Re: autopkgtest testing postinst

2022-07-21 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 09:23:20AM -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
> autopkgtest adds it's own sources.list entry under /tmp, so afaict
> 'apt-get --reinstall' will do exactly what it should.

Thanks for finding that out. Is there also a documented way to install
te packages from stable, testing, unstable to automatically test
updates?

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany|  lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421



Re: autopkgtest testing postinst

2022-07-21 Thread Matt Barry
On Thu, 2022-07-21 at 10:30 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 09:23:20AM -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
> > autopkgtest adds it's own sources.list entry under /tmp, so afaict
> > 'apt-get --reinstall' will do exactly what it should.
> 
> Thanks for finding that out. Is there also a documented way to
> install
> te packages from stable, testing, unstable to automatically test
> updates?

Not that I'm aware of, but - there is a fairly standard way of adding
to sources.list.d, so that 'apt install adduser=stable' might be made
to work; otoh it might be dependency hell (less so perhaps in this
particular case).

If you want to test unstable's tests against stable's version I'd maybe
try:

git checkout 3.121
git checkout master -- debian/tests/
autopkgtest -- 

But I might be misunderstanding what you want to do..

Cheers,
Matt



Bug#1015793: RFS: opendkim/2.11.0~beta2-7 -- DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter

2022-07-21 Thread David Bürgin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opendkim":

 * Package name: opendkim
   Version : 2.11.0~beta2-7
   Upstream Author : The Trusted Domain Project
 * URL : http://www.opendkim.org/
 * License : GPL-3+ with AutoConf exception, ISC, BSD-3-clause and SOSL
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/opendkim
   Section : mail

The source builds the following binary packages:

  opendkim - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter
  opendkim-tools - utilities for administering the OpenDKIM milter
  libopendkim11 - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) library
  libopendkim-dev - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) library (development 
files)
  libvbr2 - Vouch By Reference (VBR) library
  libvbr-dev - Vouch By Reference (VBR) library (development files)
  librbl1 - Real-time Blacklist (RBL) query library
  librbl-dev - Real-time Blacklist (RBL) query library (development files)
  miltertest - utility for testing milter applications

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/opendkim/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opendkim/opendkim_2.11.0~beta2-7.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 opendkim (2.11.0~beta2-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * systemd: Start service after network is online (Closes: #1004394).
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1 without further changes.

Cheers,
David



Bug#1015169: RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1 [ITP] -- Common metrics for common audio/music processing tasks

2022-07-21 Thread Bastian Germann

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

Am 21.07.22 um 03:48 schrieb Nilson Silva:

I forked it to my repository because I couldn't push directly to salsa as it was 
saying I didn't have permission."


Now you should be able to.



Bug#1015793: marked as done (RFS: opendkim/2.11.0~beta2-7 -- DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter)

2022-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2022 20:05:20 +0200
with message-id <5e79dc73add16778dc8cf76f76221ab5936a29fd.ca...@43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1015793: RFS: opendkim/2.11.0~beta2-7 -- DomainKeys 
Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015793,
regarding RFS: opendkim/2.11.0~beta2-7 -- DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) 
signing and verifying milter
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1015793: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015793
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opendkim":

 * Package name: opendkim
   Version : 2.11.0~beta2-7
   Upstream Author : The Trusted Domain Project
 * URL : http://www.opendkim.org/
 * License : GPL-3+ with AutoConf exception, ISC, BSD-3-clause and SOSL
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/opendkim
   Section : mail

The source builds the following binary packages:

  opendkim - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter
  opendkim-tools - utilities for administering the OpenDKIM milter
  libopendkim11 - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) library
  libopendkim-dev - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) library (development 
files)
  libvbr2 - Vouch By Reference (VBR) library
  libvbr-dev - Vouch By Reference (VBR) library (development files)
  librbl1 - Real-time Blacklist (RBL) query library
  librbl-dev - Real-time Blacklist (RBL) query library (development files)
  miltertest - utility for testing milter applications

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/opendkim/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opendkim/opendkim_2.11.0~beta2-7.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 opendkim (2.11.0~beta2-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * systemd: Start service after network is online (Closes: #1004394).
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1 without further changes.

Cheers,
David
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Thu, 2022-07-21 at 14:24 +0200, David Bürgin wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
>  opendkim (2.11.0~beta2-7) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * systemd: Start service after network is online (Closes: #1004394).
>    * Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1 without further changes.

I uploaded the package. Thanks for your contribution.

Ansgar--- End Message ---


Re: autopkgtest testing postinst

2022-07-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2022-07-21 at 10:30 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:

> Is there also a documented way to install the packages from stable,
> testing, unstable to automatically test updates?

That sounds like what piuparts is for:

https://packages.debian.org/unstable/piuparts
https://piuparts.debian.org/

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1015169: RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1 [ITP] -- Common metrics for common audio/music processing tasks

2022-07-21 Thread Nilson Silva
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo


Hello
package is already in salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mir-eval

Nilson F. Silva



De: Bastian Germann 
Enviado: quinta-feira, 21 de julho de 2022 12:40
Para: Nilson Silva ; 1015...@bugs.debian.org 
<1015...@bugs.debian.org>
Assunto: Re: Bug#1015169: RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1 [ITP] -- Common metrics for 
common audio/music processing tasks

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

Am 21.07.22 um 03:48 schrieb Nilson Silva:
> I forked it to my repository because I couldn't push directly to salsa as it 
> was saying I didn't have permission."

Now you should be able to.


Bug#1015169: RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1 [ITP] -- Common metrics for common audio/music processing tasks

2022-07-21 Thread Bastian Germann

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Disabling all of the tests is a bit of an overkill. Please only disable the 
ones that need those deprecated classes.
It should be enough to disable test_display and mpl_ic.



Bug#1015168: RFS: sphinx-multiversion/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- Sphinx extensionfor common documentation

2022-07-21 Thread Nilson Silva
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo


questions asked.
available: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sphinx-multiversion


Nilson F. Silva


De: Bastian Germann 
Enviado: domingo, 17 de julho de 2022 17:57
Para: 1015168-submit...@bugs.debian.org <1015168-submit...@bugs.debian.org>
Assunto: Bug#1015168: RFS: sphinx-multiversion/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- Sphinx 
extensionfor common documentation

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 23:41:01 + Nilson Silva  
wrote:
>  sphinx-multiversion (0.2.4-1) experimental; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Initial release. (Closes: #1014666)


Please fix the following lintian messages:
W: python3-sphinx-multiversion: no-manual-page [usr/bin/sphinx-multiversion]
X: python3-sphinx-multiversion: application-in-library-section python 
[usr/bin/sphinx-multiversion]
X: python3-sphinx-multiversion: library-package-name-for-application 
[usr/bin/sphinx-multiversion]


Bug#1015168: RFS: sphinx-multiversion/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- Sphinx extensionfor common documentation

2022-07-21 Thread Bastian Germann

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

I do not see any progress in the git repo.
Please fix the mentioned lintian messages before untagging moreinfo.