr/bin/ld: warning: size of symbol `pawc_' changed from 40004 in 
comis/code/shared/csdefn.o to 4 in paw/ntuple/shared/c_decl.o
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_inter.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:31:
 multiple definition of `learn_'; 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_gen.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:31:
 first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_inter.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:40:
 multiple definition of `pat_'; 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_gen.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:40:
 first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_inter.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:19:
 multiple definition of `net_'; 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_gen.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:19:
 first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_inter.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:49:
 multiple definition of `divers_'; 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_gen.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:49:
 first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_inter.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:92:
 multiple definition of `Hessian'; 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_gen.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:92:
 first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_inter.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:91:
 multiple definition of `ExamplesIndex'; 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_gen.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:91:
 first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_inter.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:90:
 multiple definition of `JacobianMatrix'; 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_gen.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:90:
 first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_inter.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:89:
 multiple definition of `Gamma'; 
paw/mlpfit/shared/mlp_gen.o:/build/paw-2.14.04.dfsg.2/src/pawlib/paw/mlpfit/mlp_gen.h:89:
 first defined here
...


Any further hints are welcome

   Andreas.


[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/paw/-/commit/5b7695142d3580516168086feb3e97c2b1fac575

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: Verify the library transition

2020-10-17 Thread Tong Sun
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:39 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:33AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > So `libgit2-dev` only shows up once in calligra's debian/control file.
> You need to check actual dependencies of binary packages (e.g. by looking at
> debs with dpkg-deb -f), not your debian/control.
> And libgit2-dev is a development package, binaries will depend on the
> package that contains the library itself.

OK. I got:

$ dpkg-deb -f calligrawords_3.2.1+dfsg-2_amd64.deb Depends | grep
libgit2 || echo not found
not found

> > Can I safely say that all calligra packages are fine with libgit2-dev's new 
> > v1.0.0?
> No.

With the above result, can I safely say that
calligrawords_3.2.1+dfsg-2_amd64.deb is not depending on libgit2 then?

I"ve checked every calligra related packages and have *only* found:

$ dpkg-deb -f calligra-gemini_3.2.1+dfsg-2_amd64.deb Depends
calligra-libs (= 1:3.2.1+dfsg-2), calligra-gemini-data (>=
1:3.2.1+dfsg-2), calligrasheets (>= 1:3.2.1+dfsg), calligrastage (>=
1:3.2.1+dfsg), calligrawords (>= 1:3.2.1+dfsg), libc6 (>= 2.14),
libgit2-28 (>= 0.26.0), libkf5configcore5 (>= 5.7.0),
libkf5configwidgets5 (>= 5.7.0), libkf5coreaddons5 (>= 5.7.0),
libkf5crash5 (>= 4.96.0), libkf5i18n5 (>= 5.7.0), libkf5iconthemes5
(>= 5.7.0), libkf5widgetsaddons5 (>= 5.7.0), libkf5xmlgui5 (>= 5.7.0),
libqt5core5a (>= 5.14.1), libqt5gui5 (>= 5.8.0) | libqt5gui5-gles (>=
5.8.0), libqt5network5 (>= 5.14.1), libqt5qml5 (>= 5.0.2),
libqt5quick5 (>= 5.6.1) | libqt5quick5-gles (>= 5.6.1),
libqt5quickwidgets5 (>= 5.3.0), libqt5widgets5 (>= 5.3.0), libstdc++6
(>= 4.1.1)

Thus, can I safely say that

of all  packages built out of calligra-3.2.1+dfsg, only
calligra-gemini_3.2.1+dfsg-2 need to verify with library transition,
and if it passes, then packages calligra-3.2.1+dfsg would pass as
well?

Finally, the most important one,

I found that calligra-gemini_3.2.1+dfsg-2_amd64.deb was built with the
old libgit2 (libgit2-28), not my latest libgit2-1.0, what was the
problem for that?

The d/control is not specifying a fixed version:

grep libgit2 calligra-3.2.1+dfsg/debian/control
   libgit2-dev,

So it should pick the latest version, right? Why is it not happening?

One reason I can think of is that, my latest libgit2 is called
libgit2-1.0 while the *old* one is called libgit2-28, which is in fact
libgit2 v0.28.5+dfsg.1-1. Which one would debuild pick?

