Bug#1006018: marked as done (RFS: color-picker/1.0.3-2 -- Powerful screen color picker based on Qt)

2022-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2022 11:25:29 +0100
with message-id <20220219112529.4eb64...@vip.jcf.pm>
and subject line Re: Bug#1006018: RFS: color-picker/1.0.3-2 -- Powerful screen 
color picker based on Qt
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006018,
regarding RFS: color-picker/1.0.3-2 -- Powerful screen color picker based on Qt
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1006018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006018
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "color-picker":

 * Package name: color-picker
   Version : 1.0.3-2
   Upstream Author : https://github.com/keshavbhatt/ColorPicker/issues
 * URL : https://github.com/keshavbhatt/ColorPicker
 * License : MIT
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/colorpicker
   Section : graphics

It builds those binary packages:

  color-picker - Powerful screen color picker based on Qt

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/color-picker/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/color-picker/color-picker_1.0.3-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 color-picker (1.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/upstream/io.github.keshavbhatt.color_picker.metainfo.xml:
   - Fix url of the images.
   - Improving the description.

Regards,
--
  Hugo Torres de Lima
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
uploaded, thanks!


pgpBAzlf_stzL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#1006120: marked as done (RFS: asciidoc/10.1.2-1 -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation)

2022-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2022 19:13:24 +0100
with message-id <20220219191324.58f78...@vip.jcf.pm>
and subject line re: RFS: asciidoc/10.1.2-1 -- Highly configurable text format 
for writing documentation
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006120,
regarding RFS: asciidoc/10.1.2-1 -- Highly configurable text format for writing 
documentation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1006120: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asciidoc":

 * Package name: asciidoc
   Version : 10.1.2-1
   Upstream Author : AsciiDoc Contributors 
https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc

 * URL : https://asciidoc.org
 * License : GPL-2+, GPL-2-only, GFDL-NIV-1.3, Expat
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/asciidoc
   Section : text

It builds those binary packages:

  asciidoc - Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
  asciidoc-common - Basic data and configuration files for asciidoc
  asciidoc-base - Minimal version of asciidoc not suitable for pdf
  asciidoc-dblatex - Asciidoc package including dblatex dependencies
  asciidoc-fop - Asciidoc package including fop dependencies
  asciidoc-tests - Test framework for asciidoc

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/asciidoc/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciidoc/asciidoc_10.1.2-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

 asciidoc (10.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 10.1.2
   * d/rules: Manually start tests

- Leon


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
uploaded, thanks!


pgpe7PexR7ZuU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#1005336: RFS: srpc/0.9.6 [ITP] Sogou RPC Library

2022-02-19 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:42:57PM +, Lance Lin wrote:
>  * Package name: srpc
>Version : 0.9.6

>   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/srpc/srpc_0.9.6-1.dsc

Hi!
I'm afraid the package fails to build, it needs a Build-Depend on
liblz4-dev.

Some files are "Copyright 2019, OpenTelemetry Authors" without being
mentioned in debian/copyright.

You install /usr/bin/srpc_generator to libsrpc-dev yet
/usr/share/man/man1/srpc_generator.1.gz to libsrpc -- they should be in
the same package.

The runtime library package should have a soname included in its name;
this will allow ABI bumps in the future.

The -dev package can't be "Multi-Arch: foreign" as its architecture must
match whatever [Build-]Depends on it.  Currently, if you want to build
a riscv64 package on an amd64 host, M-A: foreign would allow:
compiler:riscv64
libsrpc-dev:amd64
libsrpc0:amd64
which won't work.


喵!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Latin:   meow 4 characters, 4 columns,  4 bytes
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Greek:   μεου 4 characters, 4 columns,  8 bytes
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Runes:   ᛗᛖᛟᚹ 4 characters, 4 columns, 12 bytes
⠈⠳⣄ Chinese: 喵   1 character,  2 columns,  3 bytes <-- best!