Bug#992470: RFS: yuma123/2.12-1 -- NETCONF/YANG server/client development toolchain

2021-08-18 Thread Vladimir Vassilev

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yuma123":

 * Package name: yuma123
   Version : 2.12-1
   Upstream Author : Vladimir Vassilev 
 * URL : https://yuma123.org
 * License : public-domain, MIT, Artistic or GPL-1+, BSD-3-clause
 * Vcs : -
   Section : net

It builds those binary packages:

  libyangrpc-dev - NETCONF/YANG simple client applications development files
  libyangrpc2 - NETCONF/YANG library for simple client applications
  netconfd-module-ietf-system - SIL module for netconfd implementing 
ietf-system.yang
  netconfd-module-ietf-interfaces - SIL module for netconfd implementing 
ietf-interfaces.yang
  yangdump - Validate YANG modules and convert them to different formats
  yangcli - NETCONF/YANG command line client application
  netconfd - NETCONF (RFC-6241) agent
  libyuma-dev - NETCONF/YANG application development files
  libyuma2 - NETCONF/YANG library
  libyuma-base - Configuration script, YANG models and documentation

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/yuma123/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yuma123/yuma123_2.12-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 yuma123 (2.12-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Bump Standards version to 4.5.1
   * Updated homepage. Closes: #929522
   * Added "Multi-Arch: same" to -dev and module packages
   * Added 0005-Workaround-library-not-linked-against-libc.patch

Regards,
--
  Vladimir Vassilev



Bug#992456: RFS: libonig/6.9.7.1-2 -- regular expressions library

2021-08-18 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libonig":

   Package name: libonig
   Version : 6.9.7.1-2
   Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
   URL : https://github.com/kkos/oniguruma
   License : BSD-2-clause
   Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/libonig.git
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  libonig-dev - regular expressions library — development files
  libonig5 - regular expressions library

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libonig/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libo/libonig/libonig_6.9.7.1-2.dsc

or from 

 git https://jff.email/cgit/libonig.git/?h=release/debian/6.9.7.1-2

Changes since the last upload:

 libonig (6.9.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Upload into unstable.
   * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.0 (No changes needed).


CU
Jörg
-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:  https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema: SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype: joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#992451: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.32-4 -- API library for scanners

2021-08-18 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sane-backends":

   Package name: sane-backends
   Version : 1.0.32-4
   Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
   URL : http://www.sane-project.org
   License : Artistic, GPL-3+, GPL-2, GPL-2+,
 GPL-2+ with sane exception, GFDL-1.1, LGPL-2.1+
   Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/sane-backends.git
   Section : graphics

It builds those binary packages:

  libsane - API library for scanners [transitional package]
  libsane-dev - API development library for scanners [development files]
  libsane1 - API library for scanners
  libsane-common - API library for scanners -- documentation and support files
  sane-utils - API library for scanners -- utilities

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/sane-backends/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

 dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sane-backends/sane-backends_1.0.32-4.dsc

or from 

 git https://jff.email/cgit/sane-backends.git?h=release/debian/1.0.32-4

Changes since the last upload:

 sane-backends (1.0.32-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Upload into unstable.
   * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.0 (No changes needed).

CU
Jörg
-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:  https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema: SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype: joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#992450: RFS: shotwell/0.30.14-1 -- digital photo organizer

2021-08-18 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shotwell":

   Package name: shotwell
   Version : 0.30.14-1
   Upstream Author : Jim Nelson 
   URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Shotwell
   License : LGPL-2.1
   Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/shotwell.git
   Section : gnome

It builds those binary packages:

  shotwell-common - digital photo organizer - common files
  shotwell - digital photo organizer

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/shotwell/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

 dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shotwell/shotwell_0.30.14-1.dsc

or from 

 git https://jff.email/cgit/shotwell.git/?h=release/debian/0.30.14-1

Changes since the last upload:

 shotwell (0.30.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.0 (No changes needed).
   * debian/copyright:
 - Add year 2021 for debian/* to myself.

CU
Jörg

-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:  https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema: SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype: joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#988329: ITA: usbredir/0.9.0-1 -- Simple USB host TCP server

2021-08-18 Thread Lin Qigang
Hi Tobi,

> (- as said in the mail before, dont close the RFS bug in the changelog)
> 

> -   you could add yourself to the debian/* section in d/copyright,
> -   d/control
> -   has still the old S-V of 4.2.1...
> -   the long description for usbredirserver, the deprecation notice should
> 

> possibly have its own paragraph?
> -   is the B-D on cmake necessary? (as the package uses meson)

I made the changes, it should be good now

> As othewise the package looks good, so lets finish the polishing and 
> then do the upload!   