Hmm... no quite, looking further into all those libgit2 related
packages that I've already built, I saw mixed results:

-
$ dpkg-deb -f gir1.2-ggit-1.0_0.28.0.1-2_amd64.deb Depends
gir1.2-glib-2.0, libgit2-glib-1.0-0 (>= 0.28.0.1)

$ dpkg-deb -f golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28-dev_0.28.5-1_all.deb Depends
pkg-config, libgit2-dev (>> 0.28~)

$ dpkg-deb -f libgit2-glib-1.0-0-dbgsym_0.28.0.1-2_amd64.deb Depends
libgit2-glib-1.0-0 (= 0.28.0.1-2)

$ dpkg-deb -f libgit2-glib-1.0-0_0.28.0.1-2_amd64.deb Depends
libc6 (>= 2.14), libgit2-28 (>= 0.28.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.44.0)

$ dpkg-deb -f libgit2-glib-1.0-dev_0.28.0.1-2_amd64.deb Depends
gir1.2-ggit-1.0 (= 0.28.0.1-2), libgit2-glib-1.0-0 (= 0.28.0.1-2),
libgit2-dev (>= 0.26.0), libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.44.0)

$ dpkg-deb -f librust-libgit2-sys+https-dev_0.10.0-1_amd64.deb Depends
librust-libgit2-sys-dev (= 0.10.0-1), librust-openssl-sys-0.9+default-dev

$ dpkg-deb -f librust-libgit2-sys+libssh2-sys-dev_0.10.0-1_amd64.deb Depends
librust-libgit2-sys-dev (= 0.10.0-1),
librust-libssh2-sys-0.2+default-dev (>= 0.2.11-~~)

$ dpkg-deb -f librust-libgit2-sys-dev_0.10.0-1_amd64.deb Depends
librust-cc-1+default-dev (>= 1.0.42-~~), librust-cc-1+parallel-dev (>=
1.0.42-~~), librust-libc-0.2+default-dev,
librust-libz-sys-1+default-dev (>= 1.0.22-~~),
librust-pkg-config-0.3+default-dev (>= 0.3.7-~~), libgit2-dev
-

I.e.,

- some of them about built with libgit2-glib-1.0-0
- but some others are built with libgit2-28 (>= 0.28.1)
- and some I just literally don't know, e.g., libgit2-dev (>> 0.28~)

I.e., I still haven't figured out how to control the lib a package
should links to.

PS, here are all libgit2 related packages installed in my system, and
their versions:

libgit2-1.0:amd64_1.0.0+dfsg.1-1
libgit2-28:amd64_0.28.5+dfsg.1-1
libgit2-build-deps_1.0.0+dfsg.1-1
libgit2-dev:amd64_0.28.5+dfsg.1-1
libgit2-glib-1.0-0:amd64_0.28.0.1-2
libgit2-glib-1.0-dev:amd64_0.28.0.1-2

Please help.

thanks!



Bug#961996: RFS: uriparser/0.9.4+dfsg-1 -- URI parsing library compliant with RFC 3986

2020-10-17 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Hello,

Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2020, 08:02 +0300 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 08:29:42PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > ...
> > Changes since the last upload:
> > ...
> >  - New debian/not-installed:
> >+ Add all files of dh_missing errors.
> 
> This would be followed by
> 
> RFS: uriparser/0.9.4+dfsg-2 [RC]
>* Fix ftbfs with dh_missing
> 

  * debian/not-installed:
- Remove architecture specific path.

> > ...
> >  - Add +dsfg staff.
> 
> stuff
> 

Typo corrected.


The package is uploaded to mentors  
https://mentors.debian.net/package/uriparser/  


and can downloaded

https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uriparser/uriparser_0.9.4+dfsg-1.dsc

or from 

 git https://jff.email/cgit/uriparser.git?h=release%2Fdebian%2F0.9.4%2Bdfsg-1




> > ...
> > CU
> > Jörg Frings-Fürst
> 
> cu
> Adrian

CU
Jörg

-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:  https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema:  SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype:joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Speeding up test builds Re: Building a few of packages

2020-10-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer

(These are general hints, I haven't looked at your particular package.)

Since the binary you want is arch-specific (_amd64 rather than _all), 
use dpkg-buildpackage --build=source,any.


If the tests are long, you can skip them with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck. 
 If you're trying to fix a test failure bug, it is often possible to 
manually run a single test afterwards.  (How depends on what test 
framework upstream are using.)


If you still have the previous build tree, or expect to need more than 
one additional build, consider using dpkg-buildpackage --no-pre-clean to 
re-use the parts that haven't changed.  (Warning: this may not have the 
same result as a normal build.)


Tong Sun wrote:

The only way I can think of is to change d/control file, comment out
all other packages.


This probably won't be much faster: it's likely to build everything and 
just not package up the pieces you didn't ask for.


To do only part of the actual build, you probably need to modify 
debian/rules and/or the upstream build system.



But that will cause trouble to dpkg-buildpackage


Changes under debian/ shouldn't.  Changes to upstream files do need to 
be made into an actual patch (dpkg-source --commit), but this is not the 
same as committing to git.



or gbp buildpackage, which requires me checking in those temporary
changes before starting


This gbp check can be turned off with --git-ignore-new.



Bug#972107: xscreensaver: looking for new sponsor

2020-10-17 Thread Andrej Shadura
Hi Tormod,

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, at 20:50, Tormod Volden wrote:
> My current sponsor for the xscreensaver package is very busy with more
> important things so I am looking for someone to sponsor my
> 5.44+dfsg1-1 release from
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xscreensaver
> 
> I also asked the previous sponsor, without luck.
> 
> Hopefully someone that is also using xscreensaver and is willing to
> continue in the future. A co-maintainer would also be welcome.
> 
> But someone who just jumps in and uploads this release is also very
> much welcome!
> 
> Usually there are not many issues with my packages, so it shouldn't be
> a big task.

I have uploaded your package with a few minor changes.

I used to use xscreensaver myself even though I no longer do, but I can help 
you with packaging and uploads, feel free to prod me next time.

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrej



Bug#972107: xscreensaver: looking for new sponsor

2020-10-17 Thread Gürkan Myczko

Hi Tormod

Looking at this URL, one thing doesn't fit, it's yours:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;dist=unstable


(Following the advice on http://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto
... No, that's a joke because it is a broken link, from


If you specify where you saw that URL, you should be able to report it 
at

the right place to have it fixed.


https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_get_a_sponsor_for_my_package.3F)


I'm not able to find your xscreensaver package on mentors.debian.net.
Would be great if you could do that... Once I get access to your source 
package,

preferably a .dsc URL that I can use with dget.


My current sponsor for the xscreensaver package is very busy with more
important things so I am looking for someone to sponsor my
5.44+dfsg1-1 release from
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xscreensaver


Just having had a short look at it, you claim in d/changelog to bump
standards version and debhelper version.

debhelper still is at 9, and d/compat is around. We're at 13.
standards version should be 4.5.0. but shows me 4.1.4 at given salsa 
address.


I doubt anyone would sponsor that.


I also asked the previous sponsor, without luck.


The explanation is above... probably among other things.


Hopefully someone that is also using xscreensaver and is willing to
continue in the future. A co-maintainer would also be welcome.

But someone who just jumps in and uploads this release is also very
much welcome!


Debian stands for quality, so I doubt that'll happen at its current 
state.



Usually there are not many issues with my packages, so it shouldn't be
a big task.


Best,



Building a few of packages

2020-10-17 Thread Tong Sun
Hi,

How to select only a few packages to build, out of a single source?

The Calligra Suite, calligra-3.2.1+dfsg, builds 46 packages, and it
took over 8 hours to build on my machine.

Now I need to rebuild it, but need to rebuild only one out of the 46
packages -- calligra-gemini_3.2.1+dfsg-2_amd64.deb. What's the best
way to do that?

The only way I can think of is to change d/control file, comment out
all other packages. But that will cause trouble to dpkg-buildpackage
or gbp buildpackage, which requires me checking in those temporary
changes before starting, while checking in the temporary change then
revoke it later is something that I want to avoid.

Please help.

Thanks



Bug#972383: RFS: simple-scan/3.38.1-1 -- Simple Scanning Utility

2020-10-17 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "simple-scan":

   Package name: simple-scan
   Version : 3.38.1-1
   Upstream Author : Robert Ancell 
   URL : https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/simple-scan
   License : GPL-3+
   Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/simple-scan.git
   Section : gnome

It builds those binary packages:

  simple-scan - Simple Scanning Utility

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/simple-scan/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/simple-scan/simple-scan_3.38.1-1.dsc

or from 

 git https://jff.email/cgit/simple-scan.git?h=release%2Fdebian%2F3.38.1-1



Changes since the last upload:

 simple-scan (3.38.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.


CU
Jörg


-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:  https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema:  SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype:joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#972373: RFS: dmidecode/3.3-1 -- SMBIOS/DMI table decoder

2020-10-17 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmidecode":

   Package name: dmidecode
   Version : 3.3-1
   Upstream Author : dmidecode-de...@nongnu.org
   URL : https://nongnu.org/dmidecode/
   License : GPL-2+
   Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/dmidecode.git/
   Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

  dmidecode-udeb - SMBIOS/DMI table decoder (udeb)
  dmidecode - SMBIOS/DMI table decoder

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmidecode/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmidecode/dmidecode_3.3-1.dsc

or from 

 git https://jff.email/cgit/dmidecode.git/?h=release%2Fdebian%2F3.3-1


Changes since the last upload:

 dmidecode (3.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
 - Remove upstream applied patches:
   + debian/patches/0140-Fix_scan_entry_point.patch
   + debian/patches/0005-build.patch
 + Refresh debian/patches/0001-hurd.patch.
   * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.5.0 (No changes needed).
   * Migrate to debhelper 13:
 - Bump debhelper-compat version in debian/control to = 13.
   * Remove unused debian/source/include-binaries.
   * Remove superficial test.
   * debian/copyright:
 - Add year 2020 to Jean Delvare and myself.

CU
Jörg

-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:  https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema:  SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype:joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part