Bug#1023987: RFS: golang-github-vektah-gqlparser/2.5.1-1 [ITP] -- Port of the parser from graphql-js into golang (library)
Control: close -1 Hi Taavi, On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 04:40:12PM +0200, Taavi Väänänen wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-vektah-gqlparser": > > * Package name : golang-github-vektah-gqlparser >Version : 2.5.1-1 >Upstream contact : Adam Scarr > * URL : https://github.com/vektah/gqlparser > * License : Expat, BSD-3-clause > * Vcs : > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-vektah-gqlparser >Section : golang I have uploaded this package to NEW with a copyright change. BTW, no need to create RFS bugs/uploads to mentors.d.n while asking for sponsorship in go-team. Sending an RFS mail to the list (like you did earlier) should be enough. Thank you. -- Best, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1024127: RFS: tapecalc/20221104-1 -- full-screen tape editor that lets the user edit a calculation
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tapecalc": * Package name : tapecalc Version : 20221104-1 Upstream contact : Thomas E. Dickey * URL : https://invisible-island.net/add/add.html * License : X11, MIT-old * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tapecalc Section : math The source builds the following binary packages: tapecalc - full-screen tape editor that lets the user edit a calculation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/tapecalc/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tapecalc/tapecalc_20221104-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: tapecalc (20221104-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 20221104. * Bump standards version to 4.6.1. Regards, - -- Victor Westerhuis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJHBAEBCAAxFiEE6OxII3T+o0Ujs6ECQz2Rq5dHQPsFAmNy9kUTHHZpY3RvckB3 ZXN0ZXJodS5pcwAKCRBDPZGrl0dA+6PUD/9DmP5UIESBTWA0tRVmNqeYUfDY+EMA UjDHfvR+pfGfnZFSoybvIMZE2sbptwcOJ4hi8pBVk8WrPNodf6/rb7N1a4qKH/py UO8+Jikl4pvSqud0/NXR2u1gKV/qSeo3QLSqlaFC8A7hF/bvUPHaT4FLSoYaoNmr yLgl4YiaKuUecF8XD6+ta/REgh4WFWTXuznxLdKgs25L2D2TkYfraTQ04wQhR+F+ 18kPdzkAJWsuc0uvF3JZuckwMBILcERnVJfGfc+PoPRm9yI7T1F+HZFHkYiK5q+W 8U68cb3FHg3sQSX4ryBGKo0bpGcSRH8uFXa1PWElKTygUfzS8Vvj2CcFwY3EVGQx +pv0Oog3i7lx5M/Fv04uiNpxs5QukLZOOfbmWwSid/NQ+yo/aYnqc1dJDwB8hIJZ zy0Yh3r/dC8hb3KHhaxYVfS2JFh238LqQIyWAwb2W61O/36encMtN57juJ84iwqd HSekqiptfgVRwpfEsBwC5Jdb6pGhWJN3x+CRK/UREgIo29SkjAF0dM0pwJfiqKQ7 BxyfCN+DSaiCWAzWvCeGyxKpbiIFlVjnd06N1dXC7uMEvel0o74hh5aKl1uYTvUj CQLZXDJTqRaz2jiTramOqyXJLdDJBI2cA5+ql/OF6dyUuuASsRgLwugSYeTgw7Jd /qhhD//4Wnm9ng== =C+zl -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: GPG user ID policy - online persona/brand
On 2022-11-14 13:44 +, Dániel Fancsali wrote: >Hello, >I was just wondering the other day, what is and isn't acceptable as the >"user id" of my package signing key? >What if I have a separate online persona as a tech blogger, and I'd like >attach the packages I create to that brand? >Would the mentors project accept that? Would the debian mainstream accept >that, if I make it so far that I got to be part of the Debian project? >Is there any official policy/documentation/best-practices-list for this >situation? My understanding of policy is that what we really care about is that the GPG key securely attests to a particular identity. We prefer that to be somone's 'actual/real/offical' identity, but it can be another identity if it is consistently used. I believe we do have a few DD's that do not use their 'official/conventional' name within debian. I'm not sure what people would think of using a 'brand' identity, but it might be OK if that is how someone normally/consistently presents themselves within debian. This is just my personal understanding. I'm fairly sure there is some actual policy written down somewhere, probably in the 'DD/DM application process' info. Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1024051: marked as done (RFS: wiki2beamer/0.10.0-5 -- Tool to create LaTeX beamer presentations in wiki syntax)
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2022 18:02:08 +0100 with message-id <26935e3d-0ac0-b5fd-0ead-d02a26915...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: wiki2beamer/0.10.0-5 -- Tool to create LaTeX beamer presentations in wiki syntax has caused the Debian Bug report #1024051, regarding RFS: wiki2beamer/0.10.0-5 -- Tool to create LaTeX beamer presentations in wiki syntax to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1024051: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024051 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wiki2beamer": * Package name : wiki2beamer Version : 0.10.0-5 Upstream contact : Valentin Haenel * URL : https://wiki2beamer.github.io/ * License : GPL-2+, GFDL-1.3+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wiki2beamer Section : text The source builds the following binary packages: wiki2beamer - Tool to create LaTeX beamer presentations in wiki syntax To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/wiki2beamer/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wiki2beamer/wiki2beamer_0.10.0-5.dsc Changes since the last upload: wiki2beamer (0.10.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium--- End Message ---
GPG user ID policy - online persona/brand
Hello, I was just wondering the other day, what is and isn't acceptable as the "user id" of my package signing key? What if I have a separate online persona as a tech blogger, and I'd like attach the packages I create to that brand? Would the mentors project accept that? Would the debian mainstream accept that, if I make it so far that I got to be part of the Debian project? Is there any official policy/documentation/best-practices-list for this situation? Thanks, Daniel
