Bug#1024991: RFS: jamulus/3.9.1+dfsg-1 [QA] -- real-time collaborative music session client and server

2022-11-30 Thread Bo YU
Hi,

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:59 AM Adam Borowski  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:52:48PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> >  * Package name : jamulus
> >Version  : 3.9.1+dfsg-1
> >Upstream contact : https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/
> >  * URL  : https://jamulus.io/
> >  * License  : GPL-2.0+ and MIT-STK, CC0, GPL-2.0+, BSD3-OPUS, 
> > famfamfam-flag-icons
> >  * Vcs  : 
> > https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=alioth/jamulus.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
> >Section  : sound
>
> >  jamulus (3.9.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> >  .
> >* QA upload.
> >* Set Debian QA as maintainer. See #1023670.
> >* New upstream version 3.9.1.
> >* Update d/copyright:
> >  - adjust Files-Excluded due to repack.
> >  - update file-pattern due to upstream change.
> >* Add support for riscv64. (Closes: #1024984)
> >* Rebase all patches.
> >* Adjust d/source/lintian-overrides
> >* Update execute_after_dh_auto_install
>
> Hi!
>
> .--[ debian/source/lintian-overrides ]
> # old repo
> jamulus source: orphaned-package-not-maintained-in-debian-infrastructure
> `
>
> This is not a false positive -- an orphaned package's packaging repo is
> supposed to be moved to some place that's writeable by people other than
> the previous maintainer.

Yes. I think the *right* place is debian namespace on salsa. But I do not have
writable permission about it, so I did not change vcs field. In fact I
put it under
my namespace on salsa when packaging.
>
> Of course, there's no need to fix everything, especially not in a QA upload
> where the only expectation is for the new version to be better than the old
> one -- but hiding issues is no good.

Agree. I do not intend to hide the issue here just think the lintian error is a
false positive in this case.:). Another factor is that from uploading myself
packages experience, lintian error will not be accepted even lintian warning
by my sponsor. So I have to try to erase it.

The most challenge to updating it for me is repacking it to obey DFSG. The
workflow for such packages is unclear to me. But I have mastered some points
from the package.

Thanks again for pointing it. I saw Boyuan[0] has helped to upload the package
to Debian archive. So I think I can close the reportbug.

BR,
Bo

[0]: 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1392012/accepted-jamulus-391dfsg-1-source-into-unstable/
>
>
> Meow!
> --
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos?
> ⠈⠳⣄



Bug#1025198: RFS: memtest86+/6.00-1~bpo11+1 -- thorough real-mode memory tester

2022-11-30 Thread Fabio Fantoni

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "memtest86+":

 * Package name : memtest86+
   Version  : 6.00-1~bpo11+1
   Upstream contact : Samuel Demeulemeester 
 * URL  : https://www.memtest.org/
 * License  : GPL-2
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/memtest86plus
   Section  : misc

The source builds the following binary packages:

  memtest86+ - thorough real-mode memory tester

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/memtest86+/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/memtest86+/memtest86+_6.00-1~bpo11+1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

 memtest86+ (6.00-1~bpo11+1) bullseye-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for bullseye-backports.

Regards,
--
  Fabio Fantoni



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#993996: RFS: guerillabackup/0.3.0-1 [ITP]: Updated package version for ITP, looking for sponsors

2022-11-30 Thread halfdog
Dear mentors,

A new version of the package is uploaded at mentors with the
following changes compared with the previous version uploaded:

* Include upstream support for backup policies checks both for
  quality (verify interval policy) but also regulatory/GDPR
  compliant retention policy.
* Fixed Debian FHS violation pedantic lintian warning.


Now I am looking for a sponsor for my package "guerillabackup":

 * Package name : guerillabackup
   Version  : 0.3.0-1
   Upstream contact : m...@halfdog.net
 * URL  : https://github.com/halfdog/guerillabackup
 * License  : LGPL-3.0+
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/halfdog-guest/guerillabackup
   Section  : misc

The source builds the following binary packages:

  guerillabackup - resilient, distributed backup and archiving solution

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/guerillabackup/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/guerillabackup/guerillabackup_0.3.0-1.dsc

Changes for the initial release:

 guerillabackup (0.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial packaging of guerillabackup (Closes: #849714)

Regards,
-- 
  hd



Bug#1024887: Subject: RFS: wxmaxima/22.11.0-1 -- GUI for the computer algebra system Maxima

2022-11-30 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 02:55:34PM +0100, Gunter Königsmann wrote:
>  * Package name : wxmaxima
>Version  : 22.11.0-1

>  wxmaxima (22.11.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* New upstream version
>* Disallowed to build with the old wxWidgets 3.0
> Seems like the last of these two changes is especially important as
> debian actively wants to get actively rid of the old 3.0 version of
> wxWidgets.

Hi!
It looks like you have a bunch of droppings of a failed merge left in
debian/


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos?
⠈⠳⣄



Bug#1024991: RFS: jamulus/3.9.1+dfsg-1 [QA] -- real-time collaborative music session client and server

2022-11-30 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:52:48PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
>  * Package name : jamulus
>Version  : 3.9.1+dfsg-1
>Upstream contact : https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/
>  * URL  : https://jamulus.io/
>  * License  : GPL-2.0+ and MIT-STK, CC0, GPL-2.0+, BSD3-OPUS, 
> famfamfam-flag-icons
>  * Vcs  : 
> https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=alioth/jamulus.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
>Section  : sound

>  jamulus (3.9.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* QA upload.
>* Set Debian QA as maintainer. See #1023670.
>* New upstream version 3.9.1.
>* Update d/copyright:
>  - adjust Files-Excluded due to repack.
>  - update file-pattern due to upstream change.
>* Add support for riscv64. (Closes: #1024984)
>* Rebase all patches.
>* Adjust d/source/lintian-overrides
>* Update execute_after_dh_auto_install

Hi!

.--[ debian/source/lintian-overrides ]
# old repo
jamulus source: orphaned-package-not-maintained-in-debian-infrastructure
`

This is not a false positive -- an orphaned package's packaging repo is
supposed to be moved to some place that's writeable by people other than
the previous maintainer.

Of course, there's no need to fix everything, especially not in a QA upload
where the only expectation is for the new version to be better than the old
one -- but hiding issues is no good.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos?
⠈⠳⣄



Bug#1024849: marked as done (RFS: pipes.sh/1.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Animated pipes terminal screensaver)

2022-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:18:24 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#1024849: RFS: pipes.sh/1.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Animated pipes 
terminal screensaver
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024849,
regarding RFS: pipes.sh/1.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Animated pipes terminal screensaver
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1024849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pipes.sh":

* Package name : pipes.sh
   Version  : 1.3.0-1
   Upstream contact : Yu-Jie Lin 
* URL  : https://github.com/pipeseroni/pipes.sh
* License  : MIT
* Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/werdahias/pipes.sh
   Section  : games

The source builds the following binary packages:

  pipes-sh - Animated pipes terminal screensaver

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/pipes.sh/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pipes.sh/pipes.sh_1.3.0-1.dsc

There hasn't been a new upstream release in quite some time (~ 5 years), so
this would be a low-maintanance package. Furthermore, it's a very lightweight
package.

Changes for the initial release:

pipes.sh (1.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium--- End Message ---


Bug#1025166: RFS: zvbi/0.2.38-1 -- Vertical Blanking Interval (VBI) utilities

2022-11-30 Thread Ileana Dumitrescu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zvbi":

 * Package name : zvbi
   Version  : 0.2.38-1
   Upstream contact : Ileana Dumitrescu 
 * URL  : https://github.com/zapping-vbi/zvbi
 * License  : MIT, GPL-2+, LGPL-2+, GPL-2, GPL-2+ or BSD-3-Clause, 
BSD-2-Clause, LGPL-2.1+
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/zvbi
   Section  : devel

The source builds the following binary packages:

  libzvbi0 - Vertical Blanking Interval decoder (VBI) - runtime files
  libzvbi-dev - Vertical Blanking Interval decoder (VBI) - development files
  libzvbi-common - Vertical Blanking Interval decoder (VBI) - common files
  libzvbi-doc - Vertical Blanking Interval decoder (VBI) - documentation files
  zvbi - Vertical Blanking Interval (VBI) utilities

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/zvbi/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zvbi/zvbi_0.2.38-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 zvbi (0.2.38-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * debian/upstream/signing-key.asc: new file to verify upstream signature
   * debian/source/lintian-overrides: added file to remove long line warnings
   * debian/libzvbi0.lintian-overrides: added file to remove false positive
 lintian warning for symbols file
   * debian/watch: updated to check for upstream signature
   * debian/copyright: updated licensing

Regards,
-- 
Ileana Dumitrescu

GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be

2022-11-30 Thread fumiama
Thank you!