Bug#1074554: RFS: simple-scan/46.0-1 -- Simple Scanning Utility

2024-07-01 Thread Pierre Gruet

Hi,

Le 01/07/2024 à 02:36, Phil Wyett a écrit :

Hi Jörg,

Preamble...

Thanks for taking time to create this package and your contribution to Debian.

The below review is for assistance. It is offered to help submitters of
packages to Debian mentors improve their packages prior to possible
sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the subitter to
make any alterations based upon information provided in the review.

Review...

1. Build: Good

2. Lintian: Issue

I: simple-scan: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 4772kB 90%
N:
N:   The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data
N:   (over 4MB, or over 2MB and more than 50% of the package) in /usr/share but
N:   is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and
N:   bandwidth since it means distributing multiple copies of this data, one
N:   for each architecture.
N:
N:   If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, this is a
N:   Policy violation that should be fixed by moving the data elsewhere
N:   (usually /usr/lib).
N:
N:   Please refer to Section 6.7.5 of the Debian Developer's Reference for
N:   details.
N:
N:   Visibility: info
N:   Show-Always: no
N:   Check: huge-usr-share

Something to possibly investigate at a later date for action/upload.

3. Licenses: Good

4. Build Twice (sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc): Good

5. Reproducible builds (reporotest)[1]: Good

6. Install (No previous installs): Good

7. Upgrade (Over previous installs if any): Good

Summary...

I believe simple-scan is ready for sponsorship/upload. Could a Debian Developer 
(DD) with available
free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method


And also thanks for the work on simple-scan.

In addition to the review made by Phil, I have some points:
- the changelog should mention this upload closes Bug #1064939
- quite some copyright holders are missing in d/copyright
- while you are at it, raise the Standards version to latest one
- although not mandatory for my sponsorship, it would be great if the 
package was hosted in Salsa (the repo exists! The last commit there was 
5 years ago, pointing Vcs-* fields to this repo).





Regards

Phil



Thanks again,

--
Pierre


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1074596: RFS: cpio/2.15+dfsg-2 [NMU] -- GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of files

2024-07-01 Thread Zixing Liu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpio":

 * Package name : cpio
   Version  : 2.15+dfsg-2
   Upstream contact : bug-c...@gnu.org
 * URL  : https://www.gnu.org/software/cpio/
 * License  : LGPL-3+, GPL-3+
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/lamby/pkg-cpio
   Section  : utils

The source builds the following binary packages:

  cpio - GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of files

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/cpio/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.15+dfsg-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 cpio (2.15+dfsg-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
 .
   * Use compat level 13 (Closes: #1073111, #851631).
 - Switch to use autoconf Debian Helper template.
 - Switch to use dh generated alternatives scripts.
 - Remove all manual installation steps from d/rules.

Regards,
-- 
  Zixing Liu



Bug#1074498: RFS: baby/1.0-2 [ITP] -- Abbreviate long commands in terminal

2024-07-01 Thread Manuel Guerra
Hello Daniel,

After a thorough review of the problems in my package, I have been able to
resolve them and the build turns out fine

I think that time is the most valuable thing we have in life, but I ask you
to give me a second chance and come check my package:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/baby/

Dear greetings,

Manuel Guerra

El sáb, 29 jun 2024 a las 19:41, Daniel Gröber ()
escribió:

> Hi Manuel,
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 08:23:14PM -0300, Manuel Guerra wrote:
> > I completely understand what you are saying about the program not being
> > very useful for Debian, it has few functions but I hope to expand it
> later.
>
> I'd recommend incubating your idea in the wider FLOSS community (which I
> admit can be hard to get a foot into).
>
> Distributions are only really interested in programs once they've reached a
> level of usefulnes you can usually only get to by either having lots of
> experience already or getting feedback from others.
>
> However Debian unstable is not the right place to gather this early stage
> feedback for something like this. You can try IRC or other Debian community
> spaces https://wiki.debian.org/Community, but I'm not sure we have
> anything
> that's quite right for you. Hmm.
>
> > Regarding the tarball and the binary included in the package, I will
> solve
> > it as soon as possible. This error is because I am new to the world of
> free
> > software and it took me a long time to get to this point since I have
> done
> > everything self-taught, breaking my brain reading forums on the web.
>
> Admirable :)
>
> You should try to find a community space where people at a comparable (but
> maybe slightly higher) skill level as you hang out. I'm afraid I'm not much
> help with specifics here.
>
> --Daniel
>


Bug#1073027: RFS: parlatype/4.2-1 -- Minimal audio player for manual speech transcription

2024-07-01 Thread Gabor Karsay

Hi Phil,

thank you for your review! I saw it quite late, because I thought I was 
automatically subscribed to this bug.


As for your comment at "1. Build", I intentionally didn't use these 
substitution variables because in 
/usr/share/doc/gobject-introspection/README.Debian.gz at "3. Runtime 
dependencies" it says:


* Add ${gir:Depends} to -dev packages if they contain GIR XML
* Add ${gir:Provides} to -dev packages if they contain GIR XML

And there is no GIR XML in this -dev package.

Regards
Gabor




OpenPGP_0xC892C2F1310F600B.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1074592: RFS: selint/1.5.0-2 -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies

2024-07-01 Thread Christian Göttsche
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "selint":

 * Package name : selint
   Version  : 1.5.0-2
   Upstream contact : Daniel Burgener 
 * URL  : https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selint
 * License  : Apache-2.0
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/selinux-team/selint
   Section  : devel

The source builds the following binary packages:

  selint - Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/selint/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/selint/selint_1.5.0-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 selint (1.5.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/control:
 - bump to std version 4.7.0 (no further changes)
 - use pkgconf instead of pkg-config
   * d/patches: cherry-pick upstream commits:
 - Add-check-for-fcontext-lines-containing-only-spaces:
   Support file context lines with whitespaces only
 - Support-CIDR-address-notation-in-nodecon-statement:
   Support new CIDR nodecon syntax

Regards,
-- 
   Christian Göttsche