Bug#1026841: RFS: dnshistory/1.3-3 [QA] [RC] -- Translating and storing of IP addresses from log files
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dnshistory": * Package name : dnshistory Version : 1.3-3 Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://www.stedee.id.au/dnshistory/ * License : [fill in] * Vcs : [fill in URL of packaging vcs] Section : web The source builds the following binary packages: dnshistory - Translating and storing of IP addresses from log files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dnshistory/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dnshistory/dnshistory_1.3-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: dnshistory (1.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * QA upload. * Set Debian QA as maintainer. See #1001813 * Update debhelper, fix ftbfs. (Closes: #965493) * Drop debian/compat * Set std-ver to 4.6.1 * Remove autotools-dev in B-D * Add build-arch and build-indep in debian/rules * Drop dh_clean -k to use dh_prep instead -- Regards, -- Bo YU signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1026362: Upload of binutils-sh-elf
Hi, So, my package got auto-rejected. I talked to the FTP Masters, and they'd much rather that a workaround be incorporated into my package than them having to manually make it pass through. I've uploaded the one-line change to mentors.debian.net; if you could upload it once more, there shouldn't be any problems now. Thank you, John signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#1026811: RFS: d11amp/0.59-1 [ITP] -- Simple MP3 player
Thomas, I would just like to say that I don’t consider the existence of any number of other MP3 players in Debian to be a good reason to prohibit the introduction of another one. I am not yet a Debian Developer, but if I were I would sponsor your package. Soren On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 6:22:07 AM MST Thomas Dettbarn wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I would like to point out that there is still a BADASS-LOOKING package > "d11amp" > waiting to be sponsored. > > > > > * Package name : d11amp > Version : 0.59-1 > Upstream contact : Thomas Dettbarn > * URL : https://www.dettus.net/d11amp/ > * License : BSD-2-Clause > * Vcs : https://github.com/dettus/d11amp/ > Section : sound > > The source builds the following binary packages: > > d11amp - Simple MP3 player > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/d11amp/ > > Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/d11amp/d11amp_0.59-1.dsc > > Changes for the initial release: > > d11amp (0.59-1) unstable; urgency=low -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1026836: RFS: runit-services/0.5.2 -- UNIX init scheme with service supervision (services)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: plore...@disroot.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit-services": * Package name : runit-services Version : 0.5.2 Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstream's web site] * License : BSD-3-Clause, CC0-1.0 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/Lorenzo.ru.g-guest/runit-services Section : admin The source builds the following binary packages: runit-services - UNIX init scheme with service supervision (services) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/runit-services/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/runit-services/runit-services_0.5.2.dsc Git repo: https://salsa.debian.org/Lorenzo.ru.g-guest/runit-services/-/tree/next Changes since the last upload: runit-services (0.5.2) experimental; urgency=medium . * Improve purge documentation (Closes: #1024962) * Fix wrong boot order for sysv dbus-services (Closes: #1024969) * Automate d/copyright update for runscripts: - add a simple copyright header to each runfile - add d/copyright.in - add a script that automatically update d/copyright based on copyright.in and runscripts headers * update copyright and copyright.in * d/prerm: fix wrong path for meta files * All runscripts cleanup: - do not set -e, relevant commands are tested - do not use redundant 'sv check' for checking service dependencies, 'sv start' is enough Regards, -- Lorenzo Puliti
Re: Bug#1021364: RFS: ghostwriter/2.2.0-1 [RC] -- Distraction-free, themeable Markdown editor
Hi Sebastian,
Le mardi 20 décembre 2022, 18:04:50 CET Sebastien Chavaux a écrit :
> Hello Aurelien :-)
>
> For the integration of Ghostwriter in the scope of the Qt/KDE packaging
> team, I agree, no worries, I also had the case at openSUSE and I'm looking
> how I could in the following days, pass all that on to Debian as well.
thanks, I’ve moved the Salsa repo after you granted me the necessary rights.
Feel free to check that you still have access to the repo, or complain to me
directly if not.
> I'll try to free up time to make the changes but it's not said. I don't
> have any Debian around right now.
That needs fixing.
Installing Debian is relatively straightforward these days, you know. ^^
Joke aside I’ve made the changes I proposed below and uploaded the package.
Thank you for working on it until now, I hope I’ll see you contributing to
Debian again !
Happy hacking,
--
Aurélien
> Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 13:30, Aurélien COUDERC a écrit :
>
> > To follow up on the RFS discussion:
> > - MathJax3 is currently not packaged so it’s fine to keep it vendored
> > (3rdparty) for now. We can migrate to the Debian package once it’s
> > available.
> > - The source-is-missing lintian tags are false positives to me (if lintian
> > still really emits them, I haven’t checked). The folders
> > 3rdparty/{MathJax,react} contain valid, human modifiable source files.
> > Please add a comment in the lintian-overrides file to explain so.
> > - You should use the Files-Excluded directive in debian/copyright [1] to
> > describe which files should be removed from the upstream source. That
> > should be the debian/ folder + 3rd party libraries already available in
> > Debian.
> > - I would prefer the +ds suffix instead of +dfsg, +dfsg is more
> > appropriate for cases where we remove upstream sources due to licensing
> > concerns which is not the case here IIUC.
> > - uscan --download-current-version fails, it should work from a clean
> > clone of the repo (the uupdate is not required unless I’m missing
> > something), and…
> > - it would be preferable for debian/watch to target the invent.kde.org
> > repo which is now the reference repo, you have examples for GitLab tags
> > here [2].
> > - In the git packaging repo you have the « source » folder next to the
> > « debian » folder, it should be *inside* it.
> > - source/options can be removed.
> > - Remove debian/compat and replace the debhelper (>= 11) build dependency
> > by a debhelper-compat (= 13) build dep.
> > - Remove debian/git-build-recipe.manifest ? I don’t know what it’s for so
> > it’s probably not useful. :)
> >
> >
> > Feel free to ping me or the team on IRC about any of the above.
> >
> >
> > [0] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras
> > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements
> > [2] https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#Gitlab
Bug#1021364: marked as done (RFS: ghostwriter/2.1.6+dfsg-1 [RC] -- Distraction-free, themeable Markdown editor)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Dec 2022 23:29:55 +0100
with message-id <2099372.OBFZWjSADL@grummly>
and subject line Re: Bug#1021364: RFS: ghostwriter/2.2.0-1 [RC] --
Distraction-free, themeable Markdown editor
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021364,
regarding RFS: ghostwriter/2.1.6+dfsg-1 [RC] -- Distraction-free, themeable
Markdown editor
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1021364: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021364
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ghostwriter":
* Package name : ghostwriter
Version : 2.2.0-1
Upstream contact : wereturtle
* URL : https://wereturtle.github.io/ghostwriter/
* License : Expat, GPL-3.0+, CC-BY-SA-4.0, GPL-3.0, ISC
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/seb95-guest/ghostwriter
Section : editors
The source builds the following binary packages:
ghostwriter - Distraction-free, themeable Markdown editor
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ghostwriter/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ghostwriter/ghostwriter_2.2.0-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
ghostwriter (2.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
* debian/control: set Standards-Version: to 4.6.1
* debian/control: address correction
* debian/watch: address correction
* CVE-2022-24724 (Closes: #1006757)
Regards,
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Sebastian,
Le mardi 20 décembre 2022, 18:04:50 CET Sebastien Chavaux a écrit :
> Hello Aurelien :-)
>
> For the integration of Ghostwriter in the scope of the Qt/KDE packaging
> team, I agree, no worries, I also had the case at openSUSE and I'm looking
> how I could in the following days, pass all that on to Debian as well.
thanks, I’ve moved the Salsa repo after you granted me the necessary rights.
Feel free to check that you still have access to the repo, or complain to me
directly if not.
> I'll try to free up time to make the changes but it's not said. I don't
> have any Debian around right now.
That needs fixing.
Installing Debian is relatively straightforward these days, you know. ^^
Joke aside I’ve made the changes I proposed below and uploaded the package.
Thank you for working on it until now, I hope I’ll see you contributing to
Debian again !
Happy hacking,
--
Aurélien
> Le mar. 20 déc. 2022 à 13:30, Aurélien COUDERC a écrit :
>
> > To follow up on the RFS discussion:
> > - MathJax3 is currently not packaged so it’s fine to keep it vendored
> > (3rdparty) for now. We can migrate to the Debian package once it’s
> > available.
> > - The source-is-missing lintian tags are false positives to me (if lintian
> > still really emits them, I haven’t checked). The folders
> > 3rdparty/{MathJax,react} contain valid, human modifiable source files.
> > Please add a comment in the lintian-overrides file to explain so.
> > - You should use the Files-Excluded directive in debian/copyright [1] to
> > describe which files should be removed from the upstream source. That
> > should be the debian/ folder + 3rd party libraries already available in
> > Debian.
> > - I would prefer the +ds suffix instead of +dfsg, +dfsg is more
> > appropriate for cases where we remove upstream sources due to licensing
> > concerns which is not the case here IIUC.
> > - uscan --download-current-version fails, it should work from a clean
> > clone of the repo (the uupdate is not required unless I’m missing
> > something), and…
> > - it would be preferable for debian/watch to target the invent.kde.org
> > repo which is now the reference repo, you have examples for GitLab tags
> > here [2].
> > - In the git packaging repo you have the « source » folder next to the
> > « debian » folder, it should be *inside* it.
> > - source/options can be removed.
> > - Remove debian/compat and replace the debhelper (>= 11) build dependency
> > by a debhelper-compat (= 13) build dep.
> > - Remove debian/git-build-recipe.manifest ? I don’t know what it’s for so
> > it’s probably not useful. :)
> >
> >
> > Feel free to ping me or the team on IRC about any of the above.
> >
> >
> > [0] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras
> > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements
> > [2] https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#Gitlab--- End Message
Bug#1026824: RFS: cglm/0.8.8-1 -- Optimized OpenGL Mathematics library for C
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cglm": * Package name : cglm Version : 0.8.8-1 Upstream contact : Recep Aslantas * URL : https://github.com/recp/cglm * License : Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/cglm Section : libs The source builds the following binary packages: libcglm-doc - Documentation for the cglm library libcglm-dev - Development files for the cglm library libcglm0 - Optimized OpenGL Mathematics library for C To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/cglm/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cglm/cglm_0.8.8-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: cglm (0.8.8-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * d/control: janitor: Apply multi-arch hints * d/patches: Remove (fixed by upstream) * d/control: Update feature list in description * d/watch: Use the example from uscan(1) * d/control: Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2 - no changes needed - Leon OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1026823: RFS: zvbi/0.2.39-1 -- Vertical Blanking Interval (VBI) utilities
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zvbi": * Package name : zvbi Version : 0.2.39-1 Upstream contact : Ileana Dumitrescu * URL : https://github.com/zapping-vbi/zvbi * License : GPL-2+, LGPL-2.1+, LGPL-2+, GPL-2+ or BSD-3-Clause, MIT, GPL-2, BSD-2-Clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/zvbi Section : devel The source builds the following binary packages: libzvbi0 - Vertical Blanking Interval decoder (VBI) - runtime files libzvbi-dev - Vertical Blanking Interval decoder (VBI) - development files libzvbi-common - Vertical Blanking Interval decoder (VBI) - common files libzvbi-doc - Vertical Blanking Interval decoder (VBI) - documentation files zvbi - Vertical Blanking Interval (VBI) utilities To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/zvbi/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zvbi/zvbi_0.2.39-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: zvbi (0.2.39-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * debian/rules: Remove NOCONFIGURE=1. I am also hoping to work with a mentors team member to help secure a key endorsement for my DM application. Please let me know what I can do! Regards, -- Ileana Dumitrescu GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354 OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1026811: RFS: d11amp/0.59-1 [ITP] -- Simple MP3 player
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I would like to point out that there is still a BADASS-LOOKING package "d11amp" waiting to be sponsored. * Package name : d11amp Version : 0.59-1 Upstream contact : Thomas Dettbarn * URL : https://www.dettus.net/d11amp/ * License : BSD-2-Clause * Vcs : https://github.com/dettus/d11amp/ Section : sound The source builds the following binary packages: d11amp - Simple MP3 player To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/d11amp/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/d11amp/d11amp_0.59-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: d11amp (0.59-1) unstable; urgency=low
Bug#1026438: marked as done (RFS: opendkim/2.11.0~beta2-8 -- DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:58:03 +0100 with message-id <77addb3b-b67c-53f0-e03e-dd0378d28...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: opendkim/2.11.0~beta2-8 -- DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter has caused the Debian Bug report #1026438, regarding RFS: opendkim/2.11.0~beta2-8 -- DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1026438: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026438 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opendkim": * Package name : opendkim Version : 2.11.0~beta2-8 Upstream contact : The Trusted Domain Project * URL : http://www.opendkim.org/ * License : ISC, GPL-3+ with AutoConf exception, BSD-3-clause and SOSL * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/opendkim Section : mail The source builds the following binary packages: opendkim - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signing and verifying milter opendkim-tools - utilities for administering the OpenDKIM milter libopendkim11 - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) library libopendkim-dev - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) library (development files) libvbr2 - Vouch By Reference (VBR) library libvbr-dev - Vouch By Reference (VBR) library (development files) librbl1 - Real-time Blacklist (RBL) query library librbl-dev - Real-time Blacklist (RBL) query library (development files) miltertest - utility for testing milter applications To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/opendkim/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opendkim/opendkim_2.11.0~beta2-8.dsc Changes since the last upload: opendkim (2.11.0~beta2-8) unstable; urgency=medium . [ David Bürgin ] * Add patch "fix-RSA_Sign-call.patch": Fix signedness bug in RSA_Sign call (patch by Martin Grimm; closes: #1012506). * Update debian/watch to monitor GitHub tags instead of releases page. * Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2 without further changes. . [ Debian Janitor ] * Set upstream metadata fields: Archive, Repository-Browse, Bug-Database, Bug-Submit. Thank you, -- David --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Thanks for the update!--- End Message ---
Bug#1025274: RFS: tuxguitar/1.5.6+dfsg1-1 [QA] -- Multitrack guitar tablature editor and player
> > ... wasn't the whole idea of Java to be arch independent? > That's true, but Tuxguitar comes with some audio modules written in C/C++ > (see > build-scripts/native-modules/). > I was able to cross compile them with aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc etc. on amd64. > Next I will try to cross-build the whole package with sbuild (thanks for the > links, Lourisvaldo). sbuild works fine for native builds on amd64, but fails for cross-builds (sbuild --host=arm64) with the following error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy:arm64 : Depends: debhelper-compat:arm64 (= 13) Depends: maven-debian-helper:arm64 (>= 2.6) but it is not installable Depends: libmaven-antrun-plugin-java:arm64 but it is not installable Depends: libmaven-compiler-plugin-java:arm64 but it is not installable Depends: libmaven-dependency-plugin-java:arm64 but it is not installable Depends: libmaven-jar-plugin-java:arm64 but it is not installable Depends: default-jdk:arm64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: docbook-to-man:arm64 Depends: libswt-gtk-4-java:arm64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libitext5-java:arm64 but it is not installable Depends: libasound2-dev:arm64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libjack-jackd2-dev:arm64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libfluidsynth-dev:arm64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: liblilv-dev:arm64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsuil-dev:arm64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: qtbase5-dev:arm64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: crossbuild-essential-arm64:amd64 Depends: libc-dev:arm64 Depends: libstdc++-dev:arm64 E: External solver failed with: The following packages have unmet dependencies: apt-get failed. E: Package installation failed I get the same error message when i try to cross-build other Java packages like tuxguitar-1.2 or pdfsam-4.3.4 from the Debian sources. The same happens with 'pdebuild -- --host-arch arm64'. It seems that the dependency resolver tries to install :arm64, but fails because the package is architecture-independent :all. The package inetutils-2.4 builds fine with 'sbuild --host=arm64', probably because it does not build-depend on any architecture-independent package. Of course, cross-compiling pure Java packages is not very useful, but packages that contain Java and architecture-dependent code cannot be cross-compiled either. > > The package is marked as UNRELEASED in the changelog, thus explicitly not > > for upload. I'll leave further review to someone with a clue about Java > > and Maven... > The main reason for marking the package as UNRELEASED is the unclear license > of the included "Magic Sound Font v2.0"; see the discussion in #819332. > I have tried to contact the author by mail, but have not yet received a > reply. > I will try again, but if it is not possible to resolve this issue, we could > omit the file. Tuxguitar also works with other soundbanks already included in > Debian. I have now marked the package as unstable and assume that the MagicSFver2.sf2 file can be redistributed under the LGPL-2.1+ license. I'm not sure if this is legitimate; please advice.
