Bug#1011670: RFS: open-ath9k-htc-firmware/1.4.0-108-gd856466+dfsg1 -- firmware for AR7010 and AR9271 USB wireless adapters
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-ath9k-htc-firmware": * Package name : open-ath9k-htc-firmware Version : 1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : ath9k_htc...@lists.infradead.org * URL : https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-firmware * License : BSD-3-Clause-Clear, Expat, BSD-3-Clause-Clear or GPL-2, GPL-2+-with-linking-exception, GPL-2, FSFAP-with-endorsements- clause, BSD-3-Clause-Clear or GPL-2, and BSD-4-Clause, BSD-3-Clause or GPL-2 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/jscott/open-ath9k-htc-firmware Section : kernel The source builds the following binary packages: firmware-ath9k-htc - firmware for AR7010 and AR9271 USB wireless adapters To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/open-ath9k-htc-firmware/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/open-ath9k-htc-firmware/open-ath9k-htc-firmware_1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: open-ath9k-htc-firmware (1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Add package version control info. * Clean up the copyright file. - Distinguish the BSD 3-Clause Clear variant from the conventional one. - Make conformant to DEP-5 specification for machine readability. * Build cross toolchain with Binutils 2.36 and GCC 12 with patch. This package was previously uploaded, but failed to clear NEW because my introduction of a udeb wasn't fully vetted. This upload drops the udeb so we can fix the FTBFS; perhaps it can be reintroduced later. I think Bastian Germann has been watching this package closely, so allow a little time for him to review this RFS. I would like to move the Salsa repo into the Debian namespace as he suggested; could somebody create this for me? My Salsa username is 'jscott' Thanks everyone! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1010242: RFS: opengnb/1.2.8.7-1 [ITP] -- via P2P to setup de-centralized layer3 network VPN
Hi Bastian, Thanks for your detail review d/copyright. I'd added the copyright infos as your suggestions. The libs/protocol/network_protocol.h is mixed the third-party file and upstream author's modify. I add some comments on it: Files: libs/protocol/network_protocol.h Copyright:1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 WIDE Project. 1982, 1986, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. License: BSD-3-clause Comment: The upstream distribution does not contain an explicit statement of copyright ownership. . struct ip6_hdr come from FreeBSD: src/sys/netinet/ip6.h /* $FreeBSD: src/sys/netinet/ip6.h,v 1.5 2001/06/11 12:39:00 ume Exp $ */ /* $KAME: ip6.h,v 1.18 2001/03/29 05:34:30 itojun Exp $ */ . struct iphdr come from BSD, modified by upstream author. The other parts of this file is write by upstream author. Is this acceptable? I also minor update the d/control file for the package description's grammar. I uploaded the new package to: https://mentors.debian.net/package/opengnb/ The attachment is orig ip.h file come from FreeBSD. Thanks! xiao sheng wen 在 2022/5/24 00:50, Bastian Germann 写道: > Hi Xiao, > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:14:51 +0800 wrote: >> Changes for the initial release: >> >> opengnb (1.2.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=low >> . >> [ xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) ] >> * Initial release (Closes: #1003101) > > I have had a first look at d/copyright. There are some problems: > > * license shortname has to be GPL-3+ as the "or later" clause is used > * missing tap-windows.h license (has to be included even if not compiled) > => It is GPL-3+ incompatible GPL-2 licensed but okay as it is not > compiled. > * missing murmurhash license (might be public domain but has to be > documented) > * missing ed25519 license > * missing miniupnpc license. The license has to be included even > though its deb pkg is used. > > Where does libs/protocol/network_protocol.h come from? It looks like a > third-party file. > This might be a copyright violation. > > d/control: Please have a look at the package description's grammar > again, especially simple present singular-s is missing at some places. > > Thanks, > Bastian > > -- 肖盛文 xiao sheng wen Faris Xiao 微信(wechat)：atzlinux 《铜豌豆 Linux》https://www.atzlinux.com 基于 Debian 的 Linux 中文 桌面 操作系统 Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=atzlinux%40sina.com GnuPG Public Key: 0x00186602339240CB /* $FreeBSD: src/sys/netinet/ip6.h,v 1.5 2001/06/11 12:39:00 ume Exp $ */ /* $KAME: ip6.h,v 1.18 2001/03/29 05:34:30 itojun Exp $ */ /* * Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 WIDE Project. * All rights reserved. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * 3. Neither the name of the project nor the names of its contributors *may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software *without specific prior written permission. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE PROJECT AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PROJECT OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF * SUCH DAMAGE. */ /* * Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1993 * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors *may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software *without specific prior written permission. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONT
Bug#1011018: marked as done (RFS: pyment/0.3.4+ds-1 [ITP] -- generate/convert the docstrings from code signature)
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 02:21:02 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: ENC: RFS: pyment/1.0-1 [ITP] -- generate/convert the docstrings from code signature (CONSIDER THIS) has caused the Debian Bug report #1011018, regarding RFS: pyment/0.3.4+ds-1 [ITP] -- generate/convert the docstrings from code signature to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1011018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011018 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyment": * Package name: pyment Version : 0.3.4+ds-1 Upstream Author : https://github.com/dadadel/pyment/issues * URL : https://github.com/dadadel/pyment * License : GPL-3, BSD-3-Clause or GPL-2+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pyment Section : utils The source builds the following binary packages: pyment - generate/convert the docstrings from code signature To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyment/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyment/pyment_0.3.4+ds-1.dsc https://salsa.debian.org/nilsonfsilva/pyment Note: I made a manual that was sent https://github.com/dadadel/pyment/pull/122 Changes for the initial release: pyment (0.3.4+ds-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Initial release. (Closes: #876813) Regards, -- Josenilson Ferreira da SIlva --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Am 25.05.22 um 23:42 schrieb Nilson Silva: Below are the requirements you made earlier: Following the pattern of the package you had suggested to me as an example, this three lintian remained: X: python-pyment-doc: new-package-should-not-package-python2-module python-pyment-doc X: python3-pyment: application-in-library-section python usr/bin/pyment X: python3-pyment: library-package-name-for-application usr/bin/pyment To remove the lintians would have to change the names of pyment and pymentt-doc and the pyment session. But I don't know if it would be correct. I preferred to wait for you to guide me first. Keep it as-is. Please change d/copyright's Files-Excluded to the whole doc/sphinx/html directory. *done*. Please force push the upstream branch, rebase debian/master on it and then force push debian/master. **done*.* Why don't you build the documentation? It should be included as separate binary package. Please see the dh_make python template on how to build it without using the Makefile. *done*. I have slightly changed d/copyright and d/watch in git. Please pull the changes. *done*.. When you have updated the package please untag moreinfo. *done*. I followed the repository with the changes. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pyment/-/tree/debian/master/ https://salsa.debian.org/nilsonfsilva/pyment strangely in my repository the CI/CD test passes. In salsa Debian is giving error. I have correected the team repo. You had the debian/ dir in the upstream branch commit and one upstream file was touched. I do not know why the CI in your user namespace passed. There are examples in the sources that do not show up in the package. I have added them. I am uploading this. For future python team packages, please hand in the RFS as topic change in the team's IRC.--- End Message ---
Bug#1011651: marked as done (RFS: logrotate/3.18.0-2+deb11u1 -- Log rotation utility)
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2022 01:45:40 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1011651: RFS: logrotate/3.18.0-2+deb11u1 -- Log rotation utility has caused the Debian Bug report #1011651, regarding RFS: logrotate/3.18.0-2+deb11u1 -- Log rotation utility to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1011651: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011651 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logrotate": * Package name: logrotate Version : 3.18.0-2+deb11u1 Upstream Author : https://github.com/logrotate/logrotate/issues * URL : https://github.com/logrotate/logrotate * License : GPL-2, GPL-3+, BSD-3-Clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/logrotate Section : admin The source builds the following binary packages: logrotate - Log rotation utility To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/logrotate/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logrotate/logrotate_3.18.0-2+deb11u1.dsc Changes since the last upload: logrotate (3.18.0-2+deb11u1) stable; urgency=medium . * d/patches: cherry-pick upstream fixes: - skip locking if state file is world-readable (CVE-2022-1348) . - more strict configuration parsing to avoid parsing parts of foreign files, e.g. core dumps, (see #1002022) . - do not use incorrect stat information when verifying an olddir configuration after creating the olddir . - advance pointer in full_write on incomplete write to avoid data corruption See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004580 and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011644 Regards, Christian Göttsche --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:50:30AM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: >Version : 3.18.0-2+deb11u1 >Upstream Author : https://github.com/logrotate/logrotate/issues > logrotate (3.18.0-2+deb11u1) stable; urgency=medium > . >* d/patches: cherry-pick upstream fixes: > - skip locking if state file is world-readable (CVE-2022-1348) > . > - more strict configuration parsing to avoid parsing >parts of foreign files, e.g. core dumps, (see #1002022) > . > - do not use incorrect stat information when verifying an olddir >configuration after creating the olddir > . > - advance pointer in full_write on incomplete write to avoid data >corruption You need to target "bullseye" not "stable", as the latter keeps changing. I've amended this and uploaded. > See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004580 > and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011644 Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ If you ponder doing what Jesus did, remember than flipping tables ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and chasing people with a whip is a prime choice. ⠈⠳⣄--- End Message ---
Bug#1011368: RFS: libkdumpfile/0.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Python bindings for libkdumpfile9
Hi Adam, On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 13:31 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 03:50:08PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > * Package name : libkdumpfile > > Version : 0.4.1-1 > > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/michel/libkdumpfile > > > libkdumpfile-bin - libkdumpfile9 utilities > > libkdumpfile-dev - libkdumpfile9 development libraries and header > > files > > libkdumpfile-doc - Kernel coredump file access (documentation) > > libkdumpfile9 - Kernel coredump file access > > python3-libkdumpfile - Python bindings for libkdumpfile9 > > > libkdumpfile (0.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > . > > * Initial release (Closes: #1010829) > > Hi! > I'm afraid the autopkgtest fails: > Ah, thanks. How do I run this locally? Best, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1011368: RFS: libkdumpfile/0.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Python bindings for libkdumpfile9
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 03:50:08PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > * Package name: libkdumpfile >Version : 0.4.1-1 > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/michel/libkdumpfile > libkdumpfile-bin - libkdumpfile9 utilities > libkdumpfile-dev - libkdumpfile9 development libraries and header > files > libkdumpfile-doc - Kernel coredump file access (documentation) > libkdumpfile9 - Kernel coredump file access > python3-libkdumpfile - Python bindings for libkdumpfile9 > libkdumpfile (0.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Initial release (Closes: #1010829) Hi! I'm afraid the autopkgtest fails: autopkgtest [13:24:56]: test autodep8-python3: set -e ; for py in $(py3versions -r 2>/dev/null) ; do cd "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" ; echo "Testing with $py:" ; $py -c "import libkdumpfile; print(libkdumpfile)" ; done autopkgtest [13:24:56]: test autodep8-python3: [--- Testing with python3.9: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'libkdumpfile' Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ * *** ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1011485: marked as done (RFS: proftpd-mod-kafka/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ProFTPD module mod_kafka)
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 13:16:10 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1011485: RFS: proftpd-mod-kafka/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ProFTPD module mod_kafka has caused the Debian Bug report #1011485, regarding RFS: proftpd-mod-kafka/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ProFTPD module mod_kafka to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1011485: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011485 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proftpd-mod-kafka": * Package name: proftpd-mod-kafka Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : TJ Saunders * URL : https://github.com/Castaglia/proftpd-mod_kafka/releases * License : GPL-2+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian-proftpd-team/proftpd-mod-kafka Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: proftpd-mod-kafka - ProFTPD module mod_kafka To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/proftpd-mod-kafka/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/proftpd-mod-kafka/proftpd-mod-kafka_0.1-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: proftpd-mod-kafka (0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial Release. (Closes: #1009887) Regards, -- Hilmar Preusse signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:04:58PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > * Package name: proftpd-mod-kafka >Version : 0.1-1 > proftpd-mod-kafka (0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Initial Release. (Closes: #1009887) I have no clue about specifics of proftpd mods, but generic parts of the packaging look fine. In NEW, thanks for your work! Meow. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Eight legs good, four legs bad! -- when your drider pwns a ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ smelly goodie centaur. ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Rearkick OP -- my grandpa's brother-in-law got one-shotted ⠈⠳⣄ from full hp in RL, please nerf!--- End Message ---
