Bug#1028423: marked as done (RFS: spek/0.8.5+dfsg-1 [ITP] [RC] -- acoustic spectrum analyser)

2023-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2023 23:38:56 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#1028423: RFS: spek/0.8.5-1 [ITP] [RC] -- acoustic 
spectrum analyser
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028423,
regarding RFS: spek/0.8.5+dfsg-1 [ITP] [RC] -- acoustic spectrum analyser
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1028423: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028423
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spek":

 * Package name : spek
   Version  : 0.8.5-1
   Upstream contact : Alexander Kojevnikov 
 * URL  : http://spek.cc/
 * License  : GPL-3+
   Section  : sound

The source builds the following binary packages:

  spek - acoustic spectrum analyser

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/spek/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spek/spek_0.8.5-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 spek (0.8.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #1007814).
   * debian/compat:
 - Replace compat file with debhelper-compat virtual package.
   * debian/control:
 - Change maintainer.
 - Remove autotools-dev from Build-Depends.
 - Update Build-Depends debhelper (>= 9) to debhelper-compat (= 13).
 - Update Build-Depends libwxgtk3.0-dev to libwxgtk3.0-gtk3-dev
   (Closes: #933438).
 - Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2.
 - Add Rules-Requires-Root field (no).
   * debian/copyright:
 - Rewrite file to be machine-readable.
   * debian/docs:
 - Add LICENCE.md, MANUAL.md and README.md as doc files to be installed.
   * debian/patches/:
 - Delete dir and its content since there is no need for patches with this
   release.
   * debian/rules:
 - Add hardening flags.
 - Remove verbose variable.
   * debian/spek.menu:
 - Delete menu file due to Technical Committee decision.
   * debian/upstream/metadata:
 - Add basic upstream meta-information.
   * debian/watch:
 - Bump version to 4.
 - Change link to the new GitHub repository since Google Code has closed
   down.

Regards,

-- 
Matteo Bini
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Am 16.01.23 um 22:20 schrieb Matteo Bini:

I think I've fixed everything, I just don't know what do you mean with

Please drop debian/autoreconf.*.

There is no file named autoreconf.*. inside the debian dir.
What exactly should I do?


It is okay. I thought you had created them but they are some dh_autoreconf 
output.

I have changed the debian/watch file (dversionmangle=auto, no filenamemangle) 
and uploaded the package.--- End Message ---


Demands Question Demandon

2023-01-16 Thread Simeone Dominique


 Chers amis, dear friends, kara amikoj,
exist package for anarkist on Debian, il existe un paquet anarchiste pour 
Debian, ekzitas pakon pri anarkisno ĉe Debian.
Is-it possible to create a package for freemasonry(history,time,calendar...)? 
Est-il possible de créer un paquet sur la franc-maçonnerie (histoire, temps, 
calendrier...)? Ĉu estas eblo krei pakaĝon pri framasonismo (historio, tempo, 
kalendaro...)?
Plej Debiane, Le plus Debian, Best Debian.
Mr.Dominique SimeonePS : Calendrier Républicain, Calendar French 
Revolution,kalendaron de la Franca Revolucio. You can create it for Linŭx? Le 
créer pour linŭx. Krei por linŭx?

Bug#1029033: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool

2023-01-16 Thread Bastian Germann

On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:30:07 +0100 Norwid Behrnd  wrote:

 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/nbehrnd/ruby-mdl


I am not very knowledgable about the Ruby Team's policy.
They seem to have a salsa namespace for their packages at 
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team.
Shouldn't this be moved there?



Bug#1028423: RFS: spek/0.8.5-1 [ITP] [RC] -- acoustic spectrum analyser

2023-01-16 Thread Matteo Bini
Hi Bastian,
thank you for your precious help.

I think I've fixed everything, I just don't know what do you mean with
> Please drop debian/autoreconf.*.
There is no file named autoreconf.*. inside the debian dir.
What exactly should I do?

You can download the DFSG package with dget:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spek/spek_0.8.5+dfsg-1.dsc

Please, I think we can make it! I'm trying to be as fast as possible.
Forgive my ignorance: many things are new to me.
Have a good night.

--
Matteo Bini



Re: filename case policy inside /usr/bin ?

2023-01-16 Thread The Wanderer
On 2023-01-16 at 15:04, Fab Stz wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Is there any policy for the filename case for the executables
> installed in /usr/bin ? Most are lowercase.
> 
> The package I maintain uses mixed uppercase & lowercase. For example:
>  /usr/bin/FreeFileSync

I'm not aware of any specific policy just offhand, and I'm certainly not
an expert or an authority, but:

$ apt-file search /usr/bin/ | grep [A-Z] | wc -l
2094

There appear to be *rather a lot* of files under /usr/bin/ whose names
include uppercase letters...

$ apt-file search /usr/bin/ | grep [A-Z] | cut -d ':' -f 1 | uniq -c | wc -l
524

...and also rather a lot of packages which include such files.

My guess is that this would be just fine.

> Please, leave me in copy of your answer.

In turn, please do not reply to me directly, only via the list. (Unless
you specifically want to draw my attention to that specific message, and
you think I won't get, or will miss noticing, the message otherwise.)

-- 
   The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


filename case policy inside /usr/bin ?

2023-01-16 Thread Fab Stz
Hello,

Is there any policy for the filename case for the executables installed in /
usr/bin ? Most are lowercase.

The package I maintain uses mixed uppercase & lowercase. For example: 
/usr/bin/FreeFileSync

I added a lowercase symlink also (+ symlink of manpages)

Please, leave me in copy of your answer.

Regards
Fab





Bug#1025274: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html
> > Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers.
> > 
> > I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and added a note to 
> > README.Debian.
> > The new package now depends on fluid-soundfont-gm, see
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/tuxguitar/
> > 
> > The package builds and runs on amd64 and in Qemu for arm64. It looks pretty 
> > good to me now.
> > Maybe someone can take a look and upload it?
> > If there is anything more I can do, just let me know.
> 
> Hello Helmar,
> 
> I am reviewing the updated package now and will either sponsor an upload
> if everything looks good or provide feedback.

The update looks great!  I have updated debian/copyright to document
the files that are licensed under a license other than the LGPL, but
otherwise everything looks good.  I will upload today.

For the time-being, I will push the updated sources and tag to the
current java-team repo [1], but we may want adjust that before the
bullseye release since the package is no longer team-maintained.

Thank you for your work on this!
tony

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/tuxguitar



Bug#1029033: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool

2023-01-16 Thread Norwid Behrnd
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl":

 * Package name : ruby-mdl
   Version  : 0.12.0-2
   Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"]
 * URL  : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint
 * License  : MIT
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/nbehrnd/ruby-mdl
   Section  : ruby

The source builds the following binary packages:

  ruby-mdl - Markdown lint tool

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/ruby-mdl/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x
  https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ruby-mdl/ruby-mdl_0.12.0-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 ruby-mdl (0.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Source only upload for migration to testing

Regards,
-- 
  Norwid Behrnd



Re: How to create multi-source tarball with different submodules for scipy

2023-01-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
I haven’t looked closely at it myself, but qtwebengine-opensource-src 
accomplishes 
something along these lines using `get-orig-source` in their rules file.

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/blob/master/debian/rules[1]

Note that, in their case, you must have the python3-debian package installed, 
because the 
script depends on Python for some of the processing.

On Monday, January 16, 2023 9:27:59 AM MST Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 05:05:39PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I tried to create a multi-source tarball for scipy in its experimental
> > branch[1].  Upstream includes a set of git submodules in its build
> > process.  I intended to merge all these submodules in a single
> > scipy_1.10.0.orig-submodules.tar.gz.  This tarball is created with a
> > script[2] which makes sure that the exact directory structure as it is
> > used by upstream is conserved.  This directory layout is needed in the
> > build process.  Unfortunately `dpkg-source -x` extracts the content of
> > the submodules tarball into a subdirectory submodules/.
> > 
> > Is there any trick to unpack this tarball right into the root?
> > Otherwise I need to do some symlinks workaround in d/rules to provide
> > all files where these are needed.
> 
> Not that I know of; this is the design of the multi-source tarball
> setup: each component tarball is extracted into a directory with the
> name of the component.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
>Julian


-- 
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com


[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/blob/master/debian/rules


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: How to create multi-source tarball with different submodules for scipy

2023-01-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 05:05:39PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I tried to create a multi-source tarball for scipy in its experimental
> branch[1].  Upstream includes a set of git submodules in its build
> process.  I intended to merge all these submodules in a single
> scipy_1.10.0.orig-submodules.tar.gz.  This tarball is created with a
> script[2] which makes sure that the exact directory structure as it is
> used by upstream is conserved.  This directory layout is needed in the
> build process.  Unfortunately `dpkg-source -x` extracts the content of
> the submodules tarball into a subdirectory submodules/.
> 
> Is there any trick to unpack this tarball right into the root?
> Otherwise I need to do some symlinks workaround in d/rules to provide
> all files where these are needed.

Not that I know of; this is the design of the multi-source tarball
setup: each component tarball is extracted into a directory with the
name of the component.

Best wishes,

   Julian



Bug#1025274: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html
> Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers.
> 
> I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and added a note to 
> README.Debian.
> The new package now depends on fluid-soundfont-gm, see
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/tuxguitar/
> 
> The package builds and runs on amd64 and in Qemu for arm64. It looks pretty 
> good to me now.
> Maybe someone can take a look and upload it?
> If there is anything more I can do, just let me know.

Hello Helmar,

I am reviewing the updated package now and will either sponsor an upload
if everything looks good or provide feedback.

Thank you!
tony


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


How to create multi-source tarball with different submodules for scipy

2023-01-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

I tried to create a multi-source tarball for scipy in its experimental
branch[1].  Upstream includes a set of git submodules in its build
process.  I intended to merge all these submodules in a single
scipy_1.10.0.orig-submodules.tar.gz.  This tarball is created with a
script[2] which makes sure that the exact directory structure as it is
used by upstream is conserved.  This directory layout is needed in the
build process.  Unfortunately `dpkg-source -x` extracts the content of
the submodules tarball into a subdirectory submodules/.

Is there any trick to unpack this tarball right into the root?
Otherwise I need to do some symlinks workaround in d/rules to provide
all files where these are needed.

Kind regards
   Andreas.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/scipy/-/tree/experimental
[2] 
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/scipy/-/blob/experimental/debian/get-submodules

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: help with python3 depends < 3.11

2023-01-16 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 04:20:35PM +0100, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> I have been trying to make an update to my package "siconos".
> However, in the Salsa build, which nicely runs all tests, it fails on
> "piuparts".

> I am confused, because it fails with the following error:
> 
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > python3-siconos : Depends: python3 (< 3.11) but 3.11.1-1 is to be installed
> 
> However, debian/control uses ${python3:Depends} and does not mention
> version 3.11 anywhere, so I cannot understand where it's getting this
> "< 3.11" constraint from.

The package was build for 3.10 only.  Then, python3 defaults got changed,
and now packages are supposed to build 3.11 instead.

Thus, all packages have been rebuilt.  But alas:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=siconos
is quite red.  You'd need to investigate why it fails to build, and upload a
fix.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Let's make a Debian conference in Yalta, Ukraine.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀
⠈⠳⣄