Bug#1005360: marked as done (RFS: xca/2.4.0-2 -- x509 Certification Authority management tool based on QT)

2022-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 13:22:40 +0100
with message-id <40f6dc53-0b18-dfd0-99cd-b78f8a4c5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: xca/2.4.0-2 -- x509 Certification Authority 
management tool based on QT
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005360,
regarding RFS: xca/2.4.0-2 -- x509 Certification Authority management tool 
based on QT
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1005360: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005360
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xca":

* Package name : xca
Version : 2.4.0-2
Upstream Author : Christian Hohnstaedt
* URL : https://hohnstaedt.de/xca/
* License : BSD-3-clause
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xca
Section : x11

It builds those binary packages:

xca - x509 Certification Authority management tool based on QT

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


https://mentors.debian.net/package/xca/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xca/xca_2.4.0-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

xca (2.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium--- End Message ---


Bug#1005371: marked as done (RFS: libfilezilla/0.36.0-2 -- build high-performing platform-independent programs (runtime lib))

2022-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:00:46 +0100
with message-id <8f91fa4c-7d72-e702-4091-104a21b38...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: libfilezilla/0.36.0-2 -- build high-performing 
platform-independent programs (runtime lib)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005371,
regarding RFS: libfilezilla/0.36.0-2 -- build high-performing 
platform-independent programs (runtime lib)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1005371: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005371
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libfilezilla":

 * Package name: libfilezilla
   Version : 0.36.0-2
   Upstream Author : Tim Kosse 
 * URL : https://lib.filezilla-project.org/
 * License : GPL-2+
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libfilezilla
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  libfilezilla-dev - build high-performing platform-independent programs 
(development)
  libfilezilla-common - build high-performing platform-independent programs 
(translations)
  libfilezilla24 - build high-performing platform-independent programs (runtime 
lib)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libfilezilla/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libf/libfilezilla/libfilezilla_0.36.0-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 libfilezilla (0.36.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Source only upload for migration to testing

Note: Already imported into salsa.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***

WWW: https://kathenas.org

Twitter: @kathenasorg

IRC: kathenas

GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Thanks for the contribution.--- End Message ---


Bug#1005371: RFS: libfilezilla/0.36.0-2 -- build high-performing platform-independent programs (runtime lib)

2022-02-12 Thread Philip Wyett
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libfilezilla":

 * Package name: libfilezilla
   Version : 0.36.0-2
   Upstream Author : Tim Kosse 
 * URL : https://lib.filezilla-project.org/
 * License : GPL-2+
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libfilezilla
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  libfilezilla-dev - build high-performing platform-independent programs 
(development)
  libfilezilla-common - build high-performing platform-independent programs 
(translations)
  libfilezilla24 - build high-performing platform-independent programs (runtime 
lib)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libfilezilla/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libf/libfilezilla/libfilezilla_0.36.0-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 libfilezilla (0.36.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Source only upload for migration to testing

Note: Already imported into salsa.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***

WWW: https://kathenas.org

Twitter: @kathenasorg

IRC: kathenas

GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1003080: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/0.2-2 [ITP] -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)

2022-02-12 Thread Gioele Barabucci

Control: tags - moreinfo

On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:25:01 +0100 Bastian Germann  wrote:

The package fails to build from scratch because misses the shellcheck build 
dependency.

FTBFS fixed and new revision of the package uploaded to mentors.

Regards,

--
Gioele Barabucci