I retargeted the package to unstable since Debian released recently. I noticed 
there was a new version of usbredir released last week. Should I reupload the 
package with that version?

Lin Qigang 
GPG Fingerprint:  8CAD 1250 8EE0 3A41 7223  03EC 7096 F91E D75D 028F

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#992434: RFS: extsmail/2.5-1 -- enables the robust sending of e-mail to external commands

2021-08-18 Thread Olivier Girondel



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "extsmail"

 * Package name: extsmail
   Version : 2.5-1
   Upstream Author : Laurence Tratt 
 * URL : https://tratt.net/laurie/src/extsmail/
 * License : BSD/MIT
   Section : mail

  It builds this binary package:

extsmail   - enables the robust sending of e-mail to external commands

  The package appears to be lintian-clean

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/extsmail


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/extsmail/extsmail_2.5-1.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release 2.5.
  * debian/control: Build-Depends: Update debhelper-compat (= 13).
  * debian/control: Build-Depends: Add libbsd-dev.
  * debian/control: Standards-Version: 4.6.0.0.
  * debian/patches/: Removed.

  Regards,

--
Olivier



Bug#992431: RFS: chromono/1.1.1-1 [ITP] -- A circular color puzzle game

2021-08-18 Thread Thomas Perl
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chromono":

* Package name: chromono
   Version : 1.1.1-1
   Upstream Author : Thomas Perl 
* URL : https://thp.io/2013/chromono/
* License : CC-BY-3.0, GPL-2+, CC0
   Section : games

It builds those binary packages:

  chromono - A circular color puzzle game

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/chromono/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chromono/chromono_1.1.1-1.dsc

Changes for the initial release:

chromono (1.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium



Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation

2021-08-18 Thread Leon Marz
Hi tobi,
Thanks for helping me adopting this package.
First I'm sorry that I haven't answered before. For some reason I didn't
receive any of your emails. Hopefully that is now fixed.

On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:50:47 +0200 Tobias Frost 
wrote:> What I can see from the diff is that the only package dropped is
vim-ascidoc.
> This looks sane to me, and due to the fact that vim depends on vim-runtime
> on any vim flavour != tiny, people possibly have already vim-runtime 
> installed.

In the previous discussion I have stated that I also want to remove
asciidoc-base. During the freeze period I've decided that I want to keep
this binary package because it reduces the amount of dependencies for
smaller use cases like generating man pages. Sorry if that caused some
confusion.

> However -- as popcon of the package is rather high -- I would put up some
> NEWS.Debian file saying that this is dropped in favour of vim-runtime; 
> This is especially useful, if (I did not check if that is the case!) the
> user needs to do someting to switch to the vim-runtime provided thingy.
> What do you think?

Sounds good. I have written something in the NEWS file in the newest
upload. The user doesn't have to change their configuration. It should
work out of the box.

- Leon




OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#968576: RFS: golang-github-emersion-go-message-dev/0.12.0-1 -- dependency of aerc 0.4.0

2021-08-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Tue, 01 Jun 2021 08:02:43 +0200 Tobias Frost  wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:41:35 +0530 Nilesh Patra  wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> (...)
> > It has been a while, but do you still need sponsoring for this? If yes,
> > I'm willing to do so.
> > 
> > PS: aerc is out of testing for this release unfortunately :/
> > Nevertheless, lets target the next one
> 
> Pinging Ben explictly… Maybe he missed that mail.
> (Otherwise I'll mark the bugs moreinfo in a few weeks, as they are not
> actionable without Ben's feedback; this includes the other golang RFS-bugs as
> well…)

Few weeks earlier, I saw a message from the other manitainer of aerc
(Karthik in CC) in
a common channel saying that both him and Ben do not have the time and
enrgy to maintain this.
Maybe someone really will have to take over the maintainance. I'll try
reaching out meanwhile to ben but Ben does not seem active either.

@Karthik, can you confirm that this is right? And if yes, can you please
send in an email to the list if someone wants to take over the
maintainance, if not, could you please file in a RFA bug?

It still has RC bugs open, version lags behind, and folks are interested
in the package as well, so this is kinda important.
Hope that's fine

Nilesh


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature