Bug#1011394: RFS: shotwell/0.30.16-1 -- digital photo organizer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shotwell": Package name: shotwell Version : 0.30.16-1 Upstream Author : Jim Nelson URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Shotwell License : LGPL-2.1 Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/shotwell.git Section : gnome The source builds the following binary packages: shotwell - digital photo organizer shotwell-common - digital photo organizer - common files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/shotwell/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shotwell/shotwell_0.30.16-1.dsc or from git https://jff.email/cgit/shotwell.git/?h=release%2Fdebian%2F0.30.16-1 Changes since the last upload: shotwell (0.30.16-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release: - Remove not longer needed patches: + debian/patches/0110-use_relative_lib_path.patch. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser git: https://jff.email/cgit/ Threema: SYR8SJXB Wire: @joergfringsfuerst Skype: joergpenguin Ring: jff Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1011311: RFS: colordiff/1.0.20-1 -- tool to colorize 'diff' output
Thanks for uploading, I see the package has entered unstable. What is the convention now, with this RFS bug? Should I mark it as closed/done? Dave. -- Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
Bug#1011384: RFS: bats/1.7.0-0.1 [NMU] -- bash automated testing system
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the package "bats": * Package name: bats Version : 1.7.0-0.1 (unstable has 1.2.0) * URL : https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core * License : MIT * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/gioele/bats (my fork) : https://github.com/neurodebian/bats (maintainer's) Section : shells The source builds the following binary packages: bats - bash automated testing system To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/bats/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bats/bats_1.7.0-0.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: bats (1.7.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload * New upstream release (Closes: #1009366) * debian/control: Use debhelper 13 * debian/patches: Remove unused patch `deb_libexec_to_lib` * debian/control: Update standards version to 4.6.1, no changes * debian/watch: Update to latest standard pattern * debian/copyright: Update years and format URL * debian/control: Specify Rules-Requires-Root: no Regards, -- Gioele Barabucci
Bug#1011018: RFS: pyment/1.0-1 [ITP] -- generate/convert the docstrings from code signature
Am 21.05.22 um 14:21 schrieb Nilson Silva: Why don't you build the documentation? It should be included as separate binary package. Please see the dh_make python template on how to build it without using the Makefile. Sorry, but I've never done that. Could you tell me how to do it? See an example in source package cbor2 that builds binary package python-cbor2-doc. Look at d/control, d/rules, and d/python-cbor2-doc.* files. This uses the template-generated source almost untouched.
Bug#1011383: marked as done (RFS: gcc-sh-elf/4 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices)
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2022 15:36:16 +0200 with message-id <185a79a6-0d38-29ff-9c48-9993a838c...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/4 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices has caused the Debian Bug report #1011383, regarding RFS: gcc-sh-elf/4 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1011383: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011383 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf": * Package name : gcc-sh-elf Version : 4 * License : various * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/toolchains/gcc-sh-elf Section : devel The source builds the following binary packages: gcc-sh-elf - GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices libnewlib-sh-elf-dev - small ISO C standard library for embedded SuperH devices To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-sh-elf/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-sh-elf/gcc-sh-elf_4.dsc This is just an upload of the existing experimental package to unstable along with a Standards-Version bump. It was uploaded to experimental because of a serious regression in GCC 12, but it has since been fixed for the most part and I'm happy to upload it to unstable now. Otherwise, I do not believe new test failures deserve additional attention. I believe the autopkgtests offer very good coverage for this package; they all pass. Furthermore, I've been able to build carl9170fw using GCC 12 without a problem. (I'll be resurrecting my RFS for carl9170fw soon.) I'll probe the reproducible builds situation soon, but this should not postpone the migration to GCC 12. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Please push the change in git as well. Uploaded.--- End Message ---
Bug#1011377: RFS: ngraph-gtk/6.09.06-1 -- create scientific 2-dimensional graphs
Control: tags 1011377 - moreinfo From: Bastian Germann Subject: Re: RFS: ngraph-gtk/6.09.06-1 -- create scientific 2-dimensional graphs Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 13:29:37 +0200 Message-ID: > Please integrate Helmut's changelog into the 6.09.06-1 log. > UNRELEASED versions are not supposed to be included in the changelog. Thak you for the comment. I have fixed the problem and uploaded to mentors.debian.org.
Bug#1011383: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/4 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf": * Package name : gcc-sh-elf Version : 4 * License : various * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/toolchains/gcc-sh-elf Section : devel The source builds the following binary packages: gcc-sh-elf - GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices libnewlib-sh-elf-dev - small ISO C standard library for embedded SuperH devices To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-sh-elf/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-sh-elf/gcc-sh-elf_4.dsc This is just an upload of the existing experimental package to unstable along with a Standards-Version bump. It was uploaded to experimental because of a serious regression in GCC 12, but it has since been fixed for the most part and I'm happy to upload it to unstable now. Otherwise, I do not believe new test failures deserve additional attention. I believe the autopkgtests offer very good coverage for this package; they all pass. Furthermore, I've been able to build carl9170fw using GCC 12 without a problem. (I'll be resurrecting my RFS for carl9170fw soon.) I'll probe the reproducible builds situation soon, but this should not postpone the migration to GCC 12. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1011379: marked as done (RFS: ffmpegfs/2.10-2~bpo11+1 [ ITP] -- read-only FUSE filesystem which transcodes between audio and video formats on the fly))
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2022 15:11:19 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: ffmpegfs/2.10-2~bpo11+1 [ ITP] -- read-only FUSE filesystem which transcodes between audio and video formats on the fly) has caused the Debian Bug report #1011379, regarding RFS: ffmpegfs/2.10-2~bpo11+1 [ ITP] -- read-only FUSE filesystem which transcodes between audio and video formats on the fly) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1011379: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011379 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ffmpegfs" to upload it to bullseye-backports, hoping to find someone who's interested. Package is the same as in Bookworm testing, see https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/ffmpegfs, just repackaged for backports. * Package name : ffmpegfs Version : 2.10-2~bpo11+1 Upstream Author : Norbert Schlia nsch...@oblivion-software.de * URL : https://github.com/nschlia/ffmpegfs * License : GPL Section : mutimedia It builds those binary packages: ffmpegfs - read-only FUSE filesystem which transcodes between audio and video formats on the fly To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ffmpegfs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/ffmpegfs/ffmpegfs_2.10-2~bpo11+1.dsc More information about ffmpegfs can be obtained from https://nschlia.github.io/ffmpegfs/html/index.html. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Norbert has provided a new version that I have just uploaded.--- End Message ---
Bug#1011379: RFS: ffmpegfs/2.10-2~bpo11+1 [ ITP] -- read-only FUSE filesystem which transcodes between audio and video formats on the fly)
Control: tags -1 moreinfo You have removed a whole lot of the changelog. The only diff should be: diff -Nru ffmpegfs-2.10/debian/changelog ffmpegfs-2.10/debian/changelog --- ffmpegfs-2.10/debian/changelog 2022-05-15 16:28:10.0 +0200 +++ ffmpegfs-2.10/debian/changelog 2022-05-21 09:18:36.0 +0200 @@ -1,13 +1,19 @@ +ffmpegfs (2.10-2~bpo11+1) bullseye-backports; urgency=medium + + * Rebuild for bullseye-backports. + + -- Norbert Schlia Sat, 21 May 2022 09:18:36 +0200 + ffmpegfs (2.10-2) unstable; urgency=medium Please provide a version that does not touch the changelog in that way. When you are done with a reupload, untag moreinfo.
Bug#1011377: RFS: ngraph-gtk/6.09.06-1 -- create scientific 2-dimensional graphs
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Sat, 21 May 2022 18:42:21 +0900 (JST) Hiroyuki Ito wrote: Changes since the last upload: ngraph-gtk (6.09.06-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * debian/control - bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1 - ngraph-gtk-doc is marked as Multi-Arch: foreign. * patches/cross.patch - removed because it was merged to the upstream ngraph-gtk (6.09.05-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Improve cross building: (Closes: #1004486) - Annotate ruby interpreter dependency with :native. - Do not abuse AC_CHECK_FILE for build system files. Please integrate Helmut's changelog into the 6.09.06-1 log. UNRELEASED versions are not supposed to be included in the changelog. When you have provided a fixed version untag moreinfo.
Bug#1011377: RFS: ngraph-gtk/6.09.06-1 -- create scientific 2-dimensional graphs
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ngraph-gtk": * Package name: ngraph-gtk Version : 6.09.06-1 Upstream Author : Ito Hiroyuki * URL : http://hito.music.coocan.jp/ngraph/ngraph-gtk.html * License : GPL-2.0+, CC0-1.0, GPL-3.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/hito-guest/ngraph-gtk/ Section : graphics The source builds the following binary packages: ngraph-gtk - create scientific 2-dimensional graphs libngraph0 - library to create scientific 2-dimensional graphs ngraph-gtk-addins-base - addins of Ngraph-gtk - base programs ngraph-gtk-addins - addin collection of Ngraph-gtk ngraph-gtk-addin-import-ps - import-ps addin of Ngraph-gtk ngraph-gtk-addin-tex-equation - tex-equation addin of Ngraph-gtk ngraph-gtk-addin-spellcheck - spell check addin of Ngraph-gtk ngraph-gtk-doc - documents of Ngraph-gtk libngraph0-dev - Header files for compiling plugins for Ngraph-gtk ngraph-gtk-plugin-ruby - Ruby plugin for Ngraph-gtk ruby-ngraph - Library for using ngraph-gtk Ruby programs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ngraph-gtk/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ngraph-gtk/ngraph-gtk_6.09.06-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: ngraph-gtk (6.09.06-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * debian/control - bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1 - ngraph-gtk-doc is marked as Multi-Arch: foreign. * patches/cross.patch - removed because it was merged to the upstream ngraph-gtk (6.09.05-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Improve cross building: (Closes: #1004486) - Annotate ruby interpreter dependency with :native. - Do not abuse AC_CHECK_FILE for build system files. Regards, -- Hiroyuki Ito
Bug#1011370: RFS: rednotebook/2.25+ds-1~bpo11+1 -- Modern desktop diary and personal journaling tool
Hi Phil, Please ask for DM rights on your package in backports. Then you should be able to upload this yourself. Thanks, Bastian
Bug#1011370: RFS: rednotebook/2.25+ds-1~bpo11+1 -- Modern desktop diary and personal journaling tool
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rednotebook": * Package name: rednotebook Version : 2.25+ds-1~bpo11+1 Upstream Author : Jendrik Seipp * URL : https://rednotebook.app * License : PSF-2, GPL-2+, GPL-3+, CC0-1.0, LGPL-3+ * Vcs : https://github.com/jendrikseipp/rednotebook Section : text The source builds the following binary packages: rednotebook - Modern desktop diary and personal journaling tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/rednotebook/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rednotebook/rednotebook_2.25+ds-1~bpo11+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: rednotebook (2.25+ds-1~bpo11+1) bullseye-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for bullseye-backports. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** Associations: * Debian Maintainer (DM) * Fedora/EPEL Maintainer. * Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation. WWW: https://kathenas.org Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Twitter: @kathenasorg Instagram: @kathenasorg IRC: kathenas GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